So glad I have my internet with Cogeco.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Emraldo"]
So glad I have my internet with Cogeco.
PBSnipes
Cogeco has the same model of bandwidth caps and overage charges as Bell, Rogers, et al. :?
and I heared people talking about Cogeco going following suite in the future
ya it is. Its a Law, thats why in Canada pretty much all cellphones plans offer and cost the same, and why Internet and cable is pretty much the same no matter who you go with. its not ment to benefit the coustmer, its to benefit Bell, and Rogers mostly.Where's the logic in that? I don't follow![QUOTE="gamer-adam1"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]Is that a fact? I find that too ridiculous to believe. Competition tends to benefit the consumer but if there is none...Hexagon_777
Logic is companys get more money and we get less.....thats what you get for living in canada
Im with Shaw Cable Donw think they are doing thisMkavanaugh77
Telus is already doing it. I only get about 2mbs and have a 50 gb cap. So you probably already have one (might depend on your province).I am on Telus, am I safe??
iloverikku11
[QUOTE="daqua_99"]
[QUOTE="PBSnipes"]
So what's your point? That because Australia gets screwed it's fine if other countries get screwed too?
Yongying
No, my point is that people should pay for what they use. We do so for every other commodity (electricity, water, fuel, etc), why not for internet bandwidth? Why should someone who uses 25GB pay the same as someone who uses 250GB of downloads?
People like you piss me off, instead of supporting the interests of consumers (you), you side with the interests of multimillion dollar companies. :|why? the hell i don't know why, you probably wouldn't even care if electricity, water and fuel rose 200% in price.
**** ya you tell em....[QUOTE="iloverikku11"]Telus is already doing it. I only get about 2mbs and have a 50 gb cap. So you probably already have one (might depend on your province).I am on Telus, am I safe??
deangallop
Telus MIGHT drop it down to 25gb, if things go well for Bell
[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]ya it is. Its a Law, thats why in Canada pretty much all cellphones plans offer and cost the same, and why Internet and cable is pretty much the same no matter who you go with. its not ment to benefit the coustmer, its to benefit Bell, and Rogers mostly.gamer-adam1Where's the logic in that? I don't follow!Logic is companys get more money and we get less.....thats what you get for living in canadaThat certainly doesn't fit the Canadian stereotype of every Canadian being nice. The Canadian government is screwing its people over by allowing such laws.
[QUOTE="PBSnipes"]
[QUOTE="daqua_99"]
Meh people need to realise that bandwidth is a commodity. Toughen up, you can't expect anything for free.
daqua_99
No, but we can expect reasonable and fair business practices, as opposed to the blatant price-gouging and anti-competitive practices behind these implementations of bandwidth caps and UBB.
We've been having all this in Australia for years. Most of the lines here are owned by one company, Telstra, and there is virtually no stable unlimited system. You want unlimited, you get a crappy connection, as your ISP puts you as lowest priority.
I pay $60 a month for 20mb/s, though I only get ~2mb/s. I have a 50GB download limit.
Australia may well be worse than china when it comes to the Internet, why should I care what your policies are?
i call for a revolution. we must raid the streets. this is an outrage. down with with bell!GreatEmpireLet Canada be part of the Middle East and a revolution you shall have!
I have a 16 Mbps download with 2 Mbps upload at home with AT&T and it only costs like $50 a month regular, however right now we are getting it for $23.99/month With unlimited bandwidth.. ahhh I love my Internet.. Sucks to be you Canada.ferrari2001
yup march 1st 1000's of people will be going from Unlimited DLC and lower to 25 gb, cause apparently, Most canadians dont use more than 5 gbs a month
ya it is. Its a Law, thats why in Canada pretty much all cellphones plans offer and cost the same, and why Internet and cable is pretty much the same no matter who you go with. its not ment to benefit the coustmer, its to benefit Bell, and Rogers mostly.Where's the logic in that? I don't follow! Don't listen to him, there's competition. Take Koodo Mobile for example, they came up from behind and just exploded, because they offered much better deals than the incumbents. As far as I know, the only laws are to prevent price-gouging, so as to undercut an upstart company.[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]Is that a fact? I find that too ridiculous to believe. Competition tends to benefit the consumer but if there is none...Hexagon_777
Logic is companys get more money and we get less.....thats what you get for living in canadaThat certainly doesn't fit the Canadian stereotype of every Canadian being nice. The Canadian government is screwing its people over by allowing such laws. Links please? I say again, I'm pretty sure the only restrictions are to prevent unfair business practices.[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]Where's the logic in that? I don't follow!Hexagon_777
[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]Logic is companys get more money and we get less.....thats what you get for living in canadaTylendalThat certainly doesn't fit the Canadian stereotype of every Canadian being nice. The Canadian government is screwing its people over by allowing such laws. Links please? I say again, I'm pretty sure the only restrictions are to prevent unfair business practices.I am just going by what this honest Canadian citizen is telling me. He wouldn't lie to me, would he?
My thought is this might be an alternative method of combating piracy. Their last attempt was shot down, but the Conservatives have been itching to put into place measures designed to curb it. This seems like a devious way of accomplishing that goal. Obviously I don't like it at all, as I use Steam a great deal. However, I don't download so much that I wouldn't be able to cope with the new limits.
I do hope they'll re-consider the 25 GB limit. It's too low for my liking.
