Out of these five years, which one would you live in?

Out of these five years, which one would you live in?

You would live in any place of your choice for that whole year. You would then be transported back to the present on the last day of the year (December 31st).

I'd live in 2155! Future FTW!:P

Either the future or 1925. I think you'd be mad to try to live in the other 3.

2155 because the me now would be dead long before.. I'd like to see the future or in this case, I would be in 2155. I hope the world doesn't explode by then.

The future or 1925. People did not shower or brush their teeth back in the days.

Definitely the future.

I'm gonna go with 1187 just because I can. What made you choose these particular years OP?

Definitely the future, living in the other years would be a hassle for me.

The first one. Back when my skills could be used to their full potential. (traveling merchant and/or store owner.)

One question: would we be transported back with all the knowledge currently in our heads? Like how Velcro and hybrids and computers work and the business models of giant conglomerates?

If so, I would be a god in 1925 ...

What made you choose these particular years OP?

Radiatedrich91

While I wouldn't mind visiting the other years, 2155 is the one I'd choose to live in because I would miss technology. Commander-Gree

But, you see, my point is you can make technology.

One question: would we be transported back with all the knowledge currently in our heads? Like how Velcro and hybrids and computers work and the business models of giant conglomerates?

my_mortal_coil

I demand someone tell me what 1187 was like. Was their a war going on? How much develpoment would they have? Would i go back to the castle times?

I demand someone tell me what 1187 was like. Was their a war going on? How much development would they have? Would i go back to the castle times?

warownslife

[QUOTE="warownslife"]

I demand someone tell me what 1187 was like. Was their a war going on? How much development would they have? Would i go back to the castle times?

gamerguru100

Argh, I suck at decisions. The future would be interesting, but so would the past. >.>

2155, it would be interesting to see the future. I would not choose1187 because no technology, people didn't bath much, the food.

Argh, I suck at decisions. The future would be interesting, but so would the past. >.>

TwilightTown15

[QUOTE="TwilightTown15"]

Argh, I suck at decisions. The future would be interesting, but so would the past. >.>

warownslife

1187. I would then proceed to show them the wonders of modern technology and that I am a god. My next step would be to prohecy my return in 1987 in America (which I would also discover) then when I get back cross my fingers and hope I'm king.

Assuming that I could be assured of health and survival: 1187, so that I could witness the Battle of Hattin and the Seige of Jerusalem first hand. And also to experience mideval Jerusalem and experience it under both Crusader and Muslim control.

Assuming that I could be assured of health and survival: 1187, so that I could witness the Battle of Hattin and the Seige of Jerusalem first hand. And also to experience mideval Jerusalem and experience it under both Crusader and Muslim control.

worlock77

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Assuming that I could be assured of health and survival: 1187, so that I could witness the Battle of Hattin and the Seige of Jerusalem first hand. And also to experience mideval Jerusalem and experience it under both Crusader and Muslim control.

warownslife

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Assuming that I could be assured of health and survival: 1187, so that I could witness the Battle of Hattin and the Seige of Jerusalem first hand. And also to experience mideval Jerusalem and experience it under both Crusader and Muslim control.

warownslife

Uh, no. And hadn't been for approximately 1,154 years.

[QUOTE="warownslife"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Assuming that I could be assured of health and survival: 1187, so that I could witness the Battle of Hattin and the Seige of Jerusalem first hand. And also to experience mideval Jerusalem and experience it under both Crusader and Muslim control.

worlock77

Uh, no. And hadn't been for approximately 1,154 years.

1187. I would then proceed to show them the wonders of modern technology and that I am a god. My next step would be to prohecy my return in 1987 in America (which I would also discover) then when I get back cross my fingers and hope I'm king.

Plzhelpmelearn

That could backfire on you in a big way if they end up thinking you're the Antichrist.

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]

1187. I would then proceed to show them the wonders of modern technology and that I am a god. My next step would be to prohecy my return in 1987 in America (which I would also discover) then when I get back cross my fingers and hope I'm king.

Radiatedrich91

That could backfire on you in a big way if they end up thinking you're the Antichrist.

Come back to the past. Being a traveling merchant is hard but its easy to start. Simple steps. 1. steal people money and possessions. 2. buy a cart and sell possessions. 3. buy food and everything you would need on a trip. 4. but more stuff and go sell them. 5. repeat. :Dwarownslife

Already know how it was in the past so future would be cool cause no "expert" can tell you what it will be like in the future. Also 1187 was the dark ages! Why the hell would you want to go there?atony12

Year 0 was when he was born. He died in like 32 or something =/Iantheone

[QUOTE="Iantheone"]Year 0 was when he was born. He died in like 32 or something =/smc91352

Generally estimates vary from between around 5 BC to 5 AD. There's no way of knowing exactly (assuming that he even existed in the first place).

[QUOTE="Radiatedrich91"]

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]

1187. I would then proceed to show them the wonders of modern technology and that I am a god. My next step would be to prohecy my return in 1987 in America (which I would also discover) then when I get back cross my fingers and hope I'm king.

warownslife

That could backfire on you in a big way if they end up thinking you're the Antichrist.

[QUOTE="Radiatedrich91"]

That could backfire on you in a big way if they end up thinking you're the Antichrist.

[QUOTE="warownslife"]

[QUOTE="Radiatedrich91"]

That could backfire on you in a big way if they end up thinking you're the Antichrist.

Plzhelpmelearn

Good God man, why?

1925... roaring 20's man. Jazz music and real dancing.

edit:jazz music aka real talent and not computer mastered sound.

I would go for 1683. I am not interested in seeing the future, and while 1925 would be absolutely sweet to see, the opportunity to go further back would be even more tempting. However, being a woman, I think 1683 would be the safest option (though I would choose any of the first 3) since there was enough of an emergence of science by that point to mean that I might not be burned as a witch right away.

1187 because i have an interest in medieval England.

Definitely 2155 cause it would be awesome to see how much things have changed in future.