Obama named 15th best president by 238 Presidential Scholars

I dont think it's worth arguing about any more Snipes. If you genuinely think he's so stupid that he would thank himself Ron Burgundy style that's your decision.

In regards to this whole 'he writes for congress' thing though, you simply don't know what you're talking about. He's a pool writer. He writes pool reports. Not articles.

Ninja-Hippo

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

I dont think it's worth arguing about any more Snipes. If you genuinely think he's so stupid that he would thank himself Ron Burgundy style that's your decision.

In regards to this whole 'he writes for congress' thing though, you simply don't know what you're talking about. He's a pool writer. He writes pool reports. Not articles.

Snipes_2

He writes about Congress, not for Congress. There's a world of difference. And, frankly, you've been extremely irrational in your arguments here.

I dont think it's worth arguing about any more Snipes. If you genuinely think he's so stupid that he would thank himself Ron Burgundy style that's your decision.

In regards to this whole 'he writes for congress' thing though, you simply don't know what you're talking about. He's a pool writer. He writes pool reports. Not articles.

Ninja-Hippo

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

I dont think it's worth arguing about any more Snipes. If you genuinely think he's so stupid that he would thank himself Ron Burgundy style that's your decision.

In regards to this whole 'he writes for congress' thing though, you simply don't know what you're talking about. He's a pool writer. He writes pool reports. Not articles.

Snipes_2

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

I dont think it's worth arguing about any more Snipes. If you genuinely think he's so stupid that he would thank himself Ron Burgundy style that's your decision.

In regards to this whole 'he writes for congress' thing though, you simply don't know what you're talking about. He's a pool writer. He writes pool reports. Not articles.

worlock77

He writes about Congress, not for Congress. There's a world of difference. And, frankly, you've been extremely irrational in your arguments here.

"National Journal is aimed at Washington insiders.[3] It is mostly read by members of Congress, Capitol Hill staffers, the White House, Executive Branch agencies, the media, think tanks, corporations, associations and lobbyists. Most of the journal's content can be accessed only by subscribers. The yearly subscription rate is $1,160."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Journal

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

I dont think it's worth arguing about any more Snipes. If you genuinely think he's so stupid that he would thank himself Ron Burgundy style that's your decision.

In regards to this whole 'he writes for congress' thing though, you simply don't know what you're talking about. He's a pool writer. He writes pool reports. Not articles.

Ninja-Hippo

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"] Doesn't matter, he still writes for congress etc...Which is what I said. Snipes_2

He writes about Congress, not for Congress. There's a world of difference. And, frankly, you've been extremely irrational in your arguments here.

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

He writes about Congress, not for Congress. There's a world of difference. And, frankly, you've been extremely irrational in your arguments here.

the_new_guy_92

If you read my other post I said "President, Congress etc.." that includes those other groups. :/

Snipes_2

FDR FTW!!!

Where are the actual statistics for the presidents? They mention the rankings for luck, imagination, etc but I don't see the full rankings on there unless I'm missing something.

Just a recap of your argument Snipes: 'Obama is so stupid he thanked himself because of the teleprompter.' In fact he did not. The teleprompter messed up for his guest, and he returned to the stage to thank himself as a light hearted joke. 'Prove it' Ok. Here is a newspaper article from one of the most prestigious papers in the world. The writer has 11 articles all available online which are criticle of Obama, and as such any accusations of bias on his part are irrational. In proving it was a joke, he gets the original transcript of the speech and contacts the man who wrote it, who confirms that it was indeed just a joke. 'Yes but he writes for congress so it cannot be trusted.' If that is your counter-argument i think we are done here. Ninja-Hippo

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

If you read my other post I said "President, Congress etc.." that includes those other groups. :/

Ninja-Hippo

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

If you read my other post I said "President, Congress etc.." that includes those other groups. :/

Snipes_2

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Just a recap of your argument Snipes: 'Obama is so stupid he thanked himself because of the teleprompter.' In fact he did not. The teleprompter messed up for his guest, and he returned to the stage to thank himself as a light hearted joke. 'Prove it' Ok. Here is a newspaper article from one of the most prestigious papers in the world. The writer has 11 articles all available online which are criticle of Obama, and as such any accusations of bias on his part are irrational. In proving it was a joke, he gets the original transcript of the speech and contacts the man who wrote it, who confirms that it was indeed just a joke. 'Yes but he writes for congress so it cannot be trusted.' If that is your counter-argument i think we are done here. Snipes_2

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Just a recap of your argument Snipes: 'Obama is so stupid he thanked himself because of the teleprompter.' In fact he did not. The teleprompter messed up for his guest, and he returned to the stage to thank himself as a light hearted joke. 'Prove it' Ok. Here is a newspaper article from one of the most prestigious papers in the world. The writer has 11 articles all available online which are criticle of Obama, and as such any accusations of bias on his part are irrational. In proving it was a joke, he gets the original transcript of the speech and contacts the man who wrote it, who confirms that it was indeed just a joke. 'Yes but he writes for congress so it cannot be trusted.' If that is your counter-argument i think we are done here. Ninja-Hippo

Really? The transcripts written for Cowen aren't in any files and In the Obama transcripts there's no Thank You. How do we know it's a joke if we don't have Cowen's transcripts? He does write for Congress, you said yourself that they read it etc...Snipes_2

If we're talking about the irish Prime Minister and Obama's mix-up with the teleprompter, it was indeed a mistake and Obama did make a joke out of it when he went back on stage. I remember hearing it on Fox.

If you read my other post I said "President, Congress etc.." that includes those other groups. :/

Snipes_2

That doesn't mean he writes for those people. Seriously dude. Just because you subscribe to a publication doesn't mean that publication's journalists are writing for you. They're writing for their publication, which is, presumably, about a topic that you are interested in.

Obama should be the last one.bobdood99

Oh really. How might he be worse than James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson?

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]If you read my other post I said "President, Congress etc.." that includes those other groups. :/

worlock77

That doesn't mean he writes for those people. Seriously dude. Just because you subscribe to a publication doesn't mean that publication's journalists are writing for you. They're writing for their publication, which is, presumably, about a topic that you are interested in.

Well this has gotten interesting...

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]If you read my other post I said "President, Congress etc.." that includes those other groups. :/

Snipes_2

That doesn't mean he writes for those people. Seriously dude. Just because you subscribe to a publication doesn't mean that publication's journalists are writing for you. They're writing for their publication, which is, presumably, about a topic that you are interested in.

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

That doesn't mean he writes for those people. Seriously dude. Just because you subscribe to a publication doesn't mean that publication's journalists are writing for you. They're writing for their publication, which is, presumably, about a topic that you are interested in.

Ninja-Hippo

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]If you read my other post I said "President, Congress etc.." that includes those other groups. :/

Snipes_2

That doesn't mean he writes for those people. Seriously dude. Just because you subscribe to a publication doesn't mean that publication's journalists are writing for you. They're writing for their publication, which is, presumably, about a topic that you are interested in.

You've got to be trolling in this thread. There's no other logic reason for this kind of irrationality. And with that I am done with this. I have better things to do with my time than to go around in circles with someone who won't even attempt to form a rational argument.

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

That doesn't mean he writes for those people. Seriously dude. Just because you subscribe to a publication doesn't mean that publication's journalists are writing for you. They're writing for their publication, which is, presumably, about a topic that you are interested in.

worlock77

You've got to be trolling in this thread. There's no other logic reason for this kind of irrationality. And with that I am done with this. I have better things to do with my time than to go around in circles with someone who won't even attempt to form a rational argument.

He does in fact write for Congress and other Political groups. That's who he has in mind when he writes. I never said he writes only for Congress :?

Snipes_2

EDIT: and he doesn't have anyone in mind when he writes because HE'S A POOL REPORTER. :roll:

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

He does in fact write for Congress and other Political groups. That's who he has in mind when he writes. I never said he writes only for Congress :?

Ninja-Hippo

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"] I read it, I don't see the part where Obama thanks himself. Ninja-Hippo