Well, regarding Planned Parenthood, (I would've abreviated it, but then I noticed its unfortunate initials) NY State is much more supportive of women in regards to birth control, condoms and all of that jazz than, say, Kentucky, which passed a bill requiring all women getting an abortion to look at an ultrasound and a description of the development of the fetus. In these sort of hostile places, Planned Parenthood is really the only source of aid for these women, since the entire community around them is practically damning them to a life of shame.NPR already said they can survive on their own without government assistance. I say let 'em. I really don't have an opinion on Planned Parenthood. But they are non-essential in my eyes. Perhaps it's just my state, but NY offers a lot of help to women that has nothing to do with Planned Parenthood.
To me spending responsibly means keeping taxes as low as possible while being able to support our military---with some cuts, because even Secretary Gates says there's some waste---our government, infrastructure and all other essential programs to include our safety nets.
I can even deal with letting some Bush tax cuts expire, so long as small business owners get exempt from the tax increases. Reports have already shown they are the biggest job creators in the country and we need to help them as much as possible.
I also think we should end all ag subsidies. Those are far preferable than ending oil subsidies because everyone benefits from lower gas prices.
I just can't get behind a candidate that doesn't look out for me. Social and fiscal liberals don't look out for me.
airshocker
Eh, I can't really say that I agree with your definition. Sure, we need to keep taxes as low as we can, but that really doesn't have much at all to do with the spending itself. In regards to the military, yeah, there definitely need to be some cuts and a bit more common sense (for instance, the United States has 11 aircraft carriers, while the rest of the world has 10. Do we really need to be building 3 more?) HOWEVER, in regardsto the waste, Republicans had 6 years of complete control over the government. Why didn't they cut out the waste then?
Yes, but I'd go a bit further, and restore tax rates to pre-Reagan rates.
And YES. I love you. Farm subsidies are complete bulls***, though I haven't really looked into oil subsidies too much, so I don't have a stance yet.
BUT, how are social and fiscal liberals not looking out for you? I'm just curious.
Log in to comment