Pervert films teen photoshoot until her mom and concerned citizens go ham!

So the moms ok with her daughter doing that kind of stuff in public, where thousands of people can see, but she doesn't want anyone to video tape it?ujjval16

exactly.

SHAME ON MOTHER.

That guy is such a goober.

What does goober means?Lonelynight

Goofy Goober

Awww, I like how she (the model) was all distressed about it as soon as everyone else brought it up. She didn't give a rats ass about it prior to that, at all. People were making a big deal out of it, despite the girl obviously not being uncomfortable with it. The camera man was totally in the right, the people that got provoked had no real reason to confront him the way that they did. Note: I didn't have sound on when I watched the video, I'm just going by the visuals here. :PBiancaDK

No, the camera man wasn't "in the right". Sure, he had a "right" to be there taking pictures, but the way he handled the situation was completely wrong. As soon as someone questioned what he was doing, he immediately started talking about how he can film what he wants and starts waving his rights around in the woman's face. As you can see, that did nothing but make everyone get pissed off and hostile.

Pervert or not, the camera man should've known better. If you're gonna be filming strangers without their consent, then you'd damn sure better get good at defusing potentially hostile situations, rather than making them worse. The camera man needs to be diplomatic about this kind of stuff.

[QUOTE="ToppledPillars"][QUOTE="bruinfan617"] Doesn't warrant any sort of pervertedness. I really hope people aren't going to use the blame the victim mentality....bruinfan617

Goofy Goober

EVOLV3

[QUOTE="EVOLV3"]

Goofy Goober

matthayter700

While he has the right to video tape anything he wants, he doesn't have the right to make borderline child porn. If he was focusing on the whole pose instead of focusing on her assets, then no problem. Mom didn't see him originally as he was behind her, though the professional photographers had seen him, they should have said something first. Mom said something when she did when he finally moved to videotape from a different angle.

I wonder how the ladies in this thread would feel if people video taped them while sitting at a table and filming them hoping to get an upskirt or they were walking down the street and their dress flies up and then have the video posted somewhere? The girl is obviously under 18 and the reason why her mom is there. As noted, the girl is wearing ballet shoes so the photo shoot could very well be for the girls ballet school or for the ballet she dances for. It may not necessarily be for money as some people think or assume it to be. We do not know what the shoot was for. The girl could have worn sweats, but it could hamper movements.

What I find fascinating is that a gay guy is filming a girl to begin with. With her being underage, just reinforces some people homophobias about gays being sick deviants. It would be sicker still to video underage males.

Is it just me, or does the recorder guy sound like Niko Bellic? :lol:

I am once again disheartened by humanity...

Xx_Hopeless_xX

"See ya GOOBER!" made me Lmao.

Goofy Goober

EVOLV3

[...] he doesn't have the right to make borderline child porn. [...]WhiteKnight77

Go ham? Is that really a phrase? Maybe it's just me, but I think that sounds stupid as hell. Also the heck is a goober:lol:

She didn't even care until her mother jumped inToppledPillars

I see nothing wrong with it.

He sounds like Mr. Mackey from South Park lol. :lol:

By the way, I see this as art. If he was perverted he would go wild and touch her.

I support the cameraman wholeheartedly.

The cyclist who intervened was just a self-righteous (rhymes with "brick").

:evil:

The universal rule is: Don't do anything in public that you aren't comfortable with people seeing. The cameraman may have had awful intentions, we'll never know, but the shoot was in public and therefore he's free to tape it if he feels like it.

As per borderline child pornography, that's rather a sticky issue and none of us here are able to make a legal distinction along those lines, maybe the guy is a pervert, maybe he is a troll, who knows but if it's borderline cp, than the shoot itself must have been as well.

While it is kind of creepy what he was doing its kind of hipocritical to say what he was doing was wrong... Because isnt the photoshoot of her bending over and lifting her legs up 20 feet in the air intended for perverts as well? lol Like I dont understand

While it is kind of creepy what he was doing its kind of hypocritical to say what he was doing was wrong... Because isn't the photo shoot of her bending over and lifting her legs up 20 feet in the air intended for perverts as well? lol Like I don't understand

VendettaRed07

Take note of the ballet slippers. Ballet dancers frequently preform such actions in the performance of their dance routines.

Foxhound_fox, a girl doesn't have to be naked to be considered child porn. If the cad with the video camera was not just focusing on her assets, then maybe one could agree that he wasn't being indecent, but due to him expressly focusing on those area, then yes.

[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]

While it is kind of creepy what he was doing its kind of hypocritical to say what he was doing was wrong... Because isn't the photo shoot of her bending over and lifting her legs up 20 feet in the air intended for perverts as well? lol Like I don't understand

WhiteKnight77

Take note of the ballet slippers. Ballet dancers frequently preform such actions in the performance of their dance routines.

Foxhound_fox, a girl doesn't have to be naked to be considered child porn. If the cad with the video camera was not just focusing on her assets, then maybe one could agree that he wasn't being indecent, but due to him expressly focusing on those area, then yes.

yeah idk lol the guy was taking pictures of her as well. I know thats the art form but I mean Im sure a percentage of her fanbase are perverts

you know there was like 2 or 3 other guys there taking photos...

everyone got on this guys nuts.

I bet if he was a female NO one would have said anything, they just assumed cause he was a man he must be a pervert.

Is it just me, or does the recorder guy sound like Niko Bellic? :lol:

SgtKevali

The universal rule is: Don't do anything in public that you aren't comfortable with people seeing. The cameraman may have had awful intentions, we'll never know, but the shoot was in public and therefore he's free to tape it if he feels like it.

As per borderline child pornography, that's rather a sticky issue and none of us here are able to make a legal distinction along those lines, maybe the guy is a pervert, maybe he is a troll, who knows but if it's borderline cp, than the shoot itself must have been as well.

Andrew_Xavier

[QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]

The universal rule is: Don't do anything in public that you aren't comfortable with people seeing. The cameraman may have had awful intentions, we'll never know, but the shoot was in public and therefore he's free to tape it if he feels like it.

As per borderline child pornography, that's rather a sticky issue and none of us here are able to make a legal distinction along those lines, maybe the guy is a pervert, maybe he is a troll, who knows but if it's borderline cp, than the shoot itself must have been as well.

carrot-cake

I don't know about you, but I don't know of too many parents taking crotch shots of their kids no matter what they are wearing.

*edit for sentence structure*

Why do I get the feeling we're going to be seeing this video and hearing from the guy on CNN?

you know there was like 2 or 3 other guys there taking photos...

everyone got on this guys nuts.

I bet if he was a female NO one would have said anything, they just assumed cause he was a man he must be a pervert.

Deano

Go Ham? I don't think I've heard that phrase before.Coka_Cola241

Lmao! His voice is so wierd...meconate

It's a free country, goober:|

As soon as the woman said something to him, he immediately called her a "bag", I think, which clearly shows he intended conflict. If he was innocently filming, he wouldn't have been such a jerk.SolidSnake35

she flat out accused him of being a perv. right from the start

I think his retort was quite reserved actually.

[QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]

The universal rule is: Don't do anything in public that you aren't comfortable with people seeing. The cameraman may have had awful intentions, we'll never know, but the shoot was in public and therefore he's free to tape it if he feels like it.

As per borderline child pornography, that's rather a sticky issue and none of us here are able to make a legal distinction along those lines, maybe the guy is a pervert, maybe he is a troll, who knows but if it's borderline cp, than the shoot itself must have been as well.

carrot-cake