"Marijuana potency increases to the highest level in 30+ years"

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for rudyfan04
rudyfan04

4448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 rudyfan04
Member since 2004 • 4448 Posts

What do you think? Story copied from Yahoo!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080612/ap_on_he_me/marijuana_potency

Study: Marijuana potency increases in 2007

By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer

Marijuana potency increased last year to the highest level in more than 30 years, posing greater health risks to people who may view the drug as harmless, according to a report released Thursday by the White House.

The latest analysis from the University of Mississippi's Potency Monitoring Project tracked the average amount of THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, in samples seized by law enforcement agencies from 1975 through 2007. It found that the average amount of THC reached 9.6 percent in 2007, compared with 8.75 percent the previous year.

The 9.6 percent level represents more than a doubling of marijuana potency since 1983, when it averaged just under 4 percent.

"Today's report makes it more important than ever that we get past outdated, anachronistic views of marijuana," said John Walters, director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. He cited baby boomer parents who might have misguided notions that the drug contains the weaker potency levels of the 1970s.

"Marijuana potency has grown steeply over the past decade, with serious implications in particular for young people," Walters said. He cited the risk of psychological, cognitive and respiratory problems, and the potential for users to become dependent on drugs such as cocaine and heroin.

While the drug's potency may be rising, marijuana users generally adjust to the level of potency and smoke it accordingly, said Dr. Mitch Earleywine, who teaches psychology at the State University of New York in Albany and serves as an adviser for marijuana advocacy groups. "Stronger cannabis leads to less inhaled smoke," he said.

The White House office attributed the increases in marijuana potency to sophisticated growing techniques that drug traffickers are using at sites in the United States and Canada.

A report from the office last month found that a teenager who has been depressed in the past year was more than twice as likely to have used marijuana than teenagers who have not reported being depressed - 25 percent compared with 12 percent. The study said marijuana use increased the risk of developing mental disorders by 40 percent.

"The increases in marijuana potency are of concern since they increase the likelihood of acute toxicity, including mental impairment," said Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, which funded the University of Mississippi study.

"Particularly worrisome is the possibility that the more potent THC might be more effective at triggering the changes in the brain that can lead to addiction," Volkow said.

But there's no data showing that a higher potency in marijuana leads to more addiction, Earleywine said, and marijuana's withdrawal symptoms are mild at best. "Mild irritability, craving for marijuana and decreased appetite - I mean those are laughable when you talk about withdrawal from a drug. Caffeine is worse."

The project analyzed data on 62,797 cannabis samples, 1,302 hashish samples, and 468 hash oil samples obtained primarily from seizures by law enforcement agencies in 48 states since 1975.

___

On the Net:

White House Office of National Drug Control Policy: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov

___

Associated Press writer Christine Simmons contributed to this report.

Avatar image for WeazelMan311
WeazelMan311

9620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 1

#2 WeazelMan311
Member since 2004 • 9620 Posts
i dont believe it
Avatar image for spidermonkey11
spidermonkey11

1716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 spidermonkey11
Member since 2007 • 1716 Posts

Oh noes I overdosed on marijuana.

X _ X

Avatar image for dooly420
dooly420

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 dooly420
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts
in samples seized by law enforcement agencies from 1975 through 2007. It found that the average amount of THC reached 9.6 percent in 2007, compared with 8.75 percent the previous year.rudyfan04
that's where i stopped reading. the test is wrong. the THC levels in the pot from 30 years ago has drastically deteriorated. there's no way you can get an accurate result. the same thing would happen from 06 to 07. that would explain the "rise" in THC levels.
Avatar image for El-Visitante
El-Visitante

1137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 El-Visitante
Member since 2007 • 1137 Posts
Really? I haven't noticed a difference at all.
Avatar image for kingman03
kingman03

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kingman03
Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts

I am pretty sure this will make kids want to try it now.

"Breaking news! Marijuana is stronger and will get you more high than ever before!! Don't do it though, you might want some heroin after you take a hit!"

Avatar image for geodisicdome
geodisicdome

13663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#7 geodisicdome
Member since 2005 • 13663 Posts

Really? I haven't noticed a difference at all.El-Visitante

your tolerance is up.

Avatar image for El-Visitante
El-Visitante

1137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 El-Visitante
Member since 2007 • 1137 Posts

[QUOTE="El-Visitante"]Really? I haven't noticed a difference at all.geodisicdome

your tolerance is up.

I wouldn't doubt it.
Avatar image for kingman03
kingman03

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kingman03
Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts

[QUOTE="El-Visitante"]Really? I haven't noticed a difference at all.geodisicdome

your tolerance is up.

Wayyy off topic, but is that guy in the middle of your sig devendra banhart? It looks just like him.
Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts

that's where i stopped reading. the test is wrong. the THC levels in the pot from 30 years ago has drastically deteriorated. there's no way you can get an accurate result. the same thing would happen from 06 to 07. that would explain the "rise" in THC levels.dooly420

Yes, if that is true, I'm sure the researchers totally wouldn't factor such a deterioration into their study, would they? Eh, keep rationalizing.

Avatar image for geodisicdome
geodisicdome

13663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 geodisicdome
Member since 2005 • 13663 Posts
[QUOTE="geodisicdome"]

[QUOTE="El-Visitante"]Really? I haven't noticed a difference at all.El-Visitante

your tolerance is up.

I wouldn't doubt it.

its a gutter init

Avatar image for geodisicdome
geodisicdome

13663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#12 geodisicdome
Member since 2005 • 13663 Posts
[QUOTE="geodisicdome"]

[QUOTE="El-Visitante"]Really? I haven't noticed a difference at all.kingman03

your tolerance is up.

Wayyy off topic, but is that guy in the middle of your sig devendra banhart? It looks just like him.

yes it is

Avatar image for El-Visitante
El-Visitante

1137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 El-Visitante
Member since 2007 • 1137 Posts
[QUOTE="El-Visitante"][QUOTE="geodisicdome"]

[QUOTE="El-Visitante"]Really? I haven't noticed a difference at all.geodisicdome

your tolerance is up.

I wouldn't doubt it.

its a gutter init

I don't hink I follow. Do you mean that it sucks that my tolerance is up, or that it's a gutter that I do it?
Avatar image for dooly420
dooly420

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 dooly420
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts
[QUOTE="El-Visitante"][QUOTE="geodisicdome"]

[QUOTE="El-Visitante"]Really? I haven't noticed a difference at all.geodisicdome

your tolerance is up.

I wouldn't doubt it.

its a gutter init

what's wrong with having a high tolerance? i like my tolerance high, that way i can rip 10 footer more than once every few hours.
Avatar image for ferret837
ferret837

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 ferret837
Member since 2004 • 1942 Posts
i recently got my tolerance back down and iv been getting pretty ripped. One of my friends got so high that he cried. Its actually kind of scaring me, but alot of people have been selling laced marijuana.
Avatar image for atejas
atejas

520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 atejas
Member since 2008 • 520 Posts

i recently got my tolerance back down and iv been getting pretty ripped. One of my friends got so high that he cried. Its actually kind of scaring me, but alot of people have been selling laced marijuana.ferret837

Laced with what? Maybe you should just lay off for a while until they find this guy.

Avatar image for effthat
effthat

2314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 effthat
Member since 2007 • 2314 Posts

At least the piece is well balanced. Personally, I think this is more scare tactics. A higher THC concentration isn't going to change the overall picture. Pot isn't like coke or heroine in that you don't measure out how much you're going to take before you take it. You pack a bowl, and smoke it, usually with friends and when you're baked, you're done.

Secondly, more THC means the desired results can be achieved with less inhallation and damage to lungs. That's only if you smoke it anyway as there are much less harmful options.

Finally, there is no reason to assume that marijuana is a gateway drug. At least not for any of the properties of marijuana itself. It isn't a gateway drug for it's ease of procurement because prescriptions are the easiest to get.

Let's be honest, the people you hang out has a greater effect on the drugs you do than the drugs themself. If you hang out at a rave, you'll probably try E. If you were into fashion in the late 80's you probably did coke. If you were a hippie in the 70's you probably took acid. If you were at woodstock, you may have done all three and then some. If you were in vietnam you probably developed a heroine addiction. If you lived in China in the 1800's you probably used opium.

It's crazy that we treat these issues by clouding the waters and jumping to conclusions before we've done enough research to find out. And at the end of the day, the conclusions are what sticks and the research and testing is either compromised or not done at all.