This topic is locked from further discussion.
Especially because it would only happen in bat**** worldhe may sound crazy, but i'm going to laugh if everything he says turns out to be true.
needled24-7
Notice how that source tries to make him look as stupid as possible. Now look at what he actually says vs. what the title is. ChampionoChumpsI read what he actually said, no wild leaps are being made from his statement. If he doesn't think that journalists are at risk, then he basically said nothing.
If you want to roll back decades of social progress, of course. Wait a minute, that can be said about all but 1 or 2.still the best republican canidate
M4Ntan
If everything he says turns out ot be true, I don't think there would be much to laugh about... oh, and what xaos said.he may sound crazy, but i'm going to laugh if everything he says turns out to be true.
needled24-7
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="M4Ntan"]
still the best republican canidate
If you want to roll back decades of social progress, of course. Wait a minute, that can be said about all but 1 or 2.Is the EPA that important to you?
As incompetant as they are... yeah... yeah they really are. So is the FDA...If you want to roll back decades of social progress, of course. Wait a minute, that can be said about all but 1 or 2.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="M4Ntan"]
still the best republican canidate
M4Ntan
Is the EPA that important to you?
I think what the Warren Court did is important to me.[QUOTE="M4Ntan"]If you want to roll back decades of social progress, of course. Wait a minute, that can be said about all but 1 or 2. "social progress"- like what, giving welfare to absurd amounts of people?still the best republican canidate
DroidPhysX
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="M4Ntan"]If you want to roll back decades of social progress, of course. Wait a minute, that can be said about all but 1 or 2. "social progress"- like what, giving welfare to absurd amounts of people? Couple that with my comment about the Warren Court and you nailed what my point was.still the best republican canidate
mingmao3046
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="M4Ntan"]If you want to roll back decades of social progress, of course. Wait a minute, that can be said about all but 1 or 2. "social progress"- like what, giving welfare to absurd amounts of people? More like following the constitution so literally we'd be taken back to the 1700's. As in, getting rid of a navy and instead issuing Privateer licenses.still the best republican canidate
mingmao3046
He really is a little off the wall on this one. We killed enemy combatants who just happened to be American citizens.
rofl not reallyRon Paul will be the next JFK if hes elected...quote it and carve it in stone...i will not let you down OT
cee1gee
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]rofl not really im 100 percent serious...hes for the people..and what hes telling you may be so out of wack but deep down hes actually right if you think about itRon Paul will be the next JFK if hes elected...quote it and carve it in stone...i will not let you down OT
DroidPhysX
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="cee1gee"]rofl not really im 100 percent serious...hes for the people..and what hes telling you may be so out of wack but deep down hes actually right if you ABSOLUTELY FAIL TO think about it Fixed!Ron Paul will be the next JFK if hes elected...quote it and carve it in stone...i will not let you down OT
cee1gee
[QUOTE="cee1gee"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] rofl not reallyxaosim 100 percent serious...hes for the people..and what hes telling you may be so out of wack but deep down hes actually right if you ABSOLUTELY FAIL TO think about it Fixed!
I just laughed so hard, I think I pulled my kreplach! :D
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="cee1gee"]rofl not really im 100 percent serious...hes for the people..and what hes telling you may be so out of wack but deep down hes actually right if you think about itRon Paul will be the next JFK if hes elected...quote it and carve it in stone...i will not let you down OT
cee1gee
I agree with you to an extent.
Ron Paul is a very principled man whose thoughts are well developed, well reasoned, and almost always inherently consistent with his core principles. In that regard, he is a stand up guy and easily the most honest and transparent candidate.
The problem is that Ron Paul lives in a world where everything is black and white. In his world, it is relatively easy to identify the core principles, debate which ones are at play, judge which ones take precedence over others, and what not. Unfortunately, his world is not the real world wherein we deal with many shades of grey, many competing principles that ebb and flow in their priority, and face choices where strict adherence to principles has at times very bad and impractical outcomes.
In short, we are human. We have failings as individuals. We have failing as a society. We make choices which are compromises. We pick the best of the bad options at times. We often err. We rarely have the luxury to debate forever the correct answer. And what not.
Ron Paul is apparently above all of that. He is impervious to the compromises and failings of the real world. This makes Ron Paul a seriously dangerous candidate. He will lead you off the cliff because of principle and he will be certain that he is right in doing so. I kid you not when I say that with slight changes in circumstance he would make an excellent suicide bomber, death camp commandant, cult leader, elite sports team coach, priest, and so on. The key to success in all those endeavours is to be rigidly principled and absolutely certain in the correctness of your vision, beliefs and methods. He is the last guy on the planet that you want with his finger on the nuke button.
He is the last guy on the planet that you want with his finger on the nuke button.SUD123456The football isn't a button.:P But I do agree with you that we don't want him to have nuclear launch authority.
God damn it. Every time I want to vote for the guy, he says s*** like this and have to settle for someone with a bit of pragmatism. I mean, I support him up to the stance that non-combatants should be convicted before execution. Then he has to take it up a notch further.
I always thought he flirted pretty well with the line that separates crazy from comprehensible, but for the past few weeks he has been pretty damn crazy and saying a lot of crap lol
[QUOTE="M4Ntan"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] If you want to roll back decades of social progress, of course. Wait a minute, that can be said about all but 1 or 2.Frame_Dragger
Is the EPA that important to you?
As incompetant as they are... yeah... yeah they really are. So is the FDA...you mean the folks sponsored by mcdonalds ahahaha no thank you sir!
Rep. Paul, please pass around that blunt before you put it out so we can try some of what you're smoking.
Still the best candidate.
KC_Hokie
No he's not, he's a full blown crackpot and completely unelectable, especially after his idiotic comments about 9/11.
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]
Still the best candidate.
No he's not, he's a full blown crackpot and completely unelectable
Whoa hey, I just agreed with you on something. That's like the first time ever. Do you agree that he's a crackpot or that he's unelectable?[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]
Still the best candidate.
KC_Hokie
No he's not, he's a full blown crackpot and completely unelectable, especially after his idiotic comments about 9/11.
He's very electable. The President is Obama. Whatever point you were trying to make didn't make it outside of your head, I'm afraid.[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]He's very electable. The President is Obama. Whatever point you were trying to make didn't make it outside of your head, I'm afraid.The President isn't exactly the most competent leader in American history (to be kind). Ron Paul in comparison is very electable.No he's not, he's a full blown crackpot and completely unelectable, especially after his idiotic comments about 9/11.
xaos
Whatever point you were trying to make didn't make it outside of your head, I'm afraid.The President isn't exactly the most competent leader in American history (to be kind). Ron Paul in comparison is very electable. Electable? Hell no. How do you think an independent would react when they hear his positions of agencies like the FDA? Private sector can regulate food and drug safety? Sure they can, as long as it gets them a quick buck, everything is safe.[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]He's very electable. The President is Obama.KC_Hokie
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment