Rate The Artist: Three Days Grace

3/10. They are tolerable, but I really don't care for them. I just find them to be an incredibly generic band.

Not a huge fan. I like their older stuff more. Guy's voice just doesn't do it for me. Kinda cheesy in the same vain as Avenged Sevenfold.

Not a huge fan. I like their older stuff more. Guy's voice just doesn't do it for me. Kinda cheesy in the same vain as Avenged Sevenfold.

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"] Ah, Skillet... It's weird, I love some of their songs, but dislike the band at the same time? Don't know why.battlefront23

[QUOTE="chilly-chill"] Jim Carrey sung their song "jumper" better then they did in the movie Yes Man lolbattlefront23

Jim Carrey (Yes Man) Jumper.

chilly-chill

0/10 generic bro hard rockimaps3fanboy

Just out of curiosity, when did "generic" equal a zero on ten rating? Generic would seem to imply "average" to me, like a 4-6 rating.

A zero would only seem warrented for a band that has absolutly no musical qualities whatsoever (ie. random noise).

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"]0/10 generic bro hard rockredstorm72

Just out of curiosity, when did "generic" equal a zero on ten rating? Generic would seem to imply "average" to me, like a 4-6 rating.

A zero would only seem warrented for a band that has absolutly no musical qualities whatsoever (ie. random noise).

[QUOTE="redstorm72"]

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"]0/10 generic bro hard rockimaps3fanboy

Just out of curiosity, when did "generic" equal a zero on ten rating? Generic would seem to imply "average" to me, like a 4-6 rating.

A zero would only seem warrented for a band that has absolutly no musical qualities whatsoever (ie. random noise).

Since when? Bob Dylan wasn't particularly creative (Average vocals, fairly basic instrument playing and profound, yet largely unoriginal, lyics) yet he is one of the greatest musicians of all time. Hell, look at the song "Imagine" by the Beatles, there is absolutely nothing original or creative about that song but it is still an amazing song. Creativity can be a positive, but it is not the defining factor in what is considered "good" music.

Since when? Bob Dylan wasn't particularly creative (Average vocals, fairly basic instrument playing and profound, yet largely unoriginal, lyics) yet he is one of the greatest musicians of all time. Hell, look at the song "Imagine" by the Beatles, there is absolutely nothing original or creative about that song but it is still an amazing song. Creativity can be a positive, but it is not the defining factor in what is considered "good" music.

redstorm72

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]

Just out of curiosity, when did "generic" equal a zero on ten rating? Generic would seem to imply "average" to me, like a 4-6 rating.

A zero would only seem warrented for a band that has absolutly no musical qualities whatsoever (ie. random noise).

redstorm72

Since when? Bob Dylan wasn't particularly creative (Average vocals, fairly basic instrument playing and profound, yet largely unoriginal, lyics) yet he is one of the greatest musicians of all time. Hell, look at the song "Imagine" by the Beatles, there is absolutely nothing original or creative about that song but it is still an amazing song. Creativity can be a positive, but it is not the defining factor in what is considered "good" music.

My brother played one of their songs for me one day and all I could think was average faux metal/post grunge band, could see myself skipping over it on the radio and not lookig back. So from the very little I heard, meh/10.

They're pretty terrible. In fact, are negative scores an option?

2/10 if I'm feeling generous..hate their emo songs.

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"]Imaps3fanyboy! .. Ah! I was wondering when you was gonna get your annoying ass in this thread to bash mainstream music. :) Imaps3fanboy mostly trolls in these typs of cases... All he says is bull sh!t. So don't bother arguing with this ignorent bastard. If he says it's bad? You know they are good in some way!imaps3fanboy

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="codymcclain14"]Imaps3fanyboy! .. Ah! I was wondering when you was gonna get your annoying ass in this thread to bash mainstream music. :) Imaps3fanboy mostly trolls in these typs of cases... All he says is bull sh!t. So don't bother arguing with this ignorent bastard. If he says it's bad? You know they are good in some way!codymcclain14

Whoa. That's pretty hardcore, dude.

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"][QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] All I say is bullsh*t? You shouldn't cuss, I'm emailing this thread to your momDark_Knight6

Whoa. That's pretty hardcore, dude.

[QUOTE="Postmortem123"]

0/10

Inconsistancy

Their music has little dynamics yes, but you might be getting the fatigue from the "loudness war."

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="codymcclain14"]Imaps3fanyboy! .. Ah! I was wondering when you was gonna get your annoying ass in this thread to bash mainstream music. :) Imaps3fanboy mostly trolls in these typs of cases... All he says is bull sh!t. So don't bother arguing with this ignorent bastard. If he says it's bad? You know they are good in some way!codymcclain14

6.5/10. They have some good songs here and there but they're just another generic rock band.

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"][QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] All I say is bullsh*t? You shouldn't cuss, I'm emailing this thread to your momimaps3fanboy

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]

Just out of curiosity, when did "generic" equal a zero on ten rating? Generic would seem to imply "average" to me, like a 4-6 rating.

A zero would only seem warrented for a band that has absolutly no musical qualities whatsoever (ie. random noise).

redstorm72

Since when? Bob Dylan wasn't particularly creative (Average vocals, fairly basic instrument playing and profound, yet largely unoriginal, lyics) yet he is one of the greatest musicians of all time. Hell, look at the song "Imagine" by the Beatles, there is absolutely nothing original or creative about that song but it is still an amazing song. Creativity can be a positive, but it is not the defining factor in what is considered "good" music.

Wait did you just say Bob Dylan has unoriginal lyrics?

:lol:

i'll give them a 3/10 one X was their only good album

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"]

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"] LOL! Do it. She already knows I curse now.codymcclain14

What else can you honestly expect from the guy with the Christopher Hitchens signature?

I find them decent. 7/10

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"][QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"]

What else can you honestly expect from the guy with the Christopher Hitchens signature?

6/10.

[QUOTE="Wolf-Man2006"]

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"] ? Wow you're pathetic. I didn't say that trying to sound cool cause i curse. Stupid f*ck. I was just telling you to go ahead. Like I said before. troll. lolcodymcclain14

What else can you honestly expect from the guy with the Christopher Hitchens signature?

For the record he was an Atheist that was a total dick to religious people, regardless if they deserved it or not

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"][QUOTE="Wolf-Man2006"]

What else can you honestly expect from the guy with the Christopher Hitchens signature?

For the record he was an Atheist that was a total dick to religious people, regardless if they deserved it or not

6.5/10? I haven't listened to all of their stuff, but what I have is good, not always quite my style of music though, and sometimes it seems a little repetitive.

Not even worth rating...../10

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"][QUOTE="Inconsistancy"] It's not that it's mainstream, it's that it's bad. theone86

Uh, no. THeir lyrics are angsty and unimaginative, they use simple chords and don't even show much technical proficiency in doing so, they use the same keys and scales over and over, they rely on distortion to cover up their flaws, and their songs all sound the same. They suck, end of story.

They have a few catchy songs.