braindead
This topic is locked from further discussion.
The government is imperfect, not incompetent. Anyone who thinks the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any kind of authority.
jimkabrhel
They're not terrible compared to other governments in the world, but they're not above doing some f*cked up things that wouldn't/shouldn't be tolerated by an average person.
Anyone who doesn't think the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any kind of accountability for the actions of their government.The government is imperfect, not incompetent. Anyone who thinks the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any kind of authority.
jimkabrhel
[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]Anyone who doesn't think the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any type of accountability for the actions of their government. I see. And how long do you estimate it'll be before the CIA kidnaps you in a burlap sack and throws you in the ocean for your dissent?The government is imperfect, not incompetent. Anyone who thinks the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any kind of authority.
TigerWars
[QUOTE="TigerWars"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]Anyone who doesn't think the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any type of accountability for the actions of their government. I see. And how long do you estimate it'll be before the CIA kidnaps you in a burlap sack and throws you in the ocean for your dissent?The government is imperfect, not incompetent. Anyone who thinks the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any kind of authority.
Makhaidos
Â
Good counter-point my friend.
You forgot to tell me to take my tin foil hat off.
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]Funny you should mention that. I was just thinking that a lot of the hardcore libertarians seem like the sort to be upset in their supposedly ideal setting. Their patron saint Ayn Rand benefited from social security/medicare.she also had a creepy sex life.The government is imperfect, not incompetent. Anyone who thinks the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any kind of authority.
Makhaidos
REAAAALLLLY creapy.
I see. And how long do you estimate it'll be before the CIA kidnaps you in a burlap sack and throws you in the ocean for your dissent?[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="TigerWars"] Anyone who doesn't think the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any type of accountability for the actions of their government.TigerWars
Â
Good counter-point my friend.
You forgot to tell me to take my tin foil hat off.
Oh no, keep it on; tin foil is damn near impossible to sink.Their patron saint Ayn Rand benefited from social security/medicare.she also had a creepy sex life.[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Funny you should mention that. I was just thinking that a lot of the hardcore libertarians seem like the sort to be upset in their supposedly ideal setting. MakeMeaSammitch
REAAAALLLLY creapy.
Well, I'd be a hypocrite and a half to criticize her for that. >_>It hard for an organization to actually be evil if every single one of it's ruling members is completely incompetent. They may do evil things but it's only a result of pure stupidity. ferrari2001But would it not be possible for rich men to exploit the stupid, and corrupt them, to serve their agenda?
[QUOTE="TigerWars"][QUOTE="Makhaidos"] I see. And how long do you estimate it'll be before the CIA kidnaps you in a burlap sack and throws you in the ocean for your dissent?Makhaidos
Â
Good counter-point my friend.
You forgot to tell me to take my tin foil hat off.
Oh no, keep it on; tin foil is damn near impossible to sink. Good talk, man.[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="TigerWars"]Oh no, keep it on; tin foil is damn near impossible to sink. Good talk, man. Wow, you're a lot cooler than the other conspiracy theorists I've strung along here. I think I'll stalk you a lil' bit.Â
Good counter-point my friend.
You forgot to tell me to take my tin foil hat off.
TigerWars
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]she also had a creepy sex life.[QUOTE="Makhaidos"] Their patron saint Ayn Rand benefited from social security/medicare.Makhaidos
REAAAALLLLY creapy.
Well, I'd be a hypocrite and a half to criticize her for that. >_>were you black mailing somebody half your age into sleeping with you?Well, I'd be a hypocrite and a half to criticize her for that. >_>were you black mailing somebody half your age into sleeping with you? Last time I answered that question, the FBI had some things to say to me.[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]she also had a creepy sex life.
REAAAALLLLY creapy.
MakeMeaSammitch
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]were you black mailing somebody half your age into sleeping with you? Last time I answered that question, the FBI had some things to say to me.[QUOTE="Makhaidos"] Well, I'd be a hypocrite and a half to criticize her for that. >_>Makhaidos
I'm assuming you're referring to the USA. Look...I'm not saying that this country doesn't have problems. Sure, I guess you could say that the government is a little bit evil or a little bit incompetent. But if it were REALLY evil or incompetent, I just can't help but to think that this country would be a lot worse off than it is. Let's be realistic here: the USA may not be the best country in which to live, but it's far from the worst. The standard of living here is at least fairly high for most people. And even though we definitely have injustices, we don't have anything like genocide. We don't get arrested for expressing beliefs which are unpopular in a religious or political sense. I really hate to bring up the "things could be worse" cliche. But if our government were TRULY evil or incompetent, I suspect that things WOULD be a hell of a lot worse.Incompetence: Opposing parties refuse to cooperate with eachother, and only work for thier own political gain, creating a system in which important issues hardly see any kind of resolutions. Adding to this, nearly all are corrupt and work in a deeply corrupt system in which lobbyists control their votes and corporations fund thier campaigns. Though some politicians have honorable intentions (your team!), there is always some check or balance in government that prevents them from accompishing meaningful legislation (damn other team!)
Â
Evil: A shadow government, or a concealed third-party (think the Emperor from Star Wars), pull strings from behind the scenes. Disallowing any important issues from seeing any kind of resolution to keep the people divided and bickering. The only legislation or major policy decisions that come to light are ones that serve its intentions (Oil, Money Power). Having control over all major banks and corporations (news media, food, military industrial complex, music, hollywood etc.) , they sculpt society as they see fit and even control the government through the guise of lobbyists and special interest groups.
Â
The first seems much more rational but I challenge people to consider if the second option is truly impossible? Couldn't it be true? What wouldn't be possible with unlimited money?
TigerWars
I think it's corrupt. Evil implies the sentient choosing to violate a societal moral or value despite knowing what is accepted and desired by the majority. Corrupt implies wickedness, which is to be twisted in a thought process so that you think you are doing at least some good, when in reality, you aren't.
"Evil" is a childish and subjective term that is overused when describing faceless organizations like Governments. There is no such thing as an evil government, just a government making use of its power.
I dunno dude. Hitler and Stalin were pretty evil and also not very faceless coincidentally. Side note on how Hitler ruined his 'stache but Stalin 'Staches are still going strong."Evil" is a childish and subjective term that is overused when describing faceless organizations like Governments. There is no such thing as an evil government, just a government making use of its power.
The_Power_of_X
2a. Who the **** would speak out on such a powerful force if they found its existence. They can ridicule and kill your reputation through the media. They can murder you. They can murder your family. They can offer you millions of dollars to stay quiet. You have too much faith in the honor of the average person when faced against such an entity.
7. ...See 2a. Also there have been a number of celebrities and public figures (Dave Chapelle, Tupac, Michael Jackson, Woody Harrelson, Lupe Fiasco, Mark Ruffalo) that speak out on them but the general populace (informed by the media) thinks of them only as "CrAaAaZZzy CoOoNnNSpIraCists!! LOLOLOL"
TigerWars
Are you saying thay Dave Chapelle, Lupe Fiasco and Woody Harrelson have more honour and a hell of a lot more courage than the average person? Are they mankind's greatest hope against total domination by the New World Order? Have they somehow avoided the wrath of the NWO-controlled media and gotten off with a light tap on the wrist whilst retaining their very successful careers?
Neither. It is the force that keeps our country together. It is our parent, our lover, and our brother. It is here to protect us and uphold Justice. Capitan_Kid
How does it make you feel that it protected Zimmerman?
[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="famicommander"] Government by nature relies on theft for the perpetuation of its existence. There is no conspiracy theory necessary; they are an organization that is defined and perpetuated by violence. famicommanderHahaha, you're one of those people who think taxation is theft. What I think is irrelevant. Taxation is the involuntary extraction of property by the threat of violence. That's theft.
Anarchy is never going to work. Give it up.
What I think is irrelevant. Taxation is the involuntary extraction of property by the threat of violence. That's theft.[QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="Makhaidos"] Hahaha, you're one of those people who think taxation is theft.WiiCubeM1
Anarchy is never going to work. Give it up.
He doesn't want anarchy, he wants neo-feudalism. He still hasn't explained why rent and taxation aren't two sides of the same coin. Or how self ownership is compatible with liberty, since it means you can transfer the ownership to someone else in the market (like serfdom).allowing mega corporations to exploit their workers and allow american mega cartels to exploit the genetic resources and poor of other countries is evilThe government is imperfect, not incompetent. Anyone who thinks the US government is evil is either delusional, or has a personality that refuses any kind of authority.
jimkabrhel
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]all the options suckmaybe if people demanded better candidates, they would get them, but they don't.why do people keep voting in people they don't like?
wis3boi
This forum is always whining about how awful the government is, but this age group has incredibly low voter turn out. So this itt a lot of complaining by people who don't vote.
Governments tend to be incompetent when the vast majority of citizens vote without thinking. The future remains bleak as long as people continue on with blindly following the words of politicians, biased scientists and media. I hear alot of complaining, but that changes nothing when there is no one to stand up and act. It seems that the western world has become lazy when it comes to politics.
Incompetent isn't the word I'd use. I'd say its more like everyone's too stubborn. Both political parties just like to block whatever action the other side takes, which means nothing meaningful gets done, and everything just turns into a pissing contest. Apparently all the politicians are afraid of trying to do something to benefit the country they live in, just because the other side came up with an idea and they didn't.
all the options suckmaybe if people demanded better candidates, they would get them, but they don't.[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
why do people keep voting in people they don't like?
MakeMeaSammitch
That's a good idea, but how exactly do we demand better candidates?
maybe if people demanded better candidates, they would get them, but they don't.[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
[QUOTE="wis3boi"] all the options suckEnoshimaJunko
That's a good idea, but how exactly do we demand better candidates?
petitions? public support or lack there of? Maybe actually voting?Simple example. Everybody says they care about the economy more than anything, but they vote along lines of abortion/gay rights, (for or against)
Maybe people should actually back up what they say for a start.
[QUOTE="EnoshimaJunko"]
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]maybe if people demanded better candidates, they would get them, but they don't.
MakeMeaSammitch
That's a good idea, but how exactly do we demand better candidates?
petitions? public support or lack there of? Maybe actually voting?Simple example. Everybody says they care about the economy more than anything, but they vote along lines of abortion/gay rights, (for or against)
Maybe people should actually back up what they say for a start.
Or maybe we should just get rid of the dreaded two party system
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment