What did you think of the movie? I havn't seen it yet, but it seems a little violent and looks like it has kind of a "life is not sacred' kinda theme. But i heard its really good. Should i give it a chance?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
What did you think of the movie? I havn't seen it yet, but it seems a little violent and looks like it has kind of a "life is not sacred' kinda theme. But i heard its really good. Should i give it a chance?
It is really good and yes it is violent but all Tarentino movies are violent and they pretty much always will beWhat did you think of the movie? I havn't seen it yet, but it seems a little violent and looks like it has kind of a "life is not sacred' kinda theme. But i heard its really good. Should i give it a chance?
Tokugawa77
Just watch the scenes with Christopher Waltz and Melanie Laurent. They both deserve Oscar nominations.sammyjenkis898Waltz did a great job. Easily the best character in the movie. I did like Pitt's role, though.
[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]Just watch the scenes with Christopher Waltz and Melanie Laurent. They both deserve Oscar nominations.muthsera666Waltz did a great job. Easily the best character in the movie. I did like Pitt's role, though.
Who did Waltz play again?
are you joking, the film was terrible, not entertaining in the least bit. And the basterds weren't even fully developed into characters, it was a terrible movie, trust me.I respect Inglourious Basterds more than I liked it. It was an alright film, but I was a bit disappointed. I need to see it again though just to be sure I didn't miss anything or not.
Nerd_Man
[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]are you joking, the film was terrible, not entertaining in the least bit. And the basterds weren't even fully developed into characters, it was a terrible movie, trust me. I believe I already saw the movie and I'm perfectly capable of forming my own opinions over it. Thank you very much.I respect Inglourious Basterds more than I liked it. It was an alright film, but I was a bit disappointed. I need to see it again though just to be sure I didn't miss anything or not.
cubemovies
[QUOTE="cubemovies"][QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]are you joking, the film was terrible, not entertaining in the least bit. And the basterds weren't even fully developed into characters, it was a terrible movie, trust me. I believe I already saw the movie and I'm perfectly capable of forming my own opinions over it. Thank you very much. than stop weighing public opinion and say you need to see it again. it was a waste of $10I respect Inglourious Basterds more than I liked it. It was an alright film, but I was a bit disappointed. I need to see it again though just to be sure I didn't miss anything or not.
Nerd_Man
[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"][QUOTE="cubemovies"] are you joking, the film was terrible, not entertaining in the least bit. And the basterds weren't even fully developed into characters, it was a terrible movie, trust me.cubemoviesI believe I already saw the movie and I'm perfectly capable of forming my own opinions over it. Thank you very much. than stop weighing public opinion and say you need to see it again. it was a waste of $10
Maybe I want to see it again. Maybe I feel I didn't fully understand it on my first viewing and owe it another viewing. Sometimes I just need to see a movie twice to fully appreciate it. :|
than stop weighing public opinion and say you need to see it again. it was a waste of $10[QUOTE="cubemovies"][QUOTE="Nerd_Man"] I believe I already saw the movie and I'm perfectly capable of forming my own opinions over it. Thank you very much.Nerd_Man
Maybe I want to see it again. Maybe I feel I didn't fully understand it on my first viewing and owe it another viewing. Sometimes I just need to see a movie twice to fully appreciate it. :|
you should'n't have to "learn" to like a movie, that's the difference between me and you[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"][QUOTE="cubemovies"] than stop weighing public opinion and say you need to see it again. it was a waste of $10cubemovies
Maybe I want to see it again. Maybe I feel I didn't fully understand it on my first viewing and owe it another viewing. Sometimes I just need to see a movie twice to fully appreciate it. :|
you should'n't have to "learn" to like a movie, that's the difference between me and you And I'm quite glad there's a difference between us. I hope you don't mind that I plan on wasting my money on Inglourious Basterds again in the future. Hopefully it doesn't traumatize your life because people actually pay for this movie.That'll be all.
Wait for DVD and just watch the scenes with Waltz. :PJazz_Fan
I agree with Jazz_Fan. It'll be worth watching when it comes out on DVD just for the scenes with Waltz. He was great in this movie...he carried the movie, in my opinion. Without his acting, it would have been just a bunch of aburd violence, intermingled with some beautifully shot scenes.
[QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]Wait for DVD and just watch the scenes with Waltz. :PStrawberryHill
I agree with Jazz_Fan. It'll be worth watching when it comes out on DVD just for the scenes with Waltz. He was great in this movie...he carried the movie, in my opinion. Without his acting, it would have been just a bunch of aburd violence, intermingled with some beautifully shot scenes.
Yeh, just close your eyes for the rest of the flick. JUST watch those scenes. :|
Seriously that makes no sense.
TC, it's an incredibly fun movie to watch with some great performances, cool violence, funny scenes, etc.
[QUOTE="StrawberryHill"]
[QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]Wait for DVD and just watch the scenes with Waltz. :PAAllxxjjnn
I agree with Jazz_Fan. It'll be worth watching when it comes out on DVD just for the scenes with Waltz. He was great in this movie...he carried the movie, in my opinion. Without his acting, it would have been just a bunch of aburd violence, intermingled with some beautifully shot scenes.
Yeh, just close your eyes for the rest of the flick. JUST watch those scenes. :|
Seriously that makes no sense.
TC, it's an incredibly fun movie to watch with some great performances, cool violence, funny scenes, etc.
I didn't say to not watch the entire movie. I'm saying that without the great acting on Waltz's part, it would have been a fairly empty, mediocre movie. Sure, there were some beautifully shot scenes, but without the great acting to carry it, what would we be left with?
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]
[QUOTE="StrawberryHill"]
I agree with Jazz_Fan. It'll be worth watching when it comes out on DVD just for the scenes with Waltz. He was great in this movie...he carried the movie, in my opinion. Without his acting, it would have been just a bunch of aburd violence, intermingled with some beautifully shot scenes.
StrawberryHill
Yeh, just close your eyes for the rest of the flick. JUST watch those scenes. :|
Seriously that makes no sense.
TC, it's an incredibly fun movie to watch with some great performances, cool violence, funny scenes, etc.
I didn't say to not watch the entire movie. I'm saying that without the great acting on Waltz's part, it would have been a fairly empty, mediocre movie. Sure, there were some beautifully shot scenes, but without the great acting to carry it, what would we be left with?
The whole cast gave great performances, it wasn't Waltz alone making the movie worth watching. You also have the entertaining over the top violence...who doesn't like over the top violence?[QUOTE="StrawberryHill"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]
Yeh, just close your eyes for the rest of the flick. JUST watch those scenes. :|
Seriously that makes no sense.
TC, it's an incredibly fun movie to watch with some great performances, cool violence, funny scenes, etc.
AAllxxjjnn
I didn't say to not watch the entire movie. I'm saying that without the great acting on Waltz's part, it would have been a fairly empty, mediocre movie. Sure, there were some beautifully shot scenes, but without the great acting to carry it, what would we be left with?
The whole cast gave great performances, it wasn't Waltz alone making the movie worth watching. You also have the entertaining over the top violence...who doesn't like over the top violence?True, all the actors in the film did a great job....but, wouldn't you agree that Waltz's performances outshined others?
As to the violence...sure, it's fine in doses...and Tarantino always does it artistically...but anyone with enough money and studio clout can do a dumb violence movie these days. The good acting in this film is what sets it apart from other movies...meaning, it wasn't just a movie filled with dumb violence.
The whole cast gave great performances, it wasn't Waltz alone making the movie worth watching. You also have the entertaining over the top violence...who doesn't like over the top violence?[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="StrawberryHill"]
I didn't say to not watch the entire movie. I'm saying that without the great acting on Waltz's part, it would have been a fairly empty, mediocre movie. Sure, there were some beautifully shot scenes, but without the great acting to carry it, what would we be left with?
StrawberryHill
True, all the actors in the film did a great job....but, wouldn't you agree that Waltz's performances outshined others?
As to the violence...sure, it's fine in doses...and Tarantino always does it artistically...but anyone with enough money and studio clout can do a dumb violence movie these days. The good acting in this film is what sets it apart from other movies...meaning, it wasn't just a movie filled with dumb violence.
Not so much so that the film would have become mediocre without him. One performance doesn't make a movie. Doesn't make sense to me to watch a movie for one performance.Waltz did a great job. Easily the best character in the movie. I did like Pitt's role, though.[QUOTE="muthsera666"][QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]Just watch the scenes with Christopher Waltz and Melanie Laurent. They both deserve Oscar nominations.applesxc47
Who did Waltz play again?
He was the Jew Hunter. The Nazi who was assigned to France to make sure that all of the Jews were accounted for.[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]are you joking, the film was terrible, not entertaining in the least bit. And the basterds weren't even fully developed into characters, it was a terrible movie, trust me.I respect Inglourious Basterds more than I liked it. It was an alright film, but I was a bit disappointed. I need to see it again though just to be sure I didn't miss anything or not.
cubemovies
Just because they're in the title doesn't mean they have to be fully developed.
And I actually think the title is about every character of the movie. Everybody's both Inglourious and Basterd.
What did you think of the movie? I havn't seen it yet, but it seems a little violent and looks like it has kind of a "life is not sacred' kinda theme. But i heard its really good. Should i give it a chance?
Tokugawa77
nailed it
very bloody, violent, and life is certainly not sacred.
I loved the movie, better than I was expecting.
What really impressed me was the acting; Brad Pitt was great, and Eli Roth suprised me.
And the endng...AMAZING
[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"][QUOTE="cubemovies"] than stop weighing public opinion and say you need to see it again. it was a waste of $10cubemovies
Maybe I want to see it again. Maybe I feel I didn't fully understand it on my first viewing and owe it another viewing. Sometimes I just need to see a movie twice to fully appreciate it. :|
you should'n't have to "learn" to like a movie, that's the difference between me and you Get good taste in movies before you attack people. :Pyou should'n't have to "learn" to like a movie, that's the difference between me and youcubemoviesThere are plenty of great movies that need to be watched a couple of times to get the most out of them. Not all movies should be presented while you sit in your recliner only half paying attention. Some movies are great that way, but some people like more. I, too, enjoy the movies that make you watch them a few times, not because of bad acting/directing, but because of the complexities of the narrative. Who hasn't watched Fight Club a couple of times to see the hints about the ending? It's a very similar concept.
Its pretty long and quite pointless. The best scene is shown at the beginning in the farm house with the Nazi investigator. That Nazi probably being the best character in the entire thing. Dunno who the actor was for that guy but he's good. Dont waste your money on this overrated rubbish.What did you think of the movie? I havn't seen it yet, but it seems a little violent and looks like it has kind of a "life is not sacred' kinda theme. But i heard its really good. Should i give it a chance?
Tokugawa77
The whole cast gave great performances, it wasn't Waltz alone making the movie worth watching. You also have the entertaining over the top violence...who doesn't like over the top violence?AAllxxjjnn
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I reallyhope Melanie Laurent gets a nomination.
As for the film, I didn't really care for it. There were a few scenes that I thought were brilliant and some really great performances, but that's it.
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]The whole cast gave great performances, it wasn't Waltz alone making the movie worth watching. You also have the entertaining over the top violence...who doesn't like over the top violence?sammyjenkis898
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I reallyhope Melanie Laurent gets a nomination.
As for the film, I didn't really care for it. There were a few scenes that I thought were brilliant and some really great performances, but that's it.
The only scene I really liked was the opening scene at the farm house a couple scenes ran on for too long most notably the bar scene. But, man Waltz was great. Laurent was also good, stricken by revenge.........[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]Just watch the scenes with Christopher Waltz and Melanie Laurent. They both deserve Oscar nominations.muthsera666Waltz did a great job. Easily the best character in the movie. I did like Pitt's role, though.
Who did waltz play again?
Waltz did a great job. Easily the best character in the movie. I did like Pitt's role, though.[QUOTE="muthsera666"][QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]Just watch the scenes with Christopher Waltz and Melanie Laurent. They both deserve Oscar nominations.applesxc47
Who did waltz play again?
The Jew Hunter, his name is immature but he is the most interesting and mature character in the film....[QUOTE="lm2f"][QUOTE="RearNakedChoke"]We live in sad times. But, it isn't. ;)Best movie of the year, so far..
Jazz_Fan
Or is it?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment