Porn Star wants to educate children, Yay or Nay?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

She's reading to them. An age appropriate book, not the Kama Sutra. Her vagina and its' adventures have nothing to do with reading.XilePrincess

This is really the only comment this thread needed.

Avatar image for Moriarity_
Moriarity_

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Moriarity_
Member since 2011 • 1332 Posts
Yes because she'll start doing it with the elementary school kids :roll: I really hate these close minded parents that get pissed off at anything slightly out of the norm that they don't agree with.
Avatar image for NiKva
NiKva

8181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 NiKva
Member since 2010 • 8181 Posts

I've heard from some websites that porn star's boobs have a powerful hypnotic ability that can not be contained, even by clothes.

The boys that she will read to will become porn addicts and the girls will become future porn stars.

Hide your kids! Her boobs have the power to change your child's future!

~Media telling children's parents.

Parents will believe anything the media tells them these days :/

Avatar image for Setsa
Setsa

8431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 Setsa
Member since 2005 • 8431 Posts

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I wonder how people would feel if a Marine who was cleared of charges in an incident overseas involving the deaths of children used as say, living weapons, wanted to do the exact same thing as Sasha Grey. Both had legal careers. Both should be allows the same job. But I figure both if presented with questions pertaining to the highlights of said careers by curious children would possibly create unique issues in the elementary school atmosphere. worlock77

This is what I don't get about everyone saying "it's fine": one pre-existing experience and actions can AND SHOULD dictate whether or not someone can do a certain job or be around specific people. I can assure you that no one in this thread would like it if their physician was a convicted pedophile, or if their lawyer had a criminal history, or if their kid's teachers had a drug-abuse problem in the past. Of course, not everyone who does these sorts of things isn't necessarily cut out for the occupation/task, but it does play a factor into whether or not they should be allowed to do such a task over a competing individual who has a lesser chance of social backlash or fraudulent occurences. As you said, what if kids decide to google her? If these are kids that are still at the elementary school level, they can be exposed to some things that a lot of parents might not want their kids being exposed to at such an age. It sounds silly, but why the heck not just hire someone else that'd have a lesser chance at causing controversy? Does the bad publicity really mean that much?

Well for one thing she's not applying for a teaching job. She's reading some books to some kids. That's it. For another thing even if she were applying to be a teacher her past, in this case, has no relevance to the job she's applying for. However a criminal history might have some bearing on someone wanting to be a lawyer.

I'm not blatantly saying she shouldn't be hired, but why the heck can't they just have someone else read to the children? I doubt that the ONLY person available is a former adult actress. It seems like that for the stress that it'd cause for some, it wouldn't be worth it. And a lot of job interviewers would look down upon someone who has a passt in the adult movie industry, regardless of the field (unless it's adult films :P)
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#56 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Yes because she'll start doing it with the elementary school kids :roll: I really hate these close minded parents that get pissed off at anything slightly out of the norm that they don't agree with.Moriarity_
Maybe they have good reason to disagree. Someone who decided that doing porn was a good idea might not the kind of person they want teaching their kids. :/
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51599 Posts

I don't know, but "I am an actor. I am an artist."

I lol'd.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="Moriarity_"]Yes because she'll start doing it with the elementary school kids :roll: I really hate these close minded parents that get pissed off at anything slightly out of the norm that they don't agree with.SolidSnake35
Maybe they have good reason to disagree. Someone who decided that doing porn was a good idea might not the kind of person they want teaching their kids. :/

She isn't teaching kids. She read some books. Nothing more.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#59 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Moriarity_"]Yes because she'll start doing it with the elementary school kids :roll: I really hate these close minded parents that get pissed off at anything slightly out of the norm that they don't agree with.worlock77

Maybe they have good reason to disagree. Someone who decided that doing porn was a good idea might not the kind of person they want teaching their kids. :/

She isn't teaching kids. She read some books. Nothing more.

Seems unnecessary.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

I don't know, but "I am an actor. I am an artist."

I lol'd.

Chutebox

She is. She's crossed over to mainstream films and she's a musician as well (her band is called aTelecine, she's appeared on albums by Current 93, among others).

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#61 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] This is what I don't get about everyone saying "it's fine": one pre-existing experience and actions can AND SHOULD dictate whether or not someone can do a certain job or be around specific people. I can assure you that no one in this thread would like it if their physician was a convicted pedophile, or if their lawyer had a criminal history, or if their kid's teachers had a drug-abuse problem in the past. Of course, not everyone who does these sorts of things isn't necessarily cut out for the occupation/task, but it does play a factor into whether or not they should be allowed to do such a task over a competing individual who has a lesser chance of social backlash or fraudulent occurences. As you said, what if kids decide to google her? If these are kids that are still at the elementary school level, they can be exposed to some things that a lot of parents might not want their kids being exposed to at such an age. It sounds silly, but why the heck not just hire someone else that'd have a lesser chance at causing controversy? Does the bad publicity really mean that much?Setsa

Well for one thing she's not applying for a teaching job. She's reading some books to some kids. That's it. For another thing even if she were applying to be a teacher her past, in this case, has no relevance to the job she's applying for. However a criminal history might have some bearing on someone wanting to be a lawyer.

I'm not blatantly saying she shouldn't be hired, but why the heck can't they just have someone else read to the children? I doubt that the ONLY person available is a former adult actress. It seems like that for the stress that it'd cause for some, it wouldn't be worth it. And a lot of job interviewers would look down upon someone who has a passt in the adult movie industry, regardless of the field (unless it's adult films :P)

Maybe they thouht that she was really passionate about it. In these kind of programs, passion counts alot.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Maybe they have good reason to disagree. Someone who decided that doing porn was a good idea might not the kind of person they want teaching their kids. :/SolidSnake35

She isn't teaching kids. She read some books. Nothing more.

Seems unnecessary.

Actually making a fuss about it is what's unnecessary.

Avatar image for Setsa
Setsa

8431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 Setsa
Member since 2005 • 8431 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Moriarity_"]Yes because she'll start doing it with the elementary school kids :roll: I really hate these close minded parents that get pissed off at anything slightly out of the norm that they don't agree with.worlock77

Maybe they have good reason to disagree. Someone who decided that doing porn was a good idea might not the kind of person they want teaching their kids. :/

She isn't teaching kids. She read some books. Nothing more.

Akin to how a surgeon is performing a medical procedure, not interacting in a social nor sexual context with his clientele, and ergo it being irrelevant as to whether or not he has a history in sexual harassment. Like it or not, in the real world people WILL judge you based upon the decisions you make, no matter how irrelevant they may seem, because at one point in that person's life they thought that that particular something was right. Yeah, she's not going to be performing intercourse with the kids, obviously. There's no need to even point that out because it is blatantly obvious, but she still is an individual with a past in a not-so-esteemed industry. One that many people are going to frown upon when professionalism needs to be maintained. It may seem silly, but it's in the same sense that a lot of people wouldn't want a doctor with 25 facial piercings, tattoo sleeves, and a flaming red mohawk.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#64 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

She isn't teaching kids. She read some books. Nothing more.

worlock77

Seems unnecessary.

Actually making a fuss about it is what's unnecessary.

Depends what your view of porn is. Personally I wouldn't care... but I can understand some parents caring. Past history is important. They probably liken this to having a murderer read to their kids. The latter may be worse but they're on the same scale.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Maybe they have good reason to disagree. Someone who decided that doing porn was a good idea might not the kind of person they want teaching their kids. :/Setsa

She isn't teaching kids. She read some books. Nothing more.

Akin to how a surgeon is performing a medical procedure, not interacting in a social nor sexual context with his clientele, and ergo it being irrelevant as to whether or not he has a history in sexual harassment. Like it or not, in the real world people WILL judge you based upon the decisions you make, no matter how irrelevant they may seem, because at one point in that person's life they thought that that particular something was right. Yeah, she's not going to be performing intercourse with the kids, obviously. There's no need to even point that out because it is blatantly obvious, but she still is an individual with a past in a not-so-esteemed industry. One that many people are going to frown upon when professionalism needs to be maintained. It may seem silly, but it's in the same sense that a lot of people wouldn't want a doctor with 25 facial piercings, tattoo sleeves, and a flaming red mohawk.

What is your point? A person may or may not choose a physician due to certain factors. A hospital may not emply that physican due to the same factors. In this case however the program in question and the school hosting evidently had no issue with her previous profession. Case closed.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#66 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Seems unnecessary.SolidSnake35

Actually making a fuss about it is what's unnecessary.

Depends what your view of porn is. Personally I wouldn't care... but I can understand some parents caring. Past history is important. They probably liken this to having a murderer read to their kids. The latter may be worse but they're on the same scale.

Wait a minute, how is being a pornstar on the same scale as---

Oh, **** it. Never mind.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#67 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Actually making a fuss about it is what's unnecessary.

GreySeal9

Depends what your view of porn is. Personally I wouldn't care... but I can understand some parents caring. Past history is important. They probably liken this to having a murderer read to their kids. The latter may be worse but they're on the same scale.

Wait a minute, how is being a pornstar on the same scale as---

Oh, **** it. Never mind.

Both are immoral in some people's view...
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#68 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Depends what your view of porn is. Personally I wouldn't care... but I can understand some parents caring. Past history is important. They probably liken this to having a murderer read to their kids. The latter may be worse but they're on the same scale.SolidSnake35

Wait a minute, how is being a pornstar on the same scale as---

Oh, **** it. Never mind.

Both are immoral in some people's view...

I'm sure that even most people who think porn is immoral would admit that being a pornstar is not on the same on the same "scale" as being a murderer.

Unless they're totally crazy that is.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#69 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Wait a minute, how is being a pornstar on the same scale as---

Oh, **** it. Never mind.

GreySeal9

Both are immoral in some people's view...

I'm sure that even most people who think porn is immoral would admit that being a pornstar is not on the same on the same "scale" as being a murderer.

Unless they're totally crazy that is.

One is slight immoral... the other is very immoral. Same scale.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#70 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Both are immoral in some people's view...SolidSnake35

I'm sure that even most people who think porn is immoral would admit that being a pornstar is not on the same on the same "scale" as being a murderer.

Unless they're totally crazy that is.

One is slight immoral... the other is very immoral. Same scale.

By that logic, what other scale is there? :?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Both are immoral in some people's view...SolidSnake35

I'm sure that even most people who think porn is immoral would admit that being a pornstar is not on the same on the same "scale" as being a murderer.

Unless they're totally crazy that is.

One is slight immoral... the other is very immoral. Same scale.

Being judgmental is immoral in some people's eyes. So using your logic - being judgemental is on the same scale as being a murderer.

Avatar image for Setsa
Setsa

8431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 Setsa
Member since 2005 • 8431 Posts

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

She isn't teaching kids. She read some books. Nothing more.

worlock77

Akin to how a surgeon is performing a medical procedure, not interacting in a social nor sexual context with his clientele, and ergo it being irrelevant as to whether or not he has a history in sexual harassment. Like it or not, in the real world people WILL judge you based upon the decisions you make, no matter how irrelevant they may seem, because at one point in that person's life they thought that that particular something was right. Yeah, she's not going to be performing intercourse with the kids, obviously. There's no need to even point that out because it is blatantly obvious, but she still is an individual with a past in a not-so-esteemed industry. One that many people are going to frown upon when professionalism needs to be maintained. It may seem silly, but it's in the same sense that a lot of people wouldn't want a doctor with 25 facial piercings, tattoo sleeves, and a flaming red mohawk.

What is your point? A person may or may not choose a physician due to certain factors. A hospital may not emply that physican due to the same factors. In this case however the program in question and the school hosting evidently had no issue with her previous profession. Case closed.

People can lobby against those decisions though, and if enough pressure is applied, they can crack :/ Sorry if I got a little hostile in nature, the point I was trying to get across was that regardless of how illogical it may seem to take one's past into consideration, it's still going to be heavily considered in these sorts of instances.
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Seems unnecessary.SolidSnake35

Actually making a fuss about it is what's unnecessary.

Depends what your view of porn is. Personally I wouldn't care... but I can understand some parents caring. Past history is important. They probably liken this to having a murderer read to their kids. The latter may be worse but they're on the same scale.

Ok... I highly doubt than any grounded person would compare an adult film star to a murderer....to even state that a legal profession is the same as an illegal act seems fairly ridiculous imo....
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#74 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I'm sure that even most people who think porn is immoral would admit that being a pornstar is not on the same on the same "scale" as being a murderer.

Unless they're totally crazy that is.

GreySeal9

One is slight immoral... the other is very immoral. Same scale.

By that logic, what other scale is there? :?

Things that aren't immoral aren't on the scale of immoral things. O_o
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] One is slight immoral... the other is very immoral. Same scale.SolidSnake35

By that logic, what other scale is there? :?

Things that aren't immoral aren't on the scale of immoral things. O_o

Everything is immoral to somebody.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#76 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I'm sure that even most people who think porn is immoral would admit that being a pornstar is not on the same on the same "scale" as being a murderer.

Unless they're totally crazy that is.

worlock77

One is slight immoral... the other is very immoral. Same scale.

Being judgmental is immoral in some people's eyes. So using your logic - being judgemental is on the same scale as being a murderer.

Yeah, it is. I don't know what you lot are struggling to understand. Being a porn star is immoral according to some. This is why parents won't like it. Consider other immoral things people do, like being a murderer, and it becomes clear that what someone has done in the past IS relevant...
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#77 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] One is slight immoral... the other is very immoral. Same scale.SolidSnake35

By that logic, what other scale is there? :?

Things that aren't immoral aren't on the scale of immoral things. O_o

How about a scale in which there are different degrees of immoral?

Or does that make too much sense?

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#78 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

By that logic, what other scale is there? :?

worlock77

Things that aren't immoral aren't on the scale of immoral things. O_o

Everything is immoral to somebody.

You don't need to stretch things that far to think that a lot of parents won't agree with pornstars interacting with their kids. I mean I know this is OT and people here love to be all progressive and stuff but geez.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] One is slight immoral... the other is very immoral. Same scale.SolidSnake35

Being judgmental is immoral in some people's eyes. So using your logic - being judgemental is on the same scale as being a murderer.

Yeah, it is. I don't know what you lot are struggling to understand. Being a porn star is immoral according to some. This is why parents won't like it. Consider other immoral things people do, like being a murderer, and it becomes clear that what someone has done in the past IS relevant...

I'm not struggling to understand anything, you're quite simply using a ridiculious metric. Using the logic you're displaying here then everything become comparable to murder, as everything will be immoral in some people's view.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#80 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

By that logic, what other scale is there? :?

GreySeal9

Things that aren't immoral aren't on the scale of immoral things. O_o

How about a scale in which there are different degrees of immoral?

Or does that make too much sense?

Isn't that the scale I was taking about? I think you want two different scales... one scale for slightly immoral things... and another for very immoral things. But that wouldn't mean there isn't an overarching scale that includes things from both.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#81 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Being judgmental is immoral in some people's eyes. So using your logic - being judgemental is on the same scale as being a murderer.

worlock77

Yeah, it is. I don't know what you lot are struggling to understand. Being a porn star is immoral according to some. This is why parents won't like it. Consider other immoral things people do, like being a murderer, and it becomes clear that what someone has done in the past IS relevant...

I'm not struggling to understand anything, you're quite simply using a ridiculious metric. Using the logic you're displaying here then everything become comparable to murder, as everything will be immoral in some people's view.

You CAN compare anything that you deem immoral to murder. They'd both be immoral. And for THAT reason, we can understand why parents are kicking up a fuss. And I find that totally understandable.
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Things that aren't immoral aren't on the scale of immoral things. O_oSolidSnake35

How about a scale in which there are different degrees of immoral?

Or does that make too much sense?

Isn't that the scale I was taking about? I think you want two different scales... one scale for slightly immoral things... and another for very immoral things. But that wouldn't mean there isn't an overarching scale that includes things from both.

You're stretching a lot here.....
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#83 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
[QUOTE="Ravensmash"] You're stretching a lot here.....

No I'm not. It seems that people are saying that we can't group immoral things together, i.e. put them on the same scale. I would have thought the fact that the concept "immoral" exists at all suggests we can.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#84 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Things that aren't immoral aren't on the scale of immoral things. O_oSolidSnake35

How about a scale in which there are different degrees of immoral?

Or does that make too much sense?

Isn't that the scale I was taking about? I think you want two different scales... one scale for slightly immoral things... and another for very immoral things. But that wouldn't mean there isn't an overarching scale that includes things from both.

Yeah, I should have responded differently because now this is a semantics **** but what I'm saying is that being a porstar is not comparable to being a murderer and thus the comparison doesn't really make sense. In the common use of the word scale, they are not on the same scale.

Avatar image for Celldrax
Celldrax

15053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Celldrax
Member since 2005 • 15053 Posts

Honestly......I'm sick of all these very overly politically correct parents. ***k people are idiots...

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#86 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

How about a scale in which there are different degrees of immoral?

Or does that make too much sense?

GreySeal9

Isn't that the scale I was taking about? I think you want two different scales... one scale for slightly immoral things... and another for very immoral things. But that wouldn't mean there isn't an overarching scale that includes things from both.

Yeah, I should have responded differently because now this is a semantics **** but what I'm saying is that being a porstar is not comparable to being a murderer and thus the comparison doesn't really make sense.

We can make comparisons between whatever we like. Some are good, others not so good. But my comparison only aims to achieve this: Murder shows how the past actions of a person affect a parent's view of them, and consequently affects whether they would want that person around their kids. I chose murder because its a strong example and highlights that point. Having been a porn star is also an example of past actions that a parent might disagree with.... and, again, will affect whether they would want that person around their kids. My point is this. All you people saying that her past is irrelevant are wrong. A person's past is very relevant to a parent. Show some understanding and quit trying to impress you fellow progressive GameSpotters.
Avatar image for Bloodseeker23
Bloodseeker23

8338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#87 Bloodseeker23
Member since 2008 • 8338 Posts
Does she needs assistant? Im available.
Avatar image for iloverikku11
iloverikku11

11039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 iloverikku11
Member since 2005 • 11039 Posts

I would allow her to read children's books to me at a reasonable volume for 10-15 minutes anytime. ;)

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

Our education system is already full of sex offenders, child predators, drug addicts, and socially misaligned people. I see no reason why a porn star couldn't be an educator provided they're qualified for the job.

Avatar image for Tykain
Tykain

3887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Tykain
Member since 2008 • 3887 Posts
I dont see why it should be an issue. She's a former porn star, not a child molester.
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Ravensmash"] You're stretching a lot here.....

No I'm not. It seems that people are saying that we can't group immoral things together, i.e. put them on the same scale. I would have thought the fact that the concept "immoral" exists at all suggests we can.

Legal porn actress akin to a murderer.... How is that not stretching? Even if you are basing it on people viewing it as immoral the two are so far apart :\
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#92 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Ravensmash"] You're stretching a lot here.....

No I'm not. It seems that people are saying that we can't group immoral things together, i.e. put them on the same scale. I would have thought the fact that the concept "immoral" exists at all suggests we can.

Legal porn actress akin to a murderer.... How is that not stretching? Even if you are basing it on people viewing it as immoral the two are so far apart :\

I never said they weren't far apart. In fact I think I made that clear when I first mentioned it.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#93 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Parents are pissed because someone who had sex is around their children?

If I were a kid I'd love someone so cute reading me stories.

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
I don't see why anyone cares. It's not like she's filming a porno in front of the kids, or showing them her portfolio, or banging every male student in the school. People get so irrational when anything having to do with sex is mentioned in the same breath as anything having to do with kids.
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
If she has the proper qualifications, why not?
Avatar image for iHarlequin
iHarlequin

1928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 iHarlequin
Member since 2011 • 1928 Posts

I am supportive of this. If I were a father, I'd definitely back her up.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
Hmm.. Well I guess we can look at it from the standpoint of how much locally that school collects from taxes against federal money. If it is surrounded by very poor people, then I say that they shouldn't complain. If it is a middle class area with subsantial revenue from local taxes then sure, the parents might have a say. Plus she is a woman anyhow. Even if it was middle school where puberty is a factor, it isnt like a woman having sex with underages boys and girls is the same as a man doing it in the criminal system. I say, again, let her read to 1st graders and sex ed in 5th or 6th graders.
Avatar image for raven_squad
raven_squad

78438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#98 raven_squad
Member since 2007 • 78438 Posts
I don't have a problem with it.
Avatar image for Mr_Cumberdale
Mr_Cumberdale

10189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#99 Mr_Cumberdale
Member since 2004 • 10189 Posts
I'd be worried. As an example, what if the reader as an ex-murderer? Sure there is no reason that lifestyle can interfere, but there's the risk.
Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#100 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts
I'd be worried. As an example, what if the reader as an ex-murderer? Sure there is no reason that lifestyle can interfere, but there's the risk. Mr_Cumberdale
Are you implying that this woman would start stripping in front of the children? Get real. Being a porn star doesn't cause you to perform lewd sexual acts at inappropriate times.