Privitize Social Security?

  • 193 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

What's your opinion on SS?

Seems like a total Ponzi scheme to me -- take wealth from one demographic(Young) and distribute it to another(Old).

I sincerely doubt Generation-Y, and later will even have any like SS, medicare, etc...

 

I don't understand why we can't just allow individuals to maintain, and monitor their own investments. I don't know the exact yields, but I doubt SS can offer better returns than NYSE, Gold, Bonds, or Treasury Bills.

What happens if I decide not to retire? I paid all that money for practically no personal gain? Sounds pretty awesome to me. 

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

File:21rampell.xlarge1.jpg.

Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#3 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
really, dave?
Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
Put it in the hands of the people and not the government. I like it.dave123321
Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
Really, alli?
Avatar image for Bikouchu35
Bikouchu35

8344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Bikouchu35
Member since 2009 • 8344 Posts

Bah, its all the baby boomers fault.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
Responsibility. Anyone hear of it? Not in America. The numbers aren't going to add up. I feel sorry for the people who think they're going to get their money back. And even if they did, their money put into it in the 70's was worth a hell of a lot more then the stuff they are getting out. The future isn't bright.
Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts
Not this stupidity again. How dare we want to protect retired people with a little money from a program they funded? Damn socialists and there anti-poverty programs.
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Greed, so much greed.

 

Looking after the elderly is one of the best traits humanity possesses.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

SS is p. safe.

medicare looks worrying, but that's really being driven by the increasing costs of health care - something that definitely needs resolved.

Avatar image for Yusuke420
Yusuke420

2770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 Yusuke420
Member since 2012 • 2770 Posts

I wouldn't be against people having the choice of opting into a different investment with higher yields. 

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
I personally do not expect to receive anything from Social Security, that is why I contribute to my company's retirement fund.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

I think many things should be privatized, including social security.  Most of government run agencies would be 100x more efficient if they cut regulations and let private business run them.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Um you should be making and monitoring your own investments

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

What's your opinion on SS?

Seems like a total Ponzi scheme to me -- take wealth from one demographic(Young) and distribute it to another(Old).

I sincerely doubt Generation-Y, and later will even have any like SS, medicare, etc...

 

I don't understand why we can't just allow individuals to maintain, and monitor their own investments. I don't know the exact yields, but I doubt SS can offer better returns than NYSE, Gold, Bonds, or Treasury Bills.

What happens if I decide not to retire? I paid all that money for practically no personal gain? Sounds pretty awesome to me. 

Fightingfan

lol, what do you think our entire monetary system is other than a ponzi scheme.

our money is backed by nothing physical or of any real value  and when they need more they send a note to the fed saying hey! print some more of dat shyt up.

people would get the cold sweats if they had any idea how the us money system is set up and that the rest of the world is backed up by it.

i know i do.

 

As the issuer of the currency, there is no solvency constraint at the government level as there might be for a household, state or business.  In this regard, one must be careful comparing the federal government to a household because the federal government has no solvency constraint (i.e., theres no such thing as the federal government running out of money as it can always call on the banks and the Federal Reserve to serve as agents of the government).  Households, on the other hand, have a very real solvency constraint.

http://pragcap.com/understanding-modern-monetary-system

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

I don't understand why we can't just allow individuals to maintain, and monitor their own investments. I don't know the exact yields, but I doubt SS can offer better returns than NYSE, Gold, Bonds, or Treasury Bills.

What happens if I decide not to retire? I paid all that money for practically no personal gain? Sounds pretty awesome to me. 

Fightingfan

 - Did you know that you can actually do that?

 - Actually at a certain age you collect Social Security whether you're working or not.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

I think many things should be privatized, including social security.  Most of government run agencies would be 100x more efficient if they cut regulations and let private business run them.

GOGOGOGURT

That must be why Medicare is actually more efficiently ran than private insurance.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I don't understand why we can't just allow individuals to maintain, and monitor their own investments. I don't know the exact yields, but I doubt SS can offer better returns than NYSE, Gold, Bonds, or Treasury Bills.

What happens if I decide not to retire? I paid all that money for practically no personal gain? Sounds pretty awesome to me. 

worlock77

 - Did you know that you can actually do that?

 - Actually at a certain age you collect Social Security whether you're working or not.

1) It prevents me from growing my wealth because I'm forced to pay into a service I may not even use -- and I don't even have a gurantee that I can recieve it when it's time for me to.

2) You receive a gypped portion of your benefits -- but yes I'm aware.

Avatar image for Eddie-Murphy48
Eddie-Murphy48

939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#19 Eddie-Murphy48
Member since 2013 • 939 Posts
The issue is Social Security should not have been lasting this long in the first place. It was never meant to.
Avatar image for jeremiah06
jeremiah06

7217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 jeremiah06
Member since 2004 • 7217 Posts
Not this stupidity again. How dare we want to protect retired people with a little money from a program they funded? Damn socialists and there anti-poverty programs.TheWalkingGhost
How about we actually give them back what they themselves put into it? Then allow those who don't want anything to opt out of paying for it? I wont be taking advantage of ss so why do I still have to pay into it?
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
Not this stupidity again. How dare we want to protect retired people with a little money from a program they funded? Damn socialists and there anti-poverty programs.TheWalkingGhost
My mom died when she was 54 and the cost of her cancer treatments took everything. Where is her money?
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts
I wish I could opt out and put that money in my 401K. Anyways, SS needs to be progressive both on the income end and the distribution ends.
Avatar image for Abbeten
Abbeten

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Abbeten
Member since 2012 • 3140 Posts
nope
Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts

If, you're under 50 right now...good luck!  One way or another you will end-up with squat from SS.

Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts
[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]Not this stupidity again. How dare we want to protect retired people with a little money from a program they funded? Damn socialists and there anti-poverty programs.jeremiah06
How about we actually give them back what they themselves put into it? Then allow those who don't want anything to opt out of paying for it? I wont be taking advantage of ss so why do I still have to pay into it?

The democrats will never consider it because it contradicts their either-or fallacy. According to the democrats we either have to pay into social security or all the old people will become impoverished and die. The fact that they will not even give us the option of not participating in the program shows that it is not really about helping us. They know that if people were not forced by law to pay into it then the whole system would collapse.
Avatar image for Squeets
Squeets

8185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 Squeets
Member since 2006 • 8185 Posts

[QUOTE="jeremiah06"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]Not this stupidity again. How dare we want to protect retired people with a little money from a program they funded? Damn socialists and there anti-poverty programs.Laihendi
How about we actually give them back what they themselves put into it? Then allow those who don't want anything to opt out of paying for it? I wont be taking advantage of ss so why do I still have to pay into it?

The democrats will never consider it because it contradicts their either-or fallacy. According to the democrats we either have to pay into social security or all the old people will become impoverished and die. The fact that they will not even give us the option of not participating in the program shows that it is not really about helping us. They know that if people were not forced by law to pay into it then the whole system would collapse.

Get the hell out you said you were done on this site.

Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="jeremiah06"] How about we actually give them back what they themselves put into it? Then allow those who don't want anything to opt out of paying for it? I wont be taking advantage of ss so why do I still have to pay into it?Squeets

The democrats will never consider it because it contradicts their either-or fallacy. According to the democrats we either have to pay into social security or all the old people will become impoverished and die. The fact that they will not even give us the option of not participating in the program shows that it is not really about helping us. They know that if people were not forced by law to pay into it then the whole system would collapse.

Get the hell out you said you were done on this site.

I decided to come back.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I've heard rumors that they will start having conditions for SS.  If your current assets are above a certain level, you wont qualify for the pay out.  Even if you paid in your entire life.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

SS is p. safe.

medicare looks worrying, but that's really being driven by the increasing costs of health care - something that definitely needs resolved.

coolbeans90
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I don't understand why we can't just allow individuals to maintain, and monitor their own investments. I don't know the exact yields, but I doubt SS can offer better returns than NYSE, Gold, Bonds, or Treasury Bills.

What happens if I decide not to retire? I paid all that money for practically no personal gain? Sounds pretty awesome to me. 

Fightingfan

 - Did you know that you can actually do that?

 - Actually at a certain age you collect Social Security whether you're working or not.

1) It prevents me from growing my wealth because I'm forced to pay into a service I may not even use -- and I don't even have a gurantee that I can recieve it when it's time for me to.

2) You receive a gypped portion of your benefits -- but yes I'm aware.

Has Social Security prevented Warren Buffet from growing his wealth?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="jeremiah06"] How about we actually give them back what they themselves put into it? Then allow those who don't want anything to opt out of paying for it? I wont be taking advantage of ss so why do I still have to pay into it?Squeets

The democrats will never consider it because it contradicts their either-or fallacy. According to the democrats we either have to pay into social security or all the old people will become impoverished and die. The fact that they will not even give us the option of not participating in the program shows that it is not really about helping us. They know that if people were not forced by law to pay into it then the whole system would collapse.

Get the hell out you said you were done on this site.

Did you honestly believe that?

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

[QUOTE="Squeets"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] The democrats will never consider it because it contradicts their either-or fallacy. According to the democrats we either have to pay into social security or all the old people will become impoverished and die. The fact that they will not even give us the option of not participating in the program shows that it is not really about helping us. They know that if people were not forced by law to pay into it then the whole system would collapse.worlock77

Get the hell out you said you were done on this site.

Did you honestly believe that?

It took a lot to convince him to come back here. I am happy he agreed to do so.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Squeets"]

Get the hell out you said you were done on this site.

dave123321

Did you honestly believe that?

It took a lot to convince him to come back here. I am happy he agreed to do so.

Like what? Nude shots of Elijah Wood?

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

 - Did you know that you can actually do that?

 - Actually at a certain age you collect Social Security whether you're working or not.

worlock77

1) It prevents me from growing my wealth because I'm forced to pay into a service I may not even use -- and I don't even have a gurantee that I can recieve it when it's time for me to.

2) You receive a gypped portion of your benefits -- but yes I'm aware.

Has Social Security prevented Warren Buffet from growing his wealth?

a quarter percent(.25) of Warren's income annually(Assuming it's a billion dollars) is 2.5 million-- most people won't even see in their life time. It's not comparable.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

1) It prevents me from growing my wealth because I'm forced to pay into a service I may not even use -- and I don't even have a gurantee that I can recieve it when it's time for me to.

2) You receive a gypped portion of your benefits -- but yes I'm aware.

Fightingfan

Has Social Security prevented Warren Buffet from growing his wealth?

a quarter percent(.25) of Warren's income annually(Assuming it's a billion dollars) is 2.5 million-- most people won't even see in their life time. It's not comparable.

He wasn't always wealthy, so has Social Security prevented him from growing his wealth?

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Has Social Security prevented Warren Buffet from growing his wealth?

worlock77

a quarter percent(.25) of Warren's income annually(Assuming it's a billion dollars) is 2.5 million-- most people won't even see in their life time. It's not comparable.

He wasn't always wealthy, so has Social Security prevented him from growing his wealth?

Warren is older than the SS and the Medicare systems.

Warren also comes from a family of wealth -- his father was a politician. Similar to JFK -- he would of never been poor or middle class, though I will admit his wealth wasn't handed to him, but to think he earned his wealth without intervention is silly.

His wealth would be higher granted he didn't have to pay into a system he'll never utilize. 15% of an average man's income is simply not comparable to one of the richest men in the world. 

*We're faring from the topic. So what are you saying? The Government knows how to use my money better than I do?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"] a quarter percent(.25) of Warren's income annually(Assuming it's a billion dollars) is 2.5 million-- most people won't even see in their life time. It's not comparable. Fightingfan

He wasn't always wealthy, so has Social Security prevented him from growing his wealth?

Warren is older than the SS and the Medicare systems.

Warren also comes from a family of wealth -- his father was a politician. Similar to JFK -- he would of never been poor or middle class, though I will admit his wealth wasn't handed to him, but to think he earned his wealth without intervention is silly.

His wealth would be higher granted he didn't have to pay into a system he'll never utilize. 15% of an average man's income is simply not comparable to one of the richest men in the world. 

*We're faring from the topic. So what are you saying? The Government knows how to use my money better than I do?

Warren Buffett was born in 1930. Social Security came into place in 1935. So unless Buffett started working before the age of 5 he's spent his entire career working while paying into Social Security. Has it prevented him from growing his wealth?

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

He wasn't always wealthy, so has Social Security prevented him from growing his wealth?

worlock77

Warren is older than the SS and the Medicare systems.

Warren also comes from a family of wealth -- his father was a politician. Similar to JFK -- he would of never been poor or middle class, though I will admit his wealth wasn't handed to him, but to think he earned his wealth without intervention is silly.

His wealth would be higher granted he didn't have to pay into a system he'll never utilize. 15% of an average man's income is simply not comparable to one of the richest men in the world. 

*We're faring from the topic. So what are you saying? The Government knows how to use my money better than I do?

Warren Buffett was born in 1930. Social Security came into place in 1935. So unless Buffett started working before the age of 5 he's spent his entire career working while paying into Social Security. Has it prevented him from growing his wealth?

Medicare was in the 60s, I'm not going to bother googling. Yes SS has prevented Warren from growing his wealth in comparison to what it could of been. Less money = less investments. Less investments = less returns.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

Warren is older than the SS and the Medicare systems.

Warren also comes from a family of wealth -- his father was a politician. Similar to JFK -- he would of never been poor or middle class, though I will admit his wealth wasn't handed to him, but to think he earned his wealth without intervention is silly.

His wealth would be higher granted he didn't have to pay into a system he'll never utilize. 15% of an average man's income is simply not comparable to one of the richest men in the world. 

*We're faring from the topic. So what are you saying? The Government knows how to use my money better than I do?

Fightingfan

Warren Buffett was born in 1930. Social Security came into place in 1935. So unless Buffett started working before the age of 5 he's spent his entire career working while paying into Social Security. Has it prevented him from growing his wealth?

Medicare was in the 60s, I'm not going to bother googling. Yes SS has prevented Warren from growing his wealth in comparison to what it could of been. Less money = less investments. Less investments = less returns.

Poor Warren. Only $46,000,000,000 to his name.

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Did you honestly believe that?

worlock77

It took a lot to convince him to come back here. I am happy he agreed to do so.

Like what? Nude shots of Elijah Wood?

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#41 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Some form of partial privatization might make sense. Or just have the government suck less at investing. But as a couple people have said medicare is the bigger problem.
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
Just wait for Obamacare.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
Just wait for Obamacare.Murderstyle75
Can't wait for something that has already happened, bro.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
[QUOTE="dave123321"]Put it in the hands of the people and not the government. I like it.dave123321

the government is made up of the people, by the people, for the people. thus social security is already in the hands of the people.
Avatar image for mmwmwmmwmwmm
mmwmwmmwmwmm

620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 mmwmwmmwmwmm
Member since 2008 • 620 Posts
[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="dave123321"]Put it in the hands of the people and not the government. I like it.Serraph105

the government is made up of the people, by the people, for the people. thus social security is already in the hands of the people.

lol
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"]Just wait for Obamacare.DroidPhysX
Can't wait for something that has already happened, bro.

But it hasn't exactly impacted you yet.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="Squeets"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] The democrats will never consider it because it contradicts their either-or fallacy. According to the democrats we either have to pay into social security or all the old people will become impoverished and die. The fact that they will not even give us the option of not participating in the program shows that it is not really about helping us. They know that if people were not forced by law to pay into it then the whole system would collapse.Laihendi

Get the hell out you said you were done on this site.

I decided to come back.

 

:D Yeah!  I can finally enjoy the helpless confusion caused by your posting again haha!  I don't get why people are so bothered by you, it's great.

Avatar image for osirisx3
osirisx3

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 osirisx3
Member since 2012 • 2113 Posts

Can you trust the private sector with your money? Big banks are to big to fail and to big to jail. they could piss away all your money!

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

Can you trust the private sector with your money? Big banks are to big to fail and to big to jail. they could piss away all your money!

osirisx3
That's why if you are wise with your money, you keep it out of the bank and invest it in something like Silver.