I agree with pete_merlin. This is disgusting to say the least.
Good men such as President Harry S. Truman had nightmares about what they saw when they went to the concentration camps.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I agree with pete_merlin. This is disgusting to say the least.
Good men such as President Harry S. Truman had nightmares about what they saw when they went to the concentration camps.
I know its offensive... but that's not reason enough for me to take a restrictive stance against it. They have the right to make people pissed off at them - and I'm not going to argue with that.
Firstly, Everybody Draw Muhammad day was not meant to be offensive by drawing racist pictures like everyone did (the original cartoonist did not want that),what was meant was being able to be allowed to draw him in the name of free speech because Islam denounces free speech over and over; free speech should be and needs to be a universal right. Drawing the Holocaust has nothing offensive to it assuming its not done in a racist way. There is also no point to drawing it because there is no goal or right to protect, as in example of Muhammad drawing. Dr_BrocoliI don't get this type of thinking, you can tout the draw Muhammad day was about freedom of speech all you want but people just wanted to piss of some Muslims, now people want to draw the holocaust and it's bad? I don't get it, freedom of speech and all, right? Or are they just trying to piss some people off? Like the draw Muhammad day people... The internet is full of trolls, and these new "Do this day" are ways that people can transfer their trolling into real life, and it's pathetic. Draw anything day is dumb, you have freedom of speech everyday of your life (In the US) don't know why you have to draw offensive pictures to prove it.
Firstly, Everybody Draw Muhammad day was not meant to be offensive by drawing racist pictures like everyone did (the original cartoonist did not want that)The creator was amazingly nieve then.. Becuase this was a given to most people that this was to happen..
,what was meant was being able to be allowed to draw him in the name of free speech because Islam denounces free speech over and over
No it does not, a few extremists groups did this.. Not all of Islam..
; free speech should be and needs to be a universal right. Drawing the Holocaust has nothing offensive to it assuming its not done in a racist way. There is also no point to drawing it because there is no goal or right to protect, as in example of Muhammad drawing. Dr_Brocoli
Even Jewish people draw images and interpretations of the holocaust . . . this person obviously never read the comic Maus :lol: this idea is straight up stupidfat_robSo no protests beyond that then?
Firstly, Everybody Draw Muhammad day was not meant to be offensive by drawing racist pictures like everyone did (the original cartoonist did not want that),what was meant was being able to be allowed to draw him in the name of free speech because Islam denounces free speech over and over; free speech should be and needs to be a universal right. Drawing the Holocaust has nothing offensive to it assuming its not done in a racist way. There is also no point to drawing it because there is no goal or right to protect, as in example of Muhammad drawing. Dr_BrocoliThis "Draw Holocaust Day" is defending people's right to be an ass. If you supported Draw Muhammed Day you shouldn't have a problem with this. That's hypocrisy at its finest. And complete Freedom of Speech is an American ideal, not a universal one. Stop imposing your values on everyone.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"]Even Jewish people draw images and interpretations of the holocaust . . . this person obviously never read the comic Maus :lol: this idea is straight up stupidjimmyjammer69So no protests beyond that then???? You mean did people protest Maus? I highly doubt they did . . . the work has won a bunch of awards. I could understand the point of this event if Jewish people expected the rest of the world to not draw depictions of the holocaust, but that's not the case . . . I don't see the point of this other than trying to be offensive.
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="fat_rob"]Even Jewish people draw images and interpretations of the holocaust . . . this person obviously never read the comic Maus :lol: this idea is straight up stupidfat_robSo no protests beyond that then???? You mean did people protest Maus? I highly doubt they did . . . the work has won a bunch of awards. I could understand the point of this event if Jewish people expected the rest of the world to not draw depictions of the holocaust, but that's not the case . . . I don't see the point of this other than trying to be offensive. If there's any point, it's to show that freedom of speech is a universal right, and not just when it's attacking an unpopular minority. Alternatively, draw Mohammed day was pointless.
*edit* just looked up this Spiegelman's Maus. I'm guessing that's a little less offensive than what's likely to come out of this or what came out of Draw Mohammed Day.
[QUOTE="Dr_Brocoli"]Firstly, Everybody Draw Muhammad day was not meant to be offensive by drawing racist pictures like everyone did (the original cartoonist did not want that),what was meant was being able to be allowed to draw him in the name of free speech because Islam denounces free speech over and over; free speech should be and needs to be a universal right. Drawing the Holocaust has nothing offensive to it assuming its not done in a racist way. There is also no point to drawing it because there is no goal or right to protect, as in example of Muhammad drawing. FamikingThis "Draw Holocaust Day" is defending people's right to be an ass. If you supported Draw Muhammed Day you shouldn't have a problem with this. That's hypocrisy at its finest. And complete Freedom of Speech is an American ideal, not a universal one. Stop imposing your values on everyone. Lots of countries protect freedom of speech, not just America.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]So no protests beyond that then?jimmyjammer69??? You mean did people protest Maus? I highly doubt they did . . . the work has won a bunch of awards. I could understand the point of this event if Jewish people expected the rest of the world to not draw depictions of the holocaust, but that's not the case . . . I don't see the point of this other than trying to be offensive. If there's any point, it's to show that freedom of speech is a universal right, and not just when it's attacking an unpopular minority. Alternatively, draw Mohammed day was pointless. No, draw Muhammad day was not pointless. It's imperative that freedom of speech is protected. Some Muslims impose their religious views on all of humanity even though not all of humanity believes in Islam. It's ridiculous to expect me to abide by those laws when I'm not Muslim. I can draw Muhammad if I want to . . . and they can draw the holocaust. I don't disagree with the day on a freedom of speech grounds. They can do whatever they want, I don't care. I just don't see what point their making when NO ONE is making the argument that you can't draw depictions of the holocaust. Yes, it's about free speech, but it's a moot point because no one is fighting against drawing images of the holocaust like Muslims fight against depictions of Muhammad. It's a hallow argument.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"] Lots of countries protect freedom of speech, not just America.FamikingNot complete freedom of speech like the US. Case in point: you could get arrested in Germany for participating in this. America has censorship to that effect too, it's just geared towards obscenity. Go look up the Miller Test.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"] Lots of countries protect freedom of speech, not just America.Famiking
Not complete freedom of speech like the US. Case in point: you could get arrested in Germany for participating in this.
Norway, Finland, Sweden, Færøerne, Greenland and Denmark have complete freedom of speech as well, and that's just what I can think of at the top of my head. it's nothing unique to the US.
Norway, Finland, Sweden, Færøerne, Greenland and Denmark have complete freedom of speech as well, and that's just what I can think of at the top of my head. it's nothing unique to the US.
I would even wager that the freedom of speech is greater in those countries than in the US.[QUOTE="fat_rob"] Lots of countries protect freedom of speech, not just America.FamikingNot complete freedom of speech like the US. Case in point: you could get arrested in Germany for participating in this. USA is joint 20th in freedom of the press along with Luxumburg and the UK.
[...] They will be mocking the holocaust. SquatsAreAwesom
orway, Finland, Sweden, Færøerne, Greenland and Denmark have complete freedom of speech as well, and that's just what I can think of at the top of my head. it's nothing unique to the US.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech - A lot of the countries you listed do restrict freedom of speech. While the US does not.BiancaDK
America has censorship to that effect too, it's just geared towards obscenity. Go look up the Miller Test.fat_robHmm, never heard of it before. Just read on it. How often is this law enacted?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech - A lot of the countries you listed do restrict freedom of speech. While the US does not. FamikingOf course the US restricts freedom of speech.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech - A lot of the countries you listed do restrict freedom of speech. While the US does not.[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]orway, Finland, Sweden, Færøerne, Greenland and Denmark have complete freedom of speech as well, and that's just what I can think of at the top of my head. it's nothing unique to the US.
Famiking
In effect the US definitely does restrict the practice of hate speech, by it's medias alone. That's definitely a relevant parameter when it comes to measuring ideals of freedom of speech.
Just like this is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech - A lot of the countries you listed do restrict freedom of speech. While the US does not.[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]orway, Finland, Sweden, Færøerne, Greenland and Denmark have complete freedom of speech as well, and that's just what I can think of at the top of my head. it's nothing unique to the US.
Famiking
America has censorship to that effect too, it's just geared towards obscenity. Go look up the Miller Test.fat_robHmm, never heard of it before. Just read on it. How often is this law enacted? It's not a law, but a test the US Supreme Court uses to determine obscene speech, which they say falls outside the purview of free speech (I don't think it does though). Here's a Reason.tv video on a soon-to-be-heard obscenity case. There's more on that site about free speech and limitations in America if you look. Look at the DISCOLSE Act. It's gonna greatly restrict speech if it passes.
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="fat_rob"]??? You mean did people protest Maus? I highly doubt they did . . . the work has won a bunch of awards. I could understand the point of this event if Jewish people expected the rest of the world to not draw depictions of the holocaust, but that's not the case . . . I don't see the point of this other than trying to be offensive. fat_robIf there's any point, it's to show that freedom of speech is a universal right, and not just when it's attacking an unpopular minority. Alternatively, draw Mohammed day was pointless. No, draw Muhammad day was not pointless. It's imperative that freedom of speech is protected. Some Muslims impose their religious views on all of humanity even though not all of humanity believes in Islam. It's ridiculous to expect me to abide by those laws when I'm not Muslim. I can draw Muhammad if I want to . . . and they can draw the holocaust. I don't disagree with the day on a freedom of speech grounds. They can do whatever they want, I don't care. I just don't see what point their making when NO ONE is making the argument that you can't draw depictions of the holocaust. Yes, it's about free speech, but it's a moot point because no one is fighting against drawing images of the holocaust like Muslims fight against depictions of Muhammad. It's a hallow argument. Agreed completely (except for the Draw Mohammed thing being justified - that was just everyone getting trolled by Matt and Trey).
[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="fat_rob"] Lots of countries protect freedom of speech, not just America.BiancaDK
Not complete freedom of speech like the US. Case in point: you could get arrested in Germany for participating in this.
Norway, Finland, Sweden, Færøerne, Greenland and Denmark have complete freedom of speech as well, and that's just what I can think of at the top of my head. it's nothing unique to the US.
But Bianca, has Denmark had free speech for 219 years, like the U.S. has?
[QUOTE="markop2003"] USA is joint 20th in freedom of the press along with Luxumburg and the UK.FamikingFreedom of press is not the same thing as freedom of speech. Of course it is. How can you restrict freedom of the press without restricting freedom of speech?
[QUOTE="fat_rob"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]If there's any point, it's to show that freedom of speech is a universal right, and not just when it's attacking an unpopular minority. Alternatively, draw Mohammed day was pointless.jimmyjammer69No, draw Muhammad day was not pointless. It's imperative that freedom of speech is protected. Some Muslims impose their religious views on all of humanity even though not all of humanity believes in Islam. It's ridiculous to expect me to abide by those laws when I'm not Muslim. I can draw Muhammad if I want to . . . and they can draw the holocaust. I don't disagree with the day on a freedom of speech grounds. They can do whatever they want, I don't care. I just don't see what point their making when NO ONE is making the argument that you can't draw depictions of the holocaust. Yes, it's about free speech, but it's a moot point because no one is fighting against drawing images of the holocaust like Muslims fight against depictions of Muhammad. It's a hallow argument. Agreed completely (except for the Draw Mohammed thing being justified - that was just everyone getting trolled by Matt and Trey). How is the Draw Muhammad day not justified. You're not providing an argument. Matt and Trey were making an important point though satire (like they always do on South Park).
Of course the US restricts freedom of speech.Engrish_MajorNot the same extent.
In effect the US definitely does restrict the practice of hate speech, by it's medias alone. That's definitely a relevant parameter when it comes to measuring ideals of freedom of speech.I hope you realize that the Reporters Without Borders gets its data from self-reporting. So your company can be the one that tells you you can't write certain things, and it would be counted as censorship.Just like this is:BiancaDK
Freedom of speech was guaranteed in law by the Danish Constitution in 1849. Not entirely sure what you're getting at now. =P It's not a question of who originally started doing it for an ideal to be "yours" and not someone elses, it's a question of it being put into actuality if anything.But Bianca, has Denmark had free speech for 219 years, like the U.S. has?
topsemag55
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="fat_rob"] No, draw Muhammad day was not pointless. It's imperative that freedom of speech is protected. Some Muslims impose their religious views on all of humanity even though not all of humanity believes in Islam. It's ridiculous to expect me to abide by those laws when I'm not Muslim. I can draw Muhammad if I want to . . . and they can draw the holocaust. I don't disagree with the day on a freedom of speech grounds. They can do whatever they want, I don't care. I just don't see what point their making when NO ONE is making the argument that you can't draw depictions of the holocaust. Yes, it's about free speech, but it's a moot point because no one is fighting against drawing images of the holocaust like Muslims fight against depictions of Muhammad. It's a hallow argument. fat_robAgreed completely (except for the Draw Mohammed thing being justified - that was just everyone getting trolled by Matt and Trey). How is the Draw Muhammad day not justified. You're not providing an argument. Matt and Trey were making an important point though satire (like they always do on South Park). Well, lots of people are gong to be making an important point through satire on this too. Or is Matt and Trey's art so much more valuable than everyone else's?
*edit* as for not providing arguments, I'll continue with the point I did throughout the Mohammed debacle - the day was an excuse for lots of people to air sentiment against Islam in the name of freedumz. It was dumb and pointless but the currently anti- Islam press lapped it up.
Uh, they are linked concepts. You can't have free press without free speech.fat_robExactly. You can't have free press without free speech. But you can have free speech without free press. You can take a newspaper to court for saying false things abou you that damage your public image - for example.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Agreed completely (except for the Draw Mohammed thing being justified - that was just everyone getting trolled by Matt and Trey).jimmyjammer69How is the Draw Muhammad day not justified. You're not providing an argument. Matt and Trey were making an important point though satire (like they always do on South Park). Well, lots of people are gong to be making an important point through satire on this too. Or is Matt and Trey's art so much more valuable than everyone else's? No, their art isn't more valuable, it's just that their point in drawing Muhammad has more oomph since there is an entire segment of a religion trying to prevent them from depicting Muhammad and threatened violence against Matt and Trey if they did so. No one is telling people not to draw pictures of the holocaust. Can important points be made by depicting the holocaust? Yes, but the points would be amplified if people where actually against drawing the holocaust.
I hope you realize that the Reporters Without Borders gets its data from self-reporting. So your company can be the one that tells you you can't write certain things, and it would be counted as censorship.FamikingThe US obviously has much greater media censorship than the countries listed higher, it's quite apparent for all to see.
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="fat_rob"] How is the Draw Muhammad day not justified. You're not providing an argument. Matt and Trey were making an important point though satire (like they always do on South Park). fat_robWell, lots of people are gong to be making an important point through satire on this too. Or is Matt and Trey's art so much more valuable than everyone else's? No, their art isn't more valuable, it's just that their point in drawing Muhammad has more oomph since there is an entire segment of a religion trying to prevent them from depicting Muhammad and threatened violence against Matt and Trey if they did so. No one is telling people not to draw pictures of the holocaust. Can important points be made by depicting the holocaust? Yes, but the points would be amplified if people where actually against drawing the holocaust. No, there was probably about as much outcry about their cartoon as there will be from this day. Only this time it will get far less publicity.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"]Uh, they are linked concepts. You can't have free press without free speech.FamikingExactly. You can't have free press without free speech. But you can have free speech without free press. You can take a newspaper to court for saying false things abou you that damage your public image - for example. Which is a restriction on speech . . . because the newspaper is not allowed to speak in any fashion it chooses. Any limitation on press is also a limitation on a type of speech.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Well, lots of people are gong to be making an important point through satire on this too. Or is Matt and Trey's art so much more valuable than everyone else's? jimmyjammer69No, their art isn't more valuable, it's just that their point in drawing Muhammad has more oomph since there is an entire segment of a religion trying to prevent them from depicting Muhammad and threatened violence against Matt and Trey if they did so. No one is telling people not to draw pictures of the holocaust. Can important points be made by depicting the holocaust? Yes, but the points would be amplified if people where actually against drawing the holocaust. No, there was probably about as much outcry about their cartoon as there will be from this day. Only this time it will get far less publicity. The outcry exists for different reasons though. This outcry is because it's just a blatant attempt to be offensive. The Muhammad day was to a reaction against a prohibition. See the difference?
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="fat_rob"] No, their art isn't more valuable, it's just that their point in drawing Muhammad has more oomph since there is an entire segment of a religion trying to prevent them from depicting Muhammad and threatened violence against Matt and Trey if they did so. No one is telling people not to draw pictures of the holocaust. Can important points be made by depicting the holocaust? Yes, but the points would be amplified if people where actually against drawing the holocaust. fat_robNo, there was probably about as much outcry about their cartoon as there will be from this day. Only this time it will get far less publicity. The outcry exists for different reasons though. This outcry is because it's just a blatant attempt to be offensive. The Muhammad day was to a reaction against a prohibition. See the difference? No. There was no prohibition, just outcry.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment