On tonight's episode of Deadliest Warrior...

Saddam Hussein Vs. Pol Pot

Now I stopped watching Deadliest Warrior because it was getting boring and the fanboys on the show were there to entertain the 14 year olds watching the show. However I think I will make an exception for this fight.

What say you OT?

R.I.P Saddam,Pot will watch

edit: not srs btw

it is just so bad factually and anytime the US is up against someone the whole auto winning is tiresome

Season 3 killed it for me, it just feels so dumbed down and boring. I was excited when they brought the ex navy seal on. But it just feels bias and they are overlooking so much

Season 3 killed it for me, it just feels so dumbed down and boring. I was excited when they brought the ex navy seal on. But it just feels bias and they are overlooking so much

James161324

Kind of tacky. Who was the better mass murderer?

I don'tmind the show as much as some people here. But then again, I don't care that much about all that miltaristic television stuff.

Sounds like a weird matchup for the show though.

Kind of tacky. Who was the better mass murderer?

sonicare

how the hell will they test the fighting ability of two individuals... Better yet, who cares?

I never liked the show, Comanche beating a Mongol? Spartans beating Samurai?Give me a break.

I stopped watching because the people on it treat it like a constant who's dick is bigger game..it gets old really quick.katana_duo

Idon't even want to know what you meant by that.

Actually it was kinda interesting when they got a Mujahadeen fighter on the show, come to think about it (I've seen snippets of episodes)

Deadliest Warrior got gimmicky when they started comparing specific people instead of civilisation, etc. I mean come on. Washington vs Napoleon! How can you compare these two based on weapons only. They were leaders. Their tactics are much more important than their weapons.

That's like if they had Westmoreland (US)vs Giap (Viet Cong). Sure, on paper the US would win with its weapons, but tactics would play a much bigger role. It's become too silly now.:roll:

Spartans beating Samurai?Tokugawa77

They should just do ones with the characters of Epic Rap Battles

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFA-rOls8YA

[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"]Spartans beating Samurai?OrkHammer007

pretty bad. Samurai would have had guns. Guns= automatic win in my book.

They should just do ones with the characters of Epic Rap Battles

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFA-rOls8YA

MetallicaKings

Hitler won.

[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"]Spartans beating Samurai?Tokugawa77

pretty bad. Samurai would have had guns. Guns= automatic win in my book.

[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"]

[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]I will never understand how they got that result. How badly rigged was the testing? :|

OrkHammer007

pretty bad. Samurai would have had guns. Guns= automatic win in my book.

Well it is the show's fault, then, for not specifying which era their "saumurai" was from. Since it was not specified, I see it as all weapons from all periods being fair game. In any case, in a pitched battle, medieval japanese armies would beat Spartans imo. You got numbers, firearms, cavalry, and even archers (spartans despised bows as being cowardly).

In any case, in a pitched battle, medieval japanese armies would beat Spartans imo. You got numbers, firearms, cavalry, and even archers (spartans despised bows as being cowardly).

Tokugawa77

this show makes about as many logical conclusions as the System Wars forum