massive population will lead to g@y relations?(fictional situation)

Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

[QUOTE="Dr_Brocoli"]No, we wont face that cause we are facing a MASSIVE population DECLINE atm. In europe and Americas the birthrate per family on average is less than 1 or around 1 meaning in 20 years when the majority of older generation dies off, we will be a much smaller population.sSubZerOo

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Dr_Brocoli"]No, we wont face that cause we are facing a MASSIVE population DECLINE atm. In europe and Americas the birthrate per family on average is less than 1 or around 1 meaning in 20 years when the majority of older generation dies off, we will be a much smaller population.Frattracide

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] Population historically speaking only goes down if one of three things happen.. War, an epidemic , or famine.. One of these things will happen when population hits critical mass.AirGuitarist87

[QUOTE="Frattracide"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] ... Those by no way means that population growth is slowing.. You named off two of the most developed places in the world.. China, India, numerous other developing nations are having huge population problems.. Furthermore if it were not for advances in genetically modified crops we would only be able to support 2/3rds of the population, while another 2 ibllion or so starved to death.F1_2004

That seems like an easy mistake to make.

[QUOTE="cgi15"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Rrrreeeaaalllyyyyy......

BumFluff122

Couple things to point out, i never said that homosexuality wasn't natural, i was just saying that just because something happens in nature doesn't mean it is preferred. Some animals kill their mate right after mating, doesn't mean that we humans should do that. Also, he said that only monkeys and dolphins have sex for enjoyment, while you listed animals that have homosexual behavior. Not the same thing. And to counter your list anyway, there is maybe 150 species listed on that list, while there are millions of species on the planet, so by current research homosexual behavior isn't that popular or diverse.

I never actually denied that homosexuality was natural. I completely agree that it is natural. What i was trying to say is that being natural should not be a reason why homosexuality is acceptable. Because one can use the nature argement as a way of saying that some things we do is acceptable(many animalseat meat so we can eat meat too, no problem there)but also as a way of saying that some things we do aren't acceptable(many animals eat dirt so wecan eat dirt too, kind of an issue there.) I don't really have a stance on homosexuality, i just don't like the whole natural argument for it because it can go both ways.

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="cgi15"]

Couple things to point out, i never said that homosexuality wasn't natural, i was just saying that just because something happens in nature doesn't mean it is preferred. Some animals kill their mate right after mating, doesn't mean that we humans should do that. Also, he said that only monkeys and dolphins have sex for enjoyment, while you listed animals that have homosexual behavior. Not the same thing. And to counter your list anyway, there is maybe 150 species listed on that list, while there are millions of species on the planet, so by current research homosexual behavior isn't that popular or diverse.

I never actually denied that homosexuality was natural. I completely agree that it is natural. What i was trying to say is that being natural should not be a reason why homosexuality is acceptable. Because one can use the nature argement as a way of saying that some things we do is acceptable(many animalseat meat so we can eat meat too, no problem there)but also as a way of saying that some things we do aren't acceptable(many animals eat dirt so wecan eat dirt too, kind of an issue there.) I don't really have a stance on homosexuality, i just don't like the whole natural argument for it because it can go both ways.

Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

I would be up for that. It would satisfy any bi-curious fantasies we may have.

It would be more likely for genocide or mass sterilization to occur than the scenario you presented. People can't just clap their hands and change their orientations on the go, so its effectuality will be questionable.

I was reading a summary of a book that in the future the worlds government and overall all society was encouraging homosexual relationships with one another to stop child birth and it would actually be illegal if you have more than one child.You know teachers teaching that it's ok to be gay perants asking their children to find good mates to be with. Do you think this could ever become a probable situation in the future? What are your thoughts on this? would be pro or against this sort of future?

CoolSkAGuy

This will never happen, especially what I have bolded. No one would tolerate this and would revolt if a law like this would be implemented. Besides, a person cannot be encouraged or forced to accept a sexual preference.

One can't make someone be attracted to the opposite sex or same sex. You either are or your not. btaylor2404

[QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ps3gamer2009

Jeebus came down from Mt. Olympus and told me it was wrong.........

Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

Indeed sir, Indeed.

Is everyone forgetting that gay people can still have children? And how exactly do you make someone a homosexual?

Is everyone forgetting that gay people can still have children? And how exactly do you make someone a homosexual?

PeaceChild90

[QUOTE="PeaceChild90"]

Is everyone forgetting that gay people can still have children? And how exactly do you make someone a homosexual?

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="PeaceChild90"]

Is everyone forgetting that gay people can still have children? And how exactly do you make someone a homosexual?

Johnny-n-Roger

[QUOTE="PeaceChild90"]

Is everyone forgetting that gay people can still have children? And how exactly do you make someone a homosexual?

BumFluff122

Its kind of hard to pass on your genes when you aren't having sex whith the opposite sex. Kind of kills the gay gene theory for you.

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="PeaceChild90"]

Is everyone forgetting that gay people can still have children? And how exactly do you make someone a homosexual?

magnax1

Its kind of hard to pass on your genes when you aren't having sex whith the opposite sex. Kind of kills the gay gene theory for you.

Its kind of hard to pass on your genes when you aren't having sex whith the opposite sex. Kind of kills the gay gene theory for you.

magnax1

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]genetic alteration.

xaos

Its kind of hard to pass on your genes when you aren't having sex whith the opposite sex. Kind of kills the gay gene theory for you.

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

Its kind of hard to pass on your genes when you aren't having sex whith the opposite sex. Kind of kills the gay gene theory for you.

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

Its kind of hard to pass on your genes when you aren't having sex whith the opposite sex. Kind of kills the gay gene theory for you.

BumFluff122

Yeah, but the gene would still die out sooner rather than Later. Difference is, people with blue eyes (and the recessive gene that comes with it) still want to have sex with people with brown eyes. I'm not saying its completely a choice(whether something leans you towards it doesn't mean you don't have a choice). There have been some studies lately that point towards it being because of hormone imbalances in the mothers womb.

[QUOTE="btaylor2404"]One can't make someone be attracted to the opposite sex or same sex. You either are or your not. sSubZerOo

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

Its kind of hard to pass on your genes when you aren't having sex whith the opposite sex. Kind of kills the gay gene theory for you.

magnax1

Yeah, but the gene would still die out sooner rather than Later. Difference is, people with blue eyes (and the recessive gene that comes with it) still want to have sex with people with brown eyes. I'm not saying its completely a choice(whether something leans you towards it doesn't mean you don't have a choice). There have been some studies lately that point towards it being because of hormone imbalances in the mothers womb.

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.snowyfleury

How would you know?

[QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.HoolaHoopMan

Erm realy?

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.chaplainDMK

Erm realy?

Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

Only because we have been lead to believe that.Theres absolutaly nothing wrong with being with someone you love, someone that makes you really happy. Even if they are the same sex.

Although the world would be totally fabulous, I don't think it would happen. ;)

Hey OP, is the book you're talking about The Forever War?

Population growth is currently in decline. And if current rates continue, we could see general world depopulation by the end of this century. That is, we could see more deaths than births over the course of a year. So I don't think that scenario is very likely.

[QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.AudioPrison

Only because we have been lead to believe that.Theres absolutaly nothing wrong with being with someone you love, someone that makes you really happy. Even if they are the same sex.

[QUOTE="AudioPrison"]

[QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]Homosexualism is wrong, in my opinion. It should be a woman and a man, like it was meant to be, naturally.ZAGAV3

Only because we have been lead to believe that.Theres absolutaly nothing wrong with being with someone you love, someone that makes you really happy. Even if they are the same sex.