Is it ok to kill in self defense?

  • 163 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Hot-Tamale
Hot-Tamale

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 Hot-Tamale
Member since 2009 • 2052 Posts

This is a very loaded topic, but I'll give my opinion anyway. I think killing in self-defense should only be a last resort, when all diplomacy has failed. Even then, it's still a tragedy and it's still murder. There's no denying that. :|

For the record, murder is "is the unlawful killing of another human being with intent," according to Wikipedia, easily making killing in self-defense count as murder in the court system.

Avatar image for Hot-Tamale
Hot-Tamale

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 Hot-Tamale
Member since 2009 • 2052 Posts

[QUOTE="xxxAdvocatexxx"]

No... Its okay to defend yourself. If you accidentally kill someone then its not your fault... But after you kick someones ass, that just attacted you... You can't just give them the final blow... That would be an intent to kill...

Brainkiller05

This, people seem a little "harsh" ie. saying it's ok to shoot a guy in the face if he punches you. As for coming into your house etc, a part of me says well he's only trying to steal your television, there's no need to kill him, beating him with a baseball bat or scaring him with your gun, though yeah he could have a gun etc. it really depends on the situation, but killing someone in self-defence shouldn't be intentional. If it was me personally I'd go downstairs, probably shoot a couple of shots to scare him off or shoot him in the leg or something, if he was standing there with a knife or my TV in his hand there's no way I'd aim at his head and shoot, that's just not reasonable (which might sound absurd since he's on your property) but the very worst that would come from the situation is you lose your television, is that really worth taking someone's life over so you can save your television? :lol: Thanks gamespot for messing up the html and removing the paragraphs :) Also reminds me of that shop worker who got arrested, his stored was robbed by some teenagers and he shot them both, they were both lying on the floor practically bleeding to death and they obviously posed no threat to the shop keeper at this point and he then walked over to them and shot them in the face. and people actually defended him.

Very insightful, I'm amazed at some people for failing to have even the slightest amount of human decency when it comes to taking the life of another.

I never heard about the incident with the shopkeeper, I should look that up. Does the case have a name?

Avatar image for Never3ndingLife
Never3ndingLife

1114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 Never3ndingLife
Member since 2009 • 1114 Posts
if it is necessary to survive than yes, but it depends on the situation i guess
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="xxxAdvocatexxx"]

No... Its okay to defend yourself. If you accidentally kill someone then its not your fault... But after you kick someones ass, that just attacted you... You can't just give them the final blow... That would be an intent to kill...

Hot-Tamale

This, people seem a little "harsh" ie. saying it's ok to shoot a guy in the face if he punches you. As for coming into your house etc, a part of me says well he's only trying to steal your television, there's no need to kill him, beating him with a baseball bat or scaring him with your gun, though yeah he could have a gun etc. it really depends on the situation, but killing someone in self-defence shouldn't be intentional. If it was me personally I'd go downstairs, probably shoot a couple of shots to scare him off or shoot him in the leg or something, if he was standing there with a knife or my TV in his hand there's no way I'd aim at his head and shoot, that's just not reasonable (which might sound absurd since he's on your property) but the very worst that would come from the situation is you lose your television, is that really worth taking someone's life over so you can save your television? :lol: Thanks gamespot for messing up the html and removing the paragraphs :) Also reminds me of that shop worker who got arrested, his stored was robbed by some teenagers and he shot them both, they were both lying on the floor practically bleeding to death and they obviously posed no threat to the shop keeper at this point and he then walked over to them and shot them in the face. and people actually defended him.

Very insightful, I'm amazed at some people for failing to have even the slightest amount of human decency when it comes to taking the life of another.

I never heard about the incident with the shopkeeper, I should look that up. Does the case have a name?

Ok I guess I was a little inaccurate with my memory of how it went down :P here is the news article "57 year old pharmacist Jerome Ersland was minding his own business at work the other day, when two kids came in with guns and tried to rob him. Before they were successful, Mr. Ersland pulled out his own gun and shot one of them in the head. Chased the other out of the store. On returning to the store, he shot the first assailant 5 more times and called the police."
Avatar image for WILL_423
WILL_423

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 WILL_423
Member since 2007 • 387 Posts

[QUOTE="xxxAdvocatexxx"]

No... Its okay to defend yourself. If you accidentally kill someone then its not your fault... But after you kick someones ass, that just attacted you... You can't just give them the final blow... That would be an intent to kill...

Brainkiller05

This, people seem a little "harsh" ie. saying it's ok to shoot a guy in the face if he punches you. As for coming into your house etc, a part of me says well he's only trying to steal your television, there's no need to kill him, beating him with a baseball bat or scaring him with your gun, though yeah he could have a gun etc. it really depends on the situation, but killing someone in self-defence shouldn't be intentional. If it was me personally I'd go downstairs, probably shoot a couple of shots to scare him off or shoot him in the leg or something, if he was standing there with a knife or my TV in his hand there's no way I'd aim at his head and shoot, that's just not reasonable (which might sound absurd since he's on your property) but the very worst that would come from the situation is you lose your television, is that really worth taking someone's life over so you can save your television? :lol: Thanks gamespot for messing up the html and removing the paragraphs :) Also reminds me of that shop worker who got arrested, his stored was robbed by some teenagers and he shot them both, they were both lying on the floor practically bleeding to death and they obviously posed no threat to the shop keeper at this point and he then walked over to them and shot them in the face. and people actually defended him.

I read in a magazine (I think it was MAXIM) thatin some states (not sure which ones) you could kill in self defense and get away with it. Like if someone were on your property threatening to attack you or steal your things or whatever, you could kill the attacker or theif and get away with murder.

Now I'm not saying you should do this. I wouldn't. Maybe a shot in the foot or arm if someone were in my house stealing my things. But xxAdvocatexx, (Hypothetically speaking) What would you do if someone had a gun or knife or whatever weapon and threaten to kill you or your family? Wouldn't you rather see the attacker dead than your family? kill or be killed?

Avatar image for perphekt
perphekt

1096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#56 perphekt
Member since 2009 • 1096 Posts
If there is literally no other way to defend yourself other than kill the opposing force, then yes. If there's a possibility to get out/leave them simply damaged, then do that instead. Death should be the last defense.
Avatar image for Hot-Tamale
Hot-Tamale

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 Hot-Tamale
Member since 2009 • 2052 Posts

[QUOTE="Hot-Tamale"]

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"] This, people seem a little "harsh" ie. saying it's ok to shoot a guy in the face if he punches you. As for coming into your house etc, a part of me says well he's only trying to steal your television, there's no need to kill him, beating him with a baseball bat or scaring him with your gun, though yeah he could have a gun etc. it really depends on the situation, but killing someone in self-defence shouldn't be intentional. If it was me personally I'd go downstairs, probably shoot a couple of shots to scare him off or shoot him in the leg or something, if he was standing there with a knife or my TV in his hand there's no way I'd aim at his head and shoot, that's just not reasonable (which might sound absurd since he's on your property) but the very worst that would come from the situation is you lose your television, is that really worth taking someone's life over so you can save your television? :lol: Thanks gamespot for messing up the html and removing the paragraphs :) Also reminds me of that shop worker who got arrested, his stored was robbed by some teenagers and he shot them both, they were both lying on the floor practically bleeding to death and they obviously posed no threat to the shop keeper at this point and he then walked over to them and shot them in the face. and people actually defended him. Brainkiller05

Very insightful, I'm amazed at some people for failing to have even the slightest amount of human decency when it comes to taking the life of another.

I never heard about the incident with the shopkeeper, I should look that up. Does the case have a name?

Ok I guess I was a little inaccurate with my memory of how it went down :P here is the news article "57 year old pharmacist Jerome Ersland was minding his own business at work the other day, when two kids came in with guns and tried to rob him. Before they were successful, Mr. Ersland pulled out his own gun and shot one of them in the head. Chased the other out of the store. On returning to the store, he shot the first assailant 5 more times and called the police."

That's still a terrible thing to do. I hope he rots in jail for murdering that boy.

Avatar image for WILL_423
WILL_423

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 WILL_423
Member since 2007 • 387 Posts

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="Hot-Tamale"]

Very insightful, I'm amazed at some people for failing to have even the slightest amount of human decency when it comes to taking the life of another.

I never heard about the incident with the shopkeeper, I should look that up. Does the case have a name?

Hot-Tamale

Ok I guess I was a little inaccurate with my memory of how it went down :P here is the news article "57 year old pharmacist Jerome Ersland was minding his own business at work the other day, when two kids came in with guns and tried to rob him. Before they were successful, Mr. Ersland pulled out his own gun and shot one of them in the head. Chased the other out of the store. On returning to the store, he shot the first assailant 5 more times and called the police."

That's still a terrible thing to do. I hope he rots in jail for murdering that boy.

That pharmacist went too far. The boy was unconcious. Just one bullet would have done it.

But still, those little punks deserved what they got. Why would they rob a drug store in the first place? Little morons.

Avatar image for Desulated
Desulated

30952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#59 Desulated
Member since 2005 • 30952 Posts

Absolutely.

But only if the other guy also as an intent to kill.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

So long as that person presents an actual threat to your life then yes but not if there are alternatives to killing said person.

Avatar image for 8732_YoungJeezy
8732_YoungJeezy

1656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#61 8732_YoungJeezy
Member since 2008 • 1656 Posts

if someone is trying to kill me of course i'm going to fight back

Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts
Yep its natural, its instinct.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
I notice a lot of you guys are saying yes but do you really think you could go through with killing someone? I can but I would try to find any other way to stop a person before going down that path. Do you think about that persons family? Maybe he/she has wife and kids and the person you just killed was the only income the family was getting. Now that family is gonna die on the street. Killing one person just led to the death of more.Rob0_Jesus
Wouldnt hesitate for a second if he/she had intent to kill me
Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

[QUOTE="Rob0_Jesus"]I notice a lot of you guys are saying yes but do you really think you could go through with killing someone? I can but I would try to find any other way to stop a person before going down that path. Do you think about that persons family? Maybe he/she has wife and kids and the person you just killed was the only income the family was getting. Now that family is gonna die on the street. Killing one person just led to the death of more.ferret-gamer
Wouldnt hesitate for a second if he/she had intent to kill me

I saw an episode of 20/20 a while ago that put people in a class room and armed them with paintball guns to simulate one of those kind of 'columbine' scenarios. When the gunman entered, about 90% of the people froze, 8% ducked behind the desks, 1% couldnt get their guns in time and only one of the people managed to get off a few shots (though they were fairly inaccurate). I guess if you knew someone was trying to hurt you i.e. they came at you and said 'I'M GOING TO KILL YOU" then I'm sure a lot of people may be able to defense themselves. If it was completely unexpected I doubt anyone on this board would be able to react (unless they were trained to do so).

Avatar image for LanceA63
LanceA63

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 LanceA63
Member since 2003 • 417 Posts

I would say that that's a given

Avatar image for Maqda7
Maqda7

3299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#66 Maqda7
Member since 2008 • 3299 Posts
Yes it's ok. And people have morality class? :?
Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts
You know what they say: "do onto others before they do onto you."
Avatar image for PublicNuisance
PublicNuisance

4582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#68 PublicNuisance
Member since 2009 • 4582 Posts

We were talking about this in morality class and wanted to know what you thought. Most of them said Hell Yes.Rob0_Jesus

I think it is alright myself.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

I don't think it's morally acceptable, no. It's practically acceptable.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

Yeah if someone attacks you unprovoked there as good as meat.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#71 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
well of course it is. though it gets more tricky when you have the ability to defend yourself without the need to kill.
Avatar image for Meejoe27
Meejoe27

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#72 Meejoe27
Member since 2009 • 786 Posts

There is no question about it. If someone tries to kill you, kill them first.

Avatar image for bsman00
bsman00

6038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 bsman00
Member since 2008 • 6038 Posts
We were talking about this in morality class and wanted to know what you thought. Most of them said Hell Yes.Rob0_Jesus
Yes
Avatar image for Big_Bad_Sad
Big_Bad_Sad

18243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Big_Bad_Sad
Member since 2005 • 18243 Posts
I wouldnt say it was OK, but if there is no other option.
Avatar image for super_mario_128
super_mario_128

23884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 super_mario_128
Member since 2006 • 23884 Posts
Yes. In a kill or be killed world, who in their right mind wold choose 'be killed'?
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="shoot-first"]

I'm sure if it was necessary, yes.

Rob0_Jesus
But you are taking another human life away. Isnt there enough violence and destruction in the world? Couldnt you just knock them out?

If you have the chance to then you're obviously not killing them in self defence....
Avatar image for Mydral2005
Mydral2005

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Mydral2005
Member since 2005 • 1185 Posts

Depends on the situation.


If someone goes with a knive at me I would break that arm so that he cannot use it anymore

If someone wants to use a gun I would try to disable them, if they are too strong for this or it won't work I guess I would have to kill them first.

Its quiet simple... if you pick up a gun with the intention to kill another human being you have surrendered your right to live for that moment.

Avatar image for AikiSpirit
AikiSpirit

331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#78 AikiSpirit
Member since 2008 • 331 Posts

It depends on the situation. I think in self defence you may do it by reflex, like punching the solar plexus without realising what you're doing. I think everyone should be taught self defence in school, so they can learn ways to neutralise attacks without leaving permanent damage. Thats what i'm pushing for at my old school.

Avatar image for corwinn01
corwinn01

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 corwinn01
Member since 2004 • 842 Posts

It wouldn't bother me in the least to kill someone in self defense.

Avatar image for Penguinchow
Penguinchow

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 Penguinchow
Member since 2006 • 1629 Posts
Killing is not wrong. Murder is wrong. Killing in self defense does not = murder.
Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts
Of course. The most important thing in this world is the safety of myself and my family. No one else's life matters 1/100 of my family's or mine.
Avatar image for AikiSpirit
AikiSpirit

331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#83 AikiSpirit
Member since 2008 • 331 Posts

Depends on the situation.


If someone goes with a knive at me I would break that arm so that he cannot use it anymore

If someone wants to use a gun I would try to disable them, if they are too strong for this or it won't work I guess I would have to kill them first.

Its quiet simple... if you pick up a gun with the intention to kill another human being you have surrendered your right to live for that moment.

Mydral2005

A knife is easy to deal with because they telegraph they''re attacks, and usually only come at you with the knife, meaning you don't have to worry about the other four limbs. A gun? So you'd try to disable them, then if that wouldn't work you'd kill them? How much time do you think it would take for them to pull the trigger after you start struggling? Plus, you've got to enter in on them while they can distance and still kill you. Seems to me that in that situation you'd do as you're told to stay alive.

Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#84 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts

I don't have a problem with it.

[QUOTE="Rob0_Jesus"]I notice a lot of you guys are saying yes but do you really think you could go through with killing someone? I can but I would try to find any other way to stop a person before going down that path. Do you think about that persons family? Maybe he/she has wife and kids and the person you just killed was the only income the family was getting. Now that family is gonna die on the street. Killing one person just led to the death of more.THE_BRUTALIZER
Im not thinking about his family when he's trying to kill me.

Yeah, and if the person trying to kill me I would feel much better killing that person instead of letting him/her raising a child.

Yes, but how about torturing for defensive matters?
Say someone has kidnapped someone you love, and he doesn't want to say where he keeps him/her. Is it ok to torture the kidnapper in order to get where your loved one is?

I would

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
We were talking about this in morality class and wanted to know what you thought. Most of them said Hell Yes.Rob0_Jesus
To be honest however, the moment someone tries to kill me, they are not worth mercy back onto them. If I can avoid killing them, it is for myself, not them. I do not care why they to do what they did. If they were fighting to feed their family, then they should have killed me before i killed them. I didnt ask them to attack me. I dont care why. If my own survival in that instance means taking them out as quickly as possible, then yes, that is the course. Obviously, if they have no weapons, then I will try and avoid killing them. However if they have a knife, bat, or anything considered a deadly weapon when it comes to assaulting someone, then I will take them out since they cannot hold it against me. I mean obviously I cant knock the weapon out of their hand and start slamming their skull into the concrete, but like I said, I wouldnt go out of my way to avoid killing them if they were trying to kill me. Now.. if i was asleep in my home and someone broke in, then I would shoot to kill. I dont need some criminal to break into my home, get a non lethal wound because I didnt want to kill them, and then get sued if the wound left a life long disability or trauma.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

Yes it is.

On a side note, the majority of people equate this with selfishness. It is, and there's nothing wrong with selfishness. Nothing at all, unless you personally don't believe in it. It's just another case of others trying to shove their beliefs down your throat when you are free to believe what you want.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8

22399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
Member since 2007 • 22399 Posts
if you feel its the only way you can safely leave the situation...i can't say its perfectly fine, but if the only way you feel safe leaving a situation is to take his life than at the least there would be no legal peneltys
Avatar image for AikiSpirit
AikiSpirit

331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#88 AikiSpirit
Member since 2008 • 331 Posts

LOL at some people's over confidence in taking down someone with a kinfe. I think 'you would kill them' should be changed to 'I hope I could do something if the situation ever arose.'

Seed-timing-distance-size-movement=not easy things to take into account and just act upon. Honestly if someone was bigger than you yes, there's a chance you could disarm them. But to say you outright would, that would take years of training in self defence AND the situation to even happen to know for sure.

Avatar image for bigblunt537
bigblunt537

6907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#89 bigblunt537
Member since 2003 • 6907 Posts

Depends. If your lfie in danger or are you over reacting? I'd say if you know your life isn't in complete danegr and you take a life then it's wrong, but if it's either me or him or one of my family members or him it's definitely going to be him.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#90 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
If it is necessary, then of course.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

Yes it is ok. If it can be avoided, let it be avoided.

But if it isnt then the lack of choice and the fact that its done on defense are important factors when deciding about the morality of such an act.

Avatar image for Solid_Snake325
Solid_Snake325

6091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#92 Solid_Snake325
Member since 2006 • 6091 Posts
Yes.
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

I notice a lot of you guys are saying yes but do you really think you could go through with killing someone? I can but I would try to find any other way to stop a person before going down that path. Do you think about that persons family? Maybe he/she has wife and kids and the person you just killed was the only income the family was getting. Now that family is gonna die on the street. Killing one person just led to the death of more.Rob0_Jesus

If they're threatening my life, yes. It's all instincts then. Afterwards it will most likely bother you though. But at a time when your life or a loved one's life is in danger, you don't really think, you just react.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

This is a very loaded topic, but I'll give my opinion anyway. I think killing in self-defense should only be a last resort, when all diplomacy has failed. Even then, it's still a tragedy and it's still murder. There's no denying that. :|

For the record, murder is "is the unlawful killing of another human being with intent," according to Wikipedia, easily making killing in self-defense count as murder in the court system.

Hot-Tamale

"unlawful". Killing in self-defens is "lawful"...

Avatar image for mohfrontline
mohfrontline

5678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#95 mohfrontline
Member since 2007 • 5678 Posts

[QUOTE="Rob0_Jesus"]We were talking about this in morality class and wanted to know what you thought. Most of them said Hell Yes.ufcfan17

it depends on the situation really

yes, depends on the situation. If your life is not at stake, that doesn't really give you the right to take the other man's life.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#96 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="ufcfan17"]

it depends on the situation really

ariz3260

This. What if you are the one that instigate the attacker to attack you in the first place?

No. Regardless of who provoked whom, still there was one person that responded to said provocation and now is threatening your life (assuming that only then someone would kill in defense) which is way beyond just a provocation.

The line was crossed by the person that's threatening your life. He/She had other choices.

Avatar image for groundgamer
groundgamer

2122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 118

User Lists: 0

#97 groundgamer
Member since 2009 • 2122 Posts
Listen, it goes like this... A guy tries to kill you, then you would want to kill him back, wouldn't you? There. So yes, it is ok.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#98 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

Listen, it goes like this...

A guy tries to kill you, then you would want to kill him back, wouldn't you?

There. So yes, it is ok.groundgamer

Well thats like saying "I want to kill you because you tried to and I am pissed".

Its more like "you are now trying to kill me and the only way to stop you from doing it, is to kill YOU instead"

Although of course those thought processes are not conscious.

Unless I misinterpreted your post.

Avatar image for AikiSpirit
AikiSpirit

331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#99 AikiSpirit
Member since 2008 • 331 Posts
Exactly, you can't go to caught an justify trying to kill someone with 'He/she called me a bad word.' If they attack you for calling them all the names under the sun, they're still in the wrong in the eyes of the law. To attack someone for words is petty anyway, and the person attacking would deserve to lose
Avatar image for mindstorm
mindstorm

15255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 mindstorm
Member since 2003 • 15255 Posts
Yes. And before anyone quotes me and mentions the "return the other cheek" passage, know that Jesus was talking about insults. I do not think there is anything morally wrong for hitting someone over the head with a brick while he is trying to rape my daughter... but that's just me.