nationalized health care is scary.

  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for newbpwnage
newbpwnage

2409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 newbpwnage
Member since 2007 • 2409 Posts
1) The government has inefficiencies and would increase the overall cost of health care. While innefficiencies occur in the private sector currently, even more would be created through government intervention.

2) Currently noone is denied emergency health care. If you walk in to an ER without insurance, you will still be seen by a doctor, and billed, of course.

3) We have the best health care in the world. Why would we consider changing it?

4) Many people who are uninsured right now are actually middle class people who choose to self-insure rather than pay for health insurance. In fact, 2 out of 7 uninsured individuals make over 60,000 dollars per year.

5) Countries with nationalized heatth care have several problems
a) waiting lists, often people die before they are given transplants or crucial surgeries.
b) these waiting lists occur because doctors are given no incentive to work harder, rather, they are given a quota and once they fill their quota, they stop working.
c) The government would not have the same ability to negotiate with private doctors as the insurance companies.
d) People who can afford surgery cant get it. Rather the taxpayers pay for a service they can never use.
e) People over 70 are no longer allowed to get lifesaving transplants, EVER. So say good bye to grandma and grandpa.
f) None of the other countries have near the quality of healthcare that is rendered in America.


There are many other reasons, these just popped into my head.... enjoy, comment, whatever.... i wanna see what some lib has to say.
Avatar image for louislegros
louislegros

11530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 louislegros
Member since 2005 • 11530 Posts
there can still be private practioniers :|
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180144 Posts
Self insure is the same as paying for health insurance. We need to have free health care for all citizens. Guess what....in this country people do not get surgeries they need or transplants.
Avatar image for mmogoon
mmogoon

7311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 mmogoon
Member since 2006 • 7311 Posts
It works in my country
Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts
Silly socialists and their crazy ideas....
Avatar image for TheOT_King
TheOT_King

6359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TheOT_King
Member since 2005 • 6359 Posts
4) Many people who are uninsured right now are actually middle class people who choose to self-insure rather than pay for health insurance. In fact, 2 out of 7 uninsured individuals make over 60,000 dollars per year.
newbpwnage
What about the other 5 out of 7?
Avatar image for gamelord2004
gamelord2004

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 gamelord2004
Member since 2004 • 1448 Posts
Self insure is the same as paying for health insurance. We need to have free health care for all citizens. Guess what....in this country people do not get surgeries they need or transplants.LJS9502_basic
Thats because there are not enough organ donors. That has nothing to do with nationalized free health care
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180144 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Self insure is the same as paying for health insurance. We need to have free health care for all citizens. Guess what....in this country people do not get surgeries they need or transplants.gamelord2004
Thats because there are not enough organ donors. That has nothing to do with nationalized free health care

Then the TC should not have brought them up as a positive for private health care...however, even so, the poor have less of a chance of getting a transplant than the wealthy.  Coincidence?

Avatar image for gamelord2004
gamelord2004

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 gamelord2004
Member since 2004 • 1448 Posts

[QUOTE="gamelord2004"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Self insure is the same as paying for health insurance. We need to have free health care for all citizens. Guess what....in this country people do not get surgeries they need or transplants.LJS9502_basic

Thats because there are not enough organ donors. That has nothing to do with nationalized free health care

Then the TC should not have brought them up as a positive for private health care...however, even so, the poor have less of a chance of getting a transplant than the wealthy. Coincidence?

proff?  The organ always goes to the person who needs it the most
Avatar image for DJ-PRIME90
DJ-PRIME90

11292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#10 DJ-PRIME90
Member since 2004 • 11292 Posts
First of all, you're health care is not the best in the world. Thats just your opinion. If you can find that information on a non-american owned website, please let me know because I highly doubt your health care is considered the best in the world by anyone who isn't american:lol:
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180144 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="gamelord2004"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Self insure is the same as paying for health insurance. We need to have free health care for all citizens. Guess what....in this country people do not get surgeries they need or transplants.gamelord2004

Thats because there are not enough organ donors. That has nothing to do with nationalized free health care

Then the TC should not have brought them up as a positive for private health care...however, even so, the poor have less of a chance of getting a transplant than the wealthy. Coincidence?

proff?  The organ always goes to the person who needs it the most

Keep thinking that....
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180144 Posts
[QUOTE="DJ-PRIME90"]First of all, you're health care is not the best in the world. Thats just your opinion. If you can find that information on a non-american owned website, please let me know because I highly doubt your health care is considered the best in the world by anyone who isn't american:lol: Go and ask the people who are working 2 or 3 jobs just to get by their opinion on this, would they prefer long waits or end up with a $3,000 bill from the hospital for a 2 days hospital visit.

Try a higher rate than $3000.
Avatar image for DJ-PRIME90
DJ-PRIME90

11292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#13 DJ-PRIME90
Member since 2004 • 11292 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DJ-PRIME90"]First of all, you're health care is not the best in the world. Thats just your opinion. If you can find that information on a non-american owned website, please let me know because I highly doubt your health care is considered the best in the world by anyone who isn't american:lol: Go and ask the people who are working 2 or 3 jobs just to get by their opinion on this, would they prefer long waits or end up with a $3,000 bill from the hospital for a 2 days hospital visit.

Try a higher rate than $3000.

You sound proud of that:?
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
While I agree with your general assessment (yes, nationalized healthcare sucks), there are a couple of things that aren't quite right. For example, 5c you said that people can't get surgery if they can afford it. In countries like Canada, you're right. But some countries with nationalized healthcare allow for private facilities and if you can afford it still, you can get it done there. A minor quibble, I know. A big problem I personally have with nationalized healthcare is that it just reduces freedom in general. We're overtaxed as it is and I don't like the idea of my government FORCING me to buy health insurance. Can't I elect to not have it and keep the extra money? Apparently not, because those politicians know what's good for me and I don't. :roll: Plus I have family members who abuse the current system- they go to the ER with headaches to try to get painkillers and the taxpayers have to foot the bill. They don't deserve to have me pay for all of their healthcare costs when they abuse the current system as it is. If anything, our healthcare system needs to be freed up. An easy example is selling organs- you have 2 lungs. You can sell one if that's what you want to do. The pro-choice advocates of America will advocate "it's her body, she can do what she wants" but it's the same general group of people (liberal-minded people) that want to prevent you from selling your organs. So now we have less organs available than we could have simply because laws restrict us from having freedom.
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
[QUOTE="DJ-PRIME90"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DJ-PRIME90"]First of all, you're health care is not the best in the world. Thats just your opinion. If you can find that information on a non-american owned website, please let me know because I highly doubt your health care is considered the best in the world by anyone who isn't american:lol: Go and ask the people who are working 2 or 3 jobs just to get by their opinion on this, would they prefer long waits or end up with a $3,000 bill from the hospital for a 2 days hospital visit.

Try a higher rate than $3000.

You sound proud of that:?

Hmm...dead due to waiting, or pay a lot of money and live....which will I choose?
Avatar image for bastards12345
bastards12345

7194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 bastards12345
Member since 2005 • 7194 Posts
[Holy ****, wrong thread]
Avatar image for DJ-PRIME90
DJ-PRIME90

11292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#17 DJ-PRIME90
Member since 2004 • 11292 Posts
[QUOTE="Vampyronight"][QUOTE="DJ-PRIME90"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DJ-PRIME90"]First of all, you're health care is not the best in the world. Thats just your opinion. If you can find that information on a non-american owned website, please let me know because I highly doubt your health care is considered the best in the world by anyone who isn't american:lol: Go and ask the people who are working 2 or 3 jobs just to get by their opinion on this, would they prefer long waits or end up with a $3,000 bill from the hospital for a 2 days hospital visit.

Try a higher rate than $3000.

You sound proud of that:?

Hmm...dead due to waiting, or pay a lot of money and live....which will I choose?

I think its more like dead due to waiting, or pay a lot of money and live...but become homeless due to your medical bill....which will I choose? And heres a website that appears to tell the truth about american health care, even though its an american owned site: http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-healthcare.htm
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180144 Posts
[QUOTE="DJ-PRIME90"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DJ-PRIME90"]First of all, you're health care is not the best in the world. Thats just your opinion. If you can find that information on a non-american owned website, please let me know because I highly doubt your health care is considered the best in the world by anyone who isn't american:lol: Go and ask the people who are working 2 or 3 jobs just to get by their opinion on this, would they prefer long waits or end up with a $3,000 bill from the hospital for a 2 days hospital visit.

Try a higher rate than $3000.

You sound proud of that:?

Did you not read my initial post....
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
While I said it before, the reason this Nation is in a Health Care mess to begin with, isn't the system, but the consumers who have no sense of what is going on. Everyone goes to the Dr. for a cold or the flu. Consumerism is the problem in the end.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
What's that? Someone defending our current healthcare system? Wait in the emergency room for six hours with a broken skull then we'll talk.
Avatar image for newbpwnage
newbpwnage

2409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 newbpwnage
Member since 2007 • 2409 Posts
First of all, you're health care is not the best in the world. Thats just your opinion. If you can find that information on a non-american owned website, please let me know because I highly doubt your health care is considered the best in the world by anyone who isn't american:lol:DJ-PRIME90
find one that says its not.
While I said it before, the reason this Nation is in a Health Care mess to begin with, isn't the system, but the consumers who have no sense of what is going on. Everyone goes to the Dr. for a cold or the flu. Consumerism is the problem in the end.LukeAF24
the demand for health care is always higher than the supply, no matter what the supply becomes, people will always want to live longer.
What's that? Someone defending our current healthcare system? Wait in the emergency room for six hours with a broken skull then we'll talk.quiglythegreat
but your still not denied care. waiting is a fact of life, that doesnt mean its broken, it just means its busy.
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
[QUOTE="LukeAF24"]While I said it before, the reason this Nation is in a Health Care mess to begin with, isn't the system, but the consumers who have no sense of what is going on. Everyone goes to the Dr. for a cold or the flu. Consumerism is the problem in the end.newbpwnage
the demand for health care is always higher than the supply, no matter what the supply becomes, people will always want to live longer.

That has nothing to do with my point. Perhaps you should look up what consumerism is.
Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts
Look at Scandinavia. Free healthcare, and they're doing fine, if not better than us. 
Avatar image for Aznsilvrboy
Aznsilvrboy

11495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Aznsilvrboy
Member since 2002 • 11495 Posts
It works in my country.
Avatar image for 1fast6
1fast6

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 1fast6
Member since 2004 • 729 Posts

your very first statement is false... medicare (if you want to consider that an example of US socialized medicine) management adds approximately 1.5% overhead to the cost to provide care... most insurance companies pay a 5% dividend to its shareholders, so before they have paid a cent to healthcare or to even managing it, they have spent 3x what medicare spends to manage the same care...

if you don't have insurance and go to an ER, they will have to treat you, and they will send you a bill... which you probably will have no way of paying (at least not enough to cover the cost to provide you that care in an ER setting)... you probably should have gone to the doctor for one tenth the cost, but... oh, thats right you don't have insurance, and no doctor in his right mind would accept you as a patient without insurance...

also, by most objective outcome or quality measures, US healthcare is mediocre at best, rating pretty much in the middle of the pack of second tier countries... quality healthcare isn't about transplants, its about the simple stuff, like immunizations, childhood diseases, infectious/communicable diseases, etc...

face it, in the US, if you're lucky enough to have insurance (meaning you have a job) or have wealth and you live in a metropolitan area, you probably have pretty good access to healthcare... if you answered "no" to either of the above, then you are at significant risk in the event of poor heath...

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#26 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts
It works in my country.Aznsilvrboy
Works in mine, too.
Avatar image for drj077
drj077

8375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 drj077
Member since 2003 • 8375 Posts

First of all, you're health care is not the best in the world. Thats just your opinion. If you can find that information on a non-american owned website, please let me know because I highly doubt your health care is considered the best in the world by anyone who isn't american:lol:DJ-PRIME90

Actually, yes, America does have the best healthcare system in the world.  In terms of progression of research, overall survivability, and maintenance of facilities along with aseptic conditions America is definitely the best in the world.  I've talked with residents who have attended medical schools in Australia, the Middle East, East Asia, Russia, England, and other areas of Europe and they all say the same thing once they come to the U.S. 

Hell, the majority of countries in the world don't even have disposable surgical equipment and simply sit there in awe when American doctors go overseas to demonstrate our technology, achievements, and equipment. 

That's not coming from a non-american website, either.  That's coming from a person with significant medical ties.  

Avatar image for MCH
MCH

972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MCH
Member since 2003 • 972 Posts

f) None of the other countries have near the quality of healthcare that is rendered in America.

You are completely and totally wrong.
Avatar image for Aznsilvrboy
Aznsilvrboy

11495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Aznsilvrboy
Member since 2002 • 11495 Posts
[QUOTE="Aznsilvrboy"]It works in my country.Zeke129
Works in mine, too.



Thats because our country is the same :o
Avatar image for oscar530
oscar530

4430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 oscar530
Member since 2005 • 4430 Posts
why is it scary we have it in Canada and we love it
Avatar image for drj077
drj077

8375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 drj077
Member since 2003 • 8375 Posts

why is it scary we have it in Canada and we love itoscar530

Some of you do.  However, the Canadians and Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. and stay here tend to disagree with you. 

Avatar image for sutherland19
sutherland19

4016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 sutherland19
Member since 2004 • 4016 Posts

[QUOTE="oscar530"]why is it scary we have it in Canada and we love itdrj077

Some of you do.  However, the Canadians and Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. and stay here tend to disagree with you. 

America has this advanced equipment and such because of the ridiculous amounts they charge patients etc.. I won't deny America is definitely the most advanced country in medicine, technology wise. But the problem is the system, not the technology. The system treats wealthy Americans nicely, while poverish Americans who don't have insurance get screwed over time and time again. Shouldn't everyone have the right to getting treated for injuries and disease without having to be in debt the rest of their lives? And Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. stay there because they get higher salaries in the States.
Avatar image for drj077
drj077

8375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 drj077
Member since 2003 • 8375 Posts
[QUOTE="drj077"]

[QUOTE="oscar530"]why is it scary we have it in Canada and we love itsutherland19

Some of you do.  However, the Canadians and Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. and stay here tend to disagree with you. 

America has this advanced equipment and such because of the ridiculous amounts they charge patients etc.. I won't deny America is definitely the most advanced country in medicine, technology wise. But the problem is the system, not the technology. The system treats wealthy Americans nicely, while poverish Americans who don't have insurance get screwed over time and time again. Shouldn't everyone have the right to getting treated for injuries and disease without having to be in debt the rest of their lives? And Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. stay there because they get higher salaries in the States.

You'd be wrong on that one.  America has the technology and research capabilities that it has because of government funded grants and government run programs such as medicare.  The NIH funds the development of new drugs, technology, and procedures while companies pick up where the research starts to create a product that is relatively cheap and safe for patients. 

The American people pay millions and even billions of dollars every year out of pocket to keep medicare and medicaid going.  Because of this fact, pretty much any given town in America has a CT scanner, a surgeon, a general practice doctor, and the American people are allowed to continue in their ignorance, gluttony, diabetes, alcoholism, and the like. 

Of course, if you feel differently, perhaps you could convince the American public to force medical schools to lower the cost of tuition for medical school under $150,000 so that your common doctor could function appropriately in a small town instead of having to rely on medicare and people unwilling to pay their medical bills, so that they could pay back their school loans before they die of old age. 

Also, I don't think that you have any idea how much it costs to run MRI, CT, XRay, and PET scanners.  There is no way around it either.  Giant rotating magnets tend to be sort of on the expensive side in case you didn't know. 

Avatar image for menis01
menis01

1720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 menis01
Member since 2005 • 1720 Posts
[QUOTE="sutherland19"][QUOTE="drj077"]

[QUOTE="oscar530"]why is it scary we have it in Canada and we love itdrj077

Some of you do. However, the Canadians and Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. and stay here tend to disagree with you.

America has this advanced equipment and such because of the ridiculous amounts they charge patients etc.. I won't deny America is definitely the most advanced country in medicine, technology wise. But the problem is the system, not the technology. The system treats wealthy Americans nicely, while poverish Americans who don't have insurance get screwed over time and time again. Shouldn't everyone have the right to getting treated for injuries and disease without having to be in debt the rest of their lives? And Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. stay there because they get higher salaries in the States.

You'd be wrong on that one. America has the technology and research capabilities that it has because of government funded grants and government run programs such as medicare. The NIH funds the development of new drugs, technology, and procedures while companies pick up where the research starts to create a product that is relatively cheap and safe for patients.

The American people pay millions and even billions of dollars every year out of pocket to keep medicare and medicaid going. Because of this fact, pretty much any given town in America has a CT scanner, a surgeon, a general practice doctor, and the American people are allowed to continue in their ignorance, gluttony, diabetes, alcoholism, and the like.

Of course, if you feel differently, perhaps you could convince the American public to force medical schools to lower the cost of tuition for medical school under $150,000 so that your common doctor could function appropriately in a small town instead of having to rely on medicare and people unwilling to pay their medical bills, so that they could pay back their school loans before they die of old age.

Also, I don't think that you have any idea how much it costs to run MRI, CT, XRay, and PET scanners. There is no way around it either. Giant rotating magnets tend to be sort of on the expensive side in case you didn't know.


Man, I'll definitely agree with you about the med school bills. Not that I attend, but yeah. I can't possibly imagine taking out a mortgage on my future like that, and then having to decide how it's going to be paid off.

