This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"][QUOTE="MrPraline"]That's cute, but using Arabs is wrong; it's the North Africans that are the problem here.MrPralineSo you mean the Berbers? Same applies to them as well. No, it doesn't apply to them. Look at the major Western European cities, for example. Then again, who even says you need numbers to take over a country? And still doesn't answer the biggest question: why the f*ck do we have to read about "honour" beatings in italy, honour killings in UK, murders of Islam critics in NL, Madrid bombings in Spain? Keep that f*cking filth far away please thanks bye. ...Of the 5000 honor killings annually committed, less than 500 hundred are perpetrated by Muslims.
http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/27986-honor-killing-worldwide-rate-5000-year.html
You can infer, then, that honor killings are rooted in culture, since Islam's advent had EXPLICITLY forbidden honor killings.
Also, muslims only account for approximately 1 percent of European terrorists, as according to the EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT) https://www.europol.europa.eu/latest_publications/2
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Honestly I'm apathetic on the matter, the woman obviously knew she was going against her father, and the religious norm.MrPralineProof that you're morally bankrupt. Big problem with 2012 "liberals" is that criticising is somehow a faux pas. Maybe if we can all be honest and agree that cultures, as opposed to people, are not equal, we wouldn't have to step on egg shells and could actually discuss tragedies like this.
That reminds me of a quote by Marcello Pera (Former President of the Italian Senate):
"the signs of this pathology are everywhere, especially in my view, in the prison house of insincerity and hypocrisy known as political correctness. Europe has locked itself in this cage for fear of saying things that are not at all incorrect but rather ordinary truths, and to avoid facing its own responsibility and the consequences of what might be said. Political correctness does allow itself some liberties. For example if someone feels like it and truly believes it (perhaps out of poor taste), he is allowed to say that the tuxedo is better than the caftan. However, try saying that the nations of men who wear tuxedos after centuries of struggle and untold bloodshed have built better states and societies than the men in caftans. All metaphors aside, try saying that Western institutions are better than the institutions in Islamic countries. A warrant will be sworn out for your cultural arrest. You will be banished from literary societies, clubs and academies. You can forget about winning any book prizes or being invited to speak at a conference or symposium.
....
The prohibition does not go both ways, however odd that may seem. There are hundreds of examples. If President George Bush says that there is an axis of evil, he is decried not for bad policies, but rather as a cowboy or an illiterate- an accusation one could, of course, never make of a European intellectual, ever wise, profound, and knowledgeable. Noam Chomsky can claim without qualms that the United States is a 'leading terrorist state'. Jose Saramago Prime Minister Sharon to Hitler the Israelis to Nazis...
... But could one likewise criticize another state or event the Palestinian Authority. Not on your life."
(Marcello Pera "Letter to Joseph Ratzinger". In Ratzinger, Joseph and Pera, Marcello, Without Roots: Europe, Relativism, Christianity, Islam. pp. 87-9.). This can be found on Google books here.
Big problem with 2012 "liberals" is that criticising is somehow a faux pas. Maybe if we can all be honest and agree that cultures, as opposed to people, are not equal, we wouldn't have to step on egg shells and could actually discuss tragedies like this.[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] Proof that you're morally bankrupt.whipassmt
That reminds me of a quote by Marcello Pera (Former President of the Italian Senate):
"the signs of this pathology are everywhere, especially in my view, in the prison house of insincerity and hypocrisy known as political correctness. Europe has locked itself in this cage for fear of saying things that are not at all incorrect but rather ordinary truths, and to avoid facing its own responsibility and the consequences of what might be said. Political correctness does allow itself some liberties. For example if someone feels like it and truly believes it (perhaps out of poor taste), he is allowed to say that the tuxedo is better than the caftan. However, try saying that the nations of men who wear tuxedos after centuries of struggle and untold bloodshed have built better states and societies than the men in caftans. All metaphors aside, try saying that Western institutions are better than the institutions in Islamic countries. A warrant will be sworn out for your cultural arrest. You will be banished from literary societies, clubs and academies. You can forget about winning any book prizes or being invited to speak at a conference or symposium.
....
The prohibition does not go both ways, however odd that may seem. There are hundreds of examples. If President George Bush says that there is an axis of evil, he is decried not for bad policies, but rather as a cowboy or an illiterate- an accusation one could, of course, never make of a European intellectual, ever wise, profound, and knowledgeable. Noam Chomsky can claim without qualms that the United States is a 'leading terrorist state'. Jose Saramago Prime Minister Sharon to Hitler the Israelis to Nazis...
... But could one likewise criticize another state or event the Palestinian Authority. Not on your life."
(Marcello Pera "Letter to Joseph Ratzinger". In Ratzinger, Joseph and Pera, Marcello, Without Roots: Europe, Relativism, Christianity, Islam. pp. 87-9.). This can be found on Google books here.
Good quote. Agreed.i checked the link, but before reading it i figured i knew what it was and i was right. the tweets he did are very tame, fvck compared to what is said about the Prophet from people on this very thread. but that is how hypersensitive the ulema and clerics are in Saudi and how they're able to rally their followers to wish death on someone for making such an innocuous self-introspective remark. but in Saudi it's still a very hot-topic but you can push women's rights (driving, education, access to employment are the big issues i keep hearing about), protections for foreign workers in the country, and stopping child marriages (i've physically written my signature on two petitions against it that were sent to the ministry of interior. so... they got my name). SaudiFuryAh. I personally do not have any first hand experience outside of North America(Mexico/American owned land) on the cultural sub-laws, though I still think it would be smart to simply defy the norm outside of the borders/gates, where you can't be expedited, and never return. For example. Here in Miami I have tons of friends who've been military solders for the Castro Brothers, and they enjoy discussing the difference in laws that vary not even 90 miles away, though I have no personal experience. I'm sure they'll never return to cuba where they'll lose their rights, and probably be set to death for defecting the Castro brothers. Point being, keep your mouth shout when you're within the gates of a particular society that views whatever you're doing illegal, and once you leave never return.
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]by "poor Europe too. rip" are you saying you think most European countries will become predominately Islamic in a few decades?MrPralineYeah. UK will be the first to fall. Netherlands, France, Italy, Sweden, Spain and others will follow. Either that or we'll be fully encapsulated in the fourth reich that is the EU. Either way we are f*cked. You can already send some flowers to my grave if you'd like. Well at least Vatican City will not become a majority muslim state or a EU state, unless of course they get invaded (which is probably more likely if Italy becomes an Islamist state, then the Pope will probably have to flee to Latin America or maybe he'll move into the United States and use the Congress building as the new St. Peter's Basilica). Do you think Ireland and Poland will fall too, or just mainland Western Europe? If most of Europe becomes one big Caliphate, Martel will really be tossing in his grave.
Yeah. UK will be the first to fall. Netherlands, France, Italy, Sweden, Spain and others will follow. Either that or we'll be fully encapsulated in the fourth reich that is the EU. Either way we are f*cked. You can already send some flowers to my grave if you'd like. Well at least Vatican City will not become a majority muslim state or a EU state, unless of course they get invaded (which is probably more likely if Italy becomes an Islamist state, then the Pope will probably have to flee to Latin America or maybe he'll move into the United States and use the Congress building as the new St. Peter's Basilica). Do you think Ireland and Poland will fall too, or just mainland Western Europe? If most of Europe becomes one big Caliphate, Martel will really be tossing in his grave.Hm I'm not sure to be honest. All I'm really familiar with is Western Europe and there are definitely alarming signs daily.[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="whipassmt"]by "poor Europe too. rip" are you saying you think most European countries will become predominately Islamic in a few decades?whipassmt
[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]And presumably you're knowledgeable about Islam? :lol: Antagonistic Atheists are usually ignorant about theology, let alone "scholars" on the subject matter. ZevianderThose blinders are on so tight they are cutting off the circulation to your brain. O rly?
[QUOTE="Zeviander"][QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]And presumably you're knowledgeable about Islam? :lol: Antagonistic Atheists are usually ignorant about theology, let alone "scholars" on the subject matter. Nayef_shroofThose blinders are on so tight they are cutting off the circulation to your brain. O rly? Yes, really.
[QUOTE="whipassmt"][QUOTE="MrPraline"] Big problem with 2012 "liberals" is that criticising is somehow a faux pas. Maybe if we can all be honest and agree that cultures, as opposed to people, are not equal, we wouldn't have to step on egg shells and could actually discuss tragedies like this. MrPraline
That reminds me of a quote by Marcello Pera (Former President of the Italian Senate):
"the signs of this pathology are everywhere, especially in my view, in the prison house of insincerity and hypocrisy known as political correctness. Europe has locked itself in this cage for fear of saying things that are not at all incorrect but rather ordinary truths, and to avoid facing its own responsibility and the consequences of what might be said. Political correctness does allow itself some liberties. For example if someone feels like it and truly believes it (perhaps out of poor taste), he is allowed to say that the tuxedo is better than the caftan. However, try saying that the nations of men who wear tuxedos after centuries of struggle and untold bloodshed have built better states and societies than the men in caftans. All metaphors aside, try saying that Western institutions are better than the institutions in Islamic countries. A warrant will be sworn out for your cultural arrest. You will be banished from literary societies, clubs and academies. You can forget about winning any book prizes or being invited to speak at a conference or symposium.
....
The prohibition does not go both ways, however odd that may seem. There are hundreds of examples. If President George Bush says that there is an axis of evil, he is decried not for bad policies, but rather as a cowboy or an illiterate- an accusation one could, of course, never make of a European intellectual, ever wise, profound, and knowledgeable. Noam Chomsky can claim without qualms that the United States is a 'leading terrorist state'. Jose Saramago Prime Minister Sharon to Hitler the Israelis to Nazis...
... But could one likewise criticize another state or event the Palestinian Authority. Not on your life."
(Marcello Pera "Letter to Joseph Ratzinger". In Ratzinger, Joseph and Pera, Marcello, Without Roots: Europe, Relativism, Christianity, Islam. pp. 87-9.). This can be found on Google books here.
Good quote. Agreed. I liked that book, it was an interesting read. I normally like Ratzinger's writings, but I have to say I think I got more of a kick out of Pera, that guy he tells it like he sees it (although I don't think Ratzinger/Benedict XVI cares too much if he offends somebody). Pera's writings are so funny, because you know some people will read it and be like "I can't believe he just said that".[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"][QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] I left Islam because I don't like its teachings, not because I'm ignorant of them.By reading the assertions you make against Islam on this site, I'd say that isn't the case. You are obviously ignorant about the teachings of Islam in a multitude of subjects, especially concerning the rights of women... well if he's mentioning women's rights in the same breath as Islam he sounds a bit ignorant, yeah obviously that's a contradictio in terminis to be fair, Islam did ban the pre-Islamic Arabian practice (I believe it's called "wabat") of burying unwanted baby girls alive in the sand, much like Christianity cracked down on the Greco-Roman practices of abortion and exposure (leaving an unwanted infant out to die).MrPraline
well if he's mentioning women's rights in the same breath as Islam he sounds a bit ignorant, yeah obviously that's a contradictio in terminis to be fair, Islam did ban the pre-Islamic Arabian practice (I believe it's called "wabat") of burying unwanted baby girls alive in the sand, much like Christianity cracked down on the Greco-Roman practices of abortion and exposure (leaving an unwanted infant out to die).That's good, definitely. Still not much rights for women to be found there, though.[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"] By reading the assertions you make against Islam on this site, I'd say that isn't the case. You are obviously ignorant about the teachings of Islam in a multitude of subjects, especially concerning the rights of women...whipassmt
[QUOTE="TheFallenDemon"]
Religion of peace
leviathan91
Bu... Bu... Christians do it too! :cry:
She's quite attractive btw.
Christians do what too, beat women for not wearing a veil? To be honest most Christians don't wear veils, although occasionally you'll see some women wearing lace head coverings at Church. The Current Code of Canon Law (i.e. the 1983 Code), says that women can wear a head covering or a veil at Church but they don't have too (older versions had required it), though they should respect the choice of each other in that regard (i.e. women who wear it shouldn't thing women who don't are sleazy and women who don't wear it shouldn't think those who do are old fuddy-duds).[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"][QUOTE="Zeviander"] Those blinders are on so tight they are cutting off the circulation to your brain.MrPralineO rly? Yes, really. As opposed to your xenophobic/prejudicial ignorance? I think not...
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]to be fair, Islam did ban the pre-Islamic Arabian practice (I believe it's called "wabat") of burying unwanted baby girls alive in the sand, much like Christianity cracked down on the Greco-Roman practices of abortion and exposure (leaving an unwanted infant out to die).That's good, definitely. Still not much rights for women to be found there, though. It probably varies a bit from country to country. Turkey and Lebanon are probably a bit more lenient than Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan (although I imagine Afghanistan probably has some women's rights de jure that aren't recognize de facto, maybe Iraq does too).[QUOTE="MrPraline"] well if he's mentioning women's rights in the same breath as Islam he sounds a bit ignorant, yeah obviously that's a contradictio in terminisMrPraline
Yes, really. As opposed to your xenophobic/prejudicial ignorance? I think not... There's nothing xenophobic about me. My objections against Islam are loud and clear, and too concrete to be accused of having a general fear of foreigners.[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"] O rly?Nayef_shroof
[QUOTE="leviathan91"]
[QUOTE="TheFallenDemon"]
Religion of peace
whipassmt
Bu... Bu... Christians do it too! :cry:
She's quite attractive btw.
Christians do what too, beat women for not wearing a veil? To be honest most Christians don't wear veils, although occasionally you'll see some women wearing lace head coverings at Church. The Current Code of Canon Law (i.e. the 1983 Code), says that women can wear a head covering or a veil at Church but they don't have too (older versions had required it), though they should respect the choice of each other in that regard (i.e. women who wear it shouldn't thing women who don't are sleazy and women who don't wear it shouldn't think those who do are old fuddy-duds).I wasn't being serious. It's just a response to when someone says something negative about the cultural aspect of Islam and then someone else replies that Christianity is just as bad.
They were probably cheering while praising the Quran.I'm a bit surprised it escalated that fast and nobody intervened at first. Usually altercations in public people always jump in, especially if it's man hitting a woman.
chilly-chill
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]to be fair, Islam did ban the pre-Islamic Arabian practice (I believe it's called "wabat") of burying unwanted baby girls alive in the sand, much like Christianity cracked down on the Greco-Roman practices of abortion and exposure (leaving an unwanted infant out to die).That's good, definitely. Still not much rights for women to be found there, though. Islam: - Halted the practice of female infanticide - Allowed women to own property - Allowed women to obtain an education - Emancipated women from arranged marriages (Allowed to choose who they would marry) etc. Compare that with the plight of European women during the Medieval era, and it's quite apparent that Islam, at the time, liberated women from the prevalent misogynist culture of antiquity.[QUOTE="MrPraline"] well if he's mentioning women's rights in the same breath as Islam he sounds a bit ignorant, yeah obviously that's a contradictio in terminisMrPraline
[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] to be fair, Islam did ban the pre-Islamic Arabian practice (I believe it's called "wabat") of burying unwanted baby girls alive in the sand, much like Christianity cracked down on the Greco-Roman practices of abortion and exposure (leaving an unwanted infant out to die).Nayef_shroofThat's good, definitely. Still not much rights for women to be found there, though. Islam: - Halted the practice of female infanticide - Allowed women to own property - Allowed women to obtain an education - Emancipated women from arranged marriages (Allowed to choose who they would marry) etc. Compare that with the plight of European women during the Medieval era, and it's quite apparent that Islam, at the time, liberated women from the prevalent misogynist culture of antiquity. We got better though. 2012 and all that. You are still culturally stuck in a year consisting of 3 digits!
-You cannot drink any intoxicating substances -You cannot obtain 72 virgins, since that "reward" is a fabrication. I believe the hadith stems from an incredulous/unreliable volume of certain hadiths that westerners read and assumed were Islamic "scripture" -You cannot beat your wife whatsoever.[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
IF ghokle and all the other apostate scum have been wrong about the tenets of Islam, allow me to reconsider.
In Islam, can I drink beer and whisky? I would be willing to forfeit rum, vodka, tequila, and possibly wine for 72 virgins. I'd be willing to drop pork, too. I draw the line at beer/whisky and bacon. Also, I am willing to beat my wife if she misbehaves but NOT willing to cover her head-to-toe. What kind of room do I have for negotiation in the terms for eternal salvation?
Nayef_shroof
No deal, brohammed. I keep my intoxicating substances.
-You cannot drink any intoxicating substances -You cannot obtain 72 virgins, since that "reward" is a fabrication. I believe the hadith stems from an incredulous/unreliable volume of certain hadiths that westerners read and assumed were Islamic "scripture" -You cannot beat your wife whatsoever.[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
IF ghokle and all the other apostate scum have been wrong about the tenets of Islam, allow me to reconsider.
In Islam, can I drink beer and whisky? I would be willing to forfeit rum, vodka, tequila, and possibly wine for 72 virgins. I'd be willing to drop pork, too. I draw the line at beer/whisky and bacon. Also, I am willing to beat my wife if she misbehaves but NOT willing to cover her head-to-toe. What kind of room do I have for negotiation in the terms for eternal salvation?
coolbeans90
No deal, brohammed. I keep my intoxicating substances.
Cheers.Christianity can never be compared to Islam. The bible is full of stories and parables; Islam is the direct word and command of God. And Christianity is a religion as opposed to a totalitarian ideology.MrPralineI think some "leftists" on OT probably would think Christianity is totalitarian. Though I think one could make a case that Christianity is more lenient than Islam: afterall in the Bible none of the early Christians wage wars against the Jews or the Romans (they pretty much just preach and get arrested and martyred). Also by the time the Christians launched the first Crusade against Islam, Muslim armies had been conquering Christian lands for centuries.
I think some "leftists" on OT probably would think Christianity is totalitarian. Though I think one could make a case that Christianity is more lenient than Islam: afterall in the Bible none of the early Christians wage wars against the Jews or the Romans (they pretty much just preach and get arrested and martyred). Also by the time the Christians launched the first Crusade against Islam, Muslim armies had been conquering Christian lands for centuries. I don't think Christianity, or any other religion, is as personally controlling as Islam. It's not just a matter of believing in x and y, it's following a script laid out for you.[QUOTE="MrPraline"]Christianity can never be compared to Islam. The bible is full of stories and parables; Islam is the direct word and command of God. And Christianity is a religion as opposed to a totalitarian ideology.whipassmt
Christians do what too, beat women for not wearing a veil? To be honest most Christians don't wear veils, although occasionally you'll see some women wearing lace head coverings at Church. The Current Code of Canon Law (i.e. the 1983 Code), says that women can wear a head covering or a veil at Church but they don't have too (older versions had required it), though they should respect the choice of each other in that regard (i.e. women who wear it shouldn't thing women who don't are sleazy and women who don't wear it shouldn't think those who do are old fuddy-duds).[QUOTE="whipassmt"]
[QUOTE="leviathan91"]
Bu... Bu... Christians do it too! :cry:
She's quite attractive btw.
leviathan91
I wasn't being serious. It's just a response to when someone says something negative about the cultural aspect of Islam and then someone else replies that Christianity is just as bad.
okay I see.[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"][QUOTE="MrPraline"]That's good, definitely. Still not much rights for women to be found there, though.MrPralineIslam: - Halted the practice of female infanticide - Allowed women to own property - Allowed women to obtain an education - Emancipated women from arranged marriages (Allowed to choose who they would marry) etc. Compare that with the plight of European women during the Medieval era, and it's quite apparent that Islam, at the time, liberated women from the prevalent misogynist culture of antiquity. We got better though. 2012 and all that. You are still culturally stuck in a year consisting of 3 digits! The Muslims aren't stuck in a 3 digit year. The Current Muslim Year is 1433 H.
We got better though. 2012 and all that. You are still culturally stuck in a year consisting of 3 digits! The Muslims aren't stuck in a 3 digit year. The Current Muslim Year is 1433 H. Wasn't talking about their calendar, as far as culture and civilization they are still stuck in 700 AD as far as I am concerned.[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"] Islam: - Halted the practice of female infanticide - Allowed women to own property - Allowed women to obtain an education - Emancipated women from arranged marriages (Allowed to choose who they would marry) etc. Compare that with the plight of European women during the Medieval era, and it's quite apparent that Islam, at the time, liberated women from the prevalent misogynist culture of antiquity.whipassmt
-You cannot drink any intoxicating substances -You cannot obtain 72 virgins, since that "reward" is a fabrication. I believe the hadith stems from an incredulous/unreliable volume of certain hadiths that westerners read and assumed were Islamic "scripture" -You cannot beat your wife whatsoever. Islam doesn't allow the consumption of alcohol, proof it sucks total dick.[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
IF ghokle and all the other apostate scum have been wrong about the tenets of Islam, allow me to reconsider.
In Islam, can I drink beer and whisky? I would be willing to forfeit rum, vodka, tequila, and possibly wine for 72 virgins. I'd be willing to drop pork, too. I draw the line at beer/whisky and bacon. Also, I am willing to beat my wife if she misbehaves but NOT willing to cover her head-to-toe. What kind of room do I have for negotiation in the terms for eternal salvation?
Nayef_shroof
[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"] Islam: - Halted the practice of female infanticide - Allowed women to own property - Allowed women to obtain an education - Emancipated women from arranged marriages (Allowed to choose who they would marry) etc. Compare that with the plight of European women during the Medieval era, and it's quite apparent that Islam, at the time, liberated women from the prevalent misogynist culture of antiquity.Zeviander"In theory" and "in practice" are two totally different things. And lol @ Islam being better for women than Christian Europe. One step over the bottom is not something to be proud of.
One step over the bottom? So what was the top back then? China? Africa? India?
Honestly I'm apathetic on the matter, the woman obviously knew she was going against her father, and the religious norm.FightingfanWhat a terrible justification.....:|
[QUOTE="omho88"]
A quote from ur TC's post "marriage (sexual slavery)"
Are you an idiot ?!
Of course forcing someone to marry someone else is another matter.
Phaze-Two
what was the word that came right before "marriage"?
oppsss. I dun know how I missed that .... sorry TC .... my apologies for this mistake.
She shouldn't have taken her veil off to be fair.
Ilovegames1992
1. Religion forces women to cover face with a veil when in public.
2. Woman refuses to wear veil <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< the part that Ilovegames1992 has a problem with
3. Father beats woman visciously when he spots daughter without veil.
whats wrong with this picture?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment