"There's no emotion in speed" (guitar playing)

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#51 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

Speed and emotion are totally different things. How can you even relate them?

In my personal opinion, if you can fly all over the fretboard, thats cool.... but your not really a good musician unless you appeal to the emotions of your audience. Your just a machine.

Being a musician myself, emotional quality is most important, over everything else. At the end of the day, its all about who you affected, not how awesome of a technical player you are.

Thats my opinion.

Avatar image for Kruiz_Bathory
Kruiz_Bathory

4765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#52 Kruiz_Bathory
Member since 2009 • 4765 Posts

There can be emotion in speed, its just hard to do.

Grodus5
Not True
Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#53 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
if that statement is used as a rule, then it puts a limit on art. i could easily identify a band that simply noodles around just for the sake of showing off, but there is such a wide range of human emotions that its ridiculous to say that all bands that play fast arent articulating any sort of emotion.
Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
[QUOTE="Grodus5"]

There can be emotion in speed, its just hard to do.

Kruiz_Bathory
Not True

What, how does that prove Grodus5 wrong?
Avatar image for themagicbum9720
themagicbum9720

6536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 themagicbum9720
Member since 2007 • 6536 Posts

john petrucci and buckethead can play with emotion, even michael angelo batio. i think rusty cooley plays fast because he can.

Avatar image for Amadeous
Amadeous

3092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Amadeous
Member since 2003 • 3092 Posts
[QUOTE="lonewolf604"]

Don't you kind of hate it when people use this argument? I think most people say this because they themselves can't play fast.

I think its a pretty ridiculous depending on how you look at it.

A guitar player will spend years on his technique, just for people to say "there's no emotion" in that.

Sure, simplicity (and emotion) shouldn't be over looked, but then that's just too easy.

Thoughts? Opinions?

xaos
Technical prowess is good for impressing other guitar aficionados but is not sufficient to make engaging or entertaining music to a general audience.

i disagree with Xaos. i absolutely don't think one needs to be an aficionado to be entertained by technical prowess. i mean, even at a rudimentary level, most people don't know what 4/4 time is, or what a "measure" is, but nevertheless can follow along intuitively. and as far as technical prowess on guitar (or any instrument), a lot of the time people don't even think about what the musician may be doing, but are simply being swept up by the ferocity, raw power, lightning speed, (and/or) the exotic scales of the solo. hell, i might even argue that knowing more about music theory can ruin a solo you once thought was cool, because it's mystery is gone.
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
It's rare to find a speedy section that i would call emotional, so yes.
Avatar image for lex_in_the_moon
lex_in_the_moon

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#58 lex_in_the_moon
Member since 2007 • 770 Posts

Depends entirely on the genre, if you play metal there obviously needs to be speed but that doesn't mean there's no emotion. But there are genres such as grunge where speed is not important and it depends on simplicity and emotional power. Everyone has different taste in music and people often forget that, so let's not criticize one another (unless someone listens to modern pop).

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
The reason why most shredding sounds blend is because that the guitarist puts so much attention on playing all the correct notes that he neglects other aspects of the music, such as it's phrasing and dynamics. It's not that playing fast = emotionless(hell, just look at some of Chopin's work) playing, just that it's harder to show musicality when you have to focus on the technical aspect of it, so I'll say that people who play fast but without any sort of phrasing and dynamics is not fluent enough on his instrument.
Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts

Speed and emotion are totally different things. How can you even relate them?

In my personal opinion, if you can fly all over the fretboard, thats cool.... but your not really a good musician unless you appeal to the emotions of your audience. Your just a machine.

Being a musician myself, emotional quality is most important, over everything else. At the end of the day, its all about who you affected, not how awesome of a technical player you are.

Thats my opinion.

Shmiity
A tempo of a piece is going to affect how it presents it's message or emotion, so yes, they are related. And while you don't need amazing technique to play with emotion, having good technique can certainly help you express yourself better. How can a person carry a conversation if he only knows a few words?
Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

Speed can definitely reflect emotion. It is best when there is a crescendo or such and the speed is the sort of release after the buildup.

Couple good examples from good ol' Metallica would be the end solo's of Fade to Black and One.

Speed is also great in general when it comes to expression agression and anger. The only example of slow yet agressive that comes to my mind is Walk by Pantera which also happens to be one of the greatest examples of great simplicity.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180267 Posts
Technical ability does not inherently mean emotion.
Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
Technical ability does not inherently mean emotion. LJS9502_basic
Yes, it is a tool to express emotion.
Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#64 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

That would depend on precisely what emotion you're looking for, wouldn't it?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180267 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Technical ability does not inherently mean emotion. Lonelynight
Yes, it is a tool to express emotion.

No...it's a technique.
Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
[QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Technical ability does not inherently mean emotion. LJS9502_basic
Yes, it is a tool to express emotion.

No...it's a technique.

What? Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Did you mean that technique is a technique, and not a tool? If that's the case then, I'll say that having technique can greatly help one with expressing emotion through music.
Avatar image for Nifty_Shark
Nifty_Shark

13137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Nifty_Shark
Member since 2007 • 13137 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Lonelynight"] Yes, it is a tool to express emotion.Lonelynight
No...it's a technique.

What? Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Did you mean that technique is a technique, and not a tool? If that's the case then, I'll say that having technique can greatly help one with expressing emotion through music.

Basically he means that if you play a scale super duper fast you are not giving any emotion in which case he is right.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts

[QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No...it's a technique.Nifty_Shark

What? Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Did you mean that technique is a technique, and not a tool? If that's the case then, I'll say that having technique can greatly help one with expressing emotion through music.

Basically he means that if you play a scale super duper fast you are not giving any emotion in which case he is right.

But what if the music calls for a fast scale run? In clas sical music, scales are used a lot, and they do serve a purpose other than showing off the performers ability. Plus just because it's a scale, doesn't mean it will be soulless.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#69 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

fast does not mean emotionless, speed is not the only thing that determines what you all call "playing with emotion" (if you think this, you may need to do some restudying of music)

John Petrucci/Jeff Loomis, these 2 play with a lot of emotion, and these 2 are some of the fastest playing people I have heard.

Avatar image for incred_davis
incred_davis

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 incred_davis
Member since 2005 • 1166 Posts

its not a clear cut question, i can shred without emotion... or i can shred with emotion. it all depends on the person holding the guitar and what he wants to convey at that particular time.

if your asking "is it possible to shred and still convey emotion" then the answer is yes.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#71 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

its not a clear cut question, i can shred without emotion... or i can shred with emotion. it all depends on the person holding the guitar and what he wants to convey at that particular time.

if your asking "is it possible to shred and still convey emotion" then the answer is yes.

incred_davis

This, like I said before, speed is not the determining factor for with or without emotion... Though speed can add or take away some emotion, (depends on the emotions conveyed)

but playing fast is emotionless, is a fallacy, usually used by people who a) can't play fast, or b) don't listen to music where they do play fast...

It is an argument however which degrades other play techniques, to justify the importance of the ones they prefer.

Avatar image for ex-mortis
ex-mortis

1599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 ex-mortis
Member since 2009 • 1599 Posts

Shredding is a lot like playing chords in a sense. It is not about the individual notes, it is about the main idea being produced. Shredding, believe it or not, is perfectly capable of creating an atmosphere and adding color to a piece. An experienced shredder is not just trying to shred up and down musical scales. A truly great shredder chooses his notes carefully and the outcome will be far from "mindless shredding" as is the common stereotype of shredding. Here is a great example:

Yngwie J. Malmsteen - Black Star

This piece contains a lot of really technically impressive guitar playing, but not for one minute is it not expressive and "emotional". Notwithstanding all that, it is not important to play "beautifully". Music is not about expressing beauty at all, and if the specific moment calls for really chaotic playing, and it is appropriate, then that can also not be called mindless.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#73 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

Shredding is a lot like playing chords in a sense. It is not about the individual notes, it is about the main idea being produced. Shredding, believe it or not, is perfectly capable of creating an atmosphere and adding color to a piece. An experienced shredder is not just trying to shred up and down musical scales. A truly great shredder chooses his notes carefully and the outcome will be far from "mindless shredding" as is the common stereotype of shredding. Here is a great examples:

Yngwie J. Malmsteen - Black Star

This piece contains a lot of really technically impressive guitar playing, but not for one minute is it not expressive and "emotional". Notwithstanding all that, it is not important to play "beautifully". Music is not about expressing beauty at all, and if the specific moment calls for really chaotic playing, and it is appropriate, then that can also not be called mindless.

ex-mortis

yeah yngwie malmsteen (I love his flamenco diablo) is a great guitar player, him Jeff Loomis and John Petrucci are all 3 examples of the Fallacy : fast is emotionless.

All 3 of them can and often do play very fast, and also have some of the most beautiful/emotional guitar passages/solos/riffs (regardless of the speed)

Avatar image for cyberdarkkid
cyberdarkkid

16777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#74 cyberdarkkid
Member since 2007 • 16777 Posts
[QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Lonelynight"] Yes, it is a tool to express emotion.

No...it's a technique.

What? Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Did you mean that technique is a technique, and not a tool? If that's the case then, I'll say that having technique can greatly help one with expressing emotion through music.

I agree with you here, the wider your musical vocabulary and skills are the better you'll be able to express and paraphrase your emotions.
Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

[QUOTE="incred_davis"]

its not a clear cut question, i can shred without emotion... or i can shred with emotion. it all depends on the person holding the guitar and what he wants to convey at that particular time.

if your asking "is it possible to shred and still convey emotion" then the answer is yes.

Lach0121

This, like I said before, speed is not the determining factor for with or without emotion... Though speed can add or take away some emotion, (depends on the emotions conveyed)

but playing fast is emotionless, is a fallacy, usually used by people who a) can't play fast, or b) don't listen to music where they do play fast...

It is an argument however which degrades other play techniques, to justify the importance of the ones they prefer.

I just wanna say that you two's avatars makes your having a discussion pretty amusing:lol:

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#76 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="incred_davis"]

its not a clear cut question, i can shred without emotion... or i can shred with emotion. it all depends on the person holding the guitar and what he wants to convey at that particular time.

if your asking "is it possible to shred and still convey emotion" then the answer is yes.

LostProphetFLCL

This, like I said before, speed is not the determining factor for with or without emotion... Though speed can add or take away some emotion, (depends on the emotions conveyed)

but playing fast is emotionless, is a fallacy, usually used by people who a) can't play fast, or b) don't listen to music where they do play fast...

It is an argument however which degrades other play techniques, to justify the importance of the ones they prefer.

I just wanna say that you two's avatars makes your having a discussion pretty amusing:lol:

lqtm I thought the same thing to myself.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180267 Posts

yeah yngwie malmsteen is a great guitar player, him Jeff Loomis and John Petrucci are all 3 examples of the Fallacy : fast is emotionless.

All 3 of them can and often do play very fast, and also have some of the most beautiful/emotional guitar passages/solos/riffs (regardless of the speed)

Lach0121

I've always found Malmsteens music to lack emotion...it's technically brilliant...but emotionless. And yes, I used to listen to his Malmsteen before we go down that road.

As I stated earlier...emotion is not inherently part of technique. Someone who works to perfect a technique does not by osmosis acquire emotion. Not to sat that every musician is an example of not having emotion....but it's false to say the technique causes emotion in and of itself.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#78 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

yeah yngwie malmsteen is a great guitar player, him Jeff Loomis and John Petrucci are all 3 examples of the Fallacy : fast is emotionless.

All 3 of them can and often do play very fast, and also have some of the most beautiful/emotional guitar passages/solos/riffs (regardless of the speed)

LJS9502_basic

I've always found Malmsteens music to lack emotion...it's technically brilliant...but emotionless. And yes, I used to listen to his Malmsteen before we go down that road.

As I stated earlier...emotion is not inherently part of technique. Someone who works to perfect a technique does not by osmosis acquire emotion. Not to sat that every musician is an example of not having emotion....but it's false to say the technique causes emotion in and of itself.

No now this I agree with you on(malmsteen aside), though it is the technique which gives you the tools/abilities to convey your emotion... Music is the language of emotion, and techniques playing stiles (misspelled I know gamespot is a turd with that word) are what give you the tools to convey said emotion.

but your right, technique does not mean emotion.. but having technique can help you better utilize/transpose/and convey the emotions.

Avatar image for cyberdarkkid
cyberdarkkid

16777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#79 cyberdarkkid
Member since 2007 • 16777 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

yeah yngwie malmsteen is a great guitar player, him Jeff Loomis and John Petrucci are all 3 examples of the Fallacy : fast is emotionless.

All 3 of them can and often do play very fast, and also have some of the most beautiful/emotional guitar passages/solos/riffs (regardless of the speed)

LJS9502_basic

I've always found Malmsteens music to lack emotion...it's technically brilliant...but emotionless. And yes, I used to listen to his Malmsteen before we go down that road.

I think his first album combines emotion and skills very well, then it was all mostly pure showoff crap.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#80 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
It really depends on the artist/song... emotion does not depend on how quickly the music is played.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#81 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

It really depends on the artist/song... emotion does not depend on how quickly the music is played.chessmaster1989

bingo, as well as the perception of the audience/listener.