Russia + Venezuela = "Go ahead and squeal, yankees."

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#151 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?Vilot_Hero

I think you need to make your own arguments, and actually read what I posted. :|

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?The_Ish

I think you need to make your own arguments, and actually read what I posted. :|

Or you can just accept that the States lost:| The USA may of won several of the battles, but they still failed their objective. Which would cause a defeat. Alright?
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#153 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?Vilot_Hero

I think you need to make your own arguments, and actually read what I posted. :|

Or you can just accept that the States lost:| The USA may of won several of the battles, but they still failed their objective. Which would cause a defeat. Alright?

lol, no. You obviously just skimmed my points, and you were hoping to ride on Jointed's work to look like you knew something after you bailed the thread. If you want to make a meaningful argument, respond to the points I made earlier. Otherwise, good game.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?The_Ish

I think you need to make your own arguments, and actually read what I posted. :|

Or you can just accept that the States lost:| The USA may of won several of the battles, but they still failed their objective. Which would cause a defeat. Alright?

lol, no. You obviously just skimmed my points, and you were hoping to ride on Jointed's work to look like you knew something after you bailed the thread. If you want to make a meaningful argument, respond to the points I made earlier. Otherwise, good game.

I had to bail because I needed to study for a chemistry test:| And I gave facts in the form of the wiki links. Good game indeed(USA lost...That's all dude).
Avatar image for ElectronicMagic
ElectronicMagic

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 ElectronicMagic
Member since 2005 • 5412 Posts
Sounds like a good deal to me. Over the last decade or so, America has had free reign over the world and has done pretty much whatever it wanted. But now that is changing, I hope that we can get back to a time where there was a balance of power in the world between the east and west. Now with the rise of India and China, and Russia now back, we might be able to get to that place.
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

Sounds like a good deal to me. Over the last decade or so, America has had free reign over the world and has done pretty much whatever it wanted. But now that is changing, I hope that we can get back to a time where there was a balance of power in the world between the east and west. Now with the rise of India and China, and Russia now back, we might be able to get to that place.ElectronicMagic

Yeah, the Cold War was wonderful, wasn't it?

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#157 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

I had to bail because I needed to study for a chemistry test:| And I gave facts in the form of the wiki links. Good game indeed(USA lost...That's all dude).Vilot_Hero

Yes, and you needed to be on GS forums to be AFK. And I actually countered your point by showing you how your own link disagrees with you - good job.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="ElectronicMagic"]Sounds like a good deal to me. Over the last decade or so, America has had free reign over the world and has done pretty much whatever it wanted. But now that is changing, I hope that we can get back to a time where there was a balance of power in the world between the east and west. Now with the rise of India and China, and Russia now back, we might be able to get to that place.Rhazakna

Yeah, the Cold War was wonderful, wasn't it?

It's the fact that the USA has been acting like the world police and were being all cocky. Im sure other country's would approve of that.
Avatar image for ElectronicMagic
ElectronicMagic

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 ElectronicMagic
Member since 2005 • 5412 Posts

[QUOTE="ElectronicMagic"]Sounds like a good deal to me. Over the last decade or so, America has had free reign over the world and has done pretty much whatever it wanted. But now that is changing, I hope that we can get back to a time where there was a balance of power in the world between the east and west. Now with the rise of India and China, and Russia now back, we might be able to get to that place.Rhazakna

Yeah, the Cold War was wonderful, wasn't it?

Depends on how you look at it.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]I had to bail because I needed to study for a chemistry test:| And I gave facts in the form of the wiki links. Good game indeed(USA lost...That's all dude).The_Ish

Yes, and you needed to be on GS forums to be AFK. And I actually countered your point by showing you how your own link disagrees with you - good job.

It was bloody defeat!!Alright? Why would history textbooks say that the Americans lost the Vietnam War? Unless they're false:roll:
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#161 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

It was bloody defeat!!Alright? Why would history textbooks say that the Americans lost the Vietnam War? Unless there false they're:roll:Vilot_Hero

Exactly which sources? Because even by your own posted source, it doesn't say the US lost.

Either way, you havn't given a single argument towards making your point, and now your resorting to "They lost! Believe me!".

You've made some insubstantial claims, and you wern't ready to back them up.

Avatar image for hokies1313
hokies1313

13919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#162 hokies1313
Member since 2005 • 13919 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]I had to bail because I needed to study for a chemistry test:| And I gave facts in the form of the wiki links. Good game indeed(USA lost...That's all dude).Vilot_Hero

Yes, and you needed to be on GS forums to be AFK. And I actually countered your point by showing you how your own link disagrees with you - good job.

It was bloody defeat!!Alright? Why would history textbooks say that the Americans lost the Vietnam War? Unless they're false:roll:

The United States withdrew from the Vietnam War after a cease-fire was put in place.

Some time after the American withdrawal the North once again invaded the south and rapidly overran the country.

While not technically a defeat, it was the first war in which the US did not accomplish it's goals fully and the South was eventually defeated.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?Vilot_Hero
The politicians lost.....not the military.;)
Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] It was bloody defeat!!Alright? Why would history textbooks say that the Americans lost the Vietnam War? Unless there false they're:roll:The_Ish

Exactly which sources? Because even by your own posted source, it doesn't say the US lost.

Either way, you havn't given a single argument towards making your point, and now your resorting to "They lost! Believe me!".

You've made some insubstantial claims, and you wern't ready to back them up.

So the Americans won the Vietnam War according to you?
Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?LJS9502_basic
The politicians lost.....not the military.;)

That means the USA did not accomplish all their goals right? That would make it a defeat/loss.
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#166 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

So the Americans won the Vietnam War according to you?Vilot_Hero

Ever heard of a draw?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?Vilot_Hero
The politicians lost.....not the military.;)

That means the USA did not accomplish all their goals right? That would make it a defeat/loss.

No. That's not what it means.
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?Vilot_Hero
The politicians lost.....not the military.;)

That means the USA did not accomplish all their goals right? That would make it a defeat/loss.

No, because the wider strategy was containment, which the US succeeded in. Otherwise about hald the developing world would be communist today.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?LJS9502_basic
The politicians lost.....not the military.;)

That means the USA did not accomplish all their goals right? That would make it a defeat/loss.

No. That's not what it means.

Im pretty sure it does:|
Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] So the Americans won the Vietnam War according to you?The_Ish

Ever heard of a draw?

Yeah right. America retreated while there were still troops in the region.
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#171 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

Yeah right. America retreated while there were still troops in the region.Vilot_Hero

Thank you for magnifying your own ignorance on the matter, and for showing that you don't read your own sources. :lol:

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] Yeah right. America retreated while there were still troops in the region.The_Ish

Thank you for magnifying your own ignorance on the matter, and for showing that you don't read your own sources. :lol:

Iv read my sources, but have you?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
Im pretty sure it does:|Vilot_Hero
It means the military accomplished their agenda.;)
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

Iv read my sources, but have you?Vilot_Hero

Flat out lie.

Otherwise you wouldn't have made such a claim.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] Im pretty sure it does:|LJS9502_basic
It means the military accomplished their agenda.;)

Yet the war was labeled as a defeat for America?
Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#176 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
[QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

Guys, its all about oil.

And revenge.

The situation is this: Russia and the US made some sort of deal concerning a pipeline through Georgia. This was back before and during the Clinton administration. In short, Clinton screwed Russia on the deal but Russia was too busy dealing with post- Communism stuff to care about it. This is why there is the conflict now, and why the US is compelled to side with Georgia (fighting for independence, right...) and why Russia even bothered in the first place.

Now that Russia is an up-and-comer and entering the modern political economy, they feel wronged and now theyre seeking revenge. The best way to do this is via oil. So now Russia is going to Venezuela (they have oil) because Venezuela hates the US, and so does Russia, but Russia cant really say that so they have to come up with some excuse to side with the dude that hates the US so they can do it vicariously

just my two cents

Kuhu

Your close but missed the point a bit. The US and NATO (aka its b**ches) are putting missile defense systems on Russian borders, and even want to get Ukraine and Georgia into NATO. So what does Russia do? The exact same thing, get onto the US borders, a taste of its own medicine. There is a huge double standard in the world, because when the US does something it is fine, but when Russia does the same thing it is evil. Russia really doesn't take Chavez too seriously, but hey why not, given that the US is on the door step, Russia just wants to equalize.

Russia is not the super power they used to be, what they're doing now is just unecessary. They should just shut up and step in line just like all the other easter European nations.

You couldn't be more wrong, Russia wields a global influence, though not militarily, but economically. Comparing Russia to the rest of eastern European countries, is like comparing Canada to Mexico. Russia is immensely powerful, and it is the only country who can stand up to the US, and of which the US is afraid of. Like it or not it is true. The only reason the is no war with Iran right now is because Russia is backing Iran.

Russia isn't powerful. Their economy and infrastructure is weak and their military is outdated. And just look at their population, 140 million. Are you kidding me? The EU alone is enough to deter Russia. The only reason they're taken seriously is because they've got nukes, but we all know that bargainingwith nukes is the same as political and international suicide.

Look, the only thing stopping Russia from taking over the entire Europe is NATO. Russia has the man power, it has the tech. Russia has very good allies, such as Syria, Iran, India,, well basically all of middle east would support Russia, except for Pakistan. How is 140 million a small population? Germany didn't have this much, and they waged a global war. Russia would cut all communications in Europe first, the eliminate power plants with missile or air strikes, and then let loose the bombers. No nukes necessary. Russia still has all the intel on western Europe, and all the invasion plant left over from the USSR. Germany knows it, France knows it, The UK knows it, but is too proud to admit it. If it wansn't for the US all of europe would be speaking Russian right now. Also lets not forget that Russian GDP is higher then that of Canada

When did this happen? :S

2006 apparently.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] Im pretty sure it does:|Vilot_Hero
It means the military accomplished their agenda.;)

Yet the war was labeled as a defeat for America?

Not true....that's too simplistic of an answer dude.
Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] Iv read my sources, but have you?The_Ish

Flat out lie.

Otherwise you wouldn't have made such a claim.

*sigh*Can you just accept that the States lost the Vietnam War? No one wants this to continue for 500 days.
Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] Im pretty sure it does:|LJS9502_basic
It means the military accomplished their agenda.;)

Yet the war was labeled as a defeat for America?

Not true....that's too simplistic of an answer dude.

I think thats pretty concrete. Tell me where it was labeled as a victory for America?
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#180 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

*sigh*Can you just accept that the States lost the Vietnam War? No one wants this to continue for 500 days.Vilot_Hero

No, because it isn't true, and I won't just so you don't have to admit you were wrong.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]*sigh*Can you just accept that the States lost the Vietnam War? No one wants this to continue for 500 days.The_Ish

No, because it isn't true, and I won't just so you don't have to admit you were wrong.

Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#182 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.Vilot_Hero

Fallacious logic. That doesn't make it true.

Especially when your claim just now is baseless.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#183 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60723 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

Guys, its all about oil.

And revenge.

The situation is this: Russia and the US made some sort of deal concerning a pipeline through Georgia. This was back before and during the Clinton administration. In short, Clinton screwed Russia on the deal but Russia was too busy dealing with post- Communism stuff to care about it. This is why there is the conflict now, and why the US is compelled to side with Georgia (fighting for independence, right...) and why Russia even bothered in the first place.

Now that Russia is an up-and-comer and entering the modern political economy, they feel wronged and now theyre seeking revenge. The best way to do this is via oil. So now Russia is going to Venezuela (they have oil) because Venezuela hates the US, and so does Russia, but Russia cant really say that so they have to come up with some excuse to side with the dude that hates the US so they can do it vicariously

just my two cents

muscleserge

Your close but missed the point a bit. The US and NATO (aka its b**ches) are putting missile defense systems on Russian borders, and even want to get Ukraine and Georgia into NATO. So what does Russia do? The exact same thing, get onto the US borders, a taste of its own medicine. There is a huge