It's Official: An Asteroid Wiped Out The Dinosaurs

  • 61 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
I wish people would stop acting like the asteroid theory is/was universally accepted and is factual truth. It's just one of the many theories used to describe it and it has its own set of facts and proofs. If you've done more research outside of childhood dinosaur movies, you'd now there are many theories trying to explain it, the ice age theory being the second most popular. It's not evolution vs. creationism. It's more like the function of the human appendix. That said, I still think the asteroid theory has many holes to cover. But I don't disagree with it.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts

*Cough* Gamma Ray Burst *cough* Ok, they think they have DISPROVED (shakey evidence at that) about volcanoes, and that suddenly makes it so that asteroids were the only way the dinosuars could be killed? I'm not saying its right or wrong, but come on, gamma Ray Bursts are awesome when they don't happen to us...

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts

*Cough* Gamma Ray Burst *cough* Ok, they think they have DISPROVED (shakey evidence at that) about volcanoes, and that suddenly makes it so that asteroids were the only way the dinosuars could be killed? I'm not saying its right or wrong, but come on, gamma Ray Bursts are awesome when they don't happen to us...

Grodus5
I was disappointed by the article too :( I thought they actually found cold, hard evidence to an asteroid. But it was more like "yeah, we had a vote, that makes it true!"
Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts

[QUOTE="Grodus5"]

*Cough* Gamma Ray Burst *cough* Ok, they think they have DISPROVED (shakey evidence at that) about volcanoes, and that suddenly makes it so that asteroids were the only way the dinosuars could be killed? I'm not saying its right or wrong, but come on, gamma Ray Bursts are awesome when they don't happen to us...

Famiking

I was disappointed by the article too I thought they actually found cold, hard evidence to an asteroid. But it was more like "yeah, we had a vote, that makes it true!"

Yeah, they just voted on it with no basis to their decision at all, right? What would "cold, hard evidence" be anyway, a video recording of it?

Sure, give them another twenty years and they might decide it was something else, but this straw man hyperbole is a bit much.

Avatar image for Snakewiseman
Snakewiseman

1287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Snakewiseman
Member since 2009 • 1287 Posts
[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

[QUOTE="Snakewiseman"]

whats the religious stance on dinosaurs, is there one?

You just didnt say that.:(

I meant to say dinosaur extinction
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#56 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Yucatan crater? Like the 180 Km one?

chaplainDMK

They've been arguing over the past couple decades about what killed the dinosaurs. There is still no definitive proof as to what did. It could be a single thing, or it could be a combination of many things. The fact is, we can never "know" what actually did it, only make educated speculations as to the most likely cause.

You know it's based in part on the giant crater that can be dated to approximately the same period of time and physics-based models of what kind of effects that sort of impact would have, right? I'm not saying that is 100% definitely why they went extinct when they did, but when you say that "there is still the problem of evidence" it sounds like you're asserting that it is nothing but wild speculation.

Wild speculation is for archaeologists, not biologists and geologists. :P

SpaceMoose

Actually, I'm merely asserting that it is impossible to know with 100% certainty if that is what killed off the dinosaurs. In no way was I suggesting that it is "wild speculation."

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

And an asteroid'll wipe us out too. :o

megagene
cant wait.
Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127736 Posts
I thought this was somewhat confirmed years ago.
Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts
I thought this was somewhat confirmed years ago.horgen123
Slow news day. :P
Avatar image for YoJim8obaJoe
YoJim8obaJoe

2653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 YoJim8obaJoe
Member since 2008 • 2653 Posts

The first responce by kathy on that page is funny as hell,shows you how some peoples brains just dont work

Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts

The first responce by kathy on that page is funny as hell,shows you how some peoples brains just dont work

YoJim8obaJoe

...and that reply got 1587 thumbs up so far. :?

I love how these people always know better than all of the experts in the field who have dedicated their lives to a particular subject, and they always have the most flawed and asinine reasons for knowing better.

Here is a quote from her reply:

"For the asteroid impact theory to be correct, one would have to assume that every dinosaur on the planet was incinerated instantly."

Yeah, so, um, that's not even what the argument is. See, the really sad and absurd part about that is that one could get that much right from the article she replied to. That means she either couldn't be bothered to spend the minute or two it would have taken to read it before talking out of her *** or that she somehow just completely failed to comprehend what she read.