I don't ever give a tip. I feel bad for the guy though cause he's kinda cross-eyed
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="SYKLOPS"]
I ordered lunch today from Papa Ginos and according to their web site, my order should have come to $7.64 with sales tax. When the driver arrived, the total was $9.48. I only had $10 with me so I gave him all $10 and let him keep the change, which turned out to only be 52 cents. I was planning on giving him a bigger tip, but since the total was almost $2 more than I was expecting it to be, I was stuck.
The driver looked a little upset at the small tip. But I figured a small tip was better than no tip at all. Was I wrong? Is a small tip more insulting than no tip at all?
REA24409
Nope. I never tip good, sure it makes you feel like a dick. But what's the point in wasting all that money to tip a guy for a job I could do myself?
Because you DIDN'T do it yourself. When you have other people do stuff for you, it is customary to pay them.
That sounds like a good reason to sue :D There is no obligation to tip - if you're so depressed over earning below minimum wage then call a strike. FamikingFlamebait is flamebait.
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Famiking"]That sounds like a good reason to sue :D There is no obligation to tip - if you're so depressed over earning below minimum wage then call a strike. FamikingFlamebait is flamebait. Your post was just as much of a flamebait as mine ;) No, my post was just as pointless, but did not incite flames in any sense. Yours was intended to provoke a negative reaction.
I did not say get a new job, nor did I imply it :| Calling a strike is entirely in your favour and is your choice - though I'm not sure about the US, can you get fired for striking?FamikingThere's no REASON to strike, as tips actually work in the favor of the employee. Except for when people don't tip. Tips are better for EVERYONE. Better for the employee, employer, AND the consumer. As long as the consumer continues tipping at least some minimum amount (for decent service), anyhow. On that note, yes, I'm sure you could lose your job for "striking" lol. There aren't unions for restaurant/food delivery places. Many are family owned.
[QUOTE="Famiking"]I did not say get a new job, nor did I imply it :| Calling a strike is entirely in your favour and is your choice - though I'm not sure about the US, can you get fired for striking?JandurinThere's no REASON to strike, as tips actually work in the favor of the employee. Except for when people don't tip. Tips are better for EVERYONE. Better for the employee, employer, AND the consumer. As long as the consumer continues tipping at least some minimum amount (for decent service), anyhow. On that note, yes, I'm sure you could lose your job for "striking" lol. There aren't unions for restaurant/food delivery places. Many are family owned. How are tips better for the employee? The tips cover up what would have been his wage, balanced out by the good, bad and average tips. It's also a pretty sad situation of "my employer doesn't pay me, so can you give me some money?". It's equivalent to begging IMO. I'd also argue that it's worse for the consumer. In a tipping environment, there is an excuse for bad services, the excuse being a poor tip. As opposed to a non-tipping environment where bad service is simply inexcusable. The only one who benefits from this is the employer - he gives less money to his employees. Also, it's quite sad you can't strike :? It looks as if the employer can get away with giving you a poor wage and making you work in poor conditions and can fire if you strike. It's a right that should be protected by the government, not labour unions.
next time around maybe we'd take the extra-long route to get to your house....comp_atkinsmy friend mixed jalapeno juice into the tomato sauce of a pizza for a long-term non-tipper that ordered pizza every Friday at rush time... >_>[QUOTE="Famiking"] How are tips better for the employee? The tips cover up what would have been his wage, balanced out by the good, bad and average tips. It's also a pretty sad situation of "my employer doesn't pay me, so can you give me some money?". It's equivalent to begging IMO. I'd also argue that it's worse for the consumer. In a tipping environment, there is an excuse for bad services, the excuse being a poor tip. As opposed to a non-tipping environment where bad service is simply inexcusable. The only one who benefits from this is the employer - he gives less money to his employees. Also, it's quite sad you can't strike :? It looks as if the employer can get away with giving you a poor wage and making you work in poor conditions and can fire if you strike. It's a right that should be protected by the government, not labour unions. Employee: If good, will likely get much more money from tips than from a static wage. Employer: Can hire with a less discerning eye as people that get low tips due to bad service weed themselves out. Consumer: Gets better service as crappy people weed themselves out.
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"] next time around maybe we'd take the extra-long route to get to your house....Jandurinmy friend mixed jalapeno juice into the tomato sauce of a pizza for a long-term non-tipper that ordered pizza every Friday at rush time... >_>[QUOTE="Famiking"] How are tips better for the employee? The tips cover up what would have been his wage, balanced out by the good, bad and average tips. It's also a pretty sad situation of "my employer doesn't pay me, so can you give me some money?". It's equivalent to begging IMO. I'd also argue that it's worse for the consumer. In a tipping environment, there is an excuse for bad services, the excuse being a poor tip. As opposed to a non-tipping environment where bad service is simply inexcusable. The only one who benefits from this is the employer - he gives less money to his employees. Also, it's quite sad you can't strike :? It looks as if the employer can get away with giving you a poor wage and making you work in poor conditions and can fire if you strike. It's a right that should be protected by the government, not labour unions. Employee: If good, will likely get much more money from tips than from a static wage. Employer: Can hire with a less discerning eye as people that get low tips due to bad service weed themselves out. Consumer: Gets better service as crappy people weed themselves out. Do you have proof that employees get more wages when they are paid from tips? Then why do waiters complain so much about... everything? This probably also means the consumer is paying more for the service then he should actually be paying - which is a con for the consumer. Consumer - Won't have to expect spit in his food or having a plate thrown at his face anytime soon. And like I said - a tipping environment gives an excuse for bad service. In a non-tipping environment the consumer wouldn't have to expect such assuming they have a supervisor. Employer - Good riddance.
Ehh, just search youtube, bunch of whining waiters calling out on bad-tippers. Either way there is no statistic showing tipped waiters get payed more than employer-payed waiters so I'm going to stand by what I originally thought.FamikingI have worked at several different waiter positions and always made around 10 dollars an hour minimum. Minimum wage was around 5.50 at the time. People will whine about anything.
[QUOTE="Famiking"]Ehh, just search youtube, bunch of whining waiters calling out on bad-tippers. Either way there is no statistic showing tipped waiters get payed more than employer-payed waiters so I'm going to stand by what I originally thought.JandurinI have worked at several different waiter positions and always made around 10 dollars an hour minimum. Minimum wage was around 5.50 at the time. People will whine about anything. I thought ~$10 or higher was about the wage waiters get :?
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Famiking"]Ehh, just search youtube, bunch of whining waiters calling out on bad-tippers. Either way there is no statistic showing tipped waiters get payed more than employer-payed waiters so I'm going to stand by what I originally thought.FamikingI have worked at several different waiter positions and always made around 10 dollars an hour minimum. Minimum wage was around 5.50 at the time. People will whine about anything. I thought ~$10 or higher was about the wage waiters get :? I don't know what that means.
I thought that $10+ an hour was the average wage a waiter receives. Seriously, I doubt they'd earn minimum wage, that's only $10,000 a year if you work for 2,000 hours which is already far above the national average.FamikingRight... So, then, what's your point? You can't honestly be saying waiters should be making more? It's unskilled labor. If you want more money, you can use your years of experience to get a job at a more trendy restaurant where you can make more money, I guess?
[QUOTE="Famiking"]I thought that $10+ an hour was the average wage a waiter receives. Seriously, I doubt they'd earn minimum wage, that's only $10,000 a year if you work for 2,000 hours which is already far above the national average.JandurinRight... So, then, what's your point? You can't honestly be saying waiters should be making more? It's unskilled labor. If you want more money, you can use your years of experience to get a job at a more trendy restaurant where you can make more money, I guess? The point is - the minimum wage is not the average wage of a waiter. In many countries.
The point is - the minimum wage is not the average wage of a waiter. In many countries.FamikingNor is it here, I would wager.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment