Is the Idea of Eternal Hellfire a Biblical Teaching?

  • 138 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for EntropyWins
EntropyWins

1209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 EntropyWins
Member since 2010 • 1209 Posts

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"]Provide evidence that the nephilim were human and explain why the Bible does not specify this. Also why are sons of god referring to angels in Job? Lastly, what did the angels in Jude do to get punished?Crushmaster


You made the first claim, thus it is on your head to first provide evidence. I have an excellent article which I will give you after you do; feel free to find an article yourself.

I basically presented my evidence within my questions to you. I dont really need any article that tries to explain away what appears to be a straightforward myth from thousands of years ago in order to make it fit into modern christian belief. I can't prove you wrong, and you can't prove me wrong and that is what is wonderful about the Bible. Everyone can plug their ears call everyone else wrong and not have to worry about anything ever being proven. Until the rapture I mean...th_snicker.gif

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#102 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"]Provide evidence that the nephilim were human and explain why the Bible does not specify this. Also why are sons of god referring to angels in Job? Lastly, what did the angels in Jude do to get punished?EntropyWins


You made the first claim, thus it is on your head to first provide evidence. I have an excellent article which I will give you after you do; feel free to find an article yourself.

I basically presented my evidence within my questions to you. I dont really need any article that tries to explain away what appears to be a straightforward myth from thousands of years ago in order to make it fit into modern christian belief. I can't prove you wrong, and you can't prove me wrong and that is what is wonderful about the Bible. Everyone can plug their ears call everyone else wrong and not have to worry about anything ever being proven. Until the rapture I mean...th_snicker.gif

Well I'm not sure if your looking for an honest discussion or not, but here is my post on your quesiton again in case you missed it. I'm not a creationist nor a fudamentialist.

Nephilim simply means (loosely translated) "one without a soul", and in the texts is says "the children of God" not Angels necessarily. This could mean simply early humans who God did not want breeding with the Nephilim, the "souless ones". "Giant" is a mistranlastion.

No one is sure what it means exactly, but if you want my honest view, I think it was describing Neanderthal man. That's who I think the Nephilim were, and our ancestors, the homo sapiens, were the children of God and he did not want us breeding with those who looked like man but were not man.

The Neanderthal females could have been the daughters that the Children of God were taking as wives. God not liking this decided to get rid of them later, perhaps that's why Neandertals mysteeriously disappeard?

But that's all just speculation on my part. Though the orgional meaning was never "Giant". That was pure mistranslation. Also much of Genesis is symbolic and not meant to be taken literally, the creation account is literally a story.

In the Hebrew Texts it begins with "Once upon a time, God created the Dirt and the Sky". That's seriously how it begins, and it's "dirt and sky" because the Hebrews did not know of the Heavens or Earth, that was beyond their knowledge.

Also the rapture is not biblical at all, it's purely made up.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#103 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

.

ShadowMoses900

I'm not sure why you post pictures like that all the time, I think you do it because you want attention and you know OT will give it to you because the majority of members will agree with you and applaud you for it.

I said I believe in Evolution, as do many other religious people. It's only the fundamentalists and those who take the Bible (or it's variations) 100% literally that have a problem with it.

Also I don't think Creationsists are dumb, just they misunderstand things or are ignorant (doesn't mean stupid) of what Evolution actually is. I personally believe God created and used Evolution to make us. A view many religious people have.

because people who say evolution doesnt exist are sticking their fingers in their ears and generally afraid of the fact that humans aren't special, and I find it pretty sad.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#104 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"]

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]
You made the first claim, thus it is on your head to first provide evidence. I have an excellent article which I will give you after you do; feel free to find an article yourself.

ShadowMoses900

I basically presented my evidence within my questions to you. I dont really need any article that tries to explain away what appears to be a straightforward myth from thousands of years ago in order to make it fit into modern christian belief. I can't prove you wrong, and you can't prove me wrong and that is what is wonderful about the Bible. Everyone can plug their ears call everyone else wrong and not have to worry about anything ever being proven. Until the rapture I mean...th_snicker.gif

Well I'm not sure if your looking for an honest discussion or not, but here is my post on your quesiton again in case you missed it. I'm not a creationist nor a fudamentialist.

Nephilim simply means (loosely translated) "one without a soul", and in the texts is says "the children of God" not Angels necessarily. This could mean simply early humans who God did not want breeding with the Nephilim, the "souless ones". "Giant" is a mistranlastion.

No one is sure what it means exactly, but if you want my honest view, I think it was describing Neanderthal man. That's who I think the Nephilim were, and our ancestors, the homo sapiens, were the children of God and he did not want us breeding with those who looked like man but were not man.

The Neanderthal females could have been the daughters that the Children of God were taking as wives. God not liking this decided to get rid of them later, perhaps that's why Neandertals mysteeriously disappeard?

But that's all just speculation on my part. Though the orgional meaning was never "Giant". That was pure mistranslation. Also much of Genesis is symbolic and not meant to be taken literally, the creation account is literally a story.

In the Hebrew Texts it begins with "Once upon a time, God created the Dirt and the Sky". That's seriously how it begins, and it's "dirt and sky" because the Hebrews did not know of the Heavens or Earth, that was beyond their knowledge.

Also the rapture is not biblical at all, it's purely made up.

it's so sad to see people trying to make sense of the bible and saying to themselves "is not literal" and "is just an analogy" or "just a metaphor", you guys are just fooling yourselves, you see there are so many contradictions in the bible and so many things that make absolutely no sense yet you refuse to see it and instead try to rationalize it.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180149 Posts
This is still going on? Heaven = with God. Hell = without. Have a nice day....
Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#106 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17972 Posts
I fear I'm going to hell if one in fact does exist but I take comfort in the fact that I won't be alone. Not much I can do about it anyway, because I can't bring myself to believe in such a cruel, petty being and would have to pervert my worldview even if I'd want to. So either way I'm screwed. But I don't worry too much. The world is too beautiful a place for such a God to exist. I feel for those that believe in Hell as it's truly a disgusting belief. The concept of Hell is nothing more than a way to coerce belief through cowardice, and apparently it's quite effective. Says quite a lot about people.
Avatar image for jshaas
jshaas

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#107 jshaas
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts
[QUOTE="J-man45"]

Not trying to be "that guy" but just to point out, the Bible says the words "eternal fire" at least once (Matthew 18:8). And I don't know if I agree with TC's interpretation of a "spirit" or a "soul."

harashawn
As C.S. Lewis said, "You don't have a soul, you are a soul. You have a body."

I agree. Corinthians says when we are born again we become a new creation. This is the act of accepting Jesus as your Lord and Savior. Your old self is now dead, and new self (your soul that is now saved) is within your physical body.
Avatar image for PlanetJosh
PlanetJosh

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 PlanetJosh
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
The rich man (often referred to as "Dives" which is Latin for rich/wealthy) knew that Lazarus was so poor and refused to help him one bit even though Dives could have easily done so. Thus Dives was punished and sent to hell for failing to help Lazarus.whipassmt
I was hoping for someone to say the rich man's hell is just a metaphor for something that doesn't include fire or pain. So I was being somewhat sarcastic in my askking for an explanation. I'm hoping stories like this Lazarus one use hell as metaphors for teaching good morals. And that there isn't really a hell or if there is one it's just nothingness where you cease to exist and you don't experience anything. Can you or anyone explain the Lazarus story to fit that view of hell or such that there isn't really a hell?
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#109 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
This is still going on? Heaven = with God. Hell = without. Have a nice day....LJS9502_basic
I actually agree with this 100%
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

.

wis3boi

I'm not sure why you post pictures like that all the time, I think you do it because you want attention and you know OT will give it to you because the majority of members will agree with you and applaud you for it.

I said I believe in Evolution, as do many other religious people. It's only the fundamentalists and those who take the Bible (or it's variations) 100% literally that have a problem with it.

Also I don't think Creationsists are dumb, just they misunderstand things or are ignorant (doesn't mean stupid) of what Evolution actually is. I personally believe God created and used Evolution to make us. A view many religious people have.

because people who say evolution doesnt exist are sticking their fingers in their ears and generally afraid of the fact that humans aren't special, and I find it pretty sad.

Even if you are pure atheist you have to admit that people are special. There is no other animal on Earth that is even close. The closest animals are chimpanzee's and dolphins.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#111 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

Until the rapture I mean...EntropyWins
No where in the Bible is there an event like the Rapture described.

The Rapture is purely an invention by a man called John Wilson Darby. He invented the idea to get people to come to his church in the 1830's.

And he based this idea by cherry picking a single line from the Bible, with no consideration for what it was actually saying.

Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

don't you guys get tired of talking about the same thing every week.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#113 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"]

I basically presented my evidence within my questions to you. I dont really need any article that tries to explain away what appears to be a straightforward myth from thousands of years ago in order to make it fit into modern christian belief. I can't prove you wrong, and you can't prove me wrong and that is what is wonderful about the Bible. Everyone can plug their ears call everyone else wrong and not have to worry about anything ever being proven. Until the rapture I mean...th_snicker.gif

Krelian-co

Well I'm not sure if your looking for an honest discussion or not, but here is my post on your quesiton again in case you missed it. I'm not a creationist nor a fudamentialist.

Nephilim simply means (loosely translated) "one without a soul", and in the texts is says "the children of God" not Angels necessarily. This could mean simply early humans who God did not want breeding with the Nephilim, the "souless ones". "Giant" is a mistranlastion.

No one is sure what it means exactly, but if you want my honest view, I think it was describing Neanderthal man. That's who I think the Nephilim were, and our ancestors, the homo sapiens, were the children of God and he did not want us breeding with those who looked like man but were not man.

The Neanderthal females could have been the daughters that the Children of God were taking as wives. God not liking this decided to get rid of them later, perhaps that's why Neandertals mysteeriously disappeard?

But that's all just speculation on my part. Though the orgional meaning was never "Giant". That was pure mistranslation. Also much of Genesis is symbolic and not meant to be taken literally, the creation account is literally a story.

In the Hebrew Texts it begins with "Once upon a time, God created the Dirt and the Sky". That's seriously how it begins, and it's "dirt and sky" because the Hebrews did not know of the Heavens or Earth, that was beyond their knowledge.

Also the rapture is not biblical at all, it's purely made up.

it's so sad to see people trying to make sense of the bible and saying to themselves "is not literal" and "is just an analogy" or "just a metaphor", you guys are just fooling yourselves, you see there are so many contradictions in the bible and so many things that make absolutely no sense yet you refuse to see it and instead try to rationalize it.

How are we fooling oursleves? Of course the Bible has contradictions, that's because it was written by several different people, over the course of several different time periods. The laws of Leviticus contradict with many of the teachings of Jesus, but that's due to different time periods.

The ancient Israelites used those laws as it made the most sense to them at that time, the world was harsh and barbaric, they were surronded by other groups who wanted them dead. And some of the dietary laws served a purpose as pork that is not handled or cooked right can kill you, something the ancient Israelits did not know how to do.

You have to take it in the right context. Some texts (like much of Genises) are symbolic and not meant to be taken literally. I think there is wisdom in the Bible and it's variations (Torah, Quran) but you have to do it in the right context.

Avatar image for PlanetJosh
PlanetJosh

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 PlanetJosh
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="PlanetJosh"]Sounds interesting and I'll check it out further. Id like to believe it. But the story of the rich man in hell in the New Testament disturbs me. The story goes that a rich man while on earth refused to help out those in need specifically a poor man in his neighborhood. The rich man went to hell and the poor man went to heaven. The rich man pleaded for just a little bit of water to cool his tongue to relieve some his suffering in the flames. But heaven wouldnt allow it saying the rich man should have behaved better on earth so he wouldnt have to suffer like this in hell. Would someone please explain this story? Its scaring me having been a Christian years ago and now Im agnostic. You can use verse mining or whatever you have to do to ease my mind about this story. Ok I'm half joking about being scared but please interpret the story anyway plz. Source: Luke. 16:19-31 (Im no bible thumper, heres a link) : http://www.lazaruscomeforth.com/bible-lazarus-and-rich-man Mike-uk

The rich man (often referred to as "Dives" which is Latin for rich/wealthy) knew that Lazarus was so poor and refused to help him one bit even though Dives could have easily done so. Thus Dives was punished and sent to hell for failing to help Lazarus.

Dives can go fk himself then if that's the case.

I think I found a metaphorical explanation for the rich man/Lazarus story above. Hell in the Bible refers to hard times in the present life. Which has probably been mentioned in general earlier in the thread but I havent read all the posts yet. And when the rich man dies he doesnt literally die, he falls on hard times meaning he suffers financially (hell.) And god further punishes him by refusing to help him get out of his financial bind. For example god (the government) refuses to give the former rich man a bail out. Now lets look at the literal translation of the story. God will burn alive someone who continually refuses to help one poor person in need? Or a few poor people at most? Thats absurd to think torture is justified punishment for that offense. If the story is referring to rich people who continually refuse to help many poor people then the story becomes a metaphor or at least an analogy for the suffering of the poor in general. Which means the story is open to other kinds of metaphorical or analogous interpretations, like mine. A fundamentalist Christian may say its not just the rich man refusing to help a few poor people. He continually rejected the Christian god as his savior all his life the Christians may say. Ok if he should go to hell for that then what about Buddhist monks? They follow a clean life more than most of us and they deserve hell because their god is not Christian? Thats going overboard. And furthermore if you think people deserve torture (hellfire) simply for fornication, stealing or rejecting Jesus then no wonder the world has so many wars going on with that kind of brutal mentality. No wonder I turned away from the Christian religion (former Lutheran) and became agnostic.
Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Well I'm not sure if your looking for an honest discussion or not, but here is my post on your quesiton again in case you missed it. I'm not a creationist nor a fudamentialist.

Nephilim simply means (loosely translated) "one without a soul", and in the texts is says "the children of God" not Angels necessarily. This could mean simply early humans who God did not want breeding with the Nephilim, the "souless ones". "Giant" is a mistranlastion.

No one is sure what it means exactly, but if you want my honest view, I think it was describing Neanderthal man. That's who I think the Nephilim were, and our ancestors, the homo sapiens, were the children of God and he did not want us breeding with those who looked like man but were not man.

The Neanderthal females could have been the daughters that the Children of God were taking as wives. God not liking this decided to get rid of them later, perhaps that's why Neandertals mysteeriously disappeard?

But that's all just speculation on my part. Though the orgional meaning was never "Giant". That was pure mistranslation. Also much of Genesis is symbolic and not meant to be taken literally, the creation account is literally a story.

In the Hebrew Texts it begins with "Once upon a time, God created the Dirt and the Sky". That's seriously how it begins, and it's "dirt and sky" because the Hebrews did not know of the Heavens or Earth, that was beyond their knowledge.

Also the rapture is not biblical at all, it's purely made up.

ShadowMoses900

it's so sad to see people trying to make sense of the bible and saying to themselves "is not literal" and "is just an analogy" or "just a metaphor", you guys are just fooling yourselves, you see there are so many contradictions in the bible and so many things that make absolutely no sense yet you refuse to see it and instead try to rationalize it.

How are we fooling oursleves? Of course the Bible has contradictions, that's because it was written by several different people, over the course of several different time periods. The laws of Leviticus contradict with many of the teachings of Jesus, but that's due to different time periods.

The ancient Israelites used those laws as it made the most sense to them at that time, the world was harsh and barbaric, they were surronded by other groups who wanted them dead. And some of the dietary laws served a purpose as pork that is not handled or cooked right can kill you, something the ancient Israelits did not know how to do.

You have to take it in the right context. Some texts (like much of Genises) are symbolic and not meant to be taken literally. I think there is wisdom in the Bible and it's variations (Torah, Quran) but you have to do it in the right context.

that alone is proof it has nothing divine about it, just an historical book of people trying to impose their rules and beliefs at certain point in time. I do think there is wisdom in them, but nothing that points there is anything supernatural about it

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#116 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I'm not sure why you post pictures like that all the time, I think you do it because you want attention and you know OT will give it to you because the majority of members will agree with you and applaud you for it.

I said I believe in Evolution, as do many other religious people. It's only the fundamentalists and those who take the Bible (or it's variations) 100% literally that have a problem with it.

Also I don't think Creationsists are dumb, just they misunderstand things or are ignorant (doesn't mean stupid) of what Evolution actually is. I personally believe God created and used Evolution to make us. A view many religious people have.

Nuck81

because people who say evolution doesnt exist are sticking their fingers in their ears and generally afraid of the fact that humans aren't special, and I find it pretty sad.

Even if you are pure atheist you have to admit that people are special. There is no other animal on Earth that is even close. The closest animals are chimpanzee's and dolphins.

In higher thinking capacity, yes. In that we are guided and punished by sky daddy and were created in his image? No.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I'm not sure why you post pictures like that all the time, I think you do it because you want attention and you know OT will give it to you because the majority of members will agree with you and applaud you for it.

I said I believe in Evolution, as do many other religious people. It's only the fundamentalists and those who take the Bible (or it's variations) 100% literally that have a problem with it.

Also I don't think Creationsists are dumb, just they misunderstand things or are ignorant (doesn't mean stupid) of what Evolution actually is. I personally believe God created and used Evolution to make us. A view many religious people have.

Nuck81

because people who say evolution doesnt exist are sticking their fingers in their ears and generally afraid of the fact that humans aren't special, and I find it pretty sad.

Even if you are pure atheist you have to admit that people are special. There is no other animal on Earth that is even close. The closest animals are chimpanzee's and dolphins.

You're right we're special in a way that allows us to communicate with other...us. Thanks Nuck, for enlightening us, we're the only species capable of communicating with humans.
Avatar image for jshaas
jshaas

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#118 jshaas
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"] Until the rapture I mean...Nuck81

No where in the Bible is there an event like the Rapture described.

The Rapture is purely an invention by a man called John Wilson Darby. He invented the idea to get people to come to his church in the 1830's.

And he based this idea by cherry picking a single line from the Bible, with no consideration for what it was actually saying.

"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words." ~ 1 Thessalonians 4:16-18 This is a pretty clear description of the Rapture. If you study the wording "caught up," you'll find that it means the same thing as to be raptured.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#119 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
[QUOTE="Nuck81"]

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"] Until the rapture I mean...jshaas

No where in the Bible is there an event like the Rapture described.

The Rapture is purely an invention by a man called John Wilson Darby. He invented the idea to get people to come to his church in the 1830's.

And he based this idea by cherry picking a single line from the Bible, with no consideration for what it was actually saying.

"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words." ~ 1 Thessalonians 4:16-18 This is a pretty clear description of the Rapture. If you study the wording "caught up," you'll find that it means the same thing as to be raptured.

That's a figurative passage, not a literal passage since the things it describes are impossible according to science. Things that are dead can not come back to life. The "Dead in Christ" are describing individuals that are spiritually dead. Those that are Christian in name only and their hearts and souls do not truly belong to God. Those that are truly Alive spiritually and are actively seeking God will be "Caught Up" with him in the clouds. "Clouds" in the sense refer to fog, or confusion. Kind of like when people say "my head is cloudy" Or "The Future is Clouded" The return of Christ will be met with great confusion and uncertainty, just as Jesus was to the Jews, When Jesus returns to Earth He will not come as people will expect, and only those actively seeking him will know him, and meet with him in the air. John Wilson Darby's church attendance was falling. People were simply not coming to his church anymore. He devised a plan to scare people back to Church and developed a new theory about a "Rapture" in 1830. It proved to be so popular into scaring people back into his Church that it spread to other churches and soon took off around the country. Only a few Protestant denominations teach the concept of a "Rapture" and Catholicism and Orthodox Churches have always held this passage to be figurative in meaning. The meanings of the metaphors in that scripture I provided have been established and taught for over a thousand years. Long before Darby needed more people dropping dollars in his collection plate.
Avatar image for jshaas
jshaas

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#120 jshaas
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts
[QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="Nuck81"] No where in the Bible is there an event like the Rapture described.

The Rapture is purely an invention by a man called John Wilson Darby. He invented the idea to get people to come to his church in the 1830's.

And he based this idea by cherry picking a single line from the Bible, with no consideration for what it was actually saying.

Nuck81
"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words." ~ 1 Thessalonians 4:16-18 This is a pretty clear description of the Rapture. If you study the wording "caught up," you'll find that it means the same thing as to be raptured.

That's a figurative passage, not a literal passage since the things it describes are impossible according to science. Things that are dead can not come back to life. The "Dead in Christ" are describing individuals that are spiritually dead. Those that are Christian in name only and their hearts and souls do not truly belong to God. Those that are truly Alive spiritually and are actively seeking God will be "Caught Up" with him in the clouds. "Clouds" in the sense refer to fog, or confusion. Kind of like when people say "my head is cloudy" Or "The Future is Clouded" The return of Christ will be met with great confusion and uncertainty, just as Jesus was to the Jews, When Jesus returns to Earth He will not come as people will expect, and only those actively seeking him will know him, and meet with him in the air. John Wilson Darby's church attendance was falling. People were simply not coming to his church anymore. He devised a plan to scare people back to Church and developed a new theory about a "Rapture" in 1830. It proved to be so popular into scaring people back into his Church that it spread to other churches and soon took off around the country. Only a few Protestant denominations teach the concept of a "Rapture" and Catholicism and Orthodox Churches have always held this passage to be figurative in meaning. The meanings of the metaphors in that scripture I provided have been established and taught for over a thousand years. Long before Darby needed more people dropping dollars in his collection plate.

Who are we to decide what parts of God's word are literal or not? The Dead in Christ are the people that are in Christ (true followers), but die here on earth. "Impossible according to science" doesn't mean much when we're talking about things of a supernatural power. Nothing is impossible for God... He raised dead people many times throughout the Bible. Just because our finite minds can't fathom such a thing, doesn't mean it won't happen. You keep referring to Darby's church. Can you back up this claim with Scripture? That seems to be the only logical way to debate this.
Avatar image for deactivated-598fc45371265
deactivated-598fc45371265

13247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#121 deactivated-598fc45371265
Member since 2008 • 13247 Posts

Why do atheists spend half their time b itching about religion? Are they that insecure?

Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#122 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

Why do atheists spend half their time b itching about religion? Are they that insecure?

Storm_Marine

I'm no longer an atheist. I'm moving toward the faith.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180149 Posts

Why do atheists spend half their time b itching about religion? Are they that insecure?

Storm_Marine
Yes...
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180149 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Storm_Marine"]

Why do atheists spend half their time b itching about religion? Are they that insecure?

Iszdope

Yes...

Still bemused aye?

Are you taking proper medication again yet?

Can't tell.

Aren't you just the cutest thing ever.....
Avatar image for SuperKaio-ken
SuperKaio-ken

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 SuperKaio-ken
Member since 2012 • 322 Posts
To much bible crap, couldn't read through it without /facepalming on how anybody could actually believe any of it. Though from what I understand of the bible, yes eternal hellfire is a biblical teaching.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#129 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
[QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="jshaas"] "For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words." ~ 1 Thessalonians 4:16-18 This is a pretty clear description of the Rapture. If you study the wording "caught up," you'll find that it means the same thing as to be raptured.

That's a figurative passage, not a literal passage since the things it describes are impossible according to science. Things that are dead can not come back to life. The "Dead in Christ" are describing individuals that are spiritually dead. Those that are Christian in name only and their hearts and souls do not truly belong to God. Those that are truly Alive spiritually and are actively seeking God will be "Caught Up" with him in the clouds. "Clouds" in the sense refer to fog, or confusion. Kind of like when people say "my head is cloudy" Or "The Future is Clouded" The return of Christ will be met with great confusion and uncertainty, just as Jesus was to the Jews, When Jesus returns to Earth He will not come as people will expect, and only those actively seeking him will know him, and meet with him in the air. John Wilson Darby's church attendance was falling. People were simply not coming to his church anymore. He devised a plan to scare people back to Church and developed a new theory about a "Rapture" in 1830. It proved to be so popular into scaring people back into his Church that it spread to other churches and soon took off around the country. Only a few Protestant denominations teach the concept of a "Rapture" and Catholicism and Orthodox Churches have always held this passage to be figurative in meaning. The meanings of the metaphors in that scripture I provided have been established and taught for over a thousand years. Long before Darby needed more people dropping dollars in his collection plate.

Who are we to decide what parts of God's word are literal or not? The Dead in Christ are the people that are in Christ (true followers), but die here on earth. "Impossible according to science" doesn't mean much when we're talking about things of a supernatural power. Nothing is impossible for God... He raised dead people many times throughout the Bible. Just because our finite minds can't fathom such a thing, doesn't mean it won't happen. You keep referring to Darby's church. Can you back up this claim with Scripture? That seems to be the only logical way to debate this.

1 Thessalonians was a letter written by Paul to members of the Thessalonian Church. It's a personal letter mainly answering questions of members of the early church. Paul used figurative metaphor to answer the questions. How can I back up Darby's claim with Scripture? That is my point. The idea of an actual "Rapture" is not scriptural supported. You're the one supporting Darby's claim. Shouldn't it be you who is trying to back up a "Rapture" with scripture?
Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

Why do atheists spend half their time b itching about religion? Are they that insecure?

Storm_Marine
ya
Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Iszdope"]

Still bemused aye?

Are you taking proper medication again yet?

Can't tell.

Iszdope

Aren't you just the cutest thing ever.....

You like what you see aye?

Fanks!

You like my buckyballs/cubes yet 'cos I got a surprise coming soon...

For you and another dood! Fair dinkum.

you're not funny. stop trying.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180149 Posts

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="Iszdope"]

You like what you see aye?

Fanks!

You like my buckyballs/cubes yet 'cos I got a surprise coming soon...

For you and another dood! Fair dinkum.

Iszdope

you're not funny. stop trying.

Aw man.

You'd really be in trouble if I wasn't so preoccupied.

I don't know how to break this to you....but you really aren't taken seriously.
Avatar image for jshaas
jshaas

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#135 jshaas
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts
[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="Nuck81"]That's a figurative passage, not a literal passage since the things it describes are impossible according to science. Things that are dead can not come back to life. The "Dead in Christ" are describing individuals that are spiritually dead. Those that are Christian in name only and their hearts and souls do not truly belong to God. Those that are truly Alive spiritually and are actively seeking God will be "Caught Up" with him in the clouds. "Clouds" in the sense refer to fog, or confusion. Kind of like when people say "my head is cloudy" Or "The Future is Clouded" The return of Christ will be met with great confusion and uncertainty, just as Jesus was to the Jews, When Jesus returns to Earth He will not come as people will expect, and only those actively seeking him will know him, and meet with him in the air. John Wilson Darby's church attendance was falling. People were simply not coming to his church anymore. He devised a plan to scare people back to Church and developed a new theory about a "Rapture" in 1830. It proved to be so popular into scaring people back into his Church that it spread to other churches and soon took off around the country. Only a few Protestant denominations teach the concept of a "Rapture" and Catholicism and Orthodox Churches have always held this passage to be figurative in meaning. The meanings of the metaphors in that scripture I provided have been established and taught for over a thousand years. Long before Darby needed more people dropping dollars in his collection plate.

Who are we to decide what parts of God's word are literal or not? The Dead in Christ are the people that are in Christ (true followers), but die here on earth. "Impossible according to science" doesn't mean much when we're talking about things of a supernatural power. Nothing is impossible for God... He raised dead people many times throughout the Bible. Just because our finite minds can't fathom such a thing, doesn't mean it won't happen. You keep referring to Darby's church. Can you back up this claim with Scripture? That seems to be the only logical way to debate this.

1 Thessalonians was a letter written by Paul to members of the Thessalonian Church. It's a personal letter mainly answering questions of members of the early church. Paul used figurative metaphor to answer the questions. How can I back up Darby's claim with Scripture? That is my point. The idea of an actual "Rapture" is not scriptural supported. You're the one supporting Darby's claim. Shouldn't it be you who is trying to back up a "Rapture" with scripture?

I was asking you to back up your claim that the Rapture isn't in the Bible with Scripture. Sorry if you were confused further. So what if Paul wrote the letter to the church. The Bible is the inspired word of God. God wrote through the hands of men... especially Paul who wrote about 2/3 of it.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#136 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Why do atheists spend half their time b itching about religion? Are they that insecure?

Storm_Marine

Why do theists constantly make false assumptions about atheists? Oh....right....internet. You'll probably find the vast majority of atheists don't give a rat's ass and only talk about it online here

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#137 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
[QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="jshaas"] Who are we to decide what parts of God's word are literal or not? The Dead in Christ are the people that are in Christ (true followers), but die here on earth. "Impossible according to science" doesn't mean much when we're talking about things of a supernatural power. Nothing is impossible for God... He raised dead people many times throughout the Bible. Just because our finite minds can't fathom such a thing, doesn't mean it won't happen. You keep referring to Darby's church. Can you back up this claim with Scripture? That seems to be the only logical way to debate this.

1 Thessalonians was a letter written by Paul to members of the Thessalonian Church. It's a personal letter mainly answering questions of members of the early church. Paul used figurative metaphor to answer the questions. How can I back up Darby's claim with Scripture? That is my point. The idea of an actual "Rapture" is not scriptural supported. You're the one supporting Darby's claim. Shouldn't it be you who is trying to back up a "Rapture" with scripture?

I was asking you to back up your claim that the Rapture isn't in the Bible with Scripture.

Ok. I did. Which is why only a handful of Protestant Denominations out of over 30,000 worldwide describe the Rapture as an actual physical event. You know that the rapture has no real following or support anywhere but in parts of the United States right?
Avatar image for jshaas
jshaas

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#138 jshaas
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts
[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="Nuck81"] 1 Thessalonians was a letter written by Paul to members of the Thessalonian Church. It's a personal letter mainly answering questions of members of the early church. Paul used figurative metaphor to answer the questions. How can I back up Darby's claim with Scripture? That is my point. The idea of an actual "Rapture" is not scriptural supported. You're the one supporting Darby's claim. Shouldn't it be you who is trying to back up a "Rapture" with scripture?

I was asking you to back up your claim that the Rapture isn't in the Bible with Scripture.

Ok. I did. Which is why only a handful of Protestant Denominations out of over 30,000 worldwide describe the Rapture as an actual physical event. You know that the rapture has no real following or support anywhere but in parts of the United States right?

Funny, I don't remember any Scripture quoted in any of your posts here. Do you have link to back that up?