This topic is locked from further discussion.
profiling specifically based on their religion or ethnicity is stupid, inefficient and insulting.. 9/11 was a horrible incident but it does not create this rational response because statistically there are far greater dangers for air planes or every day life than anything remotely coming close to a person possibly being a terrorist.sSubZerOoI agree with you that using religion as the sole ingredient for profiliing is inefficient. That being said, it is no less efficient that "random" searches. To me that makes no sense whatsoever. Profiling should be done but based on a combination of things. Appearance, mannerisms, is this person acting in a strange way, are they wearing multiple layers even though it's the middle of the summer. I'm not in law enforcement so I don't know the tricks of the trade, but I'm certain that there are MUCH better ways we could be using our resources. That being said, I'm still completely comfortable with pilots being able to make last minute judgement calls. If a pilot routinely kicks off people of a certain race or religion then I would think that he wouldn't be a pilot for very long. In this specific case, and again to mention the "hightened" government alerts, he followed his instincts and I'm not about to fault him for that.
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]profiling specifically based on their religion or ethnicity is stupid, inefficient and insulting.. 9/11 was a horrible incident but it does not create this rational response because statistically there are far greater dangers for air planes or every day life than anything remotely coming close to a person possibly being a terrorist.YellowOneKinobiI agree with you that using religion as the sole ingredient for profiliing is inefficient. That being said, it is no less efficient that "random" searches. To me that makes no sense whatsoever. Profiling should be done but based on a combination of things. Appearance, mannerisms, is this person acting in a strange way, are they wearing multiple layers even though it's the middle of the summer. I'm not in law enforcement so I don't know the tricks of the trade, but I'm certain that there are MUCH better ways we could be using our resources. That being said, I'm still completely comfortable with pilots being able to make last minute judgement calls. If a pilot routinely kicks off people of a certain race or religion then I would think that he wouldn't be a pilot for very long. In this specific case, and again to mention the "hightened" government alerts, he followed his instincts and I'm not about to fault him for that.
.. He makes judgement calls on landing the plane.. He is not security.. As far as I am concerned this pilot should be fired on the spot... He specifically refused to fly with them because they were Muslims.. He had no idea how they acted because he never saw them.. There are security people on the plane you know.. As well as a extremely thorough security check before flight.
Did people not read the article, he walked down the asile and started pounding on the cockpit door, anyone who did this would be kick off the plane.
I agree with you that using religion as the sole ingredient for profiliing is inefficient. That being said, it is no less efficient that "random" searches. To me that makes no sense whatsoever. Profiling should be done but based on a combination of things. Appearance, mannerisms, is this person acting in a strange way, are they wearing multiple layers even though it's the middle of the summer. I'm not in law enforcement so I don't know the tricks of the trade, but I'm certain that there are MUCH better ways we could be using our resources. That being said, I'm still completely comfortable with pilots being able to make last minute judgement calls. If a pilot routinely kicks off people of a certain race or religion then I would think that he wouldn't be a pilot for very long. In this specific case, and again to mention the "hightened" government alerts, he followed his instincts and I'm not about to fault him for that.[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]profiling specifically based on their religion or ethnicity is stupid, inefficient and insulting.. 9/11 was a horrible incident but it does not create this rational response because statistically there are far greater dangers for air planes or every day life than anything remotely coming close to a person possibly being a terrorist.sSubZerOo
.. He makes judgement calls on landing the plane.. He is not security.. As far as I am concerned this pilot should be fired on the spot... He specifically refused to fly with them because they were Muslims.. He had no idea how they acted because he never saw them.. There are security people on the plane you know.. As well as a extremely thorough security check before flight.
The pilot has every right to kick people off before a flight as a matter of airline policy, so I'm not sure what you are talking about.I'm also not sure what you mean by security people on the plane, as not all flights have air marshalls.
You are talking about the one of the "other" incidents that happenedthat day. This is a different one.Did people not read the article, he walked down the asile and started pounding on the cockpit door, anyone who did this would be kick off the plane.
Shrimp_Scampi
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] I agree with you that using religion as the sole ingredient for profiliing is inefficient. That being said, it is no less efficient that "random" searches. To me that makes no sense whatsoever. Profiling should be done but based on a combination of things. Appearance, mannerisms, is this person acting in a strange way, are they wearing multiple layers even though it's the middle of the summer. I'm not in law enforcement so I don't know the tricks of the trade, but I'm certain that there are MUCH better ways we could be using our resources. That being said, I'm still completely comfortable with pilots being able to make last minute judgement calls. If a pilot routinely kicks off people of a certain race or religion then I would think that he wouldn't be a pilot for very long. In this specific case, and again to mention the "hightened" government alerts, he followed his instincts and I'm not about to fault him for that.YellowOneKinobi
.. He makes judgement calls on landing the plane.. He is not security.. As far as I am concerned this pilot should be fired on the spot... He specifically refused to fly with them because they were Muslims.. He had no idea how they acted because he never saw them.. There are security people on the plane you know.. As well as a extremely thorough security check before flight.
The pilot has every right to kick people off before a flight as a matter of airline policy, so I'm not sure what you are talking about.I'm also not sure what you mean by security people on the plane, as not all flights have air marshalls.
No a pilot does not.. Pilots do not see their passangers to ever make the callof kicking them off for suspicious manner.. He kicked them off speciifcally because they were Muslim.. That in it self is unlawful and they should can his ass.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42989847 uhuh...8 month old baby patted down after an explosives alarm went off on the stroller...really?...you couldn't just tell that the 8 month old wasn't packing C4?... :| Omni-Slash
The 8 month old didn't pack it, but the mother sure could have packed it on the baby, thinking it wouldnt get searched.
The pilot has every right to kick people off before a flight as a matter of airline policy, so I'm not sure what you are talking about.[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
.. He makes judgement calls on landing the plane.. He is not security.. As far as I am concerned this pilot should be fired on the spot... He specifically refused to fly with them because they were Muslims.. He had no idea how they acted because he never saw them.. There are security people on the plane you know.. As well as a extremely thorough security check before flight.
sSubZerOo
I'm also not sure what you mean by security people on the plane, as not all flights have air marshalls.
No a pilot does not.. Pilots do not see their passangers to ever make the callof kicking them off for suspicious manner.. He kicked them off speciifcally because they were Muslim.. That in it self is unlawful and they should can his ass.
You're flat out wrong saying that a pilot does not have the discression to remove passengers before take-off, so I really don't know how to argue with you if you don't have the basic facts right.Further, I've been on flights where the pilot greets some passengers so again, I really don't know how to argue with you.
and I'm pretty sure you don't need to pat down a 8 month old to tell if it has it or not...8 month olds don't have teh spaces to hide it...The 8 month old didn't pack it, but the mother sure could have packed it on the baby, thinking it wouldnt get searched.
Shrimp_Scampi
actually on a plane...a Pilot's Word is law....he can choose to have anyone removed for any reason...sure it can be challenged in a court if his reason is unjust...but he has final say...No a pilot does not.. Pilots do not see their passangers to ever make the callof kicking them off for suspicious manner.. He kicked them off speciifcally because they were Muslim.. That in it self is unlawful and they should can his ass.
sSubZerOo
Is that necessarily bad? If so, why?Imagine a Christian was denied a job at a daycare facility because some priests are paedophiles. What do you think the public reaction would be?[QUOTE="HNNNGH"][QUOTE="daqua_99"]This is a clearly cut case of discrimination based on religion.BuryMe
It's the same situation here. There is absolutely no reason to say these 2 passengers had any ill intent, and they were denied their flight simple because of how they looked. There is nothing good or reasonable about that.
Bafflement as to why someone who wasn't a priest was denied a job because of people who were?How do you figure that a bomb blowing up on a plane in mid air doesn't put lives at stake? I'd like to hear your rationale on this. That was the potential of the situation and the reason the pilot refused, because of the lives at stake if a bomb were to blow up on the plane, thus lives were at stake. How is that biased?I think your poll is a little biased. There were no lives at stake in the story you quoted.
It was pure discrimination.
BuryMe
No a pilot does not.. Pilots do not see their passangers to ever make the callof kicking them off for suspicious manner.. He kicked them off speciifcally because they were Muslim.. That in it self is unlawful and they should can his ass.
sSubZerOo
I find it ammusing that you believe the guy actually flying the plane has no say in such a matter.
[QUOTE="BuryMe"]How do you figure that a bomb blowing up on a plane in mid air doesn't put lives at stake? I'd like to hear your rationale on this. That was the potential of the situation and the reason the pilot refused, because of the lives at stake if a bomb were to blow up on the plane, thus lives were at stake. How is that biased? Muslim =/= terrorist. The pilot saw two Muslims and immediately jumped to "bombs on a plane." The presence of Muslims on a plane is not a security risk. Especially Muslims that passed the TSA search.I think your poll is a little biased. There were no lives at stake in the story you quoted.
It was pure discrimination.
KeitekeTokage
Then why don't YOU get off the plane? Why do two people have to postpone or cancel their travel arrangements just because YOU are uncomfortable with their presence?If I walked onto a plane and saw guys that looked like this:
...in all honesty, I would be very edgy and put off from flying. I'm sure a lot of other people would be exactly the same.
I'm not saying what happened is right or wrong, I'm just throwing that out there.
-Unreal-
[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"][QUOTE="BuryMe"]How do you figure that a bomb blowing up on a plane in mid air doesn't put lives at stake? I'd like to hear your rationale on this. That was the potential of the situation and the reason the pilot refused, because of the lives at stake if a bomb were to blow up on the plane, thus lives were at stake. How is that biased? Muslim =/= terrorist. The pilot saw two Muslims and immediately jumped to "bombs on a plane." The presence of Muslims on a plane is not a security risk. Especially Muslims that passed the TSA search. You have absolutely no idea as to what another person (in this case the pilot)is thinking. Nor do you know if the two people in question inadvertently acted in a way that caused the pilot to be suspicious.I think your poll is a little biased. There were no lives at stake in the story you quoted.
It was pure discrimination.
Theokhoth
In addition, as a commercial pilot, do you think he has never made a flight with muslims on board?
[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"][QUOTE="BuryMe"]How do you figure that a bomb blowing up on a plane in mid air doesn't put lives at stake? I'd like to hear your rationale on this. That was the potential of the situation and the reason the pilot refused, because of the lives at stake if a bomb were to blow up on the plane, thus lives were at stake. How is that biased? Muslim =/= terrorist. The pilot saw two Muslims and immediately jumped to "bombs on a plane." The presence of Muslims on a plane is not a security risk. Especially Muslims that passed the TSA search. I didn't say that did I? The pilots judgement was obviously that they had a threatening demeanor about them. The user I was responding to said the poll was biased because there were no lives at stake. I pointed out that lives were potentially at stake. That was the whole point of the story.I think your poll is a little biased. There were no lives at stake in the story you quoted.
It was pure discrimination.
Theokhoth
[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"][QUOTE="BuryMe"]How do you figure that a bomb blowing up on a plane in mid air doesn't put lives at stake? I'd like to hear your rationale on this. That was the potential of the situation and the reason the pilot refused, because of the lives at stake if a bomb were to blow up on the plane, thus lives were at stake. How is that biased? Muslim =/= terrorist. The pilot saw two Muslims and immediately jumped to "bombs on a plane." The presence of Muslims on a plane is not a security risk. Especially Muslims that passed the TSA search.'risk' is very much a shades-of-grey issue. I point this out in the hope of preventing a crappy derailment about whether they were a risk or not.I think your poll is a little biased. There were no lives at stake in the story you quoted.
It was pure discrimination.
Theokhoth
Muslim =/= terrorist. The pilot saw two Muslims and immediately jumped to "bombs on a plane." The presence of Muslims on a plane is not a security risk. Especially Muslims that passed the TSA search. You have absolutely no idea as to what another person (in this case the pilot)is thinking. Nor do you know if the two people in question inadvertently acted in a way that caused the pilot to be suspicious.[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"] How do you figure that a bomb blowing up on a plane in mid air doesn't put lives at stake? I'd like to hear your rationale on this. That was the potential of the situation and the reason the pilot refused, because of the lives at stake if a bomb were to blow up on the plane, thus lives were at stake. How is that biased?YellowOneKinobi
In addition, as a commercial pilot, do you think he has never made a flight with muslims on board?
What could they possibly have done to make them look suspicious? Go to the bathroom for too long? Speak to eachother in Arabic? Whether he's had muslims on board or not is irrelevant to the fact that he just kicked two people off his plane for being Muslims. There is no other possible reason.[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]You have absolutely no idea as to what another person (in this case the pilot)is thinking. Nor do you know if the two people in question inadvertently acted in a way that caused the pilot to be suspicious.[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Muslim =/= terrorist. The pilot saw two Muslims and immediately jumped to "bombs on a plane." The presence of Muslims on a plane is not a security risk. Especially Muslims that passed the TSA search.Theokhoth
In addition, as a commercial pilot, do you think he has never made a flight with muslims on board?
What could they possibly have done to make them look suspicious? Go to the bathroom for too long? Speak to eachother in Arabic? Whether he's had muslims on board or not is irrelevant to the fact that he just kicked two people off his plane for being Muslims. There is no other possible reason. I'll have to wait to see what the pilot says caused him to be suspicious because (unlike you it seems) I don't pretend to know what others are thinking.And if you are painting this pilot as some sort of racist, islamaphobe or something like that, then his career and history of not having any issues with muslims is far from irrelevant.
There is no other possible reason.TheokhothWTF?..how can you possibly know that?...this guy could have completely been a racist asshat...or he could have noticed what he deemed to be suspicious behavior....you don't know wither way..and neither do I...but I'm not jumping down this guys throat pretending I do....
Why are people feeling bad for the Muslims? They now get to sue the **** out of AA, win, collect an "undisclosed" amount of money and ______ .
I WISH like hell something like this would happen to me.
What could they possibly have done to make them look suspicious? Go to the bathroom for too long? Speak to eachother in Arabic? Whether he's had muslims on board or not is irrelevant to the fact that he just kicked two people off his plane for being Muslims. There is no other possible reason. I'll have to wait to see what the pilot says caused him to be suspicious because (unlike you it seems) I don't pretend to know what others are thinking.[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] You have absolutely no idea as to what another person (in this case the pilot)is thinking. Nor do you know if the two people in question inadvertently acted in a way that caused the pilot to be suspicious.
In addition, as a commercial pilot, do you think he has never made a flight with muslims on board?
YellowOneKinobi
And if you are painting this pilot as some sort of racist, islamaphobe or something like that, then his career and history of not having any issues with muslims is far from irrelevant.
Still waiting for any possible reason to kick off two TSA-validated passengers that doesn't reek of racism or islamophobia. Here are a few possibilities: Went to the bathroom for too long--why doesn't the pilot kick off anyone who has an upset stomach? Speaking in Arabic--why doesn't the pilot kick off any non-English speaker? One or both of them are jittery--same goes for anyone afraid of flying.[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]There is no other possible reason.Omni-SlashWTF?..how can you possibly know that?...this guy could have completely been a racist asshat...or he could have noticed what he deemed to be suspicious behavior....you don't know wither way..and neither do I...but I'm not jumping down this guys throat pretending I do.... Yes, he noticed what deems to be suspicious behavior from two passengers, both of whom are muslim and did absolutely nothing to warrant it, and kicks both of them off the plane even though they did nothing warranting suspicion or getting kicked off. If they brandished a knife or yelled "death to America" then we have a valid case.
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]There is no other possible reason.Omni-SlashWTF?..how can you possibly know that?...this guy could have completely been a racist asshat...or he could have noticed what he deemed to be suspicious behavior....you don't know wither way..and neither do I...but I'm not jumping down this guys throat pretending I do.... it is obvious he has kicked off every other islamic person right? let us frame our whole view on one instance, it is sure to bring us to the proper conclusion
Pretty dumb move from the pilot. If nothing dangerous was found then why should they get off the plane. They were probably searched pretty thourougly judging by the way the look (no offence to anyone). the paranoid pilot obviously panicked and unfortuantely these two men were the victims of his paranoia,
[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]You have absolutely no idea as to what another person (in this case the pilot)is thinking. Nor do you know if the two people in question inadvertently acted in a way that caused the pilot to be suspicious.[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Muslim =/= terrorist. The pilot saw two Muslims and immediately jumped to "bombs on a plane." The presence of Muslims on a plane is not a security risk. Especially Muslims that passed the TSA search.Theokhoth
In addition, as a commercial pilot, do you think he has never made a flight with muslims on board?
What could they possibly have done to make them look suspicious? Go to the bathroom for too long? Speak to eachother in Arabic? Whether he's had muslims on board or not is irrelevant to the fact that he just kicked two people off his plane for being Muslims. There is no other possible reason. Surely the recent killing of Osama and fear of retaliation played a factor in this. And with all the media reports coming out warning of possible stand alone attacks coming out of intelligence from the Bin Laden compound, it doesn't surprise me that citizens would be on high alert, especially on an airlines. You seem to be under the impression that the pilots judgement was ultimately racist, yet we have no evidence that this happens on a regular basis with this pilot. I'm perfectly fine with our pilots making a final judgement on things like this, and if you're so offended perhaps you should get off the plane with them to make them feel better. As far as we know he hasn't done this once since 9/11 occured, nor any times before that, so to suggest he's racist is just off base.Still waiting for any possible reason to kick off two TSA-validated passengers that doesn't reek of racism or islamophobia. Here are a few possibilities: Went to the bathroom for too long--why doesn't the pilot kick off anyone who has an upset stomach? Speaking in Arabic--why doesn't the pilot kick off any non-English speaker? One or both of them are jittery--same goes for anyone afraid of flying.Theokhothman your act gets old.....everyone whom doesn't view things the way you do is a racist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, Sexist...fill in the blank here....hell I find myself wanting to tell you to shove it even when I agree with what you're saying.......
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] You have absolutely no idea as to what another person (in this case the pilot)is thinking. Nor do you know if the two people in question inadvertently acted in a way that caused the pilot to be suspicious.What could they possibly have done to make them look suspicious? Go to the bathroom for too long? Speak to eachother in Arabic? Whether he's had muslims on board or not is irrelevant to the fact that he just kicked two people off his plane for being Muslims. There is no other possible reason. Surely the recent killing of Osama and fear of retaliation played a factor in this. And with all the media reports coming out warning of possible stand alone attacks coming out of intelligence from the Bin Laden compound, it doesn't surprise me that citizens would be on high alert, especially on an airlines. You seem to be under the impression that the pilots judgement was ultimately racist, yet we have no evidence that this happens on a regular basis with this pilot. I'm perfectly fine with our pilots making a final judgement on things like this, and if you're so offended perhaps you should get off the plane with them to make them feel better. Last time I checked this doesn't happen everyday, so to suggest he's racist is just off base. Paranoia is not a valid reason to kick someone off a plane.In addition, as a commercial pilot, do you think he has never made a flight with muslims on board?
KeitekeTokage
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Still waiting for any possible reason to kick off two TSA-validated passengers that doesn't reek of racism or islamophobia. Here are a few possibilities: Went to the bathroom for too long--why doesn't the pilot kick off anyone who has an upset stomach? Speaking in Arabic--why doesn't the pilot kick off any non-English speaker? One or both of them are jittery--same goes for anyone afraid of flying.Omni-Slashman your act gets old.....everyone whom doesn't view things the way you do is a racist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, Sexist...fill in the blank here....hell I find myself wanting to tell you to shove it even when I agree with what you're saying....... Still waiting.
Yes, he noticed what deems to be suspicious behavior from two passengers, both of whom are muslim and did absolutely nothing to warrant it, and kicks both of them off the plane even though they did nothing warranting suspicion or getting kicked off. If they brandished a knife or yelled "death to America" then we have a valid case. Theokhothwere you on the plane...did you see what the pilot saw?...if not...you have no idea how they acted.....you could be right..you could be way off base....we don't know...to think otherwise is childish...
[QUOTE="Omni-Slash"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Still waiting for any possible reason to kick off two TSA-validated passengers that doesn't reek of racism or islamophobia. Here are a few possibilities: Went to the bathroom for too long--why doesn't the pilot kick off anyone who has an upset stomach? Speaking in Arabic--why doesn't the pilot kick off any non-English speaker? One or both of them are jittery--same goes for anyone afraid of flying.Theokhothman your act gets old.....everyone whom doesn't view things the way you do is a racist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, Sexist...fill in the blank here....hell I find myself wanting to tell you to shove it even when I agree with what you're saying....... Still waiting. You'll be waiting until the interviews with the pilot come out. Not everyone jumps to conclusions you know. Some of us like to have all the facts.
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Yes, he noticed what deems to be suspicious behavior from two passengers, both of whom are muslim and did absolutely nothing to warrant it, and kicks both of them off the plane even though they did nothing warranting suspicion or getting kicked off. If they brandished a knife or yelled "death to America" then we have a valid case. Omni-Slashwere you on the plane...did you see what the pilot saw?...if not...you have no idea how they acted.....you could be right..you could be way off base....we don't know...to think otherwise is childish... Man, anyone who disagrees with your view is childish, fill in the blank here.
[QUOTE="Omni-Slash"] for a date to the prom?....what are you waiting for?...surrealnumber5you to break the TOU meh you might as well report me....I'm sure I said something racist or homophobic or whatever....
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Omni-Slash"] man your act gets old.....everyone whom doesn't view things the way you do is a racist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, Sexist...fill in the blank here....hell I find myself wanting to tell you to shove it even when I agree with what you're saying.......YellowOneKinobiStill waiting. You'll be waiting until the interviews with the pilot come out. Not everyone jumps to conclusions you know. Some of us like to have all the facts. Others like to make up facts for themselves.
Man, anyone who disagrees with your view is childish, fill in the blank here.TheokhothI have no point of view on this other than to wait and see what the facts are...if that's childish toss me a passifier and some toys....
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]Man, anyone who disagrees with your view is childish, fill in the blank here.Omni-SlashI have no point of view on this other than to wait and see what the facts are...if that's childish toss me a passifier and some toys.... All I've done is ask exactly what possible reasons the pilot could have to kick them off the plane. I even gave a few, and why they wouldn't be valid. Nobody has answered this.
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]Man, anyone who disagrees with your view is childish, fill in the blank here.Omni-SlashI have no point of view on this other than to wait and see what the facts are...if that's childish toss me a passifier and some toys.... I've heard that passifiers are bad for babies because it messes with their teeth coming in straight. As a parent, do you know if that's true?
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Omni-Slash"] for a date to the prom?....what are you waiting for?...Omni-Slashyou to break the TOU meh you might as well report me....I'm sure I said something racist or homophobic or whatever.... kinda why i have stopped "debating", if you want to call it that, with a short list of circular logic fairies.
and just to make sure it is clear,by fairies i mean whimsical creatures that one would assume unable to be real
[QUOTE="Omni-Slash"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Still waiting for any possible reason to kick off two TSA-validated passengers that doesn't reek of racism or islamophobia. Here are a few possibilities: Went to the bathroom for too long--why doesn't the pilot kick off anyone who has an upset stomach? Speaking in Arabic--why doesn't the pilot kick off any non-English speaker? One or both of them are jittery--same goes for anyone afraid of flying.Theokhothman your act gets old.....everyone whom doesn't view things the way you do is a racist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, Sexist...fill in the blank here....hell I find myself wanting to tell you to shove it even when I agree with what you're saying....... Still waiting. It doesn't appear to me you're waiting, it appears you've already come to the conclusion that the pilot is a racist despite absolutely no evidence to suggest racist behavior in the past. You also seem to think the pilot has no right to make a judgement call on this, which he does. Furthermore, I hate to break this to you, but I've seen several stories recently within the past few months of TSA screwing up, I'll cite them in my next post. Perhaps you should wait for interviews with the pilot and passengers like all the other grown ups are?
I've heard that passifiers are bad for babies because it messes with their teeth coming in straight. As a parent, do you know if that's true?YellowOneKinobiI never used them for either of my boys....but jsut like anything else I'm sure if they kids use them for too long it'll mess with them...I always had an issuie with parents that just shove things in their kids mouth to shut them up rather than figuring out what they need.....
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Omni-Slash"] man your act gets old.....everyone whom doesn't view things the way you do is a racist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, Sexist...fill in the blank here....hell I find myself wanting to tell you to shove it even when I agree with what you're saying.......KeitekeTokageStill waiting. It doesn't appear to me you're waiting, it appears you've already come to the conclusion that the pilot is a racist despite absolutely no evidence to suggest racist behavior in the past. You also seem to think the pilot has no right to make a judgement call on this, which he does. Furthermore, I hate to break this to you, I've seen several stories recently within the past few months of TSA screwing up, I'll cite them in my next source. Perhaps you should wait for interviews with the pilot and passengers like all the other grown ups are? Even if he has never done a single racist thing before, ever, in hthough word or deed, that does not mean he can't now. What he has or has not done in the past is utterly irrelevant. Suicide bombers never blew up a plane before.
The pilot has the right to make a judgment call; if the call is stupid and based on paranoia, however, then he should be reprimanded for it. Otherwise, what's to stop this or any other pilot from making any kind of stupid decision in the future? Or is asking a pilot to be responsible too much for you?
Keep up with all the "grown ups" comments; I haven't insulted any of you yet you're the ones claiming to be the grown ups here.
The actions of a few shouldn't define an entire group of people.CammiTacBut it does. That's why people still hate black people and Muslims are still hated.
[QUOTE="CammiTac"]The actions of a few shouldn't define an entire group of people.XiaolinPrincessBut it does. That's why people still hate black people and Muslims are still hated. So people hating someone because of their skin colour is the same as hating someone because of their choice in their beliefs....
It doesn't appear to me you're waiting, it appears you've already come to the conclusion that the pilot is a racist despite absolutely no evidence to suggest racist behavior in the past. You also seem to think the pilot has no right to make a judgement call on this, which he does. Furthermore, I hate to break this to you, I've seen several stories recently within the past few months of TSA screwing up, I'll cite them in my next source. Perhaps you should wait for interviews with the pilot and passengers like all the other grown ups are? Even if he has never done a single racist thing before, ever, in hthough word or deed, that does not mean he can't now. What he has or has not done in the past is utterly irrelevant. Suicide bombers never blew up a plane before.[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Still waiting.Theokhoth
The pilot has the right to make a judgment call; if the call is stupid and based on paranoia, however, then he should be reprimanded for it. Otherwise, what's to stop this or any other pilot from making any kind of stupid decision in the future? Or is asking a pilot to be responsible too much for you?
Keep up with all the "grown ups" comments; I haven't insulted any of you yet you're the ones claiming to be the grown ups here.
Settle down, there's no reason for you to get your undies in a twist. All were asking you is to try to not jump to conclusions and wait for the full story from both sides to come out, which isn't what you're doing. Actually, they've tried to do so, ever hear of the underwear bomber? And I don't know why it matters if they have or not, if they had the opportunity they would. So what you're saying is that the pilot can make the judgement call, but Theokhoth makes the judgement call on that judgement call before the full story has come out? ;)Muslim =/= terrorist. The pilot saw two Muslims and immediately jumped to "bombs on a plane." The presence of Muslims on a plane is not a security risk. Especially Muslims that passed the TSA search.Theokhoth
Every successful terrorist that ever existed passed the TSA search. What's your point?
Then why don't YOU get off the plane? Why do two people have to postpone or cancel their travel arrangements just because YOU are uncomfortable with their presence?
Theokhoth
If the pilot was uncomfortable with their presence, how is he supposed to get off the plane? He can kick them off or cancel the whole flight. Better to kick them off.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment