Is it illegal to download a movie online IF you already own the BluRay?

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="blackngold29"] How does that mean that the company didn't lose money?blackngold29

The publisher isn't losing a sale if the downloader wouldn't have bought the song in the first place.

But the song is being distributed and the copyright owning party isn't recieving compensation. It's illegal no matter how you try to spin it.

Yup. It's illegal.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] But only from the source material.....;)LJS9502_basic

Legally, yes. But morally, once you've bought it, it makes no difference; torrenting it doesn't do any harm.

You didn't buy the copy you pirated. I see a difference in that. So morally....it's wrong.

But why, if you've paid for a copy, would it matter if haven't bought the copy you've pirated?
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]

[QUOTE="wayne_kar"] a sale

blackngold29

Not in all cases. I'm sure many pirates have thousands of pounds worth of music which they would otherwise never have bought.

How does that mean that the company didn't lose money?

Because the only loss is a potential loss that assumes that the person who downloaded the music would have bought it had they not had access to the download. If they weren't going to buy it either way, then there is no loss since there was never going to be a sale from that person to begin with.

I'm not saying that makes it legal. It is still illegal. However, this is why piracy is different than theft. They both involve taking something without permission. However, piracy involves using intellectual property without permission in which doing so poses no direct loss to the copyright holder. Theft involves taking a physical entity from another party (person, store, etc) which does pose a direct loss to the owner. Put in form of an example, if I download a new CD album I have committed a crime, but the copyright holder has not lost any money. Rather they have not gained any money. In contrast, if I instead decide to head down to Best Buy and shoplift the CD, Best Buy has lost money in the form of the cost of the CD.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180038 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Legally, yes. But morally, once you've bought it, it makes no difference; torrenting it doesn't do any harm.

Funky_Llama

You didn't buy the copy you pirated. I see a difference in that. So morally....it's wrong.

But why, if you've paid for a copy, would it matter if haven't bought the copy you've pirated?

Because it's two different copies.

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
Just a quickie: Is one indidvidul downloading a film to his PC more or less of a criminal than a teacher showing a film to 20 pupils without applying for copyright permission?
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] You didn't buy the copy you pirated. I see a difference in that. So morally....it's wrong.LJS9502_basic

But why, if you've paid for a copy, would it matter if haven't bought the copy you've pirated?

Because it's two different copies.

Well, yes. But why does that make it immoral?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180038 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]But why, if you've paid for a copy, would it matter if haven't bought the copy you've pirated?Funky_Llama

Because it's two different copies.

Well, yes. But why does that make it immoral?

Morality varies. Some people can slide morality all along the gray (grey for you:P) scale to justify their actions.
Avatar image for blackngold29
blackngold29

14137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 blackngold29
Member since 2004 • 14137 Posts
Just a quickie: Is one indidvidul downloading a film to his PC more or less of a criminal than a teacher showing a film to 20 pupils without applying for copyright permission?jimmyjammer69
The teacher could probably claim it as fair use, which is the use of copyrighted material for educational purposes. The same reason why Wikipedia can include pictures of album cover in its articles. There's a whole list of requirements it's gotta meet though.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
Think about it. When you download something online, you generally allow people who haven't purchased the movie to download it, too.
Avatar image for Off_Topic_Man
Off_Topic_Man

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Off_Topic_Man
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
It's probably illegal, don't do it!
Avatar image for LightR
LightR

17739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 LightR
Member since 2009 • 17739 Posts

I think it's illegal.

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Just a quickie: Is one indidvidul downloading a film to his PC more or less of a criminal than a teacher showing a film to 20 pupils without applying for copyright permission?blackngold29
The teacher could probably claim it as fair use, which is the use of copyrighted material for educational purposes. The same reason why Wikipedia can include pictures of album cover in its articles. There's a whole list of requirements it's gotta meet though.

That's actually a really interesting read. I had no idea that something like that existed. Like you say, it seems to be a list of exemptive cases, generally based on the idea that no profit is being made that there is no loss to the publisher while "help(ing) fulfill the intention of copyright law to stimulate creativity for the enrichment of the general public". Gawd knows what that means though, and whether it would provide any defence for the teacher who showed her pupils a movie for fun on the last day of school. I mean, citing the idea of loss of sales - one private viewer is fewer sales lost than 20 school kids :?
Avatar image for MetallicaKings
MetallicaKings

4781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 MetallicaKings
Member since 2004 • 4781 Posts
[QUOTE="th3warr1or"][QUOTE="duxup"]

That would be illegal. Even according to the EFF's lawyers that would be illegal. You bought a disk. If you loose it or break it you didn't buy the right to DL it again or use it in another way.

duxup
Hmm, what happens if you downloaded the HD version from iTunes or something and for some reason it ain't compatible with Zune or something.

In legal terms you're out of luck. The content owner can legally put what restrictions they want on how you use their content.

aye, of course it would be illegal. I don't see how anyone can think otherwise. I mean, sure, it would be awesome if it wasn't, but thats just not how th legal system works. You have an item and you are stealing another. It doesn't matter that they are the same.
Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
Yes, but not immoral.Funky_Llama
Agreed.
Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts

its would be the same as walking in to a DVD retailer and just helping yourself to a free copy.

wayne_kar
Not really, a closer analogy would be that its like walking into a DVD retailer, making an exact copy of it, then leaving the original behind.
Avatar image for marcthpro
marcthpro

7927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#66 marcthpro
Member since 2003 • 7927 Posts

also the law of copyright don't allow you to copy anything : music / movie / and even tv show you saw on TV cause you don't own the copyright to record it on either VHS /re-write-able DVD / PVR

http://www.dailytech.com/One+Nation+Under+Infringement/article9716.htm
http://www.dailytech.com/US+Court+Rules+Consumers+Never+Have+the+Right+to+Copy+DVD+Movies/article15969.htm

it seem you don't even own right to have a PVR and Record like 1-10 episode of Stargate Atlantis ? if you follow the law

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#67 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

There's a difference between distribution and use.

Distribution is illegal. Use is not. If you are downloading something it's up to the distributor to ensure it's legal, not the person that is going to use it. So downloading isn't illegal. Bittorrent on the other hand distributes while you are download so you can face charges if you use that hand don't have copyright permission.

Also if you want to break any sort of copyright protection you can also legally do that as long as you don't distribute any tools, software or instuctions on how to break copyright protection. On games and such breaking copyright protection, or altering the software in any way often breaks the EULA, but that only means that they will no longer provide service it doesn't allow them to press charges (in some rare cases you could be charged w/ hacking, but you can easily tell the difference).

Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts
Yes, it is. It's all part of the back room politics that make copyright law such a joke.