Is anyone else just sick of people saying "I could care less"?
I am. I almost cringe every time my American History teacher says it!:x I have an urge to correct people who type it, too.
Anyway, does it bother you?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Is anyone else just sick of people saying "I could care less"?
I am. I almost cringe every time my American History teacher says it!:x I have an urge to correct people who type it, too.
Anyway, does it bother you?
Yes, that does bug me. What also bugs me is when people say "could of" instead of "could have".xTheExploitedI didn't even notice I do that until you pointed it out. :P
Yes, that does bug me. What also bugs me is when people say "could of" instead of "could have".xTheExploited
We're saying could've, the contraction, not could of.
Yes, that does bug me. What also bugs me is when people say "could of" instead of "could have".xTheExploitedMaybe they're saying "could've"
Isn't "I couldn't care less" a double negative? I don't know.
cowplayinghalo
Double negative requires two (double) negatives. There's only one in that phrase.
[QUOTE="xTheExploited"]Yes, that does bug me. What also bugs me is when people say "could of" instead of "could have".HomicidalCherry
We're saying could've, the contraction, not could of.
Typing reveals a person's true grammar, mistakes can be hidden by accent and pronunciation but when you type, you type how you actually think it is. I know plenty of people who type 'could of''.If I don't care about the situation I'm just going to say it, I couldn't care less! One person can't cover all the bases at once, and If my goal isn't to but someone is bothering to, I'm just going to say "I couldn't care less" is I'm not caring, let some other guy do it. The only place where I don't have this attitude is dealing with my money and my job, all that humanitarian stuff that we're all supposed to care about, and what else is "important" by societies standard, I could care less about, unless it's politics that are going to effect me directly. No...
I COULDN'T CARE LESS
[QUOTE="cowplayinghalo"]
Isn't "I couldn't care less" a double negative? I don't know.
Senor_Kami
Double negative requires two (double) negatives. There's only one in that phrase.
Right, but since you're saying less...? I think it's correct to say "couldn't", but I'm not sure anymore. Could care less sounds correct.
heres some phrases i hate:
"epic fail"
"Bush League"
"That's Legit!"
"Study Abroad"
"Im not gonna lie"
among others
Lol I just realized what is wrong with that. I've probably used both "I couldn't care less" and "I could care less". I see the obvious difference now. It doesn't bother me when people say that, because I know what they mean. I'm not really a grammar nazi :lol:
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]
[QUOTE="cowplayinghalo"]
Isn't "I couldn't care less" a double negative? I don't know.
cowplayinghalo
Double negative requires two (double) negatives. There's only one in that phrase.
Right, but since you're saying less...? I think it's correct to say "couldn't", but I'm not sure anymore. Could care less sounds correct.
I've seen this before on here, but....Yes, that does bug me. What also bugs me is when people say "could of" instead of "could have".xTheExploited
We're saying could've, the contraction, not could of.
Typing reveals a person's true grammar, mistakes can be hidden by accent and pronunciation but when you type, you type how you actually think it is. I know plenty of people who type 'could of''. Thats not true... I type superbly in professional situations but on forums anything spell check didn't/couldn't pick up isn't important enough to change.Irregardless of that phrase I find that I'm much more annoyed by the whole "these ones" situation that is constantly occurring.
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]
[QUOTE="cowplayinghalo"]
Isn't "I couldn't care less" a double negative? I don't know.
cowplayinghalo
Double negative requires two (double) negatives. There's only one in that phrase.
Right, but since you're saying less...? I think it's correct to say "couldn't", but I'm not sure anymore. Could care less sounds correct.
Its about the meaning you convey.If you say "I could care less" you are actually saying that you do care even a little.
If you say "I couldnt care less" you are saying that you dont care at all, which is implied by the fact hat there is no lesser degree to which you care.
Its not about grammar. Its about the message you are trying to convey.Lol I just realized what is wrong with that. I've probably used both "I couldn't care less" and "I could care less". I see the obvious difference now. It doesn't bother me when people say that, because I know what they mean. I'm not really a grammar nazi :lol:
SoNin360
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]
[QUOTE="cowplayinghalo"]
Isn't "I couldn't care less" a double negative? I don't know.
Double negative requires two (double) negatives. There's only one in that phrase.
Right, but since you're saying less...? I think it's correct to say "couldn't", but I'm not sure anymore. Could care less sounds correct.
Think about it. If you COULD care less about something that implies that your total level of caring could be lower than what it is now. "I care about you enough that I still have room to care a little less and still care for you over all". If you couldn't care less ie. could not care less then that means you don't care at all so if you already don't care then its impossible to care less because you didn't care any in the first place. Thats like me asking you do you like me? If you said "I could always like you less" that's equivalent to saying I could care less however if you said "I hate you, as a matter of face It wouldn't be possible for me to like you less than I do right now." Thats basically I couldn't care less.[QUOTE="Teenaged"]Math =/= language Yes, but mathematical and lingual double negatives work the same exact way.No, not always.[QUOTE="magicalclick"]Mathmatically double negation = positive.scorch-62
There can be a double negative in language without it equating to a positive.
Plus in the phrase, less is not clearly a negative. Just because its notion is one of abstraction or lesser degree doesnt make it a negative.
[QUOTE="scorch-62"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]Math =/= languageTeenagedYes, but mathematical and lingual double negatives work the same exact way.No, not always.
There can be a double negative in language without it equating to a positive.
Plus in the phrase, less is not clearly a negative. Just because its notion is one of abstraction or lesser degree doesnt make it a negative.
In the English language, it always is the same as a mathematical double negative. I know that in Spanish and some of the other Romance languages double negatives are still a negative, but I thought it was implied that we were talking about in English... You know, the language that this entire site uses.
Now, while "I could care less" is a grammatically correct statement, no one ever uses it the way it means, making it gammatically incorrect for the situation.
[QUOTE="Teenaged"]No, not always.[QUOTE="scorch-62"] Yes, but mathematical and lingual double negatives work the same exact way.scorch-62
There can be a double negative in language without it equating to a positive.
Plus in the phrase, less is not clearly a negative. Just because its notion is one of abstraction or lesser degree doesnt make it a negative.
In the English language, it always is the same as a mathematical double negative. I know that in Spanish and some of the other Romance languages double negatives are still a negative, but I thought it was implied that we were talking about in English... You know, the language that this entire site uses.Um, I know we are talking about English. =/Here is the wikipedia article about the double negative.
In it, it has example of double negatives others resolving in a negation and others in a positive. All examples straight from the English language.
Plus I still await for some sound reasoning as to why the word "less" is considered a negative.
In the English language, it always is the same as a mathematical double negative. I know that in Spanish and some of the other Romance languages double negatives are still a negative, but I thought it was implied that we were talking about in English... You know, the language that this entire site uses.Um, I know we are talking about English. =/[QUOTE="scorch-62"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]No, not always.
There can be a double negative in language without it equating to a positive.
Plus in the phrase, less is not clearly a negative. Just because its notion is one of abstraction or lesser degree doesnt make it a negative.
Teenaged
Here is the wikipedia article about the double negative.
In it, it has example of double negatives others resolving in a negation and others in a positive. All examples straight from the English language.
Plus I still await for some sound reasoning as to why the word "less" is considered a negative.
It isn't considered a negative. Negatives are like: not, none, no. You can have less of something without not having it at all. You can have less, and there are cases where you can't have less. I see where he's getting confused though.[QUOTE="Teenaged"]Um, I know we are talking about English. =/[QUOTE="scorch-62"] In the English language, it always is the same as a mathematical double negative. I know that in Spanish and some of the other Romance languages double negatives are still a negative, but I thought it was implied that we were talking about in English... You know, the language that this entire site uses.RockysCatnipCo
Here is the wikipedia article about the double negative.
In it, it has example of double negatives others resolving in a negation and others in a positive. All examples straight from the English language.
Plus I still await for some sound reasoning as to why the word "less" is considered a negative.
It isn't considered a negative. Negatives are like: not, none, no. You can have less of something with out not having it at all. You can have less, and there are cases where you can't have less. I see where he's getting confused though.Indeed.The point people are also missing is that a double negative is equated to a positive due to the meaning of the two phrases (the one with the two negatives and the one with just one positive) being the same.
In this case though they arent the same as I explained in a previous post.
I'm quite sick of many people not caring about many issues in today's world. I wish it were something that could be changed. I know it practically can't and won't however. I can't blame them though. It's a lot to think about, and the more you realize what problems exist in the world and how insurmountable many of them are, the more strain it puts on yourself. This is especially true when you feel as though you want to change something in the world for the better, but you know no matter what you do, you most likely will not have a significant effect on the grand scheme of things. It's sometimes enough to make you go insane, or at the very least feel extremely depressed and helpless. That is the way I have found things to be for myself, and it's part of a larger social and political isolation I feel in all aspects of my life.
it doesnt make sense when you could though. "I could care less for that" is saying that you could dislike it more, so really its something you would say if someone was talking about something they liked but you dont really mind though dont like all that much. "I couldnt care less" is saying that you dont care and you couldnt care anymore than you do at that time.Isn't "I couldn't care less" a double negative? I don't know.
cowplayinghalo
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment