Payout to families of IRA and loyalist terrorists.

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/82304

So what do you guys think about this?

Is this a harmonising deed, designed to heal the raw wounds that is bore by both the families of the vicitms and terrorists, or rather is this a despicable insult to those who died at the hands of the vile terrorists, and certainly an act that will reinvigorate feelings of bitter resentment and grief?

Avatar image for mattykovax
mattykovax

22693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#2 mattykovax
Member since 2004 • 22693 Posts
I do not consider the IRA terrorists,so I have no problem with it.
Avatar image for noswear
noswear

3263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 noswear
Member since 2008 • 3263 Posts
I do not consider the IRA terrorists,so I have no problem with it.mattykovax
:| Do you consider al-Qa'ida to be terrorists?
Avatar image for mattykovax
mattykovax

22693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#4 mattykovax
Member since 2004 • 22693 Posts
[QUOTE="mattykovax"]I do not consider the IRA terrorists,so I have no problem with it.noswear
:| Do you consider al-Qa'ida to be terrorists?

We were not occupying al-Qa'ida's land. ireland has been occupied for so long people seem to think its right,and it is not.
Avatar image for bethwo
bethwo

1718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 bethwo
Member since 2008 • 1718 Posts
That's ridiculous.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="noswear"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]I do not consider the IRA terrorists,so I have no problem with it.mattykovax
:| Do you consider al-Qa'ida to be terrorists?

We were not occupying al-Qa'ida's land. ireland has been occupied for so long people seem to think its right,and it is not.

It's not an occupation if Northern Ireland is considered to be part of one nation/kingdom as a whole i.e. the United Kingdom
Avatar image for Bartimaeus23
Bartimaeus23

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Bartimaeus23
Member since 2009 • 134 Posts
Wow, I wonder what the majority of users will say about this.:roll:
Avatar image for McManus107
McManus107

6356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 McManus107
Member since 2008 • 6356 Posts
I've no problem with this,not everyone in the IRA were terrorists,some were just fighting for complete independance for Ireland
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
one man's terrorists is another man's freedom fighters.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
IRA covers so many splinter organisations spread over many periods of the past 100 years. and i assure you the main body of that the Provisional IRA are not a Terrorist organisation. What makes me sick is the fact the British government can try and brush the disgusting things they allowed to happen here with such a patheticc amount of money. dont get me started on this but i find your ignorance towards the conflict offensive.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="mattykovax"][QUOTE="noswear"] :| Do you consider al-Qa'ida to be terrorists?MetalGear_Ninty
We were not occupying al-Qa'ida's land. ireland has been occupied for so long people seem to think its right,and it is not.

It's not an occupation if Northern Ireland is considered to be part of one nation/kingdom as a whole i.e. the United Kingdom

so the British never invaded hundreds of years ago? They didn't prosecute the native Irish? drive them off there land and keep them from it? denie them the right to rule themselves? you clearly have little knowledge on this.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
I've no problem with this,not everyone in the IRA were terrorists,some were just fighting for complete independance for IrelandMcManus107
They still volunteered there lives when they signed up, i really dont believe there families should be paid with the others. but then again i think that the money should be shoved up Gordon Browns ***.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]We were not occupying al-Qa'ida's land. ireland has been occupied for so long people seem to think its right,and it is not.RiseAgainst12
It's not an occupation if Northern Ireland is considered to be part of one nation/kingdom as a whole i.e. the United Kingdom

so the British never invaded hundreds of years ago? They didn't prosecute the native Irish? drive them off there land and keep them from it? denie them the right to rule themselves? you clearly have little knowledge on this.

So are you trying say that Northern Ireland isn't a part of the UK? Is that what you are trying to say? Because unless you can, you have no grounds to say that I have little knowledge of this subject.
Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts
one man's terrorists is another man's freedom fighters.II_Seraphim_II
Thats good. You make it up?
Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
Well they are giving money to the families of Loyalists who died as well. I don't think this will help though. It's a waste of money and won't go very far in healing the wounds of the Troubles.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] It's not an occupation if Northern Ireland is considered to be part of one nation/kingdom as a whole i.e. the United Kingdom MetalGear_Ninty
so the British never invaded hundreds of years ago? They didn't prosecute the native Irish? drive them off there land and keep them from it? denie them the right to rule themselves? you clearly have little knowledge on this.

So are you trying say that Northern Ireland isn't a part of the UK? Is that what you are trying to say? Because unless you can, you have no grounds to say that I have little knowledge of this subject.

no i never said it wasn't, i was pointing out that it is still occupied land. and i do have grounds to say cause you show little Knowledge firstly when you use IRA to discribe all groups at the time, and also that you think land is not occupied by a foriegn government.
Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] so the British never invaded hundreds of years ago? They didn't prosecute the native Irish? drive them off there land and keep them from it? denie them the right to rule themselves? you clearly have little knowledge on this.RiseAgainst12
So are you trying say that Northern Ireland isn't a part of the UK? Is that what you are trying to say? Because unless you can, you have no grounds to say that I have little knowledge of this subject.

no i never said it wasn't, i was pointing out that it is still occupied land. and i do have grounds to say cause you show little Knowledge firstly when you use IRA to discribe all groups at the time, and also that you think land is not occupied by a foriegn government.

Well do you think Loyalists should be thrown out of Ireland for wanting to be part of the UK?
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] so the British never invaded hundreds of years ago? They didn't prosecute the native Irish? drive them off there land and keep them from it? denie them the right to rule themselves? you clearly have little knowledge on this.RiseAgainst12
So are you trying say that Northern Ireland isn't a part of the UK? Is that what you are trying to say? Because unless you can, you have no grounds to say that I have little knowledge of this subject.

no i never said it wasn't, i was pointing out that it is still occupied land. and i do have grounds to say cause you show little Knowledge firstly when you use IRA to discribe all groups at the time, and also that you think land is not occupied by a foriegn government.

So how is Northern Ireland occupied by a foreign government?
Avatar image for Bloodbath_87
Bloodbath_87

7586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 Bloodbath_87
Member since 2008 • 7586 Posts
"Terrorism" is a BS word. No "terrorist" just goes out and says "oh, i'm going to cause some terror today". They all fight for something they believe in.
Avatar image for Bartimaeus23
Bartimaeus23

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Bartimaeus23
Member since 2009 • 134 Posts
"Terrorism" is a BS word. No "terrorist" just goes out and says "oh, i'm going to cause some terror today". They all fight for something they believe in.Bloodbath_87
Yeah, I dislike the word too. It makes all of them appear to have a very narrow scope in mind with the methods they employ. One word cannot define a person entirely.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
So are you trying say that Northern Ireland isn't a part of the UK? Is that what you are trying to say? Because unless you can, you have no grounds to say that I have little knowledge of this subject.AnObscureName
no i never said it wasn't, i was pointing out that it is still occupied land. and i do have grounds to say cause you show little Knowledge firstly when you use IRA to discribe all groups at the time, and also that you think land is not occupied by a foriegn government.

Well do you think Loyalists should be thrown out of Ireland for wanting to be part of the UK?

No i don't. The PIRA fought for fairness for the catholic minority in the North and a self government.. that was achieved but the british cause another problem when they partitioned the land. The british still occupy this land no matter what ,that is all i am saying.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
"Terrorism" is a BS word. No "terrorist" just goes out and says "oh, i'm going to cause some terror today". They all fight for something they believe in.Bloodbath_87
Yeah, but the problem is, is that me and others like me don't give a flying **** what they believe in -- when their actions cause the needless death and terrorisation of innocent civilians
Avatar image for Bartimaeus23
Bartimaeus23

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Bartimaeus23
Member since 2009 • 134 Posts
[QUOTE="Bloodbath_87"]"Terrorism" is a BS word. No "terrorist" just goes out and says "oh, i'm going to cause some terror today". They all fight for something they believe in.MetalGear_Ninty
Yeah, but the problem is, is that me and others like me don't give a flying **** what they believe in -- when their actions cause the needless death and terrorisation of innocent civilians

There's always time to get to know the people you oppose better.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] So are you trying say that Northern Ireland isn't a part of the UK? Is that what you are trying to say? Because unless you can, you have no grounds to say that I have little knowledge of this subject.MetalGear_Ninty
no i never said it wasn't, i was pointing out that it is still occupied land. and i do have grounds to say cause you show little Knowledge firstly when you use IRA to discribe all groups at the time, and also that you think land is not occupied by a foriegn government.

So how is Northern Ireland occupied by a foreign government?

The British are a foriegn government to the Irish people.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="Bloodbath_87"]"Terrorism" is a BS word. No "terrorist" just goes out and says "oh, i'm going to cause some terror today". They all fight for something they believe in.MetalGear_Ninty
Yeah, but the problem is, is that me and others like me don't give a flying **** what they believe in -- when their actions cause the needless death and terrorisation of innocent civilians

What about the suffering the british establishment cause to the Catholic minority of the north? you seem to forget 2 key players in the Troubles that being the British forces and Loyalist paramilitaries. why wont you comment on them?
Avatar image for mattykovax
mattykovax

22693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#26 mattykovax
Member since 2004 • 22693 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] It's not an occupation if Northern Ireland is considered to be part of one nation/kingdom as a whole i.e. the United Kingdom MetalGear_Ninty
so the British never invaded hundreds of years ago? They didn't prosecute the native Irish? drive them off there land and keep them from it? denie them the right to rule themselves? you clearly have little knowledge on this.

So are you trying say that Northern Ireland isn't a part of the UK? Is that what you are trying to say? Because unless you can, you have no grounds to say that I have little knowledge of this subject.

Its only part of the U.K. because of occupation and displacement. Northern Ireland never said,hey we want to be british. Its stolen land.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="Bloodbath_87"]"Terrorism" is a BS word. No "terrorist" just goes out and says "oh, i'm going to cause some terror today". They all fight for something they believe in.Bartimaeus23
Yeah, but the problem is, is that me and others like me don't give a flying **** what they believe in -- when their actions cause the needless death and terrorisation of innocent civilians

There's always time to get to know the people you oppose better.

That's pretty hard when they are trying to blow you up.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] no i never said it wasn't, i was pointing out that it is still occupied land. and i do have grounds to say cause you show little Knowledge firstly when you use IRA to discribe all groups at the time, and also that you think land is not occupied by a foriegn government.RiseAgainst12
So how is Northern Ireland occupied by a foreign government?

The British are a foriegn government to the Irish people.

Yeah, and the British don't occupy the Republic of Ireland.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] So how is Northern Ireland occupied by a foreign government?MetalGear_Ninty
The British are a foriegn government to the Irish people.

Yeah, and the British don't occupy the Republic of Ireland.

so what those in the north aren't Irish?
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] The British are a foriegn government to the Irish people.RiseAgainst12
Yeah, and the British don't occupy the Republic of Ireland.

so what those in the north aren't Irish?

They're are British and Northern Irish.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="Bloodbath_87"]"Terrorism" is a BS word. No "terrorist" just goes out and says "oh, i'm going to cause some terror today". They all fight for something they believe in.RiseAgainst12
Yeah, but the problem is, is that me and others like me don't give a flying **** what they believe in -- when their actions cause the needless death and terrorisation of innocent civilians

What about the suffering the british establishment cause to the Catholic minority of the north? you seem to forget 2 key players in the Troubles that being the British forces and Loyalist paramilitaries. why wont you comment on them?

There was bad things done by both sides. But the IRA's motives were primarily immoral IMO.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] Yeah, and the British don't occupy the Republic of Ireland.MetalGear_Ninty
so what those in the north aren't Irish?

They're are British and Northern Irish.

Sorry Northern what?
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] so what those in the north aren't Irish? RiseAgainst12
They're are British and Northern Irish.

Sorry Northern what?

Well, I supposse you could call them both Northern Irish and Irish. But Northern Irish is more precise. Nevertheless, they are fully British citizens.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]one man's terrorists is another man's freedom fighters.xTheExploited
Thats good. You make it up?

Yeah, last nite actually. I luv when people make comments insinuating that a statement is cliche' because the reason sayings or proverbs become cliche' in the first place is because they are true. So my statement still stands, and it also happens to be true.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] Yeah, but the problem is, is that me and others like me don't give a flying **** what they believe in -- when their actions cause the needless death and terrorisation of innocent civiliansMetalGear_Ninty
What about the suffering the british establishment cause to the Catholic minority of the north? you seem to forget 2 key players in the Troubles that being the British forces and Loyalist paramilitaries. why wont you comment on them?

There was bad things done by both sides. But the IRA's motives were primarily immoral IMO.

yes some splinter organisations were very extreme and i do not agree. But the IRA during 1960's held very high morals and later when the Provisional IRA formed they upheld many morals in there fight and done there absolute best to avoid civillian casualties. You cannot comment on the IRA as a whole and also cant comment on the Troubles and it's legacy showing obvious bias against the Nationalist cause. and there Motives for fighting were not immoral.. Irish catholics were being heavily prosecuted in many different areas eg. housing, jobs. they wanted to put an end to it and politics were obviously failing, they wanted to show the British government that the problem could not just be ignored and they would have to engage in diplomatic talks to resolve an Agreement between all sides.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] They're are British and Northern Irish.MetalGear_Ninty
Sorry Northern what?

Well, I supposse you could call them both Northern Irish and Irish. But Northern Irish is more precise. Nevertheless, they are fully British citizens.

Northern Ireland is not a country and so doesnt hold a nationality. hence why you can only hold either Irish or British or both. Northern Ireland was set up as a temporary state until an agreement was made, they just never agreed on anything and so it has stayed as a prolonged state.
Avatar image for DJ_Novakain
DJ_Novakain

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 DJ_Novakain
Member since 2008 • 2147 Posts
So, fighting for your rights is terrorism now, eh? What does that make George Washington?
Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] What about the suffering the british establishment cause to the Catholic minority of the north? you seem to forget 2 key players in the Troubles that being the British forces and Loyalist paramilitaries. why wont you comment on them? RiseAgainst12
There was bad things done by both sides. But the IRA's motives were primarily immoral IMO.

yes some splinter organisations were very extreme and i do not agree. But the IRA during 1960's held very high morals and later when the Provisional IRA formed they upheld many morals in there fight and done there absolute best to avoid civillian casualties. You cannot comment on the IRA as a whole and also cant comment on the Troubles and it's legacy showing obvious bias against the Nationalist cause. and there Motives for fighting were not immoral.. Irish catholics were being heavily prosecuted in many different areas eg. housing, jobs. they wanted to put an end to it and politics were obviously failing, they wanted to show the British government that the problem could not just be ignored and they would have to engage in diplomatic talks to resolve an Agreement between all sides.

If he cannot comment on the IRA as a whole or on the Troubles because he is biased against the Nationalist cause then why should you when you are bias for the Nationalists...
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] What about the suffering the british establishment cause to the Catholic minority of the north? you seem to forget 2 key players in the Troubles that being the British forces and Loyalist paramilitaries. why wont you comment on them? RiseAgainst12
There was bad things done by both sides. But the IRA's motives were primarily immoral IMO.

yes some splinter organisations were very extreme and i do not agree. But the IRA during 1960's held very high morals and later when the Provisional IRA formed they upheld many morals in there fight and done there absolute best to avoid civillian casualties. You cannot comment on the IRA as a whole and also cant comment on the Troubles and it's legacy showing obvious bias against the Nationalist cause. and there Motives for fighting were not immoral.. Irish catholics were being heavily prosecuted in many different areas eg. housing, jobs. they wanted to put an end to it and politics were obviously failing, they wanted to show the British government that the problem could not just be ignored and they would have to engage in diplomatic talks to resolve an Agreement between all sides.

But the IRA tried to create political change in the country by using force and terrorism. Even though the majority of people in Northern Ireland wanted to remain a part of the UK.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] There was bad things done by both sides. But the IRA's motives were primarily immoral IMO.AnObscureName
yes some splinter organisations were very extreme and i do not agree. But the IRA during 1960's held very high morals and later when the Provisional IRA formed they upheld many morals in there fight and done there absolute best to avoid civillian casualties. You cannot comment on the IRA as a whole and also cant comment on the Troubles and it's legacy showing obvious bias against the Nationalist cause. and there Motives for fighting were not immoral.. Irish catholics were being heavily prosecuted in many different areas eg. housing, jobs. they wanted to put an end to it and politics were obviously failing, they wanted to show the British government that the problem could not just be ignored and they would have to engage in diplomatic talks to resolve an Agreement between all sides.

If he cannot comment on the IRA as a whole or on the Troubles because he is biased against the Nationalist cause then why should you when you are bias for the Nationalists...

When have i shown Bias? This topic singles out the Nationalist paramillitaries. i am simply sticking to the topic. and IRA as a whole directs so many organisations and views and it is wrong to clump them together.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] Sorry Northern what? RiseAgainst12
Well, I supposse you could call them both Northern Irish and Irish. But Northern Irish is more precise. Nevertheless, they are fully British citizens.

Northern Ireland is not a country and so doesnt hold a nationality. hence why you can only hold either Irish or British or both. Northern Ireland was set up as a temporary state until an agreement was made, they just never agreed on anything and so it has stayed as a prolonged state.

Northern Ireland is a country though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_ireland#cite_note-1
Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] When have i shown Bias? This topic singles out the Nationalist paramillitaries. i am simply sticking to the topic. and IRA as a whole directs so many organisations and views and it is wrong to clump them together.

Well you seem to support the Irish Nationalist movement which would usually mean you were biased towards their cause...
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] There was bad things done by both sides. But the IRA's motives were primarily immoral IMO.MetalGear_Ninty
yes some splinter organisations were very extreme and i do not agree. But the IRA during 1960's held very high morals and later when the Provisional IRA formed they upheld many morals in there fight and done there absolute best to avoid civillian casualties. You cannot comment on the IRA as a whole and also cant comment on the Troubles and it's legacy showing obvious bias against the Nationalist cause. and there Motives for fighting were not immoral.. Irish catholics were being heavily prosecuted in many different areas eg. housing, jobs. they wanted to put an end to it and politics were obviously failing, they wanted to show the British government that the problem could not just be ignored and they would have to engage in diplomatic talks to resolve an Agreement between all sides.

But the IRA tried to create political change in the country by using force and terrorism. Even though the majority of people in Northern Ireland wanted to remain a part of the UK.

Political change was needed, as you pointed out the majority of the North was protestant and unionist. but this led to alot of problems and hardship for Nationalists and catholics, politics were failing as i said and force is sometimes necessary... PIRA held there morals throughout the conflict and tried to avoid civillian death, they never intentionally aimed to kill civillian targets.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] When have i shown Bias? This topic singles out the Nationalist paramillitaries. i am simply sticking to the topic. and IRA as a whole directs so many organisations and views and it is wrong to clump them together.AnObscureName
Well you seem to support the Irish Nationalist movement which would usually mean you were biased towards their cause...

No i have just studied the conflict and it's background.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="AnObscureName"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] yes some splinter organisations were very extreme and i do not agree. But the IRA during 1960's held very high morals and later when the Provisional IRA formed they upheld many morals in there fight and done there absolute best to avoid civillian casualties. You cannot comment on the IRA as a whole and also cant comment on the Troubles and it's legacy showing obvious bias against the Nationalist cause. and there Motives for fighting were not immoral.. Irish catholics were being heavily prosecuted in many different areas eg. housing, jobs. they wanted to put an end to it and politics were obviously failing, they wanted to show the British government that the problem could not just be ignored and they would have to engage in diplomatic talks to resolve an Agreement between all sides.RiseAgainst12
If he cannot comment on the IRA as a whole or on the Troubles because he is biased against the Nationalist cause then why should you when you are bias for the Nationalists...

When have i shown Bias? This topic singles out the Nationalist paramillitaries. i am simply sticking to the topic. and IRA as a whole directs so many organisations and views and it is wrong to clump them together.

This topic is not bias at all. Not at all is there a hint of bias in the OP.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] yes some splinter organisations were very extreme and i do not agree. But the IRA during 1960's held very high morals and later when the Provisional IRA formed they upheld many morals in there fight and done there absolute best to avoid civillian casualties. You cannot comment on the IRA as a whole and also cant comment on the Troubles and it's legacy showing obvious bias against the Nationalist cause. and there Motives for fighting were not immoral.. Irish catholics were being heavily prosecuted in many different areas eg. housing, jobs. they wanted to put an end to it and politics were obviously failing, they wanted to show the British government that the problem could not just be ignored and they would have to engage in diplomatic talks to resolve an Agreement between all sides.RiseAgainst12
But the IRA tried to create political change in the country by using force and terrorism. Even though the majority of people in Northern Ireland wanted to remain a part of the UK.

Political change was needed, as you pointed out the majority of the North was protestant and unionist. but this led to alot of problems and hardship for Nationalists and catholics, politics were failing as i said and force is sometimes necessary... PIRA held there morals throughout the conflict and tried to avoid civillian death, they never intentionally aimed to kill civillian targets.

Apparent hardship of the nationalists is no justification of terrorism. Also, I'm afraid the IRA obviously didn't try hard enough to avoid civillian death.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] Well, I supposse you could call them both Northern Irish and Irish. But Northern Irish is more precise. Nevertheless, they are fully British citizens.MetalGear_Ninty
Northern Ireland is not a country and so doesnt hold a nationality. hence why you can only hold either Irish or British or both. Northern Ireland was set up as a temporary state until an agreement was made, they just never agreed on anything and so it has stayed as a prolonged state.

Northern Ireland is a country though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_ireland#cite_note-1

It depends how you look at it, yes it is widely accepted as a country but It was set as a temporary state. And it at anytime can be revoked into the Republic through a majority vote under the Good Friday Agreement. hence why it doesnt yet hold it's own national identity.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] But the IRA tried to create political change in the country by using force and terrorism. Even though the majority of people in Northern Ireland wanted to remain a part of the UK. MetalGear_Ninty
Political change was needed, as you pointed out the majority of the North was protestant and unionist. but this led to alot of problems and hardship for Nationalists and catholics, politics were failing as i said and force is sometimes necessary... PIRA held there morals throughout the conflict and tried to avoid civillian death, they never intentionally aimed to kill civillian targets.

Apparent hardship of the nationalists is no justification of terrorism. Also, I'm afraid the IRA obviously didn't try hard enough to avoid civillian death.

Yes it is. there is alot to what cause the trouble starting and i mean alot. they Catholic community took it for long enough. And again you Brand IRA as a whole which IRA are you refering to? because the Provisional IRA always give advanced warnings of there bomb attacks to evacuate civilians from the area.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="AnObscureName"] If he cannot comment on the IRA as a whole or on the Troubles because he is biased against the Nationalist cause then why should you when you are bias for the Nationalists...MetalGear_Ninty
When have i shown Bias? This topic singles out the Nationalist paramillitaries. i am simply sticking to the topic. and IRA as a whole directs so many organisations and views and it is wrong to clump them together.

This topic is not bias at all. Not at all is there a hint of bias in the OP.

Yes it is as it only points the blame at Nationalist paramilitaries while ignoring Loyalist Paramilitaries and British Agents.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] Northern Ireland is not a country and so doesnt hold a nationality. hence why you can only hold either Irish or British or both. Northern Ireland was set up as a temporary state until an agreement was made, they just never agreed on anything and so it has stayed as a prolonged state.RiseAgainst12
Northern Ireland is a country though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_ireland#cite_note-1

It depends how you look at it, yes it is widely accepted as a country but It was set as a temporary state. And it at anytime can be revoked into the Republic through a majority vote under the Good Friday Agreement. hence why it doesnt yet hold it's own national identity.

So, in a few years Scotland could depart away from the UK, that doesn't mean it isn't a nation now. Similarly, in a few years, there could be a majority vote to integrate NI into Ireland as a whole. That doesn't mean NI isn't a country now.