XXXXXX

127 results
1
2
3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

Was talking to a co-worker and he said my favorite NFL team ranks as one of the worst in the NFL. Now I been a fan of my team for my whole life so maybe I didn't realize how far my team has fallen. I know my team currently stinks but, I didn't realized they were put in that category by the majority of fans. So Iwant to see what people feel are the worst teams in the NFL. I want to find out if my team is considered to be among the worst.

Please list what you feel are the 4 worst NFL teams.

13 years ago

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

I assume you mean right now and not all time or the Saints would be on my list...

Bills
Browns
Bungles
Panthers

13 years ago

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 12901 Posts

Yes, the Broncos have fallen far and they do suck.

13 years ago

2969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 2969 Posts

Panthers, Bills, Lions, Redskins

13 years ago

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

Yes, the Broncos have fallen far and they do suck. fidosim

They're a mess right now but no way they're in the bottom 4.

13 years ago

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2011 • 31 Posts

Lions, Bills, Raiders, Bengals.

13 years ago

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

Yes, the Broncos have fallen far and they do suck. fidosim

Good guess but, I'm not a Broncos fan.

13 years ago

7564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 lazerface216

Member since 2008 • 7564 Posts

my browns are definitely in there, but hey there's always next....i mean this year.

13 years ago

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts

GS actually has a Sports and...
You know what? Nevermind. :P

I'm so glad that no one has said the 49ers!!! :D

13 years ago

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 sleepingzzz

Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

GS actually has a Sports and...
You know what? Nevermind. :P
I'm so glad that no one has said the 49ers!!! :D
bbkkristian

There is a 'sport games' forum but, this hasn't nothing to do with video games.

13 years ago

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 JoeJoeLaker

Member since 2010 • 704 Posts

Panthers, Browns, Bengals and the Broncos.

13 years ago

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#12 bbkkristian

Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts

There is a 'sport games' forum but, this hasn't nothing to do with video games.
sleepingzzz

OH, I thought it was Sports as in real sports. :P

The more you know

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

Panthers, Bills, Lions, Redskins
pero2008

Lions, Bills, Raiders, Bengals.
Twoyen

...the lions, really :?

13 years ago

3652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2010 • 3652 Posts

Bills, Redskins, Browns, and Panthers

13 years ago

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#15 frostybanana

Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts

[QUOTE="pero2008"]
Panthers, Bills, Lions, Redskins
rawsavon

Lions, Bills, Raiders, Bengals.
Twoyen

...the lions, really :?

They've won 8 games in 3 years. Losing to the Lions is still an embarrassment for teams despite their "progress" and with that, the Lions being in the bottom four makes perfect sense to me. Their not in my bottom four because they won six games last year and while that's not really an accomplishment, they're improving at the very least. Anyways, worst teams right now? In no order: Dolphins, Redskins, Bills, Bengals. Not just because of the team's actual performance but also because the terrible front office moves made by these teams. Except maybe the Bills who made some good draft picks and signed Thigpen. Even so, their team as a whole is pretty bad.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

frostybanana

Give me the lions team (talent) over many, many other teams in the NFL winning games is not the only thing that determines the quality of team ...some teams play the jets and pats twice a year ...some teams get to play in the NFC West = 6 easy games a year for them The Lions lost their starting QB and backup QB and still looked respectable...while playing the NFC title game teams 4 times

13 years ago

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

The Lions lost 6 games last year by less than a touchdown. No where near the worst team.

13 years ago

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 ImaPirate0202

Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

Bears

Vikings

Lions

I only need to worry about three:P

13 years ago

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

I'll go with the Dolphins, Raiders, Redskins, and Bengals. The Bills have made promising moves and the Lions have obtained the two best defensive linemen in the game over the last two years. If Stafford stays healthy then they'll be very compitive this year. As for the Broncos, they have the talent to make things happen and if they get Tebow in the mix this year he'll prove his critics wrong.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

I always look at it like this ...do they have players I would want on my team There are some teams that I would be hard pressed to find anyone (outside of some linemen or LB's)

13 years ago

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 blueboxdoctor

Member since 2010 • 2549 Posts

Lions, Bills, Raiders, Bengals.
Twoyen

I'd say Lions but if they could protect their QB they'd at least have a good starting QB.

As for my list it would have to go something like Redskins, Panthers, Browns, Raiders.

13 years ago

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

I always look at it like this ...do they have players I would want on my team There are some teams that I would be hard pressed to find anyone (outside of some linemen or LB's)rawsavon

We could probably improve at CB and safety with a player from most teams also. :P

13 years ago

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 frostybanana

Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts

[QUOTE="frostybanana"] rawsavon

Give me the lions team (talent) over many, many other teams in the NFL winning games is not the only thing that determines the quality of team ...some teams play the jets and pats twice a year ...some teams get to play in the NFC West = 6 easy games a year for them The Lions lost their starting QB and backup QB and still looked respectable...while playing the NFC title game teams 4 times

Talent and performance are two different things. You can say Matthew Stafford has talent, but it hasn't translated to performance on the field. In that regard, the team has performed only well enough to win 6 games last year, and 8 over the last 3 seasons. When it comes down to it, that's all that matters. Besides which, who is to say Stafford would have performed better than their back ups? He doesn't have a full season to gauge how much skill he actually has the NFL level. At that point, all you're talking about is just conjecture and that's not the right way to evaluate a team. Other than Stafford, that team hasn't lost any major pieces over the course of the entire season, and you're not going to convince me that a guy who's barely played is going to have that big an impact on their team.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]I always look at it like this ...do they have players I would want on my team There are some teams that I would be hard pressed to find anyone (outside of some linemen or LB's)Pirate700

We could probably improve at CB and safety with a player from most teams also. :P

You mean you don't have faith in T. New's groin... (that doesn't sound quite right) /sarcasm I am happy at safety (for the money spent) I am most worried about the right side of the O-line and our D. Ends and what happens if Jay Rat gets hurt...tl;dr: worried about both sides on the line

13 years ago

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 SF_KiLLaMaN

Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="frostybanana"] rawsavon

Give me the lions team (talent) over many, many other teams in the NFL winning games is not the only thing that determines the quality of team ...some teams play the jets and pats twice a year ...some teams get to play in the NFC West = 6 easy games a year for them The Lions lost their starting QB and backup QB and still looked respectable...while playing the NFC title game teams 4 times

the Lions also beat the Packers late in the season. Nowhere near the worst team.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"] frostybanana

Give me the lions team (talent) over many, many other teams in the NFL winning games is not the only thing that determines the quality of team ...some teams play the jets and pats twice a year ...some teams get to play in the NFC West = 6 easy games a year for them The Lions lost their starting QB and backup QB and still looked respectable...while playing the NFC title game teams 4 times

Talent and performance are two different things. You can say Matthew Stafford has talent, but it hasn't translated to performance on the field. In that regard, the team has performed only well enough to win 6 games last year, and 8 over the last 3 seasons. When it comes down to it, that's all that matters. Besides which, who is to say Stafford would have performed better than their back ups? He doesn't have a full season to gauge how much skill he actually has the NFL level. At that point, all you're talking about is just conjecture and that's not the right way to evaluate a team. Other than Stafford, that team hasn't lost any major pieces over the course of the entire season, and you're not going to convince me that a guy who's barely played is going to have that big an impact on their team.

So you think a team that lost that many close games and played in one (if not the) toughest divisions in football is in the bottom 4 :? really? When the NFC west is terrible...all of them

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"] SF_KiLLaMaN

Give me the lions team (talent) over many, many other teams in the NFL winning games is not the only thing that determines the quality of team ...some teams play the jets and pats twice a year ...some teams get to play in the NFC West = 6 easy games a year for them The Lions lost their starting QB and backup QB and still looked respectable...while playing the NFC title game teams 4 times

the Lions also beat the Packers late in the season. Nowhere near the worst team.

I think the Lions are good ...good being 9-7 (not great) Their WR, TE, and DL are all great...QB might be great (if he can stay healthy)

13 years ago

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]I always look at it like this ...do they have players I would want on my team There are some teams that I would be hard pressed to find anyone (outside of some linemen or LB's)rawsavon

We could probably improve at CB and safety with a player from most teams also. :P

You mean you don't have faith in T. New's groin... (that doesn't sound quite right) /sarcasm I am happy at safety (for the money spent) I am most worried about the right side of the O-line and our D. Ends and what happens if Jay Rat gets hurt...tl;dr: worried about both sides on the line

True. Elam has been looking good in camp also so here's hoping we've improved at least there.

13 years ago

7564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 lazerface216

Member since 2008 • 7564 Posts

The Lions lost 6 games last year by less than a touchdown. No where near the worst team.
DroidPhysX

same with the browns, doesn't stop people from thinking what they think.

13 years ago

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 frostybanana

Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Give me the lions team (talent) over many, many other teams in the NFL winning games is not the only thing that determines the quality of team ...some teams play the jets and pats twice a year ...some teams get to play in the NFC West = 6 easy games a year for them The Lions lost their starting QB and backup QB and still looked respectable...while playing the NFC title game teams 4 times

Talent and performance are two different things. You can say Matthew Stafford has talent, but it hasn't translated to performance on the field. In that regard, the team has performed only well enough to win 6 games last year, and 8 over the last 3 seasons. When it comes down to it, that's all that matters. Besides which, who is to say Stafford would have performed better than their back ups? He doesn't have a full season to gauge how much skill he actually has the NFL level. At that point, all you're talking about is just conjecture and that's not the right way to evaluate a team. Other than Stafford, that team hasn't lost any major pieces over the course of the entire season, and you're not going to convince me that a guy who's barely played is going to have that big an impact on their team.

So you think a team that lost that many close games and played in one (if not the) toughest divisions in football is in the bottom 4 :? really? When the NFC west is terrible...all of them

Do I think their in the bottom four? No, not right now. As I said, my list is Dolphins, Redskins, Bills and Bengals. BUT, I don't think it's a stretch to say the Lions. They do have young talent. But there are only two people on the entire team that have consistently performed well, Suh and Megatron. So for all the "talent" they have, all I see is them underperforming. And like I said, I don't see Stafford having that big an impact on how good the team is because, quite frankly, they're more than just a quarterback away from a playoff team. I didn't say NFC West teams were good either, nor did I say the Lion are the WORST team in the NFL. If it wasn't for the win against NO in the playoffs, I might even say Seattle is the worst team in the league.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
The Lions lost 6 games last year by less than a touchdown. No where near the worst team.
lazerface216

same with the browns, doesn't stop people from thinking what they think.

...the difference is most people think the lions underachieved and that the browns overachieved I don't think McCoy is a legit starter (even though I like him) and Hillis wore down bad at the end of the year. Those Bruiser backs last about 2-3 years (of good production) and that's it

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="frostybanana"][QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"] Talent and performance are two different things. You can say Matthew Stafford has talent, but it hasn't translated to performance on the field. In that regard, the team has performed only well enough to win 6 games last year, and 8 over the last 3 seasons. When it comes down to it, that's all that matters. Besides which, who is to say Stafford would have performed better than their back ups? He doesn't have a full season to gauge how much skill he actually has the NFL level. At that point, all you're talking about is just conjecture and that's not the right way to evaluate a team. Other than Stafford, that team hasn't lost any major pieces over the course of the entire season, and you're not going to convince me that a guy who's barely played is going to have that big an impact on their team.

So you think a team that lost that many close games and played in one (if not the) toughest divisions in football is in the bottom 4 :? really? When the NFC west is terrible...all of them

Do I think their in the bottom four? No, not right now. As I said, my list is Dolphins, Redskins, Bills and Bengals. BUT, I don't think it's a stretch to say the Lions. They do have young talent. But there are only two people on the entire team that have consistently performed well, Suh and Megatron. So for all the "talent" they have, all I see is them underperforming. And like I said, I don't see Stafford having that big an impact on how good the team is because, quite frankly, they're more than just a quarterback away from a playoff team. I didn't say NFC West teams were good either, nor did I say the Lion are the WORST team in the NFL. If it wasn't for the win against NO in the playoffs, I might even say Seattle is the worst team in the league.

For you to say, " I don't think it's a stretch to say the Lions" Means you must at least have them in your bottom 8 teams...that is a HUGE stretch. They not a bottom 10 team...many teams much worse than they are

13 years ago

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts

Patriots, Chargers, Colts, Steelers

13 years ago

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#34 frostybanana

Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] So you think a team that lost that many close games and played in one (if not the) toughest divisions in football is in the bottom 4 :? really? When the NFC west is terrible...all of them

Do I think their in the bottom four? No, not right now. As I said, my list is Dolphins, Redskins, Bills and Bengals. BUT, I don't think it's a stretch to say the Lions. They do have young talent. But there are only two people on the entire team that have consistently performed well, Suh and Megatron. So for all the "talent" they have, all I see is them underperforming. And like I said, I don't see Stafford having that big an impact on how good the team is because, quite frankly, they're more than just a quarterback away from a playoff team. I didn't say NFC West teams were good either, nor did I say the Lion are the WORST team in the NFL. If it wasn't for the win against NO in the playoffs, I might even say Seattle is the worst team in the league.

For you to say, " I don't think it's a stretch to say the Lions" Means you must at least have them in your bottom 8 teams...that is a HUGE stretch. They not a bottom 10 team...many teams much worse than they are

Bottom 8? No. Bottom 6, yes. And no, I don't believe there are many team that are much worse than they are. They have holes on all three levels of defense and instead of addressing those holes, they addressed positions that already had starters. And yes, I take front office management in consideration as well. So, you can say they have talent, but frankly, you have no proof because the wins aren't there. And until they are, they will be one of the worst teams in the NFL in my eyes.

13 years ago

2635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 2635 Posts

the NFL is so fixed that its hard to take it seriously anymore

13 years ago

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

the NFL is so fixed that its hard to take it seriously anymore
Scoob64

Sometimes it sure seems that way.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="frostybanana"][QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"] Do I think their in the bottom four? No, not right now. As I said, my list is Dolphins, Redskins, Bills and Bengals. BUT, I don't think it's a stretch to say the Lions. They do have young talent. But there are only two people on the entire team that have consistently performed well, Suh and Megatron. So for all the "talent" they have, all I see is them underperforming. And like I said, I don't see Stafford having that big an impact on how good the team is because, quite frankly, they're more than just a quarterback away from a playoff team. I didn't say NFC West teams were good either, nor did I say the Lion are the WORST team in the NFL. If it wasn't for the win against NO in the playoffs, I might even say Seattle is the worst team in the league.

For you to say, " I don't think it's a stretch to say the Lions" Means you must at least have them in your bottom 8 teams...that is a HUGE stretch. They not a bottom 10 team...many teams much worse than they are

Bottom 8? No. Bottom 6, yes. And no, I don't believe there are many team that are much worse than they are. They have holes on all three levels of defense and instead of addressing those holes, they addressed positions that already had starters. And yes, I take front office management in consideration as well. So, you can say they have talent, but frankly, you have no proof because the wins aren't there. And until they are, they will be one of the worst teams in the NFL in my eyes.

Please list your bottom 10 then

13 years ago

7564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 lazerface216

Member since 2008 • 7564 Posts

[QUOTE="lazerface216"]
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
The Lions lost 6 games last year by less than a touchdown. No where near the worst team.
rawsavon

same with the browns, doesn't stop people from thinking what they think.

...the difference is most people think the lions underachieved and that the browns overachieved I don't think McCoy is a legit starter (even though I like him) and Hillis wore down bad at the end of the year. Those Bruiser backs last about 2-3 years (of good production) and that's it

you think the lions underachieved? wow, that's the first time i've heard that. i honestly think mccoy is legit but we'll see. i agree with you about hillis though, with the way he plays he won't last very long.

13 years ago

2635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 2635 Posts

[QUOTE="Scoob64"]
the NFL is so fixed that its hard to take it seriously anymore
Pirate700

Sometimes it sure seems that way.

there was a good book on it called 'Interference'

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="lazerface216"]
same with the browns, doesn't stop people from thinking what they think.
lazerface216

...the difference is most people think the lions underachieved and that the browns overachieved I don't think McCoy is a legit starter (even though I like him) and Hillis wore down bad at the end of the year. Those Bruiser backs last about 2-3 years (of good production) and that's it

you think the lions underachieved? wow, that's the first time i've heard that. i honestly think mccoy is legit but we'll see. i agree with you about hillis though, with the way he plays he won't last very long.

I think the lions are better than their record...so yes 'underachieved' Product of both the team underachieving and the teams they played I like McCoy, I am just not sold on his skill set (same thing with Tebow...just for different reasons) Hillis just needs to look at Brandon Jackobs and Marion Barber to see how things go

13 years ago

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#41 frostybanana

Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] For you to say, " I don't think it's a stretch to say the Lions" Means you must at least have them in your bottom 8 teams...that is a HUGE stretch. They not a bottom 10 team...many teams much worse than they are

Bottom 8? No. Bottom 6, yes. And no, I don't believe there are many team that are much worse than they are. They have holes on all three levels of defense and instead of addressing those holes, they addressed positions that already had starters. And yes, I take front office management in consideration as well. So, you can say they have talent, but frankly, you have no proof because the wins aren't there. And until they are, they will be one of the worst teams in the NFL in my eyes.

Please list your bottom 10 then

Honestly, I'm not going to list and order them. If you ask me about specific teams, I'll answer. But the only other team other than the teams I already mentioned that are worse than the Lions, IMO, are the Panthers.

13 years ago

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"] Bottom 8? No. Bottom 6, yes. And no, I don't believe there are many team that are much worse than they are. They have holes on all three levels of defense and instead of addressing those holes, they addressed positions that already had starters. And yes, I take front office management in consideration as well. So, you can say they have talent, but frankly, you have no proof because the wins aren't there. And until they are, they will be one of the worst teams in the NFL in my eyes. frostybanana

Please list your bottom 10 then

Honestly, I'm not going to list and order them. If you ask me about specific teams, I'll answer. But the only other team other than the teams I already mentioned that are worse than the Lions, IMO, are the Panthers.

I don't think the Lions are going to be anything special this year either but the 31st worst team in the league? No way. Their pass rush alone puts them well above that.

13 years ago

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#43 frostybanana

Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts

[QUOTE="frostybanana"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Please list your bottom 10 thenPirate700

Honestly, I'm not going to list and order them. If you ask me about specific teams, I'll answer. But the only other team other than the teams I already mentioned that are worse than the Lions, IMO, are the Panthers.

I don't think the Lions are going to be anything special this year either but the 31st worst team in the league? No way. Their pass rush alone puts them well above that.

You misread me. Panthers + teams I already mentioned.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="frostybanana"][QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"] Bottom 8? No. Bottom 6, yes. And no, I don't believe there are many team that are much worse than they are. They have holes on all three levels of defense and instead of addressing those holes, they addressed positions that already had starters. And yes, I take front office management in consideration as well. So, you can say they have talent, but frankly, you have no proof because the wins aren't there. And until they are, they will be one of the worst teams in the NFL in my eyes.

Please list your bottom 10 then

Honestly, I'm not going to list and order them. If you ask me about specific teams, I'll answer. But the only other team other than the teams I already mentioned that are worse than the Lions, IMO, are the Panthers.

you said you have them as bottom 6...how can I get any feel for your opinions without seeing your bottom 10 I am not asking you to rank all 32 teams-just your bottom 10 It should take you no more than 2 minutes (about as long as it took to post your last message) It seems you are just holding onto that opinion (about the Lions) atm with no support behind it (that is why I wanted to see where you really rank them)

13 years ago

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="frostybanana"] Honestly, I'm not going to list and order them. If you ask me about specific teams, I'll answer. But the only other team other than the teams I already mentioned that are worse than the Lions, IMO, are the Panthers. frostybanana

I don't think the Lions are going to be anything special this year either but the 31st worst team in the league? No way. Their pass rush alone puts them well above that.

You misread me. Panthers + teams I already mentioned.

My bad. I still think they'll be better than that though.

13 years ago

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#46 frostybanana

Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="frostybanana"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Please list your bottom 10 then

Honestly, I'm not going to list and order them. If you ask me about specific teams, I'll answer. But the only other team other than the teams I already mentioned that are worse than the Lions, IMO, are the Panthers.

you said you have them as bottom 6...how can I get any feel for your opinions without seeing your bottom 10 I am not asking you to rank all 32 teams-just your bottom 10 It should take you no more than 2 minutes (about as long as it took to post your last message) It seems you are just holding onto that opinion (about the Lions) atm with no support behind it (that is why I wanted to see where you really rank them)

Oh trust me, I can go in depth as to why I think the Lions suck, no problem. I'm not holding out any information for lack of support, it's more because if I did type it all out it would be boring to read and boring for me to write. If you really want me to list them out, that's fine: Bills, Bengals, Redskins, Dolphins, Panthers, Lions, Seahawks, Cardinals, Browns, Rams.

13 years ago

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 SF_KiLLaMaN

Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

Lions are one of the worst teams? No way. They lost most of their games by less than a touchdown and they should have beat the Bears if it wasn't for that stupid rule. They also beat the champion Packers. I could see if you mean all time, like every year combined, but I wouldn't put them in my bottom 5 for last year and this year, which is really all that matters.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

Bills, Bengals, Redskins, Dolphins, Panthers, Lions, Seahawks, Cardinals, Browns, Rams.frostybanana

Since we are focused on the Lions atm, I will list the teams I think are worse and we can go from there -keep in mind that record =/= how good a team is (part of it but not all of it) b/c there is not a balanced schedule in the NFL #32 Panthers #31 Seattle #30 Bungles #29 Broncos #28 Dolphins #27 Bills #26 49ers #25 Redskins #24 Titans #23 Vikings #22 Browns #21 Raiders #20 Arizona ...then the lions *the order might be a little off, but not much difference in 29 and 31 IMO...would require that I put in lots of though Since there is no point in discussing the ones we agree on, do tell why you rank the ones I have below the lions above them

13 years ago

1281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1281 Posts

I'm going to go with the teams that will get the worst record this year, not necessarily the worst teams, because schedule has a lot to do with it.

Panthers-Cam newton is not going to do anything near what Sam Bradford did last year, best division in the NFL? Falcons/Saints/Tampa all have playoff potential

Bills -Playing the Pats and Jets 4x a year means almost 4 auto losses

Bengals- No wonder everyone wants to get out of there, they play the Steelers and Ravens 4x a year

Tie-Redskins/Raiders-Raiders finally didn't lose 10+ games in a season and what do they do? Fire their head coach... Lost best defensive player, and former #2 overall pick. Redskins because Dan Snyder is insane, and Shanahan has no quarterbacks.

Also in contention: Any member of the NFC West is at risk, Broncos, Browns, and Titans if their fall last year wasn't only due to Moss.

So I guess the bottom of the NFL is to close to call, good thing I don't have to do any power rankings....

Edit: forgot Vikings.

13 years ago

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

Zlurodirom

Don't forget the Raiders also lost one of the best young TE's in the game ...put up monster #'s with crap at QB So they lost their best offensive and defensive free agents...did not franchise either b/c...well b/c Al is one of the worst owners in sports

13 years ago

127 results
1
2
3

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment