This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
What do you guys think of this belief? I don't really understand why someone would subscribe to this belief as it is just using the word god as a substitute for nature. And I don't really see any reason to do so except to justify ones own belief that god exist.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
"God" implies a consciousness, or being. Pantheism doesn't necessarily ascribe those attributes to the whole of existence.
Avatar image for KiIIyou
KiIIyou

27204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 KiIIyou
Member since 2006 • 27204 Posts
I loves thems pants!
Avatar image for pygmahia5
pygmahia5

7428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 pygmahia5
Member since 2007 • 7428 Posts
i totally get it. if i were religious, this would be on my top 3.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

i think pantheism is a way to have God as sort of an infinite being, or the universe itself (since if you are everything, you are also nothing) but to make the universe consious. This satisfies a desire for safety and a feeling of purpose while also admitting that the theist God is improbable.

The Universe is the Universe= Cold, mysterious and no purpose

God is the Universe= warm, safe, and having a purpose

same thing in the end.

Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#6 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts

Pantheism is the view that the Universe (Nature) and God (or divinity) are identical.[1] Pantheists thus do not believe in a personal, anthropomorphic or creator god. The word derives from the Greek (pan) meaning "all" and the Greek (theos) meaning "God". As such, Pantheism denotes the idea that "God" is best seen as a process of relating to the Universe.[2] Although there are divergences within Pantheism, the central ideas found in almost all versions are the Cosmos as an all-encompassing unity and the sacredness of Nature.

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#7 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

Pantheism is the view that the Universe (Nature) and God (or divinity) are identical.[1] Pantheists thus do not believe in a personal, anthropomorphic or creator god. The word derives from the Greek (pan) meaning "all" and the Greek (theos) meaning "God". As such, Pantheism denotes the idea that "God" is best seen as a process of relating to the Universe.[2] Although there are divergences within Pantheism, the central ideas found in almost all versions are the Cosmos as an all-encompassing unity and the sacredness of Nature.

Diophage

Personally ascribe to this view of God. Personally speaking of course.

Growing up in Saudi, even with the Islamic schooling i got, and the prayers and such. My view of God was always Pantheistic-like, never personal. Have never said nor believed in a personal God. I was personally kinda surprised to find there was an actual term for the belief when i came upon it.

Avatar image for deactivated-59913425220eb
deactivated-59913425220eb

1772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-59913425220eb
Member since 2002 • 1772 Posts
I personally don't find this view to make sense. Reason being is because I believe God made nature, they are not the same thing. Nature the creation, God the creator.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I personally don't find this view to make sense. Reason being is because I believe God made nature, they are not the same thing. Nature the creation, God the creator.GameGuy642003
What if nature is merely an internal manifestation of God? Why does God have to create nature exterior to itself?
Avatar image for deactivated-59913425220eb
deactivated-59913425220eb

1772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-59913425220eb
Member since 2002 • 1772 Posts
[QUOTE="GameGuy642003"]I personally don't find this view to make sense. Reason being is because I believe God made nature, they are not the same thing. Nature the creation, God the creator.foxhound_fox
What if nature is merely an internal manifestation of God? Why does God have to create nature exterior to itself?

I love ya bro, no homo. I just find it easier to comprehend that an exterior God made nature which is something other than itself. I mean that is how our minds work, since it is easier to think that, at least for me. and the Bible (which I personally follow with all my heart and believe to be true) says we are created in the image of God. But interesting point you made.