Is Britain to blame for world's problems?

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lowkey254
lowkey254

6031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#51 lowkey254
Member since 2004 • 6031 Posts

[QUOTE="lowkey254"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"] Every Empire has it's dark moments.MetalGear_Ninty

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Golden_Stool

that's a limited explanation of what happened. The British Empire as well as the Belgians, French, Spanish are all to blame. Things don't just go away after you mess something up no matter how long ago it was.

You're just looking for a scapegoat.

Explain the truth then. Please provide facts.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
I'm curious how many people who said Jones didn't have any share in the blame of those extremists killing innocents will say that it is indeed Britain who shares some of the fault in the worlds current situation. Really Britain's Empire had some very positive effects as well as negative. Many of their colonies are now very well developed first world countries. While certainly some aren't and some of their choices (Israel) have resulted in the deaths of many it's not really as if we can go back in time and take the British Empire out of the equation and see if the world was better or worse. Honestly I think overall the positive slightly wins out in this case.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"]

[QUOTE="lowkey254"]

I agree with David Cameron, but not only Britain but Western Europe as a whole; I'll specifically point out my home country, Belgium.

Nick Lloyd seems to have the idea that providing other cultures with "Western thinking" was an ultimate gift, but that is to come to agreement that all other thinking was less than and or inaccurate. Where would the world be without imperialism? Who knows, but I can guarantee the issues in African countries and between Pakistan & India would not be as large as they are.

I mention Africa because of the colonists had created boundariesand borders where there were none before in doing so they created countries and picked which tribe would be in charge over the other (based on physical looks ie. light vs dark, tall vs short, nose width). When the Europeans left the, those same European rules were in place. One tribe would discriminate against the other, massacre the other, and cause civil war. True they may have been fighting before, but most lived in peace with minor incidents, but nothing like what's going on now.

lowkey254

That last sentence is complete and utter bull**** which you cannot substantiate. This militant anti-colonialism is based on the fallacy that in precolonial times, such countries were havens of peace and harmony. This view is antiquated and simply not true. The Birtish empire did not export violence and civil war, they already existed in those countries before we got there such is the nature of man.

Really, that's funny because they didn't have borders to create countries, they simply had regions that were flexible due to tribal growth and territories taken through war. I didn't say that they didn't have war, but you're right I cannot prove that they were peaceful, but what you see today in Africa, and between India & Pakistan, is still the cause of the European governments.

Colonialism is but one factor amongst others such as differences in wealth, race, religion and cultural tradition. To lie all the blame on the empires of yesteryear is simplistic, and if one were to go down that route we could probably go back further and use the Roman empire as a scapegoat. The British empire has been effectively obsolete for decades and we still have warfare, there must be other factors that we have to ackowledge.
Avatar image for lowkey254
lowkey254

6031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#54 lowkey254
Member since 2004 • 6031 Posts

[QUOTE="lowkey254"]

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] That last sentence is complete and utter bull**** which you cannot substantiate. This militant anti-colonialism is based on the fallacy that in precolonial times, such countries were havens of peace and harmony. This view is antiquated and simply not true. The Birtish empire did not export violence and civil war, they already existed in those countries before we got there such is the nature of man.

MetalGear_Ninty

Really, that's funny because they didn't have borders to create countries, they simply had regions that were flexible due to tribal growth and territories taken through war. I didn't say that they didn't have war, but you're right I cannot prove that they were peaceful, but what you see today in Africa, and between India & Pakistan, is still the cause of the European governments.

Colonialism is but one factor amongst others such as differences in wealth, race, religion and cultural tradition. To lie all the blame on the empires of yesteryear is simplistic, and if one were to go down that route we could probably go back further and use the Roman empire as a scapegoat. The British empire has been effectively obsolete for decades and we still have warfare, there must be other factors that we have to ackowledge.

Agreed to a point, to not take responsibility for something you had done is to remove said responsibility out of the total list of factors. Sure there were cultural differences and other factors, but what we see today are rival tribes, centuries old, fighting for the same land within those original poorly placed European borders. Prior to colonization those territories/regions were flexible and changed due to battles and wars. Those borders are no longer flexible. Countries with rival tribes within their borders can be seen as a cage really.

Avatar image for nickz_fpk
nickz_fpk

1458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 nickz_fpk
Member since 2010 • 1458 Posts

[QUOTE="lowkey254"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"] Every Empire has it's dark moments.MetalGear_Ninty

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Golden_Stool

that's a limited explanation of what happened. The British Empire as well as the Belgians, French, Spanish are all to blame. Things don't just go away after you mess something up no matter how long ago it was.

You're just looking for a scapegoat.

Really?

Avatar image for HellsAngel2c
HellsAngel2c

5540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#56 HellsAngel2c
Member since 2004 • 5540 Posts
ITT: Judging history with modern standards. Good thing most of us aren't majoring in history.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#57 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
An awful lot of "Britian is responsible" or "Europe is to blame" in this thread, with nobody seeming to want to elaborate on what exactly they're responsible for. :P
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#58 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

but what you see today in Africa, and between India and Pakistan, is still the cause of the European governments.

lowkey254
Can you explain how?
Avatar image for djedi_master
djedi_master

151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 djedi_master
Member since 2008 • 151 Posts

heey

let's blame america

that's a great way to make this topic funnier

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Or, you could blame the people who are blowing **** up and murdering people. But no, it's obviously Britains fault for poorly dividing countries 90 years ago.

redstorm72

Probably, but you know these things go. Such conflicts take a bit to die down. Hell even today everyone keeps an eye on the Germans and the French and English have only recently (if I recall correctly Sarkozy is really when they started pushing for better English-French relations) patching up to be good old friends.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

An awful lot of "Britian is responsible" or "Europe is to blame" in this thread, with nobody seeming to want to elaborate on what exactly they're responsible for. :PNinja-Hippo
Be nice if people read the article. It makes some interesting points and is not a "blame britain" bash fest. The one writer suggest that the British empire helped many nations and left them better off than they would have been otherwise. His example is India.

And ninja, by people, I don't mean you. I wasn't bashing you, lol. Just reread my post and realized that it could be taken the wrong way. I was writing to support your point.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"][QUOTE="nickz_fpk"]

I really dislike the British Empire. I thought they were a bunch of evil people who were prepared to use unnessary force to take what's not theres. Perfect example the war of the Golden Stool. The more I researched into this matter the angrier I got because of the brutality of the British Empire.

lowkey254

Every Empire has it's dark moments.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Golden_Stool

that's a limited explanation of what happened. The British Empire as well as the Belgians, French, Spanish are all to blame. Things don't just go away after you mess something up no matter how long ago it was.

Every Empire had a Hurp derp war. Nothing new.

Avatar image for nickz_fpk
nickz_fpk

1458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 nickz_fpk
Member since 2010 • 1458 Posts

[QUOTE="lowkey254"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"] Every Empire has it's dark moments.lordreaven

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Golden_Stool

that's a limited explanation of what happened. The British Empire as well as the Belgians, French, Spanish are all to blame. Things don't just go away after you mess something up no matter how long ago it was.

Every Empire had a Hurp derp war. Nothing new.

It's not just that war that makes me dislike them it's way deeper than that.

Avatar image for raynimrod
raynimrod

6862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 raynimrod
Member since 2005 • 6862 Posts

Humans are to blame for the way the world is today.

Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

I guess in conclusion both positives and negatives resulted from colonisation, and it seems certain colonies benefited more than others. Interesting read though – perhaps the conclusion could be that yes many problems stem from colonial rule, but without it it's unlikely we'd have the fantastic Indian cuisine that we do in the UK. Overall it's probably a fair trade :P

Avatar image for stanleycup98
stanleycup98

6144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#66 stanleycup98
Member since 2006 • 6144 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

[QUOTE="lowkey254"] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Golden_Stool

that's a limited explanation of what happened. The British Empire as well as the Belgians, French, Spanish are all to blame. Things don't just go away after you mess something up no matter how long ago it was.

nickz_fpk

Every Empire had a Hurp derp war. Nothing new.

It's not just that war that makes me dislike them it's way deeper than that.

And I hate the American Empire http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine%E2%80%93American_War#Concentration_camps

Avatar image for stanleycup98
stanleycup98

6144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#67 stanleycup98
Member since 2006 • 6144 Posts

I somewhat agree. Some British decisions in the past have caused conflicts that continue today. In particular, the division of the Ottoman Empire after WWI. But you can also point out problems today that have resulted from decisions made by other countries, especially the European colonizing countries. If Britain did not colonize some area, then one of the other powers would. If you are going to place blame on Britain for the division of the Ottoman Empire, you can just as easily place blame on the French, who helped set the borders, or the Americans and the Italians, who thought the division of territory was fair.

But I do think that many places are better off due to British colonization. The article mentioned India, and that is what came to mind too. Honestly, I am not sure if India would be considered a first-world, developed country if the British had not colonized it. The British gave India a huge boost on the world stage. Another major example is the USA. What would our lives be like if we had been colonized by the Spanish instead of the British? Britain left many lasting impacts on the USA, which in turn has affected tons of people around the world.

Avatar image for jiggaleroy
jiggaleroy

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 jiggaleroy
Member since 2011 • 76 Posts
Why would Britain be to blame ? The US claimed independency from Britain a long time ago.