Pope condones condom use in exceptional cases (FINALLY)

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for snakes_codec
snakes_codec

2754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 snakes_codec
Member since 2008 • 2754 Posts

seems the Catholic Church has finally seen sense your thoughts ?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11804398

Avatar image for DaJuicyMan
DaJuicyMan

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DaJuicyMan
Member since 2010 • 3557 Posts

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

Avatar image for Joshywaa
Joshywaa

10991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#3 Joshywaa
Member since 2002 • 10991 Posts

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

DaJuicyMan

I am honestly surprised at how relevent religion still is in this day and age...

I ...yeah... I guess i'll stop there.

Avatar image for snakes_codec
snakes_codec

2754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 snakes_codec
Member since 2008 • 2754 Posts

not anti Religion its just good to know that the Church has woken up and joined the 21 century is all .

Avatar image for DaJuicyMan
DaJuicyMan

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DaJuicyMan
Member since 2010 • 3557 Posts
[QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

I am honestly surprised at how relevent religion still is in this day and age...

I ...yeah... I guess i'll stop there.

I can understand how people can think it's primal or unlogical or hatever, but why do people need to make it a priority to bash religion or make others feel dumb for being religious?
Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#6 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

DaJuicyMan

because in their subconscious they know god really does exist and atheism is an attempt to suppress that knowledge. Reverberating anything that contradicts their internal defenses is a threat to those defenses. back on topic before I start the next religious war the pope throughout history has almost always taken a moderate stance on social issues. His moderate attitude doesn't surprise me. How it will affect teen pregnancies in heavily catholic regions will take time to discover. I'm not catholic, but I am admittedly surprised that the pope would repeal such a stance even though he is moderate., as contraceptives have been highly rebuked. Hopefully it won't send the message that the pope condones premarital sex.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

DaJuicyMan

Who are you referring to?

The TC or the link he posted?

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

buldog300

because in their subconscious they know god really does exist and atheism is an attempt to suppress that knowledge. Reverberating anything that contradicts their internal defenses is a threat to those defenses.

Q: Why are so many people anti-gay

A: Because in their subconscious they know they are gay and homophobia is just an attempt to suppress that knowledge.

I can play that game too. :D

Avatar image for snakes_codec
snakes_codec

2754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 snakes_codec
Member since 2008 • 2754 Posts

[QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

DaJuicyMan

I am honestly surprised at how relevent religion still is in this day and age...

I ...yeah... I guess i'll stop there.

I can understand how people can think it's primal or unlogical or hatever, but why do people need to make it a priority to bash religion or make others feel dumb for being religious?

its not dumb my Grandparents are Protestants Anglican to be more specific so i would never belittle someone for there beliefs however what is dumb is telling Africans they cant use Condoms cause the Church doesn't condone it even tho the Church knows full well these people are at risk of Diseases that will kill them .

Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts
[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"][QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

I am honestly surprised at how relevent religion still is in this day and age...

I ...yeah... I guess i'll stop there.

I can understand how people can think it's primal or unlogical or hatever, but why do people need to make it a priority to bash religion or make others feel dumb for being religious?

This thread has nothing to do with bashing religion or being anti-religious. The Pope has a lot of influence over the world and the fact that he he has made a step in not condemning something that should not be condemned especially in places like Africa where sexually transmitted AIDS rates are among the highest in the world. The fact is if he says condoms are not bad then he could be saving a lot of lives.
Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#11 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts

[QUOTE="buldog300"][QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

Teenaged

because in their subconscious they know god really does exist and atheism is an attempt to suppress that knowledge. Reverberating anything that contradicts their internal defenses is a threat to those defenses.

Q: Why are so many people anti-gay

A: Because in their subconscious they know they are gay and homophobia is just an attempt to suppress that knowledge.

I can play that game too. :D

One could make that arguement :P. I'd be less than surprised to discover a homophobic or two secretly homosexual.
Avatar image for DaJuicyMan
DaJuicyMan

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 DaJuicyMan
Member since 2010 • 3557 Posts

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"][QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

I am honestly surprised at how relevent religion still is in this day and age...

I ...yeah... I guess i'll stop there.

xTheExploited

I can understand how people can think it's primal or unlogical or hatever, but why do people need to make it a priority to bash religion or make others feel dumb for being religious?

This thread has nothing to do with bashing religion or being anti-religious. The Pope has a lot of influence over the world and the fact that he he has made a step in not condemning something that should not be condemned especially in places like Africa where sexually transmitted AIDS rates are among the highest in the world. The fact is if he says condoms are not bad then he could be saving a lot of lives.

I know, but still, I wanted to know why religion was bashed since I figured it would be somewhere on this thread anyway. Just figured i'd ask now.

Avatar image for rockerbikie
rockerbikie

10027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 rockerbikie
Member since 2010 • 10027 Posts

I dislikes the pope anyway.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="buldog300"] because in their subconscious they know god really does exist and atheism is an attempt to suppress that knowledge. Reverberating anything that contradicts their internal defenses is a threat to those defenses. buldog300

Q: Why are so many people anti-gay

A: Because in their subconscious they know they are gay and homophobia is just an attempt to suppress that knowledge.

I can play that game too. :D

One could make that arguement :P. I'd be less than surprised to discover a homophobic or two secretly homosexual.

One or two-actually homosexual- homophobic people isnt really what I described in my parody of your post.

My parody was as generalising as your post. And it couldnt get any more generalised.

Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts

[QUOTE="xTheExploited"][QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"] I can understand how people can think it's primal or unlogical or hatever, but why do people need to make it a priority to bash religion or make others feel dumb for being religious?DaJuicyMan

This thread has nothing to do with bashing religion or being anti-religious. The Pope has a lot of influence over the world and the fact that he he has made a step in not condemning something that should not be condemned especially in places like Africa where sexually transmitted AIDS rates are among the highest in the world. The fact is if he says condoms are not bad then he could be saving a lot of lives.

I know, but still, I wanted to know why religion was bashed since I figured it would be somewhere on this thread anyway. Just figured i'd ask now.

People bash things they don't respect, a lot of people don't respect christianity. I don't know how you couldn't have figured that out yourself but whatever.
Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#16 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts

[QUOTE="buldog300"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Q: Why are so many people anti-gay

A: Because in their subconscious they know they are gay and homophobia is just an attempt to suppress that knowledge.

I can play that game too. :D

Teenaged

One could make that arguement :P. I'd be less than surprised to discover a homophobic or two secretly homosexual.

One or two-actually homosexual- homophobic people isnt really what I described in my parody of your post.

My parody was as generalising as yours. And it couldnt get any more generalised.

You think I didn't know that? I meant what I said and I said what I meant, for atheists hostile to believers. 'logical' people don't harass people they deem illogical, or else we'd have to rewrite the personas of vulcans.
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts

This is good news. Hopefully we'll see some kind of positive turn for teen pregnancies.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="buldog300"] One could make that arguement :P. I'd be less than surprised to discover a homophobic or two secretly homosexual.buldog300

One or two-actually homosexual- homophobic people isnt really what I described in my parody of your post.

My parody was as generalising as yours. And it couldnt get any more generalised.

You think I didn't know that? I meant what I said and I said what I meant, for atheists hostile to believers. 'logical' people don't harass people they deem illogical, or else we'd have to rewrite the personas of vulcans.

What you said and meant is a generalisation which is also very presumptuous.

Things that can make one be hostile towards their "opposition" is not just supposedly knowing the opposition is right and its not surprising that such a rationale is used since it makes the opposed look like the victims and the ones being wronged.

One can get upset because their environment is not very friendly towards their convictions, because what they are raging agaist is considered by them very important to ignore, or they are generally people without patience or self-control. And these are just the possibilities that I can think of.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
*Phone rings* Hello? Oh, Vatican, it's for you. Vatican: Yes? Caller: Hi, I'm a representative of the twenty-first century. . . Vatican: Oh, here we go. . . Caller: Yes, well, we have on our records that you're still stuck in the eighteenth century. Would you like to upgrade? Vatican: I told you a thousand times, NO! See, this is what I hate about reality; once they hook you in, you have to keep changing to the newest version or the rest of the world leaves you in the dark. Well, the Protestants may buy into that crap, but I DON'T, thank you very much! *Hangs up*
Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

DaJuicyMan

religion has caused more wars and killed more people than anything else in history.i think the question should be why do we thrive on religion?

Avatar image for WasntAvailable
WasntAvailable

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 WasntAvailable
Member since 2008 • 5605 Posts

Yeah I suppose you would have to condone the use of condoms in the event that a priest should force himself upon a child lest he carry STDs.

Guess they need to do something to deal with the stigma created by that scandal.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

z4twenny

religion has caused more wars and killed more people than anything else in history.i think the question should be why do we thrive on religion?

Religion has caused more wars than, say, land disputes or political rifts? I find that hard to believe.
Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#23 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts

[QUOTE="buldog300"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]One or two-actually homosexual- homophobic people isnt really what I described in my parody of your post.

My parody was as generalising as yours. And it couldnt get any more generalised.

Teenaged

You think I didn't know that? I meant what I said and I said what I meant, for atheists hostile to believers. 'logical' people don't harass people they deem illogical, or else we'd have to rewrite the personas of vulcans.

What you said and meant is a generalisation which is also very presumptuous.

Things that can make one be hostile towards their "opposition" is not just supposedly knowing the opposition is right and its not surprising that such a rationale is used since it makes the opposed look like the victims and the ones being wronged.

One can get upset because their environment is not very friendly towards their convictions, because what they are raging agaist is considered by them very important to ignore, or they are generally people without patience or self-control. And these are just the possibilities that I can think of.

Yeah, they're hostile because those pesky Christians beat down their doors and convert them at gunpoint. I doubted that allegation 5 years ago when it was first presented to me and I do so today. We all get visits from Jehovah's witnesses, that doesn't mean Christians are invading your culture. I've seen christians hold their tongues around atheists enough to know there's more to the problem of social tension than mere indoctrination.

I generalized because of everything you said .I do think it is a subconscious refutation or at the very least self-doubt. I do think Christians have been in the right since the beginning of this ordeal, and I do think the casualties of the ongoing culture war have been Christians. If you disagree with me then good for you, disagreement is what makes both America and the internet great.

Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

I never like them that much anyway. It took them over 400 years to realize it was a bad idea to put Galieo under house arrest for proving them wrong.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

DaJuicyMan
When religious practice creates quality of life and public health hazards, surely it is open to criticism on that ground. The TC did not say religion is bad or wrong or stupid; his comment was pretty pointedly about their anti-condom stance.
Avatar image for starfox15
starfox15

3988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#26 starfox15
Member since 2006 • 3988 Posts

Pope does something good for a change. A positive step for Catholicism and Christianity on the whole. I don't follow it anymore but I know the benefits of him saying that. I'll take it as an overall positive change.

Avatar image for Assassin_87
Assassin_87

2349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Assassin_87
Member since 2004 • 2349 Posts

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

z4twenny

religion has caused more wars and killed more people than anything else in history.i think the question should be why do we thrive on religion?

Thanks for bringing your strawman. Luckily, there are also torches in abundance to take care of this.

What a tired old argument against religion. This is the same as saying "Love and passion have caused so many unnecessary deaths throughout history. Why don't we all just become indifferent?" The sentiment sounds ridiculous because we all know that a by-product of love (jealousy, envy, whatever) causes bad things to happen a lot of times, but never love itself. Religion doesn't cause war. People who practice religion, and as a result become fanatical and intolerant, cause wars. Political disputes and differences in other ideologies have caused wars as well. Shall we go ahead and do away with everything by seeking out human error in all things? I assure you it can be done.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#29 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Glad to see the Church beginning to enter the 21st century.
Avatar image for mfp16
mfp16

4551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#30 mfp16
Member since 2006 • 4551 Posts
it amazes me how the catholic church still feels they have to right to preach moral value to others, time and time again they have been caught sheltering and even enabling pedophiles... simply astounding...
Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

Male strippers should use condoms but not people in HIV stricken countries, great. :roll:

Avatar image for WasntAvailable
WasntAvailable

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 WasntAvailable
Member since 2008 • 5605 Posts

The Catholic church is probably the only religion in the world that is headed by a despot content to cause as much damage as possible.

Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

People are going to use condoms regardless of what the Pope says. The Catholic Church does have good intentions, though.

Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#34 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts

[QUOTE="z4twenny"]

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

Theokhoth

religion has caused more wars and killed more people than anything else in history.i think the question should be why do we thrive on religion?

Religion has caused more wars than, say, land disputes or political rifts? I find that hard to believe.

Religious wars only make up 7%(3% involved Muslims) of the wars in the history of man. No, I won't dig into the depths of good to relocate when I discovered that. The Papal states essentially was the UN of the medieval era.

Avatar image for snakes_codec
snakes_codec

2754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 snakes_codec
Member since 2008 • 2754 Posts

[QUOTE="z4twenny"]

[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"]

Why do people thrive on being anti-religion?

Theokhoth

religion has caused more wars and killed more people than anything else in history.i think the question should be why do we thrive on religion?

Religion has caused more wars than, say, land disputes or political rifts? I find that hard to believe.

first of all this Argument has been done to death so shouldn't be revisited secondly usually when there is a dispute between countries and peoples it will be because of a deference in Religion or Beliefs and the larger of the 2 countries might decided to force there beliefs on the other like it or not Religion has been the biggest cause of War in Human History and still is to this day .

however what i would say in the defence of Religion is that the Religions themselves don't tell the people to fight only man can make that decision like it or not every Religion has its idiots with very bigoted views and opinions .

Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#36 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts
To be fair the Catholic nations have been considered 'backwards' since the beginning of the industrial era. Since money lending was considered a sin, the middle class couldn't industrialize in nations like Spain or France since they lacked funds to get industry off the ground. I don't think it's fair to call the catholic church out of touch within modern society; they just have their own set of convictions to abide by.
Avatar image for WasntAvailable
WasntAvailable

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 WasntAvailable
Member since 2008 • 5605 Posts

People are going to use condoms regardless of what the Pope says. The Catholic Church does have good intentions, though.

ImaPirate0202

Good intentions? "Don't use condoms, they are evil. Just have unprotected sex with people who can't afford to bathe themselves properly with an extremely high risk of disease." Sorry, but "good intentions" is a little hard to swallow when the churcharbitrarily deems particular objects such as condoms to be evil. What if they decided keyboards, or glasses were evil? Wouldthat be all for a greater cause? No it wouldn't, so why allow for a double standard?

Avatar image for Wii4Fun
Wii4Fun

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Wii4Fun
Member since 2008 • 1472 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="z4twenny"]first of all this Argument has been done to death so shouldn't be revisited secondly usually when there is a dispute between countries and peoples it will be because of a deference in Religion or Beliefs and the larger of the 2 countries might decided to force there beliefs on the other like it or not Religion has been the biggest cause of War in Human History and still is to this day .

snakes_codec

Did you read this?

Thanks for bringing your strawman. Luckily, there are also torches in abundance to take care of this.

What a tired old argument against religion. This is the same as saying "Love and passion have caused so many unnecessary deaths throughout history. Why don't we all just become indifferent?" The sentiment sounds ridiculous because we all know that a by-product of love (jealousy, envy, whatever) causes bad things to happen a lot of times, but never love itself. Religion doesn't cause war. People who practice religion, and as a result become fanatical and intolerant, cause wars. Political disputes and differences in other ideologies have caused wars as well. Shall we go ahead and do away with everything by seeking out human error in all things? I assure you it can be done.

Assassin_87

Or this?

Religious wars only make up 7%(3% involved Muslims) of the wars in the history of man. No, I won't dig into the depths of good to relocate when I discovered that. The Papal states essentially was the UN of the medieval era.

buldog300

Avatar image for michaelP4
michaelP4

16681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 michaelP4
Member since 2004 • 16681 Posts
I'm not sure what to make of the Pope's comments. From my interpretation, he still holds the same beliefs about the use of contraceptives, but that they can be chosen as the lesser evil in specific situations (such as the one mentioned by the Pope), rather than viewing them as something that stops evil. Which, in essence, means that the Catholic Church still hasn't changed its actual doctrine on the use of contraceptives. However, his comment on them was interesting and unexpected... it could spark some change within the Catholic Church.
Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#40 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

People are going to use condoms regardless of what the Pope says. The Catholic Church does have good intentions, though.

WasntAvailable

Good intentions? "Don't use condoms, they are evil. Just have unprotected sex with people who can't afford to bathe themselves properly with an extremely high risk of disease." Sorry, but "good intentions" is a little hard to swallow when the churcharbitrarily deems particular objects such as condoms to be evil. What if they decided keyboards, or glasses were evil? Wouldthat be all for a greater cause? No it wouldn't, so why allow for a double standard?

The idea is that people shouldn't be having premarital sex, and that people are supposed to accept any god given babies as a gift. Condom's aren't evil, they aren't 'the devil's work', but they are an act of trying to disrupt the natural order of life in the world according to catholics. There's no double standard here, just a misunderstanding of the ways of others.
Avatar image for mfp16
mfp16

4551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#41 mfp16
Member since 2006 • 4551 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="z4twenny"]

religion has caused more wars and killed more people than anything else in history.i think the question should be why do we thrive on religion?

buldog300

Religion has caused more wars than, say, land disputes or political rifts? I find that hard to believe.

Religious wars only make up 7%(3% involved Muslims) of the wars in the history of man. No, I won't dig into the depths of good to relocate when I discovered that. The Papal states essentially was the UN of the medieval era.

lol, how about some proof of that statement..
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="buldog300"] You think I didn't know that? I meant what I said and I said what I meant, for atheists hostile to believers. 'logical' people don't harass people they deem illogical, or else we'd have to rewrite the personas of vulcans.buldog300

What you said and meant is a generalisation which is also very presumptuous.

Things that can make one be hostile towards their "opposition" is not just supposedly knowing the opposition is right and its not surprising that such a rationale is used since it makes the opposed look like the victims and the ones being wronged.

One can get upset because their environment is not very friendly towards their convictions, because what they are raging agaist is considered by them very important to ignore, or they are generally people without patience or self-control. And these are just the possibilities that I can think of.

Yeah, they're hostile because those pesky Christians beat down their doors and convert them at gunpoint. I doubted that allegation 5 years ago when it was first presented to me and I do so today. We all get visits from Jehovah's witnesses, that doesn't mean Christians are invading your culture. I've seen christians hold their tongues around atheists enough to know there's more to the problem of social tension than mere indoctrination.

I generalized because of everything you said .I do think it is a subconscious refutation or at the very least self-doubt. I do think Christians have been in the right since the beginning of this ordeal, and I do think the casualties of the ongoing culture war have been Christians. If you disagree with me then good for you, disagreement is what makes both America and the internet great.

So those pesky Christians have to beat down their doors and convert them at gunpoint for them to feel hostility towards them? Or feel generally suppressed or not respected? Even if their feelings of being disrespected are exaggerated or just dramatic with little base that still is different than what you are suggesting.

And I like that go on stating stuff that are irrelevant to what we are discussing or stuff I didnt doubt you believe. Should I assume those are your defenses to your self-doubt?

Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

People are going to use condoms regardless of what the Pope says. The Catholic Church does have good intentions, though.

WasntAvailable

Good intentions? "Don't use condoms, they are evil. Just have unprotected sex with people who can't afford to bathe themselves properly with an extremely high risk of disease." Sorry, but "good intentions" is a little hard to swallow when the churcharbitrarily deems particular objects such as condoms to be evil. What if they decided keyboards, or glasses were evil? Wouldthat be all for a greater cause? No it wouldn't, so why allow for a double standard?

If they could come up with a good reason as to why keyboards and glasses are evil, I would love to hear it.

The Catholic Church sees sex as a very sacred act and should only be used as a means of reproduction. That's why they say no to condoms. Not because they are evil.

Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#44 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts
[QUOTE="buldog300"]

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Religion has caused more wars than, say, land disputes or political rifts? I find that hard to believe.mfp16

Religious wars only make up 7%(3% involved Muslims) of the wars in the history of man. No, I won't dig into the depths of good to relocate when I discovered that. The Papal states essentially was the UN of the medieval era.

lol, how about some proof of that statement..

UNless I'm being graded I'm not going out of my way. If you were really interested in the truth you'd look it up yourself. Since you haven't yet, and since even if I did you'd probably throw another 'curve ball' my way, I'll leave it at that.
Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

[QUOTE="WasntAvailable"]

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

People are going to use condoms regardless of what the Pope says. The Catholic Church does have good intentions, though.

buldog300

Good intentions? "Don't use condoms, they are evil. Just have unprotected sex with people who can't afford to bathe themselves properly with an extremely high risk of disease." Sorry, but "good intentions" is a little hard to swallow when the churcharbitrarily deems particular objects such as condoms to be evil. What if they decided keyboards, or glasses were evil? Wouldthat be all for a greater cause? No it wouldn't, so why allow for a double standard?

The idea is that people shouldn't be having premarital sex, and that people are supposed to accept any god given babies as a gift. Condom's aren't evil, they aren't 'the devil's work', but they are an act of trying to disrupt the natural order of life in the world according to catholics. There's no double standard here, just a misunderstanding of the ways of others.

bingo

Avatar image for WasntAvailable
WasntAvailable

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 WasntAvailable
Member since 2008 • 5605 Posts

[QUOTE="WasntAvailable"]

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

People are going to use condoms regardless of what the Pope says. The Catholic Church does have good intentions, though.

buldog300

Good intentions? "Don't use condoms, they are evil. Just have unprotected sex with people who can't afford to bathe themselves properly with an extremely high risk of disease." Sorry, but "good intentions" is a little hard to swallow when the churcharbitrarily deems particular objects such as condoms to be evil. What if they decided keyboards, or glasses were evil? Wouldthat be all for a greater cause? No it wouldn't, so why allow for a double standard?

The idea is that people shouldn't be having premarital sex, and that people are supposed to accept any god given babies as a gift. Condom's aren't evil, they aren't 'the devil's work', but they are an act of trying to disrupt the natural order of life in the world according to catholics. There's no double standard here, just a misunderstanding of the ways of others.

Natural order of life? NEWS FLASH: People have sex. People have sex all year round, people have sex in all places, people have sex however they want, whenever they want to and most importantly for whatever reason they want to. And you know what? That's entirely natural. Animals do it too, and they arn't bound by some phoney religious laws. The Catholic church is just completely naive to the world around them. The Pope is nothing more than a dressed up politician elevated by his own self importance.

Avatar image for mfp16
mfp16

4551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 mfp16
Member since 2006 • 4551 Posts
[QUOTE="mfp16"] you'd look it up yourselfbuldog300
I have.. and from what I've read 7% is laughable...
Avatar image for Bluestorm-Kalas
Bluestorm-Kalas

13073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Bluestorm-Kalas
Member since 2006 • 13073 Posts

Oh ok, now I will start using condoms only because the pope OK'd it, not because I want to avoid STD's or unwanted pregnancies, no that's just an added bonus, my entire life goes to approval of my life by the pope.

Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#49 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"]So those pesky Christians have to beat down their doors and convert them at gunpoint for them to feel hostility towards them? Or feel generally suppressed or not respected? Even if their feelings of being disrespected are exaggerated or just dramatic with little base that still is different than what you are suggesting. And I like that go on stating stuff that are irrelevant to what we are discussing or stuff I didnt doubt you believe. Should I assume those are your defenses to your self-doubt?

Feel respected? Respect is earned, and it isn't earned with spagetti monster books and speeches by richard dawkins. If atheists want respect from christians they'd have to expect to let a few things slide, like prayer on public locales and the rights of Christians to protest abortion clinics. If atheists feel animosity from christendom, or even mild disrespect it isn't because Christians got a gray hair one day and decided to hate a demographic. And as for the conversion at gunpoint remark I made, it's a hyperbole. I hate how poorly the internet translates sarcasm. You said I generalized, I told you why I generalized. I would hardly count that as irrelevant to the discussion. Of course, the more we argue the more time on this world we waste. Now that is an irrelevant remark.
Avatar image for snakes_codec
snakes_codec

2754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 snakes_codec
Member since 2008 • 2754 Posts

To be fair the Catholic nations have been considered 'backwards' since the beginning of the industrial era. Since money lending was considered a sin, the middle class couldn't industrialize in nations like Spain or France since they lacked funds to get industry off the ground. I don't think it's fair to call the catholic church out of touch within modern society; they just have their own set of convictions to abide by.buldog300

i would agree to an extent with what you say Catholic Nations on a whole since the Industrial Revolution have been less productive than Protestant Nations Great Britain is a perfect example of this it maintained its Christen values but had great Religious and Social Freedom than Say France & Spain and the result was it Industrialised nearly 100 years ahead of the rest of Europe the United States could also be used as an example in a similar fashion in that it is a Nation of many Cultures and Faiths but at its rout it Values are more in line with a Protestant Nations .