The gluttony and diabetes problems though, that's where your argument gets me. When people don't have health insurance here, they just don't go to a doctor. And when they don't go to a doctor, they don't get warned about diabetes or the lifestyle they're leading that could lead to a heart attack or cancer. So a few years go by and they end up in an ER where doctors due triage with the help of the really expensive equipment you described and give them bills they'll never be able to pay which end up costing taxpayers money anyway, and then prescribe medicine that they can't afford (because the drug companies have got to pay for all of those ads on TV, right) for problems that could have been staved off with some simple advice earlier in the whole process.  Meanwhile, the smartest kids from the top medical schools are working private practices in Beverly Hills and doing outpatient plastic surgery or making better boner pills at Pfizer to pay their outrageous med school bills.

Now tell me what isn't screwed up about that system. I just don't think capitalism works when it's people's lives and health and well being that are involved.

Avatar image for drj077
drj077

8375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 drj077
Member since 2003 • 8375 Posts
[QUOTE="drj077"][QUOTE="sutherland19"][QUOTE="drj077"]

[QUOTE="oscar530"]why is it scary we have it in Canada and we love itmenis01

Some of you do. However, the Canadians and Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. and stay here tend to disagree with you.

America has this advanced equipment and such because of the ridiculous amounts they charge patients etc.. I won't deny America is definitely the most advanced country in medicine, technology wise. But the problem is the system, not the technology. The system treats wealthy Americans nicely, while poverish Americans who don't have insurance get screwed over time and time again. Shouldn't everyone have the right to getting treated for injuries and disease without having to be in debt the rest of their lives? And Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. stay there because they get higher salaries in the States.

You'd be wrong on that one. America has the technology and research capabilities that it has because of government funded grants and government run programs such as medicare. The NIH funds the development of new drugs, technology, and procedures while companies pick up where the research starts to create a product that is relatively cheap and safe for patients.

The American people pay millions and even billions of dollars every year out of pocket to keep medicare and medicaid going. Because of this fact, pretty much any given town in America has a CT scanner, a surgeon, a general practice doctor, and the American people are allowed to continue in their ignorance, gluttony, diabetes, alcoholism, and the like.

Of course, if you feel differently, perhaps you could convince the American public to force medical schools to lower the cost of tuition for medical school under $150,000 so that your common doctor could function appropriately in a small town instead of having to rely on medicare and people unwilling to pay their medical bills, so that they could pay back their school loans before they die of old age.

Also, I don't think that you have any idea how much it costs to run MRI, CT, XRay, and PET scanners. There is no way around it either. Giant rotating magnets tend to be sort of on the expensive side in case you didn't know.


Man, I'll definitely agree with you about the med school bills. Not that I attend, but yeah. I can't possibly imagine taking out a mortgage on my future like that, and then having to decide how it's going to be paid off.

The gluttony and diabetes problems though, that's where your argument gets me. When people don't have health insurance here, they just don't go to a doctor. And when they don't go to a doctor, they don't get warned about diabetes or the lifestyle they're leading that could lead to a heart attack or cancer. So a few years go by and they end up in an ER where doctors due triage with the help of the really expensive equipment you described and give them bills they'll never be able to pay which end up costing taxpayers money anyway, and then prescribe medicine that they can't afford (because the drug companies have got to pay for all of those ads on TV, right) for problems that could have been staved off with some simple advice earlier in the whole process.  Meanwhile, the smartest kids from the top medical schools are working private practices in Beverly Hills and doing outpatient plastic surgery or making better boner pills at Pfizer to pay their outrageous med school bills.

Now tell me what isn't screwed up about that system. I just don't think capitalism works when it's people's lives and health and well being that are involved.

You couldn't be more wrong about the medical system in this country.  The average physician makes no money until residency.  Once residency starts, the average pay rate is around $40,000.  A person can count on half of that disappearing every year during the 3-5 years of residency just to start to pay off school loans.  So, a physician doesn't actually start making as much money as you think until they are almost into their early 30s.  That's 11-13 years spent as basically a slave to the academic establishment with no real end in sight.  That's a long time to live in basically poverty while all your friends get married, have kids, buy houses, and start their lives. 

As for hospital bills, your average hospital is pretty much constantly riding the line between being in the black and being in the red.  Why?  Because, it costs so much to run all the equipment, keep the lights/heat on, pay all the physicians, pay techs/maintenance, and assure the hospital's future by constantly expanding to guarantee that the facility can help a diverse group of patients.  Not only that, but hospitals forgive millions of dollars worth of medical bills every year and you just have to be lucky enough to get such a chance. 

Socialized healthcare would cripple the American hospital system as any government funded program would prevent research opportunities, prevent expansion opportunities, and prevent facility upkeep.  The last two come from investment opportunities that the hospitals see as lucrative and as of right now, millions of dollars are being sucked out of the research industry as the money NIH uses to give out grants is now being used to fund the Iraq conflict.  There are numerous researchers in this country that have had their funding cut by 50%.

So, if this country wants socialized medicine, then it will have to pay for it out of pocket with incredible tax increases to maintain the current standard of care, research, and professionalism that other doctors around the world crave so much that they move here.  We'd be talking about a tax increase so large that everyone would probably have to give about a quarter of their paycheck every month as people would abuse the system and once again raise the costs of care (this happens in every society with socialized medicine and it's especially bad in Canada). 

Avatar image for Krigen89
Krigen89

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Krigen89
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
LOL such ignorance... The US system is flawed simply because, as pointed out, there is pretty much no health promotion going on, no prevention, only curing... yet, if people knew what's good and what's bad, the need to ER visits would go down a lot, cutting down on hospital and insurance costs The Canadian system might not be perfect at all, but it's a lot more respectable to me, in that it cares about people's health, not only their diseases
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#37 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
[QUOTE="drj077"]

[QUOTE="oscar530"]why is it scary we have it in Canada and we love itsutherland19

Some of you do.  However, the Canadians and Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. and stay here tend to disagree with you. 

America has this advanced equipment and such because of the ridiculous amounts they charge patients etc.. I won't deny America is definitely the most advanced country in medicine, technology wise. But the problem is the system, not the technology. The system treats wealthy Americans nicely, while poverish Americans who don't have insurance get screwed over time and time again. Shouldn't everyone have the right to getting treated for injuries and disease without having to be in debt the rest of their lives? And Canadian doctors that come to the U.S. stay there because they get higher salaries in the States.

That's Capitalism for you. WIth more money people get more incentives. With less money you get more paperwork. America charges insane rates for health care, which is kinda weird, considering the work is to help people, but if these people don't have vast wealth, that's their rent; that's their debt. Capitalism and Democracy don't work together. Like Communism...it's a good idea on paper, but a bad one when acted out.
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
drj clearly knows what he's talking. Furthermore, comparing the cost of a socialized healthcare country to ours is insane for this very reason- America is the fattest country in the world. Sad to say, but it's true. That's biggest source of our healthcare problems and nationalizing healthcare doesn't solve this problem or reduce costs- it would drive them, to be honest. Then it raises a very good question- given how obese/overweight people are in this country, why should someone who eats right, exercises, and avoids things like smoking, regardless if their rich, middle class, or poor, be forced to pay more for healthcare because a majority live on McDonalds and refuse to do any physical work? If anything, a better solution is to allow healthcare companies to charge more for people who are obese/smoke and have reduced rates for those who demonstrate that they can eat and exercise properly and eat things like McDonalds in moderation. Then we'd be encouraging real change for the better.
Avatar image for Krigen89
Krigen89

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Krigen89
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
[QUOTE="Vampyronight"]drj clearly knows what he's talking. Furthermore, comparing the cost of a socialized healthcare country to ours is insane for this very reason- America is the fattest country in the world. Sad to say, but it's true. That's biggest source of our healthcare problems and nationalizing healthcare doesn't solve this problem or reduce costs- it would drive them, to be honest. Then it raises a very good question- given how obese/overweight people are in this country, why should someone who eats right, exercises, and avoids things like smoking, regardless if their rich, middle class, or poor, be forced to pay more for healthcare because a majority live on McDonalds and refuse to do any physical work? If anything, a better solution is to allow healthcare companies to charge more for people who are obese/smoke and have reduced rates for those who demonstrate that they can eat and exercise properly and eat things like McDonalds in moderation. Then we'd be encouraging real change for the better.

Or maybe you could have a public health care department which would make public health an important matter and inform people about the risks associated to obesity, wether its diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol, and all the problems associated to these diseases (heart stroke, diabetic wound, death, brain damage, liver damage, kidney damage, etc)
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
[QUOTE="Krigen89"][QUOTE="Vampyronight"]drj clearly knows what he's talking. Furthermore, comparing the cost of a socialized healthcare country to ours is insane for this very reason- America is the fattest country in the world. Sad to say, but it's true. That's biggest source of our healthcare problems and nationalizing healthcare doesn't solve this problem or reduce costs- it would drive them, to be honest. Then it raises a very good question- given how obese/overweight people are in this country, why should someone who eats right, exercises, and avoids things like smoking, regardless if their rich, middle class, or poor, be forced to pay more for healthcare because a majority live on McDonalds and refuse to do any physical work? If anything, a better solution is to allow healthcare companies to charge more for people who are obese/smoke and have reduced rates for those who demonstrate that they can eat and exercise properly and eat things like McDonalds in moderation. Then we'd be encouraging real change for the better.

Or maybe you could have a public health care department which would make public health an important matter and inform people about the risks associated to obesity, wether its diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol, and all the problems associated to these diseases (heart stroke, diabetic wound, death, brain damage, liver damage, kidney damage, etc)

We have that already- it doesn't work. Even if we didn't have it and you wanted to try it, it doesn't shield us from the truth- people aren't being asked to take responsibility for their own health. Most people know that taking in a lot of sugars can lead to diabetes- Coke and Pepsi sales have never been better. McDonalds stock price continues to sore because it always seems to find new revenue streams (in other words, getting people to buy the food there). A government department to "inform" us....yeah, that worked so well. :roll: Since that has failed (or even if you want to expand it more, will fail), the next step is to just start banning people from doing what they want.
Avatar image for klubbis
klubbis

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 klubbis
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
Socialized health care works fine here in scandinavia. The problem with private care is that it relies on profit, and curing people isnt profitable, treatment is. Imagine the following scenario: 2 great medical scientists ,working in the private sector, find a cure for aids. It can be applied orally via a small pill at a very low production cost. Is the world freed from aids? No. It is much more profitable to treat millions and millions of patients every month than to cure them forever with one small pill. It is just wrong to blend profit and peoples health, personally I think it's a sick idea to begin with. Sure, Taxes are very high where I live. Hell, I spend 33% of my paycheck on it. But for that money we collectively pay for the following: *free education (yes, ALL education is free) *Free medical care(one of the best in the world, for real) *Free dental care until the age of 20 *Great infrastructure *A great social security system *A good elderly care As far as I'm concerned It's worth it. Sure, everyting isn't perfect, but at least we're looking out for each other.
Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#42 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts
Your note on people over 70 being denied life-saving treatments is flat-out false. :|
Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts
[QUOTE="gamelord2004"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="gamelord2004"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Self insure is the same as paying for health insurance. We need to have free health care for all citizens. Guess what....in this country people do not get surgeries they need or transplants.LJS9502_basic

Thats because there are not enough organ donors. That has nothing to do with nationalized free health care

Then the TC should not have brought them up as a positive for private health care...however, even so, the poor have less of a chance of getting a transplant than the wealthy. Coincidence?

proff?  The organ always goes to the person who needs it the most

Keep thinking that....

In support of LJS , Have you seen the movie John Q?
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#44 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
Seems to work ok here :|
Avatar image for drj077
drj077

8375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 drj077
Member since 2003 • 8375 Posts

LOL such ignorance... The US system is flawed simply because, as pointed out, there is pretty much no health promotion going on, no prevention, only curing... yet, if people knew what's good and what's bad, the need to ER visits would go down a lot, cutting down on hospital and insurance costs The Canadian system might not be perfect at all, but it's a lot more respectable to me, in that it cares about people's health, not only their diseasesKrigen89

No.  You're actually quite misinformed. 

Health promotion in the United States begins pretty much during Middle School with what your common student would consider to be "health class."  These classes continue through high school and are accompanied by sexual education. 

In this country, a person graduates high school knowing the difference between a healthy lifestyle and an unhealthy one. 

Prevention in the United States also begins with health class and if diseases can not be stabilized early, then other avenues are investigated.  Medications are quite capable of preventing a whole host of diseases and if recognized early enough hypertension, type II diabetes, coronary artery disease, and the like can all be essentially cured or at least carefully controlled.  Doctors quite willingly put the answers to a whole host of problems into the hands of any given patient everyday.  Most patients are well educated about their disease in the doctor's office, as well, so the blame for a majority of disease progressing acutally rests with the patients and society in general.

For the majority of diseases there is no cure, so doctors spend the majority of their day tweeking treatment regimens to assure that a patients disease remains under control.   

Avatar image for diablo_human
diablo_human

754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 diablo_human
Member since 2007 • 754 Posts
England's free health care is amazing, I've broken my arm, collar, 2 ribs, 2 fingers, had a hernia operation, stitches on my head, and my nose reshaped after it was bent from braking it, all for free. You have some points about the waiting lists though, and several other good points, I think the best option is both, like England's.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
Nationalised health care is brilliant, I would rather live in a country that provided it. Health should be available to every single person, no matter how much money they have in their wallets.
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
[QUOTE="klubbis"]Socialized health care works fine here in scandinavia. The problem with private care is that it relies on profit, and curing people isnt profitable, treatment is. Imagine the following scenario: 2 great medical scientists ,working in the private sector, find a cure for aids. It can be applied orally via a small pill at a very low production cost. Is the world freed from aids? No. It is much more profitable to treat millions and millions of patients every month than to cure them forever with one small pill. It is just wrong to blend profit and peoples health, personally I think it's a sick idea to begin with. Sure, Taxes are very high where I live. Hell, I spend 33% of my paycheck on it. But for that money we collectively pay for the following: *free education (yes, ALL education is free) *Free medical care(one of the best in the world, for real) *Free dental care until the age of 20 *Great infrastructure *A great social security system *A good elderly care As far as I'm concerned It's worth it. Sure, everyting isn't perfect, but at least we're looking out for each other.

If that's what you guys want to do, I say go for it. And of course you have a right to weigh in if nationalized healthcare is a good idea, but in relation to the US, it's a TERRIBLE idea. Scandinavia has a for more group-minded society, while Americans thrive on individualism. I'm sure you don't know this, but many Americans, especially those who make over $200,000, pay as much as 50% or more (depending on location) in taxes. Your 33% tax rate looks wonderful by comparison. Furthermore, regardless of whether people agree with our current policies in Iraq, Americans demand a large, powerful military. We can't have both and in the end, the US will choose a strong military over nationalized healthcare. Finally, we're already in debt up to our ears thanks to every president since Herbert Hoover. The 3rd largest amount of federal (national) spending goes to just pay the INTEREST on our debt, not the actual debt itself. And the debt is getting bigger- do we really need the government to take control of healthcare when we can't even fund our current obligations? If the government would pay off the debt, then we can talk about additional expenditures.
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
Nationalised health care is brilliant, I would rather live in a country that provided it. Health should be available to every single person, no matter how much money they have in their wallets.Marx_Brother
Health isn't given to you by the government- your decisions in daily life provide that. If everyone heeded that advice, healthcare would be SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper.
Avatar image for klubbis
klubbis

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 klubbis
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="Vampyronight"][QUOTE="klubbis"]Socialized health care works fine here in scandinavia. The problem with private care is that it relies on profit, and curing people isnt profitable, treatment is. Imagine the following scenario: 2 great medical scientists ,working in the private sector, find a cure for aids. It can be applied orally via a small pill at a very low production cost. Is the world freed from aids? No. It is much more profitable to treat millions and millions of patients every month than to cure them forever with one small pill. It is just wrong to blend profit and peoples health, personally I think it's a sick idea to begin with. Sure, Taxes are very high where I live. Hell, I spend 33% of my paycheck on it. But for that money we collectively pay for the following: *free education (yes, ALL education is free) *Free medical care(one of the best in the world, for real) *Free dental care until the age of 20 *Great infrastructure *A great social security system *A good elderly care As far as I'm concerned It's worth it. Sure, everyting isn't perfect, but at least we're looking out for each other.

If that's what you guys want to do, I say go for it. And of course you have a right to weigh in if nationalized healthcare is a good idea, but in relation to the US, it's a TERRIBLE idea. Scandinavia has a for more group-minded society, while Americans thrive on individualism. I'm sure you don't know this, but many Americans, especially those who make over $200,000, pay as much as 50% or more (depending on location) in taxes. Your 33% tax rate looks wonderful by comparison. Furthermore, regardless of whether people agree with our current policies in Iraq, Americans demand a large, powerful military. We can't have both and in the end, the US will choose a strong military over nationalized healthcare. Finally, we're already in debt up to our ears thanks to every president since Herbert Hoover. The 3rd largest amount of federal (national) spending goes to just pay the INTEREST on our debt, not the actual debt itself. And the debt is getting bigger- do we really need the government to take control of healthcare when we can't even fund our current obligations? If the government would pay off the debt, then we can talk about additional expenditures.

Good points. Though I must raise the question whiether americans really want a large-scale military as you have now. I'm actually half-american and many of my relatives over there are pretty p***ed at what their tax money is going to. I can understand that people want a decent defensive military, but waging two wars at once on the other side of the planet does get expensive(I don't want this to turn in to a pro vs anti war discussion). Of course, I'm guessing I don't have half the insight that you who's living there have, just some thoughts from my perspective. In scandinavia, or at least in Sweden, we also have a income based tax system. I think this in essence is a good thing, if it's balanced fairly.