Feudalism or the Future. I will probably split myself into two kindred spirits and visit both worlds. However, if I had to choose one, I would lean towards the future, since it is still the unknown and I'm curious :P
Anything but the future, I couldn't imagine wanting to come back from all the super advanced technology. Plus I don't believe one can travel into the future, as it is not predetermined
I should remind myself to travel to 1187. In your hypothetical situation, are these time periods in the same dimension as ours, or are seperate. Is it permanent or temporary?CRS98
They're temporarily on Earth.* Read OP again if you want*
I wanna be an assassin so 1459 back when Ezio Auditore was born(not really in real llife,just saying.) and 1925,cuz it was the dawn of the crime era and great depression.i wanna experience that.
Hard to say. None of the past (those years, atleast) would I want to live in. However, I have no way of knowing humanity, the planet, etc will be around in 145 years.
I couldn't even talk to anybody from 1187-1683, so those years are out of the question.
1925 is my safest bet for survival, besides the Great Depression starting 4 years later it's a pretty safe time. For all I know John Connor's resistance could be fighting Terminators in 2155. But, videogames haven't been invented in 1925, so I guess I'll have to go with the future.
None, all of the times are uninteresting. I'd choose the 1800's if I could. I don't want to see the future. I don't think it will be as exciting as movies lead people to believe. I think it will be a time of desolation.
I thought future at first, but could you imagine living so far into the future for a whole year and then coming back? You would have just barely caught up with current technology and then you were teleported back to your primitive life. Therefore I chose the earliest date. Then I will appreciate what we have a lot more when I come back.
I love a good party so 1925 it is. I'd really like to go see Babe Ruth build his house and I think it was Lou Gehrig's rookie year as well. I also think that 1925 was Pitt Stadium's first season.
1459 would be closes to what I would want to visit, but not quite.
Out of these five years, which one would you live in?
You would live in any place of your choice for that whole year. You would then be transported back to the present on the last day of the year (December 31st).
Definitely the future. We already know what happened in the past, but the future hasn't played out yet. I sometimes get a bit sad that I won't live to see the year 3,000 or something like that:(. I can't even fathom what technology will be like by then. Will the world be like in the starwars movies.8)
2155. The only reason I may choose to go back centuries is to be all badass and famous when I reveal "my own" scientific knowledge/theories (and hope that I don't get lynched for it :P).
If i went back into the past i would go and meet and watch leanardo da vinci paint the mona lisa. Or invent or ask him all of the questions i have. I can't even imagine what that would be like.
I guess I'll go with stuff from England, Ireland, Scotland, Germany and Italy then what is/became Canada 1187 /12th century: War, Crusades, Pope stuff 1459 /15th century: The invention of the harpsichord about 9 years before, No scotch for about 30 more years D: 1683 /+30 years: War, No moar wild boars in Britian, no calculus for another year (?) 1925: I could ride the first enclosed (?) double-decker buses in London, buy a Tommy Gun for $175 apparently... 2155: Future!!!
1459 is the only logical answer to brush up on my harpsichord playing. Sober.
Log in to comment