massive population will lead to g@y relations?(fictional situation)

I was reading a summary of a book that in the future the worlds government and overall all society was encouraging homosexual relationships with one another to stop child birth and it would actually be illegal if you have more than one child.You know teachers teaching that it's ok to be gay perants asking their children to find good mates to be with. Do you think this could ever become a probable situation in the future? What are your thoughts on this? would be pro or against this sort of future?

Population growth is currently in decline. And if current rates continue, we could see general world depopulation by the end of this century. That is, we could see more deaths than births over the course of a year. So I don't think that scenario is very likely.

Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

I can see the Uncle Sam posters now, "I Want You To Go Gay!"

Homosexuality is witnessed in some species, and in some cases only under special circumstances, so i wouldn't say that just because some animals do it means it is acceptable for us to do it. Basically, just because an animal does something doesn't meant that it is acceptable for a human to do it. And besides, anyone who is claiming that homosexuality is the only solution to massive population is dumb. Anyone who has been to northwestern USA knows that up in some of those states there is so much space for families to live on and farm. If people really want to fix an overcrowding problem, people just need to move, not start having less kids.

Second, they'd just promote more tube-snipping surgeries. Maqda7

Homosexuality is witnessed in some species, and in some cases only under special circumstances, so i wouldn't say that just because some animals do it means it is acceptable for us to do it. Basically, just because an animal does something doesn't meant that it is acceptable for a human to do it. And besides, anyone who is claiming that homosexuality is the only solution to massive population is dumb. Anyone who has been to northwestern USA knows that up in some of those states there is so much space for families to live on and farm. If people really want to fix an overcrowding problem, people just need to move, not start having less kids.

cgi15

Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

It's highly unlikely that this scenario will even pan out.

[QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.BattleTurtles

proly

If people really want to fix an overcrowding problem, people just need to move, not start having less kids.

cgi15

Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

[QUOTE="Maqda7"] Second, they'd just promote more tube-snipping surgeries. trust_nobody

[QUOTE="trust_nobody"]

[QUOTE="Maqda7"] Second, they'd just promote more tube-snipping surgeries. Maqda7

I think you did okay :P.

I can see the Uncle Sam posters now, "I Want You To Go Gay!"

entropyecho

[QUOTE="entropyecho"]

I can see the Uncle Sam posters now, "I Want You To Go Gay!"

Bourbons3

[QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.HoolaHoopMan

Sure, because you can totally make people gay I frequently do thatxaos

Ssssh! They find out about us! :o

it will never happenAnti-Venom

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.snowyfleury

[QUOTE="snowyfleury"][QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"] Kind of like how homosexuality is prevalent in nature and other species? BumFluff122

[QUOTE="snowyfleury"][QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"] Kind of like how homosexuality is prevalent in nature and other species? BumFluff122

Couple things to point out, i never said that homosexuality wasn't natural, i was just saying that just because something happens in nature doesn't mean it is preferred. Some animals kill their mate right after mating, doesn't mean that we humans should do that. Also, he said that only monkeys and dolphins have sex for enjoyment, while you listed animals that have homosexual behavior. Not the same thing. And to counter your list anyway, there is maybe 150 species listed on that list, while there are millions of species on the planet, so by current research homosexual behavior isn't that popular or diverse.

Homosexuality is witnessed in some species, and in some cases only under special circumstances, so i wouldn't say that just because some animals do it means it is acceptable for us to do it. Basically, just because an animal does something doesn't meant that it is acceptable for a human to do it. And besides, anyone who is claiming that homosexuality is the only solution to massive population is dumb. Anyone who has been to northwestern USA knows that up in some of those states there is so much space for families to live on and farm. If people really want to fix an overcrowding problem, people just need to move, not start having less kids.

cgi15

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="snowyfleury"] only monkeys and dolphins, because they are the only other animals that enjoy intercourse.cgi15

Couple things to point out, i never said that homosexuality wasn't natural, i was just saying that just because something happens in nature doesn't mean it is preferred. Some animals kill their mate right after mating, doesn't mean that we humans should do that. Also, he said that only monkeys and dolphins have sex for enjoyment, while you listed animals that have homosexual behavior. Not the same thing. And to counter your list anyway, there is maybe 150 species listed on that list, while there are millions of species on the planet, so by current research homosexual behavior isn't that popular or diverse.

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

only monkeys and dolphins, because they are the only other animals that enjoy intercourse.snowyfleury

Couple things to point out, i never said that homosexuality wasn't natural, i was just saying that just because something happens in nature doesn't mean it is preferred. Some animals kill their mate right after mating, doesn't mean that we humans should do that. Also, he said that only monkeys and dolphins have sex for enjoyment, while you listed animals that have homosexual behavior. Not the same thing. And to counter your list anyway, there is maybe 150 species listed on that list, while there are millions of species on the planet, so by current research homosexual behavior isn't that popular or diverse.

[QUOTE="cgi15"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Rrrreeeaaalllyyyyy......

Maniacc1

Couple things to point out, i never said that homosexuality wasn't natural, i was just saying that just because something happens in nature doesn't mean it is preferred. Some animals kill their mate right after mating, doesn't mean that we humans should do that. Also, he said that only monkeys and dolphins have sex for enjoyment, while you listed animals that have homosexual behavior. Not the same thing. And to counter your list anyway, there is maybe 150 species listed on that list, while there are millions of species on the planet, so by current research homosexual behavior isn't that popular or diverse.

The Ancient Romans and the Greeks practiced pedaestry, although the males are expected to marry eventually/hiphops_savior

[QUOTE="Maniacc1"][QUOTE="cgi15"]

Couple things to point out, i never said that homosexuality wasn't natural, i was just saying that just because something happens in nature doesn't mean it is preferred. Some animals kill their mate right after mating, doesn't mean that we humans should do that. Also, he said that only monkeys and dolphins have sex for enjoyment, while you listed animals that have homosexual behavior. Not the same thing. And to counter your list anyway, there is maybe 150 species listed on that list, while there are millions of species on the planet, so by current research homosexual behavior isn't that popular or diverse.

xaos

No, I think its that we shouldn't eat our mates after sex

If government really need to control population a more viable option probably would be to surgically make people sterile. As for homosexuality I don't see the government pushing for it per se, but I would wager the general attitude towards it to be a lot more tolerant than it is today.

No, we wont face that cause we are facing a MASSIVE population DECLINE atm. In europe and Americas the birthrate per family on average is less than 1 or around 1 meaning in 20 years when the majority of older generation dies off, we will be a much smaller population.Dr_Brocoli

they would just ban having kids for a few yrsweezyfb

[QUOTE="weezyfb"]they would just ban having kids for a few yrsMgamerBD

Sure, because you can totally make people gay I frequently do thatxaos

This population bomb is a bunch of BS. Technology will improve and crop yields will increase.

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="snowyfleury"] only monkeys and dolphins, because they are the only other animals that enjoy intercourse.cgi15

Couple things to point out, i never said that homosexuality wasn't natural, i was just saying that just because something happens in nature doesn't mean it is preferred. Some animals kill their mate right after mating, doesn't mean that we humans should do that. Also, he said that only monkeys and dolphins have sex for enjoyment, while you listed animals that have homosexual behavior. Not the same thing. And to counter your list anyway, there is maybe 150 species listed on that list, while there are millions of species on the planet, so by current research homosexual behavior isn't that popular or diverse.

[QUOTE="MgamerBD"][QUOTE="weezyfb"]they would just ban having kids for a few yrssSubZerOo

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="MgamerBD"] agreed. When the population goes back down. Then we can get busy again.BumFluff122