Links please? I say again, I'm pretty sure the only restrictions are to prevent unfair business practices.I am just going by what this honest Canadian citizen is telling me. He wouldn't lie to me, would he? Not knowingly, no. I just did some research. This isn't happening March 1st, the OP is misleading. What's happening March 1st is that the government is deciding whether or not to tell the CRTC to reverse the changes, so that it will never come into effect in the first place.[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]That certainly doesn't fit the Canadian stereotype of every Canadian being nice. The Canadian government is screwing its people over by allowing such laws.Hexagon_777
[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="Tylendal"] Links please? I say again, I'm pretty sure the only restrictions are to prevent unfair business practices.TylendalI am just going by what this honest Canadian citizen is telling me. He wouldn't lie to me, would he? Not knowingly, no. I just did some research. This isn't happening March 1st, the OP is misleading. What's happening March 1st is that the government is deciding whether or not to tell the CRTC to reverse the changes, so that it will never come into effect in the first place.So things are better than initially portrayed, correct?
Not knowingly, no. I just did some research. This isn't happening March 1st, the OP is misleading. What's happening March 1st is that the government is deciding whether or not to tell the CRTC to reverse the changes, so that it will never come into effect in the first place.So things are better than initially portrayed, correct? Yep. Basically, all that's happening is that the big broadcasting companies whined to the CRTC about services like Netflix which are making HUGE amounts of money, but are considered a broadcast service, despite doing all their business over the internet, which the ISP companies need to pay to maintain. So, the CRTC told the smaller companies that buy internet from the larger companies to sell it to the consumer, that they would no longer be allowed to provide unlimited internet, and instead pay a scaling rate, something which the large companies weren't allowed to charge them before. When the public got wind of this, they screamed 'foul', and it made its way to the rest of the government, a classic case of the right hand not knowing what the left is doing. March 1st merely marks the date when the federal government will (most likely, we hope) ask that CRTC "What the ***** were you thinking?", and backhand everything back to normal.[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]I am just going by what this honest Canadian citizen is telling me. He wouldn't lie to me, would he?Hexagon_777
[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]Where's the logic in that? I don't follow! Don't listen to him, there's competition. Take Koodo Mobile for example, they came up from behind and just exploded, because they offered much better deals than the incumbents. As far as I know, the only laws are to prevent price-gouging, so as to undercut an upstart company.[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]ya it is. Its a Law, thats why in Canada pretty much all cellphones plans offer and cost the same, and why Internet and cable is pretty much the same no matter who you go with. its not ment to benefit the coustmer, its to benefit Bell, and Rogers mostly.Tylendal
[QUOTE="one_plum"]
Isn't this going to work against the National Film Board? They have plenty of full length films online.
pianist
Yes - although I doubt the Conservatives care about the National Film Board or anything else that doesn't produce widgets...
lol... The CRTC is the only thing that I have against the Conservatives, other than that the Liberals are full of some shady people, and the NDP are nuts, if it was up to them we'd have project housing at every corner :P. Though on a more serious note I think the industry as a whole is going to have to change sooner than later as more people are catching on. Between TV, Internet, Mobile, etc. Bell and Rogers are holding Canadians back while overcharging us.Don't listen to him, there's competition. Take Koodo Mobile for example, they came up from behind and just exploded, because they offered much better deals than the incumbents. As far as I know, the only laws are to prevent price-gouging, so as to undercut an upstart company.[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]Where's the logic in that? I don't follow!
carrot-cake
I honeslty don't see how this will effect me. I'm under telus optik right now and we basically stream our TV through there new service called Telus Optik. 25gb would be used up in like a day not to mention we got like 6 PC's running off one router and everybody in my house watches youtube. I know my family isn't the only family like this either.
Let's see how long this really lasts.
Hey Canadians, there's a solution floating around the internet that will allow you to get around the cap.
Unfortunately said solution requires a 30GB download.
I did not see this as dark day, we have always been like that. 15 cents per mb if passed cap, consider yourself lucky that they only charge you $2/gb.
[QUOTE="fooZar777"]Federal government is going to throw it out. That's all that's really happening on March 1st.Can't imagine the internet with a cap. That's pretty close to my daily usage.
Tylendal
Have they actually come out and said this?
The cons thus far have always sided with the corporations over the consumers...
I seriously doubt you get charged 150 bucks per gig on a land-line conncection.I did not see this as dark day, we have always been like that. 15 cents per mb if passed cap, consider yourself lucky that they only charge you $2/gb.
stevoqwerty
~~ATTENTION~~ This is a message to all Canadians ~~ATTENTION~~
Sign the petition at: http://openmedia.ca/meter
"Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are about to impose usage-based billing on YOU.
This means we're looking at a future where ISPs will charge per byte, the way they do with smart phones. If we allow this to happen Canadians will have no choice but to pay MUCH more for less Internet. Big Telecom companies are obviously trying to gouge consumers, control the Internet market, and ensure that consumers continue to subscribe to their television services.
These Big Telecom companies are forcing small competing ISPs to adopt the same pricing scheme, so that we have no choice but to pay these punitive fees.
This will crush innovative services, Canada's digital competitiveness, and your wallet.
We urgently need to send a clear message to Ottawa, saying that we won't stand by while some of the most profitable companies in the country indiscriminately add new fees to our Internet bills. Enough is enough.
UPDATE: The Liberals and the NDP have now come out AGAINST Internet metering. We're winning, Canada - now onto the government in power! "
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment