There is more to vote the dumpster fire vs. liar liar pants on fire. There have been elections I have only voted on issues and against judges. Plus you can get free beer with I voted stickers:D.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
There is more to vote the dumpster fire vs. liar liar pants on fire. There have been elections I have only voted on issues and against judges. Plus you can get free beer with I voted stickers:D.
I think I still have the right to complain. I'll still complain even if I do vote.JDWolfie
Then you'll just look like a hypocritical douche if you do complain.
If you're not voting for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, then you're better off not voting at all. We need more informed voters. If you're not informed on the issues, don't vote. So I applaud you. Vuurk1. Demands you vote for one ideology. 2. Calls for more informed voters.
[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]Exactly. It's your right not to vote, but then don't complain about whichever candidate gets elected.MrGeezerAt least he didn't vote the guy into office. If anyone has no business complaining, it's the people who voted for that candidate. Depends, I think it is more than fair to criticize a supported candidate if they broke a promise on an issue they cared about. Situations like Obama's handling of the war in Afghanistan on the other hand, where he basically did what he said he would in the 2008 election, democrats just looked stupid complaining about it.
For everyone abstaining from voting because they don't like the candidates, two-party system, or their vote won't matter: I think in 2008, only 57% of eligible voters participated. If there was a higher participation rate, it is actually feasible for a 3rd party candidate to win.dagreenfishKeep in mind that a lot of that 43% consists of people who don't vote because they are simply apathetic.
[QUOTE="dagreenfish"]For everyone abstaining from voting because they don't like the candidates, two-party system, or their vote won't matter: I think in 2008, only 57% of eligible voters participated. If there was a higher participation rate, it is actually feasible for a 3rd party candidate to win.Sajo7Keep in mind that a lot of that 43% consists of people who don't vote because they are simply apathetic. True, but the point remains. Also how many of those apathetic people truly apathetic and how many claim such because they don't think their vote will "matter?"
[QUOTE="sexyweapons"][QUOTE="dave123321"]Vote for Gary JohnsonKC_Hokieor Ron Paul! But yeah go 3rd partyRon Paul isn't on the ballot in 48 states + DC like Gary Johnson. You can still write it in:P
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]Exactly. It's your right not to vote, but then don't complain about whichever candidate gets elected.VuurkAt least he didn't vote the guy into office. If anyone has no business complaining, it's the people who voted for that candidate. Agreed completely. Exactly.
[QUOTE="sexyweapons"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Ron Paul isn't on the ballot in 48 states + DC like Gary Johnson. KC_HokieYou can still write it in:PSure....roughly 70 people wrote in Santa Claus last election. Heck write in whoever you want CHUCK NORRIS 2012
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="sexyweapons"] You can still write it in:PsexyweaponsSure....roughly 70 people wrote in Santa Claus last election. Heck write in whoever you want CHUCK NORRIS 2012
might right in Slenderman
Heck write in whoever you want CHUCK NORRIS 2012[QUOTE="sexyweapons"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Sure....roughly 70 people wrote in Santa Claus last election. konvikt_17
might right in Slenderman
Sure,go for it![QUOTE="dagreenfish"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"] No, I got it. It's the same old tired cliche that people always say, stuff like, "if more people voted, then we could make a difference."MrGeezer
So you're saying that increased voter participation can't make a change? In some years the turnout has been as low as 49%. If it was a tight race, that means the election could have been decided by 25-26% of total eligible voters. If you don't think that that last 51% of voters can't make a difference, you are either deluding yourself or are really bad at math.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Which doesn't necessarily equate to his vote not mattering....MrGeezerSure, I'm just saying that it's sort of silly to make an argument based on the percentage of eligible voters who choose to vote or not vote. Those 47% of votes matter, but how much a single vote matters has nothing to do with whether or not those other 47% of people vote. If I don't vote, then 47% of people don't vote. If I do vote, then 47% of people still don't vote. What those other guys do or don't do has nothing to do with you or me or anyone else.
Who is argueing that somebody's vote will influence all other non voters? You keep saying that, but I didn't see anyone try to make the case you're arguing against.
Also, if you don't vote and still complain about the elected official, you're just like the fat girl complaining about not being able to lose weight when she doesn't get off the couch and keeps stuffing oreos and fried chicken in her face. Sure, you can complain, but if you don't make even an attempt at change, you look like a foolish whiner and nobody is going to take you seriously.
Sure, I'm just saying that it's sort of silly to make an argument based on the percentage of eligible voters who choose to vote or not vote. Those 47% of votes matter, but how much a single vote matters has nothing to do with whether or not those other 47% of people vote. If I don't vote, then 47% of people don't vote. If I do vote, then 47% of people still don't vote. What those other guys do or don't do has nothing to do with you or me or anyone else.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="dagreenfish"]
So you're saying that increased voter participation can't make a change? In some years the turnout has been as low as 49%. If it was a tight race, that means the election could have been decided by 25-26% of total eligible voters. If you don't think that that last 51% of voters can't make a difference, you are either deluding yourself or are really bad at math.
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Which doesn't necessarily equate to his vote not mattering....dagreenfish
Who is argueing that somebody's vote will influence all other non voters? You keep saying that, but I didn't see anyone try to make the case you're arguing against.
Also, if you don't vote and still complain about the elected official, you're just like the fat girl complaining about not being able to lose weight when she doesn't get off the couch and keeps stuffing oreos and fried chicken in her face. Sure, you can complain, but if you don't make even an attempt at change, you look like a foolish whiner and nobody is going to take you seriously.
And there isn't one voter who is 51% of voters. There isn't a single voter who's even 1% of voters. Again, sure a significant percentage of voters can make a difference, but what the **** does that have to do with one person voting? Also, I don't even tell people whether or not I voted, or who I vote for. Anyone who then "doesn't take me seriously" unless I vote can speculate about it to their heart's content and end up looking like a dumbass. Complaints about elected officials are either legitimate or not, and only a moron would ignore a perfectly legitimate complaint just because "you didn't vote".Wow you are so cool saying that you aren't going to vote. Its funny The Obama Campaign just came out with a great ad about people not voting. 537
[QUOTE="dagreenfish"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"] Sure, I'm just saying that it's sort of silly to make an argument based on the percentage of eligible voters who choose to vote or not vote. Those 47% of votes matter, but how much a single vote matters has nothing to do with whether or not those other 47% of people vote. If I don't vote, then 47% of people don't vote. If I do vote, then 47% of people still don't vote. What those other guys do or don't do has nothing to do with you or me or anyone else.MrGeezer
Who is argueing that somebody's vote will influence all other non voters? You keep saying that, but I didn't see anyone try to make the case you're arguing against.
Also, if you don't vote and still complain about the elected official, you're just like the fat girl complaining about not being able to lose weight when she doesn't get off the couch and keeps stuffing oreos and fried chicken in her face. Sure, you can complain, but if you don't make even an attempt at change, you look like a foolish whiner and nobody is going to take you seriously.
And there isn't one voter who is 51% of voters. There isn't a single voter who's even 1% of voters. Again, sure a significant percentage of voters can make a difference, but what the **** does that have to do with one person voting? Also, I don't even tell people whether or not I voted, or who I vote for. Anyone who then "doesn't take me seriously" unless I vote can speculate about it to their heart's content and end up looking like a dumbass. Complaints about elected officials are either legitimate or not, and only a moron would ignore a perfectly legitimate complaint just because "you didn't vote".Again, I don't see anyone making this point you keep trying to argue against.
Yeah, re-read my first post, that was the point I made. I'd consider 50% of eligible voters (give or take depending on year) to be a significant percentage.
You already agreed that a significant percentage of voters can make a difference. Wanna know what that has to do with one person voting? That significant percentage of voters is made up of a bunch of single individuals(one persons) voting.
Which, again, matters not one single bit, since those people still aren't voting regardless of what the tc does.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
Again, I don't see anyone making this point you keep trying to argue against.
Yeah, re-read my first post, that was the point I made. I'd consider 50% of eligible voters (give or take depending on year) to be a significant percentage.
You already agreed that a significant percentage of voters can make a difference. Wanna know what that has to do with one person voting? That significant percentage of voters is made up of a bunch of single individuals(one persons) voting.
dagreenfish
[QUOTE="dagreenfish"]Which, again, matters not one single bit, since those people still aren't voting regardless of what the tc does.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
Again, I don't see anyone making this point you keep trying to argue against.
Yeah, re-read my first post, that was the point I made. I'd consider 50% of eligible voters (give or take depending on year) to be a significant percentage.
You already agreed that a significant percentage of voters can make a difference. Wanna know what that has to do with one person voting? That significant percentage of voters is made up of a bunch of single individuals(one persons) voting.
MrGeezer
The point is, all of those non-voters probably share a similar "my vote doesn't matter philosophy", but if they all did in fact vote and change that belief, the election(s) could indeed have a very different outcome.
[QUOTE="dagreenfish"]Which, again, matters not one single bit, since those people still aren't voting regardless of what the tc does.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
Again, I don't see anyone making this point you keep trying to argue against.
Yeah, re-read my first post, that was the point I made. I'd consider 50% of eligible voters (give or take depending on year) to be a significant percentage.
You already agreed that a significant percentage of voters can make a difference. Wanna know what that has to do with one person voting? That significant percentage of voters is made up of a bunch of single individuals(one persons) voting.
MrGeezer
:lol: It's like having a conversation with my thee year old nephew.
All my claims have been general hypotheticals. You keep making stuff up to argue against. I never mentioned or said anything about the TC who you keep bringing up. I never said anything about the TC or anyone else's vote influencing other voters which you've argued against a couple of times. I never said anything about one person being 51% or 1% of total voters or whatever nonsensical arguement you were trying to make back there. It's like one big strawman with you.
Are any of you even old enough to vote? If you don't vote then don't complain about the economy or anything else for the next four years.
cukoo
Ha! like our votes really matters anyway.
and yes im old enough to vote, and am gonna do so reluctantly.
ill complain with whatever the fvck i feel like complaining about. nothing you can do about it.
argument is so flawed. "if you dont vote, you cant complain"
its so fvcking easy to say "i voted for X, so i can complain all i want.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment