Palin O'Donnell 2012!

  • 101 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ultimas_Blade
Ultimas_Blade

3671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Ultimas_Blade
Member since 2004 • 3671 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

I'd prefer Hitler.

Atleast he would be a compitent military leader while he took away our civil rights.

HoolaHoopMan

Well historically speaking, Hitler was Incompetent militarily speaking.

More competent than Palin or O'Donnell may have been the intended meaning.

Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#52 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"][QUOTE="_R34LiTY_"]

well.....

they're both "hittable", just not electable

That's really the only reason many conservatives like them. They have no idea what they're talking about most of the time.

Wow I was just thinking the same thing about Obama. :shock:
Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#53 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts

I'd prefer Hitler.

Atleast he would be a compitent military leader while he took away our civil rights.

Pixel-Pirate
You would rather have a dictator villian, who killed over 5 million innocent people? Wow Absolutely NO logic in that.
Avatar image for rcafan
rcafan

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 rcafan
Member since 2010 • 2025 Posts
0 serious plain is just =fail you won't get anywhere wit her. i take obama/biden to this date still. and i still plan on voting for them.
Avatar image for rcafan
rcafan

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 rcafan
Member since 2010 • 2025 Posts

you already know the answer your going to get.. Off topic is mostly liberal

Anyway no no no because I do not want Obama to get reelected and destroy more.

edit: woops

fueled-system

destory more he has HELP MORE. you people just CANT ADMIT IT.

what is a shame on this site is people excpet 8 years of faliure to be fix in just two years it does NOT WORK THAT WAY. it can't.

Avatar image for Jph625
Jph625

1046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Jph625
Member since 2009 • 1046 Posts

zero

Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
You would rather have a dictator villian, who killed over 5 million innocent people? Wow Absolutely NO logic in that.bbkkristian
That's extremely immoral to desire Hitler over Palin and O'Donnell, as well as offensive.
Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

That should be interesting! :D

Avatar image for alfredooo
alfredooo

2664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 alfredooo
Member since 2007 • 2664 Posts

joe the plumber should be in congress

Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#60 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

Sadly I think they could possibly get elected. Anyone who's smart wouldn't vote for them.

Avatar image for DJ419
DJ419

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 DJ419
Member since 2005 • 1016 Posts

They both worship Jesus, so God is on their side. What could go wrong?

Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#62 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts

They both worship Jesus, so God is on their side. What could go wrong?

DJ419
What are you implying? :? I'm confused.
Avatar image for DJ419
DJ419

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 DJ419
Member since 2005 • 1016 Posts

[QUOTE="DJ419"]

They both worship Jesus, so God is on their side. What could go wrong?

bbkkristian

What are you implying? :? I'm confused.

So am I. ;)

Avatar image for Maniacc1
Maniacc1

5354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#64 Maniacc1
Member since 2006 • 5354 Posts
If Christine O'Donnell wins or is selected for any level of public office, she will be one of the most uneducated and stupid people to ever win in politics. And I would be scared as hell.
Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#65 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts

[QUOTE="bbkkristian"][QUOTE="DJ419"]

They both worship Jesus, so God is on their side. What could go wrong?

DJ419

What are you implying? :? I'm confused.

So am I. ;)

lol wut?

:lol:

Avatar image for peaceful_anger
peaceful_anger

2568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 peaceful_anger
Member since 2007 • 2568 Posts

I really don't know why people think Palin won't run. If you put the pieces of the puzzle together, you would clearly see she is gearing up for a run.

The first 4 states to vote are Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina. Palin endorsed someone from each state that went on to win their Rep primary. She endorsed Terry Brandstad for Governor in Iowa, Kelly Ayotte for Senator in New Hampshire, Sharon Angle for Senator of Nevada, and Nikki Haley for Governor of South Carolina, and everyone of them is likely to win their races. All of them will basically owe Palin except for maybe Brandstad because he most likely would have won his primary without her help.

But I believe Palin's biggest move that proves she is going to give it a shot is her endorsement of Carly Fiorina for Senator in California and here's why. Romney endorsed Meg Whitman for Governor of California. Now if she wins, she will back Romney....she pretty much said so in her debate with Jerry Brown. I say Palin, knowing she needs a good showing in California if the primary goes on that long, saw this coming, so she endorsed Fiorina. Now if Fiorina wins, she will owe her win to Palin because she was running 2nd in the Rep primary until Palin endorsed her. But here is where it gets interesting. According to the lastest polls Boxer and Fiorina are neck and neck, but Brown is starting to pull away from Whitman, so what happens if Whitman loses and Fiorina wins? Romney would lose his prominent endorsement (of course she would still endorse him, but it wouldn't be as significant), where as, Palin would still have hers.
Seriously, do you really think she is going to pass up a shot when all her ducks are in a row? She has the backing of the grassroots, she can raise tons of money, and her candidates are in the positions she needs them to be in.

I'll make a prediction right now. Palin is going to run. She will be the GOP nominee, and she will pick Lieutenant Colonel Allen West (this is my pick..the guy is awesome), Bobby Jindal, or Paul Ryan for Vice President. Now I personally can't stand identity politics, but in politics, perception is everything, and Palin/West would be an interesting ticket. First woman nominee for President, and first African American nominee for Vice President. You definitely wouldn't be able to say the Republican party is run by "old white men".

Avatar image for warbmxjohn
warbmxjohn

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#67 warbmxjohn
Member since 2007 • 6014 Posts

I doubt they would stand a chance, but crazier things have happened.

Avatar image for Ultimas_Blade
Ultimas_Blade

3671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Ultimas_Blade
Member since 2004 • 3671 Posts

I really don't know why people think Palin won't run. If you put the pieces of the puzzle together, you would clearly see she is gearing up for a run.

The first 4 states to vote are Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina. Palin endorsed someone from each state that went on to win their Rep primary. She endorsed Terry Brandstad for Governor in Iowa, Kelly Ayotte for Senator in New Hampshire, Sharon Angle for Senator of Nevada, and Nikki Haley for Governor of South Carolina, and everyone of them is likely to win their races. All of them will basically owe Palin except for maybe Brandstad because he most likely would have won his primary without her help.

But I believe Palin's biggest move that proves she is going to give it a shot is her endorsement of Carly Fiorina for Senator in California and here's why. Romney endorsed Meg Whitman for Governor of California. Now if she wins, she will back Romney....she pretty much said so in her debate with Jerry Brown. I say Palin, knowing she needs a good showing in California if the primary goes on that long, saw this coming, so she endorsed Fiorina. Now if Fiorina wins, she will owe her win to Palin because she was running 2nd in the Rep primary until Palin endorsed her. But here is where it gets interesting. According to the lastest polls Boxer and Fiorina are neck and neck, but Brown is starting to pull away from Whitman, so what happens if Whitman loses and Fiorina wins? Romney would lose his prominent endorsement (of course she would still endorse him, but it wouldn't be as significant), where as, Palin would still have hers.
Seriously, do you really think she is going to pass up a shot when all her ducks are in a row? She has the backing of the grassroots, she can raise tons of money, and her candidates are in the positions she needs them to be in.

I'll make a prediction right now. Palin is going to run. She will be the GOP nominee, and she will pick Lieutenant Colonel Allen West (this is my pick..the guy is awesome), Bobby Jindal, or Paul Ryan for Vice President. Now I personally can't stand identity politics, but in politics, perception is everything, and Palin/West would be an interesting ticket. First woman nominee for President, and first African American nominee for Vice President. You definitely wouldn't be able to say the Republican party is run by "old white men".

peaceful_anger

I could put everything I own that Palin and Westwould loose nearly as bad as Barry Goldwater. West is nothing but Clarence Thomas and a disgraced serviceman. Palin has no ability to lead a song much less a country. The only one you named that could run for any nation wide office is Paul Ryan. The Republicans in my state would not vote for Jindalin the primary and this year are going to vote a Democrat in office for Governor here in SC (they are skeptical of Haley). Paul Ryan has the albatross of his roadmap that will haunt him in ANY national election.

If Palin won she'd probably pick Ron or RandPaul to appeal to her flock.

Avatar image for peaceful_anger
peaceful_anger

2568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 peaceful_anger
Member since 2007 • 2568 Posts

I could put everything I own that Palin and Westwould loose nearly as bad as Barry Goldwater. West is nothing but Clarence Thomas and a disgraced serviceman. Palin has no ability to lead a song much less a country. The only one you named that could run for any nation wide office is Paul Ryan. The Republicans in my state would not vote for Jindalin the primary and this year are going to vote a Democrat in office for Governor here in SC (they are skeptical of Haley). Paul Ryan has the albatross of his roadmap that will haunt him in ANY national election.

If Palin won she'd probably pick Ron or RandPaul to appeal to her flock.

Ultimas_Blade

I would like to know what you mean by that bolded statement. Kinda sounds like you are calling them Uncle Toms.

Let's see here, Palin has about 9 1/2 years of executive experience vs. Obama's ZERO. If it's between the two, I know who I would pick to run a country. I seriously wonder how a woman who has never had a serious thought in her head according to the left, manages to live in their heads 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The fact that liberals can't hold on to their civility when Palin's name comes up has to do with frustration because you know her influence is growing.

And Nikki Haley will be the next Governor of South Carolina.

Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts
Fifty million. If they run for prez then it'll be a guaranteed Democratic win.Theokhoth
Pretty much.
Avatar image for Mousetaches
Mousetaches

1293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Mousetaches
Member since 2009 • 1293 Posts
So much/10. I would look forward to the debates. I guarantee whichever network showed them would make tons of money off of advertisement. Even rivaling the super bowl.
Avatar image for Eragon3131
Eragon3131

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Eragon3131
Member since 2006 • 164 Posts

Hopefully Ron Paul will expose Palin in the debates for the clueless woman that she is. Then again, he did that to everyone in the 08 debates but no one noticed. As for O'Donnell, I don't see her overcoming the witch and 1st Amendment debacles.

Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts

On a scale of one to a lot, how much do you hope this happens?

Acemaster27

A lot. That's a guarantee that Obama would get re-elected. It would also be the most entertaining election to date.

Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

I'd prefer Hitler.

Atleast he would be a compitent military leader while he took away our civil rights.

HoolaHoopMan

Well historically speaking, Hitler was Incompetent militarily speaking.

Invading russia in winter was an epic fail.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#75 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

The Republicans will not give Palin their nomination.

If they see a chance to topple Pres. Obama in 2012, they are not going to ruin that with Palin (which would likely result in an Obama win even if Obama was experiencing political trouble). I would be willing to bet that there would be a concentrated effort on the Republican side to stamp Palin out.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#76 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]

I could put everything I own that Palin and Westwould loose nearly as bad as Barry Goldwater. West is nothing but Clarence Thomas and a disgraced serviceman. Palin has no ability to lead a song much less a country. The only one you named that could run for any nation wide office is Paul Ryan. The Republicans in my state would not vote for Jindalin the primary and this year are going to vote a Democrat in office for Governor here in SC (they are skeptical of Haley). Paul Ryan has the albatross of his roadmap that will haunt him in ANY national election.

If Palin won she'd probably pick Ron or RandPaul to appeal to her flock.

peaceful_anger

I would like to know what you mean by that bolded statement. Kinda sounds like you are calling them Uncle Toms.

Let's see here, Palin has about 9 1/2 years of executive experience vs. Obama's ZERO. If it's between the two, I know who I would pick to run a country. I seriously wonder how a woman who has never had a serious thought in her head according to the left, manages to live in their heads 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The fact that liberals can't hold on to their civility when Palin's name comes up has to do with frustration because you know her influence is growing.

And Nikki Haley will be the next Governor of South Carolina.

Liberals are just pretty shocked that the right would stoop so low as to accept Palin as a candidate.

Sorry, but Republicans have lowered the bar with Palin.

Nobody gives two craps about experience when Palin can't answer simple questions and has such a deficit in basic knowledge.

Avatar image for Ultimas_Blade
Ultimas_Blade

3671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Ultimas_Blade
Member since 2004 • 3671 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]

I could put everything I own that Palin and Westwould loose nearly as bad as Barry Goldwater. West is nothing but Clarence Thomas and a disgraced serviceman.Palin has no ability to lead a song much less a country. The only one you named that could run for any nation wide office is Paul Ryan. The Republicans in my state would not vote for Jindalin the primary and this year are going to vote a Democrat in office for Governor here in SC (they are skeptical of Haley). Paul Ryan has the albatross of his roadmap that will haunt him in ANY national election.

If Palin won she'd probably pick Ron or RandPaul to appeal to her flock.

peaceful_anger

I would like to know what you mean by that bolded statement. Kinda sounds like you are calling them Uncle Toms.

Let's see here, Palin has about 9 1/2 years of executive experience vs. Obama's ZERO. If it's between the two, I know who I would pick to run a country. I seriously wonder how a woman who has never had a serious thought in her head according to the left, manages to live in their heads 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The fact that liberals can't hold on to their civility when Palin's name comes up has to do with frustration because you know her influence is growing.

And Nikki Haley will be the next Governor of South Carolina.

Our Governor's race will be a close one, but Sheheen is a Democrat that can appeal to Republicans who aren't straight ticket voters. Haley has done some shady things (had a position created for her at a hospital she lobbied for that paid a whooping $110,000/yr)and really has only sponsored one piece of legislation on Beauty Salons. Sheheen however is a successful honest lawyer with a good record and honest campaign not marred by accusations of promiscuity.

Palin's experience is laughable and marred by controversy after controversy. Many Republicans who aren't running for office have let it be known that Palin is no good. Why do you think so many of them have a hard time answering whether they think she is qualified to run to be President? They don't want to piss off her fans but they don't want to seem stupid with the rational group of conservatives (ie Rove, Romney, etc)

Clarence Thomas...I don't even want to discuss that fool. West is knownto be a disgraceful soldier. Draw your own conclusions, TOU precludes me from explaining further in broader terms.

Avatar image for Fuhgeddabouditt
Fuhgeddabouditt

5468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Fuhgeddabouditt
Member since 2010 • 5468 Posts
Oh no Joe!
Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#79 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts
That's polarizing as all hell.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

I don't fancy the idea of the Democrats sweeping the 2012 general election or Palin/O'Donnell actually taking the White House. I really hope they do not run, and if they do, I would support virtually any other Republican ticket in the primary.

Avatar image for peaceful_anger
peaceful_anger

2568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 peaceful_anger
Member since 2007 • 2568 Posts

[QUOTE="peaceful_anger"]

[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]

I could put everything I own that Palin and Westwould loose nearly as bad as Barry Goldwater. West is nothing but Clarence Thomas and a disgraced serviceman.Palin has no ability to lead a song much less a country. The only one you named that could run for any nation wide office is Paul Ryan. The Republicans in my state would not vote for Jindalin the primary and this year are going to vote a Democrat in office for Governor here in SC (they are skeptical of Haley). Paul Ryan has the albatross of his roadmap that will haunt him in ANY national election.

If Palin won she'd probably pick Ron or RandPaul to appeal to her flock.

Ultimas_Blade

I would like to know what you mean by that bolded statement. Kinda sounds like you are calling them Uncle Toms.

Let's see here, Palin has about 9 1/2 years of executive experience vs. Obama's ZERO. If it's between the two, I know who I would pick to run a country. I seriously wonder how a woman who has never had a serious thought in her head according to the left, manages to live in their heads 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The fact that liberals can't hold on to their civility when Palin's name comes up has to do with frustration because you know her influence is growing.

And Nikki Haley will be the next Governor of South Carolina.

Our Governor's race will be a close one, but Sheheen is a Democrat that can appeal to Republicans who aren't straight ticket voters. Haley has done some shady things (had a position created for her at a hospital she lobbied for that paid a whooping $110,000/yr)and really has only sponsored one piece of legislation on Beauty Salons. Sheheen however is a successful honest lawyer with a good record and honest campaign not marred by accusations of promiscuity.

Palin's experience is laughable and marred by controversy after controversy. Many Republicans who aren't running for office have let it be known that Palin is no good. Why do you think so many of them have a hard time answering whether they think she is qualified to run to be President? They don't want to piss off her fans but they don't want to seem stupid with the rational group of conservatives (ie Rove, Romney, etc)

Clarence Thomas...I don't even want to discuss that fool. West is knownto be a disgraceful soldier. Draw your own conclusions, TOU precludes me from explaining further in broader terms.

Fear and Smear....gosh some you Democrats are starting to sound like Republicans during the 2008 elections. And there was NO PROOF to any of those affair allegations, so NEXT. Haley will win, and you can take that to the bank.

Once again, Palin had more experience than Obama, and he was at the top of the ticket. She ran a city and a state. What did Obama run besides his own campaign??? I really hope Obamacare covers Palin Derangement Syndrome because I have a good feeling she isn't about to get off the national stage anytime soon.

Rove...a rational conservative??? I've heard it all now. I could have sworn the left considered him evil incarnate over the past 8 years. Someone who brought America to the brink of destruction...now he's rational?? But I could give a flying rat's patoot what Rove thinks. He's part of the reason the Rep. party was in the state it was in after the 2006/2008 elections. But hey, if Republicans want to listen to Rove, who is still working with the Bush's (especially Jeb) behind the scenes, then so be it. You can let the party crash and burn, but I won't be a part of it.

So doing whatever it takes to keep the lives of his men safe makes him a disgraceful soldier?? Well if that makes him disgraceful, then I like him even more. He took responsibility for his actions, nobody was hurt, and they got information from the captured guy. I even love his answer when asked at a hearing if he would do it again "If it's about the lives of my men and their safety, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can." I don't see this as a negative at all because pretty much all Republicans and a majority of Independents would probably support him.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#82 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]

[QUOTE="peaceful_anger"] I would like to know what you mean by that bolded statement. Kinda sounds like you are calling them Uncle Toms.

Let's see here, Palin has about 9 1/2 years of executive experience vs. Obama's ZERO. If it's between the two, I know who I would pick to run a country. I seriously wonder how a woman who has never had a serious thought in her head according to the left, manages to live in their heads 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The fact that liberals can't hold on to their civility when Palin's name comes up has to do with frustration because you know her influence is growing.

And Nikki Haley will be the next Governor of South Carolina.

peaceful_anger

Our Governor's race will be a close one, but Sheheen is a Democrat that can appeal to Republicans who aren't straight ticket voters. Haley has done some shady things (had a position created for her at a hospital she lobbied for that paid a whooping $110,000/yr)and really has only sponsored one piece of legislation on Beauty Salons. Sheheen however is a successful honest lawyer with a good record and honest campaign not marred by accusations of promiscuity.

Palin's experience is laughable and marred by controversy after controversy. Many Republicans who aren't running for office have let it be known that Palin is no good. Why do you think so many of them have a hard time answering whether they think she is qualified to run to be President? They don't want to piss off her fans but they don't want to seem stupid with the rational group of conservatives (ie Rove, Romney, etc)

Clarence Thomas...I don't even want to discuss that fool. West is knownto be a disgraceful soldier. Draw your own conclusions, TOU precludes me from explaining further in broader terms.

Fear and Smear....gosh some you Democrats are starting to sound like Republicans during the 2008 elections. And there was NO PROOF to any of those affair allegations, so NEXT. Haley will win, and you can take that to the bank.

Once again, Palin had more experience than Obama, and he was at the top of the ticket. She ran a city and a state. What did Obama run besides his own campaign??? I really hope Obamacare covers Palin Derangement Syndrome because I have a good feeling she isn't about to get off the national stage anytime soon.

Rove...a rational conservative??? I've heard it all now. I could have sworn the left considered him evil incarnate over the past 8 years. Someone who brought America to the brink of destruction...now he's rational?? But I could give a flying rat's patoot what Rove thinks. He's part of the reason the Rep. party was in the state it was in after the 2006/2008 elections. But hey, if Republicans want to listen to Rove, who is still working with the Bush's (especially Jeb) behind the scenes, then so be it. You can let the party crash and burn, but I won't be a part of it.

So doing whatever it takes to keep the lives of his men safe makes him a disgraceful soldier?? Well if that makes him disgraceful, then I like him even more. He took responsibility for his actions, nobody was hurt, and they got information from the captured guy. I even love his answer when asked at a hearing if he would do it again "If it's about the lives of my men and their safety, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can." I don't see this as a negative at all because pretty much all Republicans and a majority of Independents would probably support him.

Nobody cares about her experience because

a) She has no knowledge of national affairs. Actually, she doesn't have knowledge on much of anything.

b) She absolutely breaks down in interviews and can't answer simple questions that even a lay person can answer.

c) She doesn't appear to be very intelligence.

d) She's a quitter.

Yes, Obama didn't have experience but he

a) Knew what he was talking about

b) Came across and highly educated (which he is) and intelligent.

c) Is a savvy politician.

And also, its not like Obama doesn't have any sort of government experience.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#83 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60798 Posts

if it were the name of a porno...then I hope it happens 100%

but if this is political thing...god help us all!

Avatar image for EMO_EVOLUTION
EMO_EVOLUTION

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 EMO_EVOLUTION
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Those two women are the two most uneducated people on the face of the earth, even though I have absolutely no basis for saying that. In fact, they have probably had more education than I have, but I disagree with them so I just say that they're uneducated, because I have no real argument.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I think these two get way too much press.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#87 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

Those two women are the two most uneducated people on the face of the earth, even though I have absolutely no basis for saying that. In fact, they have probably had more education than I have, but I disagree with them so I just say that they're uneducated, because I have no real argument.EMO_EVOLUTION

Uneducated? No. Dumb? Yes. Didn't seem to absorb any of that education? Yes.

I mean, really, let's be honest: does Palin strike you as somebody who has any idea what she's talking about?

It's not about disagreeing. There are may conservatives I disagree with that are well read, intelligent and are good debaters.

Palin isn't one of them. She's lowered the standard and has opened the door for other know-nothing anti-intellectual candidates.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="EMO_EVOLUTION"]Those two women are the two most uneducated people on the face of the earth, even though I have absolutely no basis for saying that. In fact, they have probably had more education than I have, but I disagree with them so I just say that they're uneducated, because I have no real argument.GreySeal9

Uneducated? No. Dumb? Yes. Didn't seem to absorb any of that education? Yes.

I mean, really, let's be honest: does Palin strike you as somebody who has any idea what she's talking about?

It's not about disagreeing. There are may conservatives I disagree with that are well read, intelligent and are good debaters.

Palin isn't one of them. She's lowered the standard and has opened the door for other know-nothing anti-intellectual candidates.

Well, Biden's our vice president and he's a complete moron. That's why I pray for Obama's health every night. If Biden ever became president, the world is toast.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#89 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="EMO_EVOLUTION"]Those two women are the two most uneducated people on the face of the earth, even though I have absolutely no basis for saying that. In fact, they have probably had more education than I have, but I disagree with them so I just say that they're uneducated, because I have no real argument.sonicare

Uneducated? No. Dumb? Yes. Didn't seem to absorb any of that education? Yes.

I mean, really, let's be honest: does Palin strike you as somebody who has any idea what she's talking about?

It's not about disagreeing. There are may conservatives I disagree with that are well read, intelligent and are good debaters.

Palin isn't one of them. She's lowered the standard and has opened the door for other know-nothing anti-intellectual candidates.

Well, Biden's our vice president and he's a complete moron. That's why I pray for Obama's health every night. If Biden ever became president, the world is toast.

Biden is definitely not the sharpest tool in the shed, but he's definitely not on Palin's level. For one, he at least knows his stuff and at least can adequately answer simple questions.

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

It's not about disagreeing. There are may conservatives I disagree with that are well read, intelligent and are good debaters.

Palin isn't one of them. She's lowered the standard and has opened the door for other know-nothing anti-intellectual candidates.

GreySeal9

Excellent point here. I think this is one of the main reasons she is so disliked of late, and frankly, I can't see her ever surmounting the popularity barriers to get the Republican nomination (and rightfully so) let alone win an election.

Avatar image for Arsephixiation
Arsephixiation

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Arsephixiation
Member since 2010 • 379 Posts

-10. America does not need right-wing idiot females in power. The issue is not about gender, it is about intelligence.

Avatar image for peaceful_anger
peaceful_anger

2568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 peaceful_anger
Member since 2007 • 2568 Posts

[QUOTE="peaceful_anger"]

[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]

I could put everything I own that Palin and Westwould loose nearly as bad as Barry Goldwater. West is nothing but Clarence Thomas and a disgraced serviceman. Palin has no ability to lead a song much less a country. The only one you named that could run for any nation wide office is Paul Ryan. The Republicans in my state would not vote for Jindalin the primary and this year are going to vote a Democrat in office for Governor here in SC (they are skeptical of Haley). Paul Ryan has the albatross of his roadmap that will haunt him in ANY national election.

If Palin won she'd probably pick Ron or RandPaul to appeal to her flock.

GreySeal9

I would like to know what you mean by that bolded statement. Kinda sounds like you are calling them Uncle Toms.

Let's see here, Palin has about 9 1/2 years of executive experience vs. Obama's ZERO. If it's between the two, I know who I would pick to run a country. I seriously wonder how a woman who has never had a serious thought in her head according to the left, manages to live in their heads 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The fact that liberals can't hold on to their civility when Palin's name comes up has to do with frustration because you know her influence is growing.

And Nikki Haley will be the next Governor of South Carolina.

Liberals are just pretty shocked that the right would stoop so low as to accept Palin as a candidate.

Sorry, but Republicans have lowered the bar with Palin.

Nobody gives two craps about experience when Palin can't answer simple questions and has such a deficit in basic knowledge.

The reason Sarah enjoys the support she does on our side is because she knows that only someone who is true in their convictions and isn't afraid to speak them will inevitably win people over. There is a reason why Reagan won two massive landslides, and it had nothing to do with him being "too far to the right". He was bold, he was passionate, and he knew where he wanted to go. That's what people like to hear, and they will come out in droves to support such a person. Now I'm not saying she is the 2nd coming of Reagan; she is merely following his playbook and so far using it to great success. Another reason our side likes her is because all she has to do is write one facebook post and Democrats have a conniption fit.

She was Mayor (executive experience) for 6 years, Chair of Alaska Oil and Gas Commission (executive experience) for a year, and Governor (executive experience) of the largest state and one of the most important when it comes to energy for 2 1/2 years...where she enjoyed the highest approval rating of any Governor in the US. I don't know about you, but someone who enjoys that high of an approval rating (up in the 80% range) is not dumb. Plus her and her husband ran a business.

Now is she the best speaker, NO, but I go by actions, and her actions show her to be an effective leader. If people actually looked at her record, they would see that she herself is personally a social conservative, but she doens't completely govern as one.
1. Did you know that when she was mayor, she refused to force bars to close at midnight rather than 4:00 a.m., which social cons in her town were pushing for?
2. Did you know that when she was Governor, she vetoed the legislative bill that tried to overturn the AK's Supreme Court decision that companies had to give benefits to same sex partners?
3. Did you know she brought NO pro-life legislation forward during her 3 legislative sessions as Governor?
4. Did you know that she appointed a pro-choice judge to the AK's Supreme Court while Governor?
5. And when asked about abortion, she says it should be left up to the states.
6. She says she's not for the legalization of pot, but "thinks we need to prioritize our law enforcement efforts." "And if somebody's gonna smoke a joint in their house and not do anybody else any harm, then perhaps there are other things our cops should be looking at to engage in and try to clean up some of the other problems that we have in society."
7. People say she is a religious nutcase, but did you know Alaska is one of the most non religious states in the country, so her popularity should speak volumes about how she governed. Before being picked as VP, democrats loved her, and they were the reason she was able to get most of her agenda through

And here are just some of her accomplishments as Governor. LINK Her biggest accomplishment is the natural gas pipeline that will help America become more energy independent. An accomplishment that no other Alaska Governor before her was able to accomplish. Then when it comes to renewable energy, she submitted her plan to the legislature for Alaska to be at 50% renewables by 2025, and they are already at 25%. Obama wanted the country to be at 25% by 2025, and Palin has already set her state on a path to double that.

Now do you ever wonder why the media never looked into all her accomplishment?? Maybe it was because Obama's would have paled in comparison.



Avatar image for Commander-Gree
Commander-Gree

4929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Commander-Gree
Member since 2009 • 4929 Posts

On a scale of one to a lot, how much do you hope this happens?

Acemaster27
10/10 The debates would be a riot.
Avatar image for Acemaster27
Acemaster27

4482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Acemaster27
Member since 2004 • 4482 Posts

The Republicans will not give Palin their nomination.

If they see a chance to topple Pres. Obama in 2012, they are not going to ruin that with Palin (which would likely result in an Obama win even if Obama was experiencing political trouble). I would be willing to bet that there would be a concentrated effort on the Republican side to stamp Palin out.

GreySeal9
But they've let Palin ruin elections for two years already. Why quit now?
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#95 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

Do any republicans actually think Palin could win a presidential election? Really?

You know you need more support than just the incredibly far right republican base to win, right?

Avatar image for Penguinchow
Penguinchow

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 Penguinchow
Member since 2006 • 1629 Posts
I'm very conservative and even I think this is a terrible, terrible idea.
Avatar image for HerrJosefK
HerrJosefK

444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 HerrJosefK
Member since 2009 • 444 Posts

I think these two get way too much press.

sonicare
Ditto.
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts

No way. No way society has hit that level of stoopid. I'm being sincere right now too.

Avatar image for MathMattS
MathMattS

4012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#99 MathMattS
Member since 2009 • 4012 Posts

Hmmmm...I think Sarah could make a good president if she does her homework in the next 2 years about international relations and foreign policy.

But right now, if the 2012 Republican primary were today, I would go with Mitt Romney if he's on the ballot.

Avatar image for Logan1616
Logan1616

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Logan1616
Member since 2008 • 3424 Posts
I hope it doesn't. That'd be ridiculous and I'd probably move, and like AfterBurner said, probably go to Australia with him. :P