Quentin Tarantino or the Coen Brothers?

I prefer the coen brothers by far.

Taratino makes more entertaining movies. Coen brothers make more interesting movies. So, it depends on what mood I am to be honest.JustPlainLucas

This. I can't even place a vote because each does their own thing so well.

Man, tough poll! Depends on my mood. But I am gonna go with QT

Quentin Tarantino by far. See, it works both ways. :P

I think an awesome movie would be written by the Coens and directed by Tarantino ... maybe.

Oooof thats a tough, tough call.

For pure entertainment, Tarantino

For mental stimulation, Coen brothers. Burn After Reading really really tipped me more in their favor though.

BOTH. QT is pretty violent though. but who doesnt like violence? His screenplays are awesome too some of the most random stuff ever.

"did you just order a 5 dollar shake?"

"I don't tip because society says I have to. All right, if someone deserves a tip, if they really put forth an effort, I'll give them something a little something extra. But this tipping automatically, it's for the birds. As far as I'm concerned, they're just doing their job."

"I don't need you to tell me how fuc**** good my coffee is, okay? I'm the one who buys it. I know how good it is. When Bonnie goes shopping she buys SH**. I buy the gourmet expensive stuff because when I drink it I want to taste it".

Its almost 50/50 right now

Coen brothers... but its close.

Coen Brothers are better writers, so I'm going to go with them.

im gonna have to go with tarantino although

ive only seen a couple of the coen bros movies.

Tarantino by far has the most entertaining movies. I thought burn after reading was pretty stupid. It seemed like a snobby person's seth rogan movie. Man, was that actress butt-ugly too...wrfade82

A snobby seth rogan movie? What does that even mean? I think im one of the few who loved Burn After Reading, the idea of it was so ridiculous but the actors executed it perfectly. I love how the whole thing was pretty much about the main girl wanting surgery. She may not be a looker, but Frances Mcdormand is a fantastic actress.

QT by far, I don't like really any of the Coen movies. No country was ok but I guess I didn't like where it ended although being the most likely outcome. Didn't like Fargo and Burn was ok but nothing spectacular.

Whereas Resovoir dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Kill Bill are some of my favorite movies.

[QUOTE="wrfade82"]Tarantino by far has the most entertaining movies. I thought burn after reading was pretty stupid. It seemed like a snobby person's seth rogan movie. Man, was that actress butt-ugly too...Film-Guy

A snobby seth rogan movie? What does that even mean? I think im one of the few who loved Burn After Reading, the idea of it was so ridiculous but the actors executed it perfectly. I love how the whole thing was pretty much about the main girl wanting surgery. She may not be a looker, but Frances Mcdormand is a fantastic actress.

Yea, I loved that movie

my favorite character was the CIA director, forgot the actor's name but he is really funny and always takes minor roles.

Anyway, he was one of the few characters who was actually grounded and his response to all the different situations was hilarious.

anyway, i think its an underrated movie. It was nice seeing Brad Pitt play a total flake, tbh

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]

[QUOTE="wrfade82"]Tarantino by far has the most entertaining movies. I thought burn after reading was pretty stupid. It seemed like a snobby person's seth rogan movie. Man, was that actress butt-ugly too...mrbojangles25

A snobby seth rogan movie? What does that even mean? I think im one of the few who loved Burn After Reading, the idea of it was so ridiculous but the actors executed it perfectly. I love how the whole thing was pretty much about the main girl wanting surgery. She may not be a looker, but Frances Mcdormand is a fantastic actress.

Yea, I loved that movie

my favorite character was the CIA director, forgot the actor's name but he is really funny and always takes minor roles.

Anyway, he was one of the few characters who was actually grounded and his response to all the different situations was hilarious.

anyway, i think its an underrated movie. It was nice seeing Brad Pitt play a total flake, tbh

John Malkovixh is the actor:D he was great.

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]

A snobby seth rogan movie? What does that even mean? I think im one of the few who loved Burn After Reading, the idea of it was so ridiculous but the actors executed it perfectly. I love how the whole thing was pretty much about the main girl wanting surgery. She may not be a looker, but Frances Mcdormand is a fantastic actress.

Film-Guy

Yea, I loved that movie

my favorite character was the CIA director, forgot the actor's name but he is really funny and always takes minor roles.

Anyway, he was one of the few characters who was actually grounded and his response to all the different situations was hilarious.

anyway, i think its an underrated movie. It was nice seeing Brad Pitt play a total flake, tbh

John Malkovixh is the actor:D he was great.

no he was the agent, im talking about the director.

he was the newspaper mogul in Spiderman. The boss in Thank You For Smoking. The dad in Juno.

man, whats his name *scratches head*

*Ahhh JK Simmons

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0799777/

prolly one of my favorite actors

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]

A snobby seth rogan movie? What does that even mean? I think im one of the few who loved Burn After Reading, the idea of it was so ridiculous but the actors executed it perfectly. I love how the whole thing was pretty much about the main girl wanting surgery. She may not be a looker, but Frances Mcdormand is a fantastic actress.

Film-Guy

Yea, I loved that movie

my favorite character was the CIA director, forgot the actor's name but he is really funny and always takes minor roles.

Anyway, he was one of the few characters who was actually grounded and his response to all the different situations was hilarious.

anyway, i think its an underrated movie. It was nice seeing Brad Pitt play a total flake, tbh

John Malkovixh is the actor:D he was great.

Burn After Reading disappointed me to be honest, the actors nailed their roles, and some of the humor was great but I had myself amped up to see the movie and it was a let down, good movie but I was expecting too much of it.

EDIT: Beat to the punch.

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

Yea, I loved that movie

my favorite character was the CIA director, forgot the actor's name but he is really funny and always takes minor roles.

Anyway, he was one of the few characters who was actually grounded and his response to all the different situations was hilarious.

anyway, i think its an underrated movie. It was nice seeing Brad Pitt play a total flake, tbh

mrbojangles25

John Malkovixh is the actor:D he was great.

no he was the agent, im talking about the director.

he was the newspaper mogul in Spiderman. The boss in Thank You For Smoking. The dad in Juno.

man, whats his name *scratches head*

Oh, J.K Simmons right? He was in I love you man.

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]

[QUOTE="wrfade82"]Tarantino by far has the most entertaining movies. I thought burn after reading was pretty stupid. It seemed like a snobby person's seth rogan movie. Man, was that actress butt-ugly too...mrbojangles25

A snobby seth rogan movie? What does that even mean? I think im one of the few who loved Burn After Reading, the idea of it was so ridiculous but the actors executed it perfectly. I love how the whole thing was pretty much about the main girl wanting surgery. She may not be a looker, but Frances Mcdormand is a fantastic actress.

Yea, I loved that movie

my favorite character was the CIA director, forgot the actor's name but he is really funny and always takes minor roles.

Anyway, he was one of the few characters who was actually grounded and his response to all the different situations was hilarious.

anyway, i think its an underrated movie. It was nice seeing Brad Pitt play a total flake, tbh

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]

John Malkovixh is the actor:D he was great.

Film-Guy

no he was the agent, im talking about the director.

he was the newspaper mogul in Spiderman. The boss in Thank You For Smoking. The dad in Juno.

man, whats his name *scratches head*

Oh, J.K Simmons right? He was in I love you man.

OK now I really gotta see that movie. Been hearing good things, but if he is in it at least im guarentteed a couple laughs

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]

A snobby seth rogan movie? What does that even mean? I think im one of the few who loved Burn After Reading, the idea of it was so ridiculous but the actors executed it perfectly. I love how the whole thing was pretty much about the main girl wanting surgery. She may not be a looker, but Frances Mcdormand is a fantastic actress.

Brutal_Elitegs

Yea, I loved that movie

my favorite character was the CIA director, forgot the actor's name but he is really funny and always takes minor roles.

Anyway, he was one of the few characters who was actually grounded and his response to all the different situations was hilarious.

anyway, i think its an underrated movie. It was nice seeing Brad Pitt play a total flake, tbh

Coen Brothers are so much better.

Coen Brothers are the MASTERS of Dark Comedy

I LOVE Raising Arizona, The Ladykillers, Big Lebowski, No Country For Old Men, Burn After Reading, and one of my favorite movie of all time: O, Brother Where Art Thou?

-----------------------------------------

Quentin Tarantino is the MASTER of memorable dialog/characters

Kill Bill, Pulp Fiction, True Romance(he wrote that), and Reservoir Dogs are all on the top shelf of my DVD tower(where all my favs are)

BUT I'd have to go with the Coen Brothers for story and Quentin for style. (I voted Coen Bros., but love 'em both equally)

Quentin Tarantino is better in my opinion. He has made several movies that I love, while the Coen Brothers have only made one that I absolutely loved and that's The Big Lebowski.

Tough call for me. I like films made by both parties a lot. I have to go with Tarantino just by a slight nod, because I like his sense of humor more.

Well, the only movie I've seen by the Coen Brothers was No Country for Old Men, and that was an absolutely horrible movie. On the other hand, Tarantino has made Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs, which were both fantastic, so I'll go with Tarantino.

Well, the only movie I've seen by the Coen Brothers was No Country for Old Men, and that was an absolutely horrible movie. On the other hand, Tarantino has made Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs, which were both fantastic, so I'll go with Tarantino.

Guppy507

You should see Fargo, Miller's crossing, Raising Arizona, O Brother where art thou, and Barton Fink. Why didnt you like No Country for old men? I like tarantino, but he tends to go for styl e over substance.

[QUOTE="Guppy507"]

Well, the only movie I've seen by the Coen Brothers was No Country for Old Men, and that was an absolutely horrible movie. On the other hand, Tarantino has made Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs, which were both fantastic, so I'll go with Tarantino.

Film-Guy

You should see Fargo, Miller's crossing, Raising Arizona, O Brother where art thou, and Barton Fink. Why didnt you like No Country for old men? I like tarantino, but he tends to go for styl e over substance.

I didn't like No Country for Old Men because nothing really happened. Man finds case of money, other man wants money, man runs away while the other man chases him, then a car accident ends the movie. For the life of me, I can't think of one good thing to say about the movie...

I've seen bits and pieces of O Brother Where Art Thou. I'll look into the others.

Can I say both?