[QUOTE="Allicrombie"]damn, thought Hallenbeck would win.ExoticAnimalI think I will vote for you just out of spite. :P
Do it. I already did and yes I was serious but someone was rather...err fast on the draw shall we say.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I wish we could get a System Wars mod up in here. Sure we were first but we had a streak of some OT mods.
My bad, I picked these out but didn't realize I was being bias, we'll even out the pkaying field the following week
Anyways russ, what are the best toppings on a pizza?
Italian sausage, awesome stuff!
what is your ideal date
Quiet dinner for two, hopefully there will be dinner rolls
wait are we on allicrombie yet?
No, can I still have the dinner rolls?
I'm Darth's sole voter?
What is the matter with you people.
SolidRuss what is the matter with these people?
I think it's something in the tap water
I wish we could get a System Wars mod up in here. Sure we were first but we had a streak of some OT mods.
My bad, I picked these out but didn't realize I was being bias, we'll even out the pkaying field the following week.
verbtex
Don't worry, I'm not calling you out on anything. I'm not accusing you of bias. I just was hoping for a little more vareity. I'm not disappointed, just being a little spoiled. :P
Oh, good. Quick question: Do you feel that a community such as this should be able to elect those that rule them/enforce the rules or have those people chosen for them? ...basically, it is the age old question of the people knowing what is best for them versus those in charge knowing what is best for the people. What say you???Is Russ still answering questions or have we moved on?
As far as I know until Wednesday
rawsavon
You're asking about a major change in policy of which I can't really say much about. That being said any kind of "election" would always be a fail, as it would turn into a popularity contest of which "elected" users may or may not uphold the Terms of Use. It's all about "track record" so to speak
Asumming you had a special emblem for yourself, custom tailored and all, what would it be/why would you have it?
I would love a Stone Cold Steve Austin one, for obvious reasons
Oh, good. Quick question: Do you feel that a community such as this should be able to elect those that rule them/enforce the rules or have those people chosen for them? ...basically, it is the age old question of the people knowing what is best for them versus those in charge knowing what is best for the people. What say you???[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
Is Russ still answering questions or have we moved on?
As far as I know until Wednesday
rawsavon
You're asking about a major change in policy of which I can't really say much about. That being said any kind of "election" would always be a fail, as it would turn into a popularity contest of which "elected" users may or may not uphold the Terms of Use. It's all about "track record" so to speak
The 'popular' person is usually the one who wins an election...that is just part of the process. It is what they do while 'in office' that determines if their popularity/approval remains high enough to keep their position. So obviously: 1. elections would not be permanent like the supreme court 2. they would still have to follow the 'law' (like elected officials are supposed to do...in theory) Thoughts?Would never work in this environment, if we did it that way Ryan the God would be in charge, enough said.
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]Oh, good. Quick question: Do you feel that a community such as this should be able to elect those that rule them/enforce the rules or have those people chosen for them? ...basically, it is the age old question of the people knowing what is best for them versus those in charge knowing what is best for the people. What say you???[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
Is Russ still answering questions or have we moved on?
As far as I know until Wednesday
rawsavon
You're asking about a major change in policy of which I can't really say much about. That being said any kind of "election" would always be a fail, as it would turn into a popularity contest of which "elected" users may or may not uphold the Terms of Use. It's all about "track record" so to speak
The 'popular' person is usually the one who wins an election...that is just part of the process. It is what they do while 'in office' that determines if their popularity/approval remains high enough to keep their position. So obviously: 1. elections would not be permanent like the supreme court 2. they would still have to follow the 'law' (like elected officials are supposed to do...in theory) Thoughts?Why are you talking to yourself Raw ? :shock:
The 'popular' person is usually the one who wins an election...that is just part of the process. It is what they do while 'in office' that determines if their popularity/approval remains high enough to keep their position. So obviously: 1. elections would not be permanent like the supreme court 2. they would still have to follow the 'law' (like elected officials are supposed to do...in theory) Thoughts?[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Oh, good. Quick question: Do you feel that a community such as this should be able to elect those that rule them/enforce the rules or have those people chosen for them? ...basically, it is the age old question of the people knowing what is best for them versus those in charge knowing what is best for the people. What say you???
You're asking about a major change in policy of which I can't really say much about. That being said any kind of "election" would always be a fail, as it would turn into a popularity contest of which "elected" users may or may not uphold the Terms of Use. It's all about "track record" so to speak
indzman
Why are you talking to yourself Raw ? :shock:
...best conversations I ever have tbh >_>Ryan the GodrawsavonIDK who that is but the way you mentioned him makes him seem like the kind of guy I'd like to know.
[QUOTE="indzman"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] The 'popular' person is usually the one who wins an election...that is just part of the process. It is what they do while 'in office' that determines if their popularity/approval remains high enough to keep their position. So obviously: 1. elections would not be permanent like the supreme court 2. they would still have to follow the 'law' (like elected officials are supposed to do...in theory) Thoughts?rawsavon
Why are you talking to yourself Raw ? :shock:
...best conversations I ever have tbh >_>We can always learn something new and exciting from you :D
[QUOTE="SCSA"]Ryan the GodJandurinIDK who that is but the way you mentioned him makes him seem like the kind of guy I'd like to know. Yes, I would like to hear said story to user as well please.
He was a staple of OT years ago, some say he was a spammer, others say he was a clever troll, well known in OT culture at the time. I'll leave personal opinions to myself, but I never had a problem with him personally
What is your all time favorite Stone Cold match?
Hard to say, he had so many. His Undertaker matches were all good, Mankind, etc.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment