Close the loop holes.......don't make it legal.If there are loopholes wouldn't you want to fix it?
SgtKevali
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Close the loop holes.......don't make it legal.If there are loopholes wouldn't you want to fix it?
SgtKevali
[QUOTE="Loco_Live"]
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. SpartanMSU
So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.
Yep. That's where all of our money should be put into. Stopping whaling. Because that's obviously the only and most important purpose of government...Because invloving our selves in wars that had nothing to do with us is better?
Some people sell cocaine to survive, just putting that out there...[QUOTE="enix165"]
Some people hunt whales to survive, just putting that out there.
BuryMe
Some people steal other peoples ID to survive, just putting that out there...
[spoiler] is that relevant :|?... [/spoiler]
Some people sell cocaine to survive, just putting that out there...[QUOTE="BuryMe"]
[QUOTE="enix165"]
Some people hunt whales to survive, just putting that out there.
Xx_Hopeless_xX
Some people steal other peoples ID to survive, just putting that out there...
The fact that some people hunt whales to survive doens't mean it's suddenly a good idea to sanction the killing of an endagered species.Just like the fact that some people selling cocaise just to survive doesn't automatically mean it's a good idea to legalise the potentially danerous drug.
Your example of identity theft was good, too.
Sorry, I had to delete your spoiler tags. Glitchspot wouldn't let me post them
Oh please, like the right suddenly cares about the whales. :roll: Anyway, I disagree with him. Hope he changes his mind or something.TauruslinkI was thinking the exact same thing.
This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. Ninja-HippoIf they are doing it illegally now, then they are not going to follow any restrictions. It just makes it easier for them to do. And considering many currently whaled species are endangered, we should not make it easier for people to wipe them off the face of the earth.
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. Loco_Live
So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.
The whole middle east thing is completely irrelevant, it has nothing to do with this. :? It is a simple fact of life that international law is incredibly hard to enforce because there are no international police. Therefore, if it is international law that whaling is completely illegal that does virtually nothing to stop people whaling because there's nobody there to make sure that law is enforced. If you ALLOW the countries where whaling occurs to do so, you give the power back to their governments to regulate and control it and REDUCE the amount of whales which die as a result of it. This will benefit the species far more than simply writing on a piece of paper that you can't do it.[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. Loco_Live
So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.
Why is it the US's job all of a suddden to enforce international regulations and laws?
[QUOTE="Loco_Live"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. Ninja-Hippo
So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.
The whole middle east thing is completely irrelevant, it has nothing to do with this. :? It is a simple fact of life that international law is incredibly hard to enforce because there are no international police. Therefore, if it is international law that whaling is completely illegal that does virtually nothing to stop people whaling because there's nobody there to make sure that law is enforced. If you ALLOW the countries where whaling occurs to do so, you give the power back to their governments to regulate and control it and REDUCE the amount of whales which die as a result of it. This will benefit the species far more than simply writing on a piece of paper that you can't do it. You assume their governments want to regulate it...which doesn't seem to be the case now....since they allow whaling.:?so what if some communities have relied on whaling in the past, times change, time for a new career.
how many blacksmiths do we have anymore, after the motor car came and horses were made redundant they pretty much all had to look for a new career.
Just so you know, you're not as clever as you think you are. :PCritics of the administration will have a whale of a time due to this.
T_P_O
[QUOTE="Loco_Live"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. Ninja-Hippo
So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.
The whole middle east thing is completely irrelevant, it has nothing to do with this. :? It is a simple fact of life that international law is incredibly hard to enforce because there are no international police. Therefore, if it is international law that whaling is completely illegal that does virtually nothing to stop people whaling because there's nobody there to make sure that law is enforced. If you ALLOW the countries where whaling occurs to do so, you give the power back to their governments to regulate and control it and REDUCE the amount of whales which die as a result of it. This will benefit the species far more than simply writing on a piece of paper that you can't do it.How do you know those countries would want to regulate it?
[QUOTE="Loco_Live"]
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. SgtKevali
So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.
Why is it the US's job all of a suddden to enforce international regulations and laws?
all of a sudden?
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
[QUOTE="Loco_Live"]
So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.
gamedude2020
Why is it the US's job all of a suddden to enforce international regulations and laws?
all of a sudden?
What I'm asking is why is it the US's job to enforce this sort of regulation? Is it written down that they have to somewhere? Like I said, I don't know a lot about this.
agreed. everyone loves to judge. they're arguing that this move could save the population of the NEXT DECADE. People have been hunting whales for hundred's of years. I dont want them to go extinct. So if they're saying this might help out the population, then at least hear them out.I would fully research the issue before heaping condemnation on the administration. I'm not a fan of Obama either, but I also know little about the research that is being used to explain how this will affect whale populations.
Atheos-Arkhaios
What I'm asking is why is it the US's job to enforce this sort of regulation? Is it written down that they have to somewhere? Like I said, I don't know a lot about this.
SgtKevali
if you are a global superpower then I guess it's your job to be global police guy, to protect your own interests and ideals...
[QUOTE="JustPlainLucas"][QUOTE="T_P_O"]Just so you know, you're not as clever as you think you are. :P Yes, my mind is as bad as my pun.Critics of the administration will have a whale of a time due to this.
T_P_O
I got a laugh out of it :P
Yep. That's where all of our money should be put into. Stopping whaling. Because that's obviously the only and most important purpose of government...[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]
[QUOTE="Loco_Live"]
So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.
Loco_Live
Because invloving our selves in wars that had nothing to do with us is better?
Yep. Terrorism has nothing to do with us.:roll:
I don't want to argue this, so don't reply.
I don't see the problem. Why couldn't they hunt whales to begin with? If extinction is the problem I can understand that.
Because many whale species are endangered. They were nearly whaled to extinction in the past.I don't see the problem. Why couldn't they hunt whales to begin with? If extinction is a problem I can understand that.
airshocker
Well funny you should say that...whale species are endangered....I don't see the problem. Why couldn't they hunt whales to begin with? If extinction is a problem I can understand that.
airshocker
If extinction is the problem I can see why this wouldn't be a good idea. But the ocean is a big place, are they really as endangered as we think they are?
On another note, this definitely isn't something the administration needs to be thinking about ATM. The US has much bigger problems.
Eh, I'm rather indifferent. Perhaps it isn't the wisest decision, but I don't know exactly what is the plan with regards to the issue. Would this have some sort of catastrophic long term effect on humans if they went extinct?
Wow, there are people dying and crime rising and education failing and poverty increasing and jobs being lost, and we're upset over whales. Priorities, priorities. Come on Barack, move on past this joke of an issue and let's tackle the real problems eh? Maniacc1Problems like this can't be put on the back burner. If you say, "We'll address it after the economy, the two wars, healthcare reform, etc" then when we finally get to addressing the issue the whales are gone. It happens far too easily.
[QUOTE="Maniacc1"]Wow, there are people dying and crime rising and education failing and poverty increasing and jobs being lost, and we're upset over whales. Priorities, priorities. Come on Barack, move on past this joke of an issue and let's tackle the real problems eh? mattbbplProblems like this can't be put on the back burner. If you say, "We'll address it after the economy, the two wars, healthcare reform, etc" then when we finally get to addressing the issue the whales are gone. It happens far too easily. I agree with you, but I don't think the issue is worth top priority. When it comes down to it, I'd much rather an animal that has no knowledge of life's meaning die than people who could have been helped. I'm not saying to kill the whales, I'm just sorta questioning the attention this issue seems to be bringing about.
Problems like this can't be put on the back burner. If you say, "We'll address it after the economy, the two wars, healthcare reform, etc" then when we finally get to addressing the issue the whales are gone. It happens far too easily.mattbbpl
The global ban ISN'T lifted, though. While this might be an issue some people care about, we have much more pressing matters to attend to.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad the guy is hanging himself for the next election, but while he is President I'd like him to do things that actually help more than a niche community.
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]Problems like this can't be put on the back burner. If you say, "We'll address it after the economy, the two wars, healthcare reform, etc" then when we finally get to addressing the issue the whales are gone. It happens far too easily.airshocker
The global ban ISN'T lifted, though. While this might be an issue some people care about, we have much more pressing matters to attend to.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad the guy is hanging himself for the next election, but while he is President I'd like him to do things that actually help more than a niche community.
I know it's not lifted. I was strictly referring to the "we have more important things to tackle first" mentality.Wow, there are people dying and crime rising and education failing and poverty increasing and jobs being lost, and we're upset over whales. Priorities, priorities. Come on Barack, move on past this joke of an issue and let's tackle the real problems eh? Maniacc1It's very difficult to prioritize.
Losing whales might not seem like a big deal, but such a significant loss of sealife could potentially kill more people (in the long run) than any war we're fighting right now.
You assume their governments want to regulate it...which doesn't seem to be the case now....since they allow whaling.:?LJS9502_basicI imagine if whaling is an important part of their economy they will very much be willing to regulate it. Either way the current system of writing on a piece of paper that you cannot whale any more is clearly useless.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You assume their governments want to regulate it...which doesn't seem to be the case now....since they allow whaling.:?Ninja-HippoI imagine if whaling is an important part of their economy they will very much be willing to regulate it. Either way the current system of writing on a piece of paper that you cannot whale any more is clearly useless. Which means whales go from endangered to extinct. Not a good option IMO.
Totally going to cost him the whale vote. (insert American obesity joke here)fidosim
I don't know whether to laugh or say shame on you. :P
I think you need to learn how we do things in America. If it sounds bad we draw our own conclusions and then seek out facts to support our own opinion rather than trying to know the truth.I would fully research the issue before heaping condemnation on the administration. I'm not a fan of Obama either, but I also know little about the research that is being used to explain how this will affect whale populations.
Atheos-Arkhaios
[QUOTE="gamedude2020"]If they can't be controlled now what makes you think they'll be controlled then Because I tend to think people obey reasonable laws. Banning all whaling forces anyone who needs whaling to do it illegally. If they can do it within the law however, they probably will. These aren't monsters who break laws for the sake of breaking them...all it does is stop illegal whaling, which is faaaar worse. if they do it legally, they can be controlled about when, where and how much they do it...
0Tyler0
If you actually read up on the story, the countries signing this agreement have to agree to REDUCE the number of whales being hunted each year, implement an oversight program and take part in the whale DNA registry. People are knee-jerk reacting to this rather than considering the facts; with this plan, whale hunting will be legal. That sucks, but before we flip out we need to examine what our actual goal is, and if that is 'saving the whales' then you cannot argue that this plan is wrong because it will actively and decisively REDUCE the number of whales killed each year. Ninja-Hippo
since none of us know the actual provisions of the agreement, your conclusion is only as good as an educated guess. how are the countries going to actually regulate the whaling activities? how are they going to actually help preserve whales? does the international community have oversight to prevent these countries from abusing their rights? until we know the precise answers to these questions and the numbers to back them up, there's absolutely no reason to support the lifting of ban on whaling.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment