Windows, although Mac tends to be used alot more in the sciences.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I have a place in my heart for all OS's :)
I admittedly only use Windows for games and nothing will convince me that it's good for anything else, so it's not that big of a loss if I don't have it on my PC.
OSX may only be for Macintosh's which really bogs down its popularity, but the good thing is the programmers only have to worry about an extremely limited set of hardware which eliminates a lot of bugs and makes it easy for third party software to develop for the platform (Maya, Photoshop, etc). The other plus about OSX is that it is very friendly for people who have little experience with anything that has a CPU in it.
Linux is my "Everything else" OS. I personally like Gentoo the most. You have to manually build it from the ground up (you don't have a GUI that has you click next, next, next) and installing software takes a while since everything is compiled, but you have tons and tons of documentation to help and Gentoo's repository is MASSIVE. Gentoo is extremely customizable so it can fit to what you want or need, but it's admittedly getting old and is probably going to be replaced by Exherbo in the coming years.
You'll find that simplistic GUI's are the lifeblood of any mass-marketed OS. The average person doesn't want to fiddle with computer settings, he/she simply wants to get work done and then call it a day, with minimal headache. Abstraction is part of intelligent software design.fiscopeNot only that, but GUI's need to eliminate as many little annoyances as possible. For example, the Windows 95 (I think) start menu was always one pixel off from the bottom left corner. The user would expect to be able to just slap the mouse down and left and expect it hover over the start menu, but it's not. Those annoyances really add up. Then there's the "gestures" thing with Windows 7. I don't think users are going to expect the window to be maximized when they move a window to the top and the cursor just so happens to be touching the top. The idea about "gestures" is good, but the execution is absolutely terrible IMO.
[QUOTE="fiscope"]You'll find that simplistic GUI's are the lifeblood of any mass-marketed OS. The average person doesn't want to fiddle with computer settings, he/she simply wants to get work done and then call it a day, with minimal headache. Abstraction is part of intelligent software design.Vax45Not only that, but GUI's need to eliminate as many little annoyances as possible. For example, the Windows 95 (I think) start menu was always one pixel off from the bottom left corner. The user would expect to be able to just slap the mouse down and left and expect it hover over the start menu, but it's not. Those annoyances really add up. Then there's the "gestures" thing with Windows 7. I don't think users are going to expect the window to be maximized when they move a window to the top and the cursor just so happens to be touching the top. The idea about "gestures" is good, but the execution is absolutely terrible IMO. Agreed. Programmers tend to think differently about information organization than the average home user, so issues like that can arise too easily. My parents love Aero's snapping function though, and to be honest I can't live without it now!
[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]huh...rly? I was shocked too. I imagined Linux or Windows would dominate the science, seeing as how both are less flash than OSX.that's what I think to. Whenever I see some serious scientist with a laptop most of the time it's thinkpad.[QUOTE="tomo90"]
Windows, although Mac tends to be used alot more in the sciences.
fiscope
Maybe he meant academic teachers
Mac is fine but I'm already used to Windows, since I've used it my whole life and I'm just used to the layout of it and the way everything works and where everything is located, especially.
I was shocked too. I imagined Linux or Windows would dominate the science, seeing as how both are less flash than OSX.that's what I think to. Whenever I see some serious scientist with a laptop most of the time it's thinkpad.[QUOTE="fiscope"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]huh...rly?
AdrianWerner
Maybe he meant academic teachers
Maybe. My professors all favor macs, they feel it is more stable. They are doctorates in my College of Computing, so I would trust their opinion on that. Still, I've yet to see any sort of instability in Windows 7.Windows
Mac OS is just...funky. And it takes a lot longer to do stuff; its tedious to work with Mac OS.
Also, no games. At least relative to windows.
mrbojangles25
Like what?
windows
but windows i think is rigged to crash once every month
.. If you say so, I havn't gotten a crash from windows for years now aside from when I was stress testing my system for overclock.. Which is expected to have lock ups and crashes.[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]that's what I think to. Whenever I see some serious scientist with a laptop most of the time it's thinkpad.[QUOTE="fiscope"] I was shocked too. I imagined Linux or Windows would dominate the science, seeing as how both are less flash than OSX.fiscope
Maybe he meant academic teachers
Maybe. My professors all favor macs, they feel it is more stable. They are doctorates in my College of Computing, so I would trust their opinion on that. Still, I've yet to see any sort of instability in Windows 7. I think your professors are suffering from tunnel vision. Why do you think the OS X is more stable? Because they don't create software compatible to other 3rd party vendors. Go to the OSX86project site, and you'll see the list of compatible hardware, which is small, and how many problems people face. Another fact that the market is mostly owned by Microsoft, there's a larger volume of potential hacker victims. If the numbers were flipped, it would be opposite. There are plenty of support forums out there, and they are filled with people complaining about their apple products, because they are having problems with it, just like every other company. Then when it comes to updates, Mac usually takes their time to roll out critical updates, whereas Microsoft has more experience with these issues and know how to play the game of fixing and updating when it's really critical. Mac OS X is just as operable as Windows, it's just most smug people usually get Mac's and claim them to be more dependable then the other, when in actuality, they both do a great deal of stuff and are just as dependable as the other. They also reveal their smugness, when they say OS X >> LINUX >> Windows, when Linux is a totally different distro, and OS X is built ontop of UNIX. Even if people were to compare OS X to Linux, Linux came way before OS X and is proven to be more reliable then Mac's.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment