Is the Bible The Inerrant Word of God?

  • 91 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ihateaynrand
ihateaynrand

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 ihateaynrand
Member since 2010 • 202 Posts
1-Because Bible was not supposed to be the end. On the other hand, Quran and prophet Muhammad were supposed to be the end.GazaAli
One wonders why God couldn't get it right the first time
Avatar image for mindstorm
mindstorm

15255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 mindstorm
Member since 2003 • 15255 Posts
Some of the translations having errors =/= the Bible being in error. You mention the two largest portions of Scripture that may or may not actually be Holy Scripture. There exists several textual traditions that exist in the world and these two passages are the largest differences that they share. Being that 98-99% of the material is exactly the same between these traditions, I find even more confidence in the truthfulness of Scripture! To give a background to these two passages of Scripture, they only exist in one textual tradition. There exists the Alexandrian text which originates from around Africa. The text includes entire copies of the New Testament such as the Codex Sinaiticus which dates to about 330 to 360 A.D. and the Codex Alexandrinus which dates to about 400 A.D.. There also includes many other texts, these two just happen to be some of the oldest, most complete, and most well preserved. However, there are some smaller portions of Scripture that date to less than 100 years after the original writing. Almost all modern versions of the Bible are based on these texts (NIV, NASB, ESV, etc.). The other textual tradition is the Byzantine textual variant. Within this tradition there exists many more manuscripts but they do not have as early of a date. This version is sometimes referred to as Textus Receptus as it is what has been the most well known over the past 1000 years. The King James Version is based upon this tradition. Why do I mention this? Of the differences between the Byzantine and Alexandrian traditions, there only major differences are the end of Mark and John 7. So which is right? I'm actually not sure it even matters truly. Of EVERY text that exists, none include or exclude any different doctrine or history. The vast majority of the information that might be different are simple copying errors and do not seem to be intentional disturbances. Yes, the Bible is indeed the inerrant Word of God.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#53 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

The reason I asked for them in Arabic because early in this topic I said that I know that the Quran is the word of God because it can't be written by a human, the language itself is so strong and different. For those two scripts you provided I'm 100% sure that they are not Quran, the language is not the language of the Quran. Of course you can ignore my saying and say you are not answering the question...etc, but as a native speaker of Arabic, I do think my opinion matter in this issue. I dunno where you got those thoGazaAli

That's an awfully vague and unfalsifiable statement. :P

Those chapters are from the version of the Qur'an compiled by Ubay ibn Ka'b; are you saying that he forgot what was and wasn't part of the Qur'an, or...?

Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

If the bible has to be interpreted, then how can it be inerrant?

With issues like the NT synoptic problem, OT textual criticism , and stuff like Ussher's chronology, the errors pop out.

Avatar image for luisen123
luisen123

6537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 luisen123
Member since 2006 • 6537 Posts
Totally, I even have mine signed by him, totally worth the line.
Avatar image for Ozmodiar1
Ozmodiar1

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Ozmodiar1
Member since 2009 • 638 Posts

The Bible and the Qu'ran are both written by men. They are full of hilarious contradictions, completely inaccurate pseudo-science and myths with as little modern worth as those of the Greeks and Romans - hell, probably less, at least Aesop threw in a few morals. The so called holy books are choc full of slaughter, xenophobia and immorality. Even the supposedly historical side of things is questionable (there's no archaeological evidence for the Jewish exodus from Egypt). Sure, there are nice bits, but they are pieces of advice universal to all humans regardless of faith, and any compassionate piece of advice in the scripture is outweighed by several heinous ones.

I say all this as a former Christian of Jewish descent. I have no problem with someone believing in something if it doesn't harm another, however that's not how it works. Thanks to the Pope, hundreds of thousands of Catholics and non-Catholics in Africa have been infected with AIDS just because the church disagrees with contraception. Homosexuals are still considered second-rate citizens to most of the modern world just because of a few words in Leviticus. Women are given virtually no freedom in most of the Islamic world. And I haven't even mentioned all the wars yet. Religion on its own may be harmless, but as a weapon used by people it can be incredibly deadly. And unfortunately, that's still how it's used.

Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

The Bible and the Qu'ran are both written by men. They are full of hilarious contradictions, completely inaccurate pseudo-science and myths with as little modern worth as those of the Greeks and Romans - hell, probably less, at least Aesop threw in a few morals. The so called holy books are choc full of slaughter, xenophobia and immorality. Even the supposedly historical side of things is questionable (there's no archaeological evidence for the Jewish exodus from Egypt). Sure, there are nice bits, but they are pieces of advice universal to all humans regardless of faith, and any compassionate piece of advice in the scripture is outweighed by several heinous ones.

I say all this as a former Christian of Jewish descent. I have no problem with someone believing in something if it doesn't harm another, however that's not how it works. Thanks to the Pope, hundreds of thousands of Catholics and non-Catholics in Africa have been infected with AIDS just because the church disagrees with contraception. Homosexuals are still considered second-rate citizens to most of the modern world just because of a few words in Leviticus. Women are given virtually no freedom in most of the Islamic world. And I haven't even mentioned all the wars yet. Religion on its own may be harmless, but as a weapon used by people it can be incredibly deadly. And unfortunately, that's still how it's used.

Ozmodiar1

I lol'ed as I read every sentence of the first paragraph. However, the smile was wiped off of my face when I read the second one.

Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts
Yeah Bible is false , but people should really differ between book written by men and being the Word of GOD , for example , GOD can speak with someone , and that someone writes , its written by men , but the Word of GOD , anyway not the bible or bibles ( there is more than one right ? ).
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts
You have provided any errors....merely used different manuscripts. So until you can provide me with the errors in question I cannot answer your question.
Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

You have provided any errors....merely used different manuscripts. So until you can provide me with the errors in question I cannot answer your question. LJS9502_basic

Wow. Just, wow. The fact that there exist many manuscripts with differing texts is a dilemma. How can you determine which manuscripts are trustworthy and which aren't? You're merely fooling yourself.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You have provided any errors....merely used different manuscripts. So until you can provide me with the errors in question I cannot answer your question. BluRayHiDef

Wow. Just, wow. The fact that there exist many manuscripts with differing texts is a dilemma. How can you determine which manuscripts are trustworthy and which aren't? You're merely fooling yourself.

Still humans deciding which manuscripts to include does NOT equal error. So your thesis is incorrect....
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts
[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You have provided any errors....merely used different manuscripts. So until you can provide me with the errors in question I cannot answer your question. LJS9502_basic

Wow. Just, wow. The fact that there exist many manuscripts with differing texts is a dilemma. How can you determine which manuscripts are trustworthy and which aren't? You're merely fooling yourself.

Still humans deciding which manuscripts to include does NOT equal error. So your thesis is incorrect....

Bible says that the angels fall and disobey GOD , how is this possible ?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts

Bible says that the angels fall and disobey GOD , how is this possible ?gubrushadow
I'm not arguing the possible. Particularly when we as humans could not contemplate the supernatural with any degree of knowledge. He stated errors and gave us differing manuscripts....which do not define error. It's all well and good if one does not believe nor have faith....but that does not mean the premise for the argument is sound.

Avatar image for PrimateJoe
PrimateJoe

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 PrimateJoe
Member since 2010 • 118 Posts
words aren't the world or the condition that with which we exist.
Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]Bible says that the angels fall and disobey GOD , how is this possible ?LJS9502_basic

I'm not arguing the possible. Particularly when we as humans could not contemplate the supernatural with any degree of knowledge. He stated errors and gave us differing manuscripts....which do not define error. It's all well and good if one does not believe nor have faith....but that does not mean the premise for the argument is sound.

How about this. Here is a passage from the Bible itself which testifies to the fact that scribes used to falsify the text:

Jeremiah 8:8:

"'How can you say, "We are wise,

for we have the law of the LORD,"

when actually the lying pen of the scribes

has handled it falsely?

9The wise will be put to shame;

they will be dismayed and trapped.

Since they have rejected the word of the LORD,

what kind of wisdom do they have?Jeremiah 8

Keywords: Lying pen of the scribes!

Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]Bible says that the angels fall and disobey GOD , how is this possible ?LJS9502_basic

I'm not arguing the possible. Particularly when we as humans could not contemplate the supernatural with any degree of knowledge. He stated errors and gave us differing manuscripts....which do not define error. It's all well and good if one does not believe nor have faith....but that does not mean the premise for the argument is sound.

I want to ask you something , if someone disbelieve in the bible of today , does he go to hell ? ( he believes in GOD).
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts

Keywords: Lying pen of the scribes!

BluRayHiDef

Well then I guess you'd have to provide proof that work was included in the bible. Because that scriptural quote does not state that work such as that would have been included.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]Bible says that the angels fall and disobey GOD , how is this possible ?gubrushadow

I'm not arguing the possible. Particularly when we as humans could not contemplate the supernatural with any degree of knowledge. He stated errors and gave us differing manuscripts....which do not define error. It's all well and good if one does not believe nor have faith....but that does not mean the premise for the argument is sound.

I want to ask you something , if someone disbelieve in the bible of today , does he go to hell ? ( he believes in GOD).

I'm not sure what the bible of today is...it hasn't been dramatically changed. Mostly just updated as language has changed. But I'd imagine God looks at the individual and how they choose to live.
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I'm not arguing the possible. Particularly when we as humans could not contemplate the supernatural with any degree of knowledge. He stated errors and gave us differing manuscripts....which do not define error. It's all well and good if one does not believe nor have faith....but that does not mean the premise for the argument is sound.

LJS9502_basic

I want to ask you something , if someone disbelieve in the bible of today , does he go to hell ? ( he believes in GOD).

I'm not sure what the bible of today is...it hasn't been dramatically changed. Mostly just updated as language has changed. But I'd imagine God looks at the individual and how they choose to live.

So like it's okay to not believe in the bible of today and go to heaven ?

Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

Keywords: Lying pen of the scribes!

LJS9502_basic

Well then I guess you'd have to provide proof that work was included in the bible. Because that scriptural quote does not state that work such as that would have been included.

It doesn't matter because there exists the possibility that it could be referring to other books in the Bible. Essentially, the possibility that it's referring to Biblical texts is equal to the possibility that it's not. Hence, there is no way that anyone can believe that the Bible is inerrant beyond a reasonable doubt.

Avatar image for Acemaster27
Acemaster27

4482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Acemaster27
Member since 2004 • 4482 Posts
I absolutely agree with mindstorm on this one. The differences that TC brought up are minute in comparison with the whole of scripture, especially since it has been preserved for two thousand years, and they especially do not change the message. I am confident in saying that the bible is the inerrant word of God.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"] I want to ask you something , if someone disbelieve in the bible of today , does he go to hell ? ( he believes in GOD).gubrushadow

I'm not sure what the bible of today is...it hasn't been dramatically changed. Mostly just updated as language has changed. But I'd imagine God looks at the individual and how they choose to live.

So like it's okay to not believe in the bible of today and go to heaven ?

IMO....which doesn't mean God's.....but from what I gather as long as one isn't actively turning others away from God....they probably have a chance. God is basically defined as love.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

Keywords: Lying pen of the scribes!

BluRayHiDef

Well then I guess you'd have to provide proof that work was included in the bible. Because that scriptural quote does not state that work such as that would have been included.

It doesn't matter because there exists the possibility that it could be referring to other books in the Bible. Essentially, the possibility that it's referring to Biblical texts is equal to the possibility that it's not. Hence, there is no way that anyone can believe that the Bible is inerrant beyond a reasonable doubt.

Of course it matters. If I said the forum was boring......that does not mean I'm talking about OT. It's too vague. He was talking about scribes....not the bible and I'd look the scripture up and get more into detail if I wasn't walking out the door to go to work.
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts
[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I'm not sure what the bible of today is...it hasn't been dramatically changed. Mostly just updated as language has changed. But I'd imagine God looks at the individual and how they choose to live.LJS9502_basic

So like it's okay to not believe in the bible of today and go to heaven ?

IMO....which doesn't mean God's.....but from what I gather as long as one isn't actively turning others away from God....they probably have a chance. God is basically defined as love.

That is actually good to hear , but what's the possibility of writing a good or a bad deed about us ?
Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
I don't believe it is.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

Bible is full of errors and contradictions. its not a word of God

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

There are some quotes from God, but it is almost all written from the perspective from man.

Then factor in human error, bad translations, and selective religious figures (who bundled the books we know as the bible) have distorted it far too much to be the "pure" word/message of God.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
I always wonder why SOME atheists try so hard to disprove the Bible and Christianity. You would think one would be happy enough/secure enough to live and let live. Furthermore, attacking someone's beliefs only strengthens their resolve to defend them...basic psychology 101 So threads like this only serve to end purposes: 1. anger people 2. strengthen believers resolve...puts them into defense mode...retreat into a shell These threads (ones that open like this) do NOT promote discussion or understanding
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#79 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38936 Posts

no and the sooner we see it as that ( and other "word of god" holy texts ) the better off we'll all be. can these books be used as a guide to live your life well? sure. is it the actual word of god dictated to man? not likely..

Avatar image for ehhwhatever
ehhwhatever

1463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 ehhwhatever
Member since 2010 • 1463 Posts

Why didn't Jesus write? Did he break his hand?

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]I always wonder why SOME atheists try so hard to disprove the Bible and Christianity. You would think one would be happy enough/secure enough to live and let live. Furthermore, attacking someone's beliefs only strengthens their resolve to defend them...basic psychology 101 So threads like this only serve to end purposes: 1. anger people 2. strengthen believers resolve...puts them into defense mode...retreat into a shell These threads (ones that open like this) do NOT promote discussion or understanding

When done properly they can. For example Gabu said many times in this topic certain things about the Quran and certain companions. We did not reach to an agreement, but it made me read some interesting stuff.
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

[QUOTE="GazaAli"]The reason I asked for them in Arabic because early in this topic I said that I know that the Quran is the word of God because it can't be written by a human, the language itself is so strong and different. For those two scripts you provided I'm 100% sure that they are not Quran, the language is not the language of the Quran. Of course you can ignore my saying and say you are not answering the question...etc, but as a native speaker of Arabic, I do think my opinion matter in this issue. I dunno where you got those thoGabuEx

That's an awfully vague and unfalsifiable statement. :P

Those chapters are from the version of the Qur'an compiled by Ubay ibn Ka'b; are you saying that he forgot what was and wasn't part of the Qur'an, or...?

I dunno really. I heard about this before but never got deep into it. However I can judge that this is not Quran. To be completely honest In this area I'm not knowledgeable enough to say this came from Ubai or not. BUT, if you really really want an answer I can start researching, and I mean really researching not reading something from somewhere.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]I always wonder why SOME atheists try so hard to disprove the Bible and Christianity. You would think one would be happy enough/secure enough to live and let live. Furthermore, attacking someone's beliefs only strengthens their resolve to defend them...basic psychology 101 So threads like this only serve to end purposes: 1. anger people 2. strengthen believers resolve...puts them into defense mode...retreat into a shell These threads (ones that open like this) do NOT promote discussion or understandingGazaAli
When done properly they can. For example Gabu said many times in this topic certain things about the Quran and certain companions. We did not reach to an agreement, but it made me read some interesting stuff.

'WHEN DONE PROPERLY' is the key. I could not agree more. Open discussions that includes listening on both sides are a great thing. But opening with an attack is no way to have a 'conversation'...that is the last thing that will happen. And, IMO after reading many of TC's topics, I do not think his intent is to have open 'discussions'. I believe his intent is to attack and anger (which is fine as well...but pointless IMO)
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
[QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="rawsavon"]I always wonder why SOME atheists try so hard to disprove the Bible and Christianity. You would think one would be happy enough/secure enough to live and let live. Furthermore, attacking someone's beliefs only strengthens their resolve to defend them...basic psychology 101 So threads like this only serve to end purposes: 1. anger people 2. strengthen believers resolve...puts them into defense mode...retreat into a shell These threads (ones that open like this) do NOT promote discussion or understandingrawsavon
When done properly they can. For example Gabu said many times in this topic certain things about the Quran and certain companions. We did not reach to an agreement, but it made me read some interesting stuff.

'WHEN DONE PROPERLY' is the key. I could not agree more. Open discussions that includes listening on both sides are a great thing. But opening with an attack is no way to have a 'conversation'...that is the last thing that will happen. And, IMO after reading many of TC's topics, I do not think his intent is to have open 'discussions'. I believe his intent is to attack and anger (which is fine as well...but pointless IMO)

I agree with your entire post, but the last part is a no no for me. I know how the west work but still, people that intend just to promote hate and anger are...dunno how to put it actually.
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
I would say it's highly unlikely. The number of falsehoods and contradictions would seem to indicate it is the word of man. People put too much faith in a book where half (the OT) is full of genocide, slaughter, and bigotry. Are there some good things to learn from it? Sure, like love your fellow man and do unto other as you would have them do unto you, however I don't think a religion is needed to come to these morals.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="GazaAli"]The reason I asked for them in Arabic because early in this topic I said that I know that the Quran is the word of God because it can't be written by a human, the language itself is so strong and different. For those two scripts you provided I'm 100% sure that they are not Quran, the language is not the language of the Quran. Of course you can ignore my saying and say you are not answering the question...etc, but as a native speaker of Arabic, I do think my opinion matter in this issue. I dunno where you got those thoGazaAli

That's an awfully vague and unfalsifiable statement. :P

Those chapters are from the version of the Qur'an compiled by Ubay ibn Ka'b; are you saying that he forgot what was and wasn't part of the Qur'an, or...?

I dunno really. I heard about this before but never got deep into it. However I can judge that this is not Quran. To be completely honest In this area I'm not knowledgeable enough to say this came from Ubai or not. BUT, if you really really want an answer I can start researching, and I mean really researching not reading something from somewhere.

Quran has been memorizied by people from the beginning and still is today, there is no possible way it could have been corrupted.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="GazaAli"] When done properly they can. For example Gabu said many times in this topic certain things about the Quran and certain companions. We did not reach to an agreement, but it made me read some interesting stuff.GazaAli
'WHEN DONE PROPERLY' is the key. I could not agree more. Open discussions that includes listening on both sides are a great thing. But opening with an attack is no way to have a 'conversation'...that is the last thing that will happen. And, IMO after reading many of TC's topics, I do not think his intent is to have open 'discussions'. I believe his intent is to attack and anger (which is fine as well...but pointless IMO)

I agree with your entire post, but the last part is a no no for me. I know how the west work but still, people that intend just to promote hate and anger are...dunno how to put it actually.

If people just want to 'fight' with words...fine, let them. But I get irritated when people try and disguise attacks as conversation. I just want them to be honest and say what they want to say. -but I can see where 'fights' would be a bigger deal in your area of the world than mine
Avatar image for face_ripper
face_ripper

968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 face_ripper
Member since 2010 • 968 Posts
The bible isn't written by God young man, it's written by a human.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#89 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Whether it is or not, it is written by humans, thus it can contain errors. It was never a text "handed" to humanity by God... but merely a few human's writings about the history of the Jews and the teachings of Jesus. I don't see too many moderate Christians these days claiming it is the infallible Word of God... only those extremist evangelicals who want Creationism taught in science cIass.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"] If people just want to 'fight' with words...fine, let them. But I get irritated when people try and disguise attacks as conversation. I just want them to be honest and say what they want to say. -but I can see where 'fights' would be a bigger deal in your area of the world than mine

They do that to avoid being modded.
Avatar image for Penguinchow
Penguinchow

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 Penguinchow
Member since 2006 • 1629 Posts
It was written by humans who were inspired by God and translated many times to reach its current state. I don't see how a few minor errors after thousands of years have any bearing on its validity.