Who do you think would win in a fight?? A 14th century knight, or a ninja???
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I have too dissagree with you guys. I think the knight would probably win. Because I don't see the ninjas blowgun, or stars getting through that armor of his. So that would mean the ninja would have too get up close and personal. And it is suicide too get up close and personal with a knight
Lies...i prefer knights, they're cooler. but ninjas would win hands down
ZeroHalberd
The Ninja would definitely win.harry_james_potA Bigger lie. A Knight would win for one, and one reason only. It's armor. A ninja can't hurt him, and last I checked the main reason on deadliest warrior as to the Spartan beat the Ninja is because he couldn't hurt him. His defense was too impregnable.
ninja easily....knight armor was built to deflect large blades.....it is easily piecred with knives or narrow swords.....not to mention the complete lack of mobility for a knight...Omni-SlashThe knight doesn't need to be that mobile assuming we're talking about real ninjas and not the video game variety. The knight's not going to be facing someone running along walls, casting lightning spells and throwing 50 stars at once. :P
The knight doesn't need to be that mobile assuming we're talking about real ninjas and not the video game variety. The knight's not going to be facing someone running along walls, casting lightning spells and throwing 50 stars at once. :PPirate700true....but literally knights were walking tanks...they were armored to face other nights....by lack of mobility I'd equate it to Turtle vs Fox....sure it may take the fox a few attempts to flip the turtle...but eventually it's done for.....
Seeing how ninjas are assassins and do not fight on the battleground, this comparison is pointless and should stop. A better comparison would be Samurai vs Knight, because you know, they actually both fight on the battleground. What is it with people and their silly comparisons.
The knight would obliterate a samurai.Seeing how ninjas are assassins and do not fight on the battleground, this comparison is pointless and should stop. A better comparison would be Samurai vs Knight, because you know, they actually both fight on the battleground. What is it with people and their silly comparisons.
carrot-cake
You make it sound like a ninja is faster then a speeding bullet, and a knight is as slow as a snail. The knight isn't as slow as you think he is, and the Ninja not as fast.Knights don't stand a chance. They are just too slow to keep up with a ninja.
TehFuneral
[QUOTE="TehFuneral"]You make it sound like a ninja is faster then a speeding bullet, and a knight is as slow as a snail. The knight isn't as slow as you think he is, and the Ninja not as fast.Remember we are on a game forum. Many people don't know what actual ninjas were like.Knights don't stand a chance. They are just too slow to keep up with a ninja.
-Big_Red-
[QUOTE="-Big_Red-"][QUOTE="TehFuneral"]
Knights don't stand a chance. They are just too slow to keep up with a ninja.
You make it sound like a ninja is faster then a speeding bullet, and a knight is as slow as a snail. The knight isn't as slow as you think he is, and the Ninja not as fast.Remember we are on a game forum. Many don't what actual ninjas were like. I know, and it's a shame. The closest thing to a ninja that these people have seen is Naruto.:(why are people having this image that all knights wear huge armor... ever heard of chainmail?
Ninjas are stealth assassins, knights are soldiers bred for war. In a face to face fight - The Dark Knight Wins.
A ninja, they're not shy of using poison or in one case waiting underneath a latrine for their victim to arrive and do his business, before striking.
Edit: A ninja would win, since he's not chained by a code of honour or chivalry.
dont be fooled by stories of valor, a knight would cut off your testies as you sleep.We are assuming the TC was referring to plate knights.why are people having this image that all knights wear huge armor... ever heard of chainmail?
Ninjas are stealth assassins, knights are soldiers bred for war. In a face to face fight - The Dark Knight Wins.
AtlanticRock
You make it sound like a ninja is faster then a speeding bullet, and a knight is as slow as a snail. The knight isn't as slow as you think he is, and the Ninja not as fast.-Big_Red-Remember we are on a game forum. Many don't what actual ninjas were like. I know, and it's a shame. The closest thing to a ninja that these people have seen is Naruto.:( well every time the knight thinks he hit the ninja he will soon find it to be a log, a poison bomb mud/ice/fire/wind/ log
[QUOTE="AtlanticRock"]
why are people having this image that all knights wear huge armor... ever heard of chainmail?
Ninjas are stealth assassins, knights are soldiers bred for war. In a face to face fight - The Dark Knight Wins.
We are assuming the TC was referring to plate knights. that was my assumption in post 3 or 4 of the thread[QUOTE="TehFuneral"]You make it sound like a ninja is faster then a speeding bullet, and a knight is as slow as a snail. The knight isn't as slow as you think he is, and the Ninja not as fast.Knights don't stand a chance. They are just too slow to keep up with a ninja.
-Big_Red-
Each have his own fighting style. Ninja's are assassins, they kill in surprise. Knights fight face on. Knights give up mobility for their protection and ninja give up their protection for mobility. A knights armour also has weak spots, not to mention his visibility is limited.
A ninja would sneak behind a knight and attack him in his weak spot, and even if he missed his high agility would allow him to at least dodge some of the knights attacks.
You make it sound like a ninja is faster then a speeding bullet, and a knight is as slow as a snail. The knight isn't as slow as you think he is, and the Ninja not as fast.[QUOTE="-Big_Red-"][QUOTE="TehFuneral"]
Knights don't stand a chance. They are just too slow to keep up with a ninja.
TehFuneral
Each have his own fighting **** Ninja's are assassins, they kill in surprise. Knights fight face on. Knights give up mobility for their protection and ninja give up their protection for mobility. A knights armour also has weak spots, not to mention his visibility is limited.
A ninja would sneak behind a knight and attack him in his weak spot, and even if he missed his high agility would allow him to at least dodge some of the knights attacks.
No... A Ninja cannot kill a knight in full body armor. And as I said before Knights are much faster then you think. And Ninjas are not as fast. Ninjas lost out to Spartans on the deadliest warrior because of the spartans shield, he couldn't kill him. Do you think he could kill someone with FULL BODY ARMOR:o?
Again, their speed doesn't matter. Ninjas were not warriors. They were spies and at the most assassins. They would sneak into your house and kill you in your sleep. They would almost surely get killed in any combat situation.Ninja. They are too fast for the knight.
TINYOWNSYOU
naruto, we have been over this in the thread alreadyDepends on what ninja, but normally the knight.
arad96
Again, their speed doesn't matter. Ninjas were not warriors. They were spies and at the most assassins. They would sneak into your house and kill you in your sleep. They would almost surely get killed in any combat situation.[QUOTE="TINYOWNSYOU"]
Ninja. They are too fast for the knight.
Pirate700
"A ninja or shinobi was a covert agent or mercenary of feudal Japan specializing in unorthodox arts of war. The functions of the ninja included espionage, sabotage, infiltration, and assassination, as well as open combat in certain situations."
I still go with ninja.
Again, their speed doesn't matter. Ninjas were not warriors. They were spies and at the most assassins. They would sneak into your house and kill you in your sleep. They would almost surely get killed in any combat situation.[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="TINYOWNSYOU"]
Ninja. They are too fast for the knight.
TINYOWNSYOU
"A ninja or shinobi was a covert agent or mercenary of feudal Japan specializing in unorthodox arts of war. The functions of the ninja included espionage, sabotage, infiltration, and assassination, as well as open combat in certain situations."
I still go with ninja.
Edit: Oops, it went black in the last post...
In the case of element of surprise, the ninja wins hands down. In a straight up fight I would say the ninja as well just because a knight wearing that suit of armor takes a lot of endurance so I'm sure that a ninja would outmaneuver and outlast him as long as he doesn't get hit.
In direct one on one combat the Knight for the very obvious reason that one on one combat is what his specialty is and what his arms and armour are designed for.
The ninja is not designed for one on one combat.... at all. They are designed for stealth, assassination, spying and occassionally armed combat against unarmed or lightly armed opponents.
The ninja could run around in circles and throw stars and what not till he is blue in the face. Meanwhile the Knight could just stand there having a smoke thinking...I'll have to get my boy to clean those scuff marks off my armour when I get back.
Eventually the ninja has to face the Knight in direct one on one combat at which point he gets murdered easily by the Knight. I don't give a darn how fast the ninja is sincehe has no weapons capable of injuring the Knight. Eventually he will get within the 6ft attack radius of the Knight and get hit at which time it is over.
It is like a guy on a motorcycle armed with a butterknife vs a guy in a tank. Sure the motorcycle can run rings around him, till it runs out of gas. Then what?
ninja easily....knight armor was built to deflect large blades.....it is easily piecred with knives or narrow swords.....not to mention the complete lack of mobility for a knight...Omni-SlashHere is how you are wrong. 1) It is actually a myth that knights are immobile. their armor is fitted to them personally, and they are able to do gymnastics in it that most people cannot do naked. 2) The knights armor can deflect small daggers and narrow swords as well. Maybe you should look up your facts instead of trusting Hollywood myths, and amine.
Standard knights use a sword that is very slow because it was made more for hacking than for cutting. They are slow, but their defense is high, Ninjas are quick and more versatile, however a single blow from the knight would end the show. I would bet on the ninja. curonoactually, the bastard sword exceded greatly for cutting. Do not forget that the knight also has his trusty halberd and crossbow. Which would keep the ninja at bay. and the ninjas poison cannot even get through the knight armor.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment