Mitt Romney is as fake of a candidate as the real "deciders" (Bilderberg group) could come up with. Every bit the same as the fake candidate who is now our president (chosen by the Biderberg group as well). These candidates are not real candidates...
Keynesian economics. Does it work? Or is it bad theory that will lead us to doom? What kind of system does Germany run? Their austerity seems to work for them.
sonicare
Germany is a running a mercantile economy(no different then China, Japan, South Korea) which will end in nothing but disaster. The single Euro idea was beyond dumb unless it becomes republic of Euro. On top of that thanks to bankster cooking the books the Greeks were allowed in. Spain and Italy up until few year ago were running in surplus and Italy today is running a surplus, but as long as the stranglehold of Euro currency is there nothing will change. Read this fellow for a better explanation http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/. The quickest way out of this mess is for Germany and some of the other northern Euro countries to exit the euro and slowly unwind the Euro project.
Running against Gorge W. is the best hope for Gorge W. Obama. But given republicans keep trying to limit themselves to fat bible thumping southern socailist welfare queens he might win by doing nothing.
Mitt Romney is as fake of a candidate as the real "deciders" (Bilderberg group) could come up with. Every bit the same as the fake candidate who is now our president (chosen by the Biderberg group as well). These candidates are not real candidates...jer_1
The Bilderburg group is also a fake proxy group. They were put in place by the skrulls.
[QUOTE="jer_1"]Mitt Romney is as fake of a candidate as the real "deciders" (Bilderberg group) could come up with. Every bit the same as the fake candidate who is now our president (chosen by the Biderberg group as well). These candidates are not real candidates...sonicare
The Bilderburg group is also a fake proxy group. They were put in place by the skrulls.And the skrulls are fake group put there by the Templar Knights:o.
Running against Gorge W. is the best hope for Gorge W. Obama. But given republicans keep trying to limit themselves to fat bible thumping southern socailist welfare queens he might win by doing nothing.
EasyStreet
Romney should make it harder for Obama to compare him to Bush by not picking a bunch of the same damn people in the Bush administration to be in his potential administration.
[QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="jshaas"] Can we stop kick this dead horse already?!?!? Everything that's wrong is not Bush's fault!!! He certainly did his share of adding to the problem, but by no means is it entirely his fault. This mess was started decades ago. Barry has done nothing to improve our situation. So we are allowed to bash the current president, but not the guy who came before him? I love it, this could help us put another republican back in power! Not at all. My point was that blaming W. for everything that's wrong today is stupid. He's not the only one at fault here. This has snowballed from decades ago... think FDR. Bush did his fair share adding to the snowball, but I don't see how the left can consistently blame all of Barry's shortcomings on Bush. It worked in 2009, but after that he needed to take some responsibilty and admit that his failing policies are not helping either. Now, if anyone points that out they're racist or stupid or whatever. Even though we're pointing out the facts of Barry's failed presidency. I doubt Romney will be that much better, but I do know that we certainly cannot afford four more years of Barry. America will surely die a slow painful death if he is re-elected.you do realize (as I just stated in a previous post) that Romney is picking the same people who ran the Bush admin to be in charge of his right?
Romney is practically the same as Obama. He may not have voted for Obamacare in the form that its in right now, but he would have approved of something only slightly less extreme.
They are both slimy politicians. If i wanted the corporations to rule the people in charge i would just get rid of the people in charge and elect the corporations themselves.
[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="Serraph105"] So we are allowed to bash the current president, but not the guy who came before him? I love it, this could help us put another republican back in power! Not at all. My point was that blaming W. for everything that's wrong today is stupid. He's not the only one at fault here. This has snowballed from decades ago... think FDR. Bush did his fair share adding to the snowball, but I don't see how the left can consistently blame all of Barry's shortcomings on Bush. It worked in 2009, but after that he needed to take some responsibilty and admit that his failing policies are not helping either. Now, if anyone points that out they're racist or stupid or whatever. Even though we're pointing out the facts of Barry's failed presidency. I doubt Romney will be that much better, but I do know that we certainly cannot afford four more years of Barry. America will surely die a slow painful death if he is re-elected.you do realize (as I just stated in a previous post) that Romney is picking the same people who ran the Bush admin to be in charge of his right? No. I haven't seen anything about who MR wants in his admin. I don't think picking up W's staff is a good idea. He should go some of the lesser known names out there to get some fresh ideas in the WH. I personally think he should ask A. West to be his VP.
[QUOTE="kraychik"] Is GFC some fake acronym for "global financial crisis"? Nobody's talking about this broad term, we're talking about domestic economic policy, of which Obama's has been a complete failure, where the financial picture, by virtually every measurement, has worsened since he's taken office. This excuse-making from the left about such economic conditions being beyond Obama's control is absurd, considering that he's implemented destructive economic policies. If Obama had simply been on vacation every day since he took office, America would be in better shape. Unfortunately, he's actually done some "work" - by implementing wealth-destroying policies.kraychik
Fake? Fake? FAKE?!
nvm
In other words, you get hung up on me calling you out for using a fake acronym in some attempt to look like something you're not, while ignoring the rest of the crap I called you out on it. Your post, essentially, boils down to Barry telling us, "it ain't mah fault!". Nah Its just after you called it fake I stopped reading Just Googled it Its an Australian thing :lol:
[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="jshaas"] Not at all. My point was that blaming W. for everything that's wrong today is stupid. He's not the only one at fault here. This has snowballed from decades ago... think FDR. Bush did his fair share adding to the snowball, but I don't see how the left can consistently blame all of Barry's shortcomings on Bush. It worked in 2009, but after that he needed to take some responsibilty and admit that his failing policies are not helping either. Now, if anyone points that out they're racist or stupid or whatever. Even though we're pointing out the facts of Barry's failed presidency. I doubt Romney will be that much better, but I do know that we certainly cannot afford four more years of Barry. America will surely die a slow painful death if he is re-elected.jshaas
you do realize (as I just stated in a previous post) that Romney is picking the same people who ran the Bush admin to be in charge of his right? No. I haven't seen anything about who MR wants in his admin. I don't think picking up W's staff is a good idea. He should go some of the lesser known names out there to get some fresh ideas in the WH. I personally think he should ask A. West to be his VP.
This is Romney's foriegn policy teamalone. Feel free to browse their names on wikipedia. You will find a lot of them to be former Bush administration.
Keynesian economics. Does it work? Or is it bad theory that will lead us to doom? What kind of system does Germany run? Their austerity seems to work for them.
sonicare
Irrelevant because, after all, "we are all Keynesians now."
[QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="Serraph105"]you do realize (as I just stated in a previous post) that Romney is picking the same people who ran the Bush admin to be in charge of his right?Serraph105
No. I haven't seen anything about who MR wants in his admin. I don't think picking up W's staff is a good idea. He should go some of the lesser known names out there to get some fresh ideas in the WH. I personally think he should ask A. West to be his VP.
This is Romney's foriegn policy teamalone. Feel free to browse their names on wikipedia. You will find a lot of them to be former Bush administration.
W's foreign policy was pretty sound if I remember correctly. It was his domestic policies that I wasn't a fan of. Either way, Romney should get fresh blood... not establishment politicians.
I didn't like Romney at first but I am starting to get use to the idea of President Romney. I do hope he is a true Mormon(I'm not Mormon) because if that is just an act then he is like the rest of presidential candidates. fake.
Log in to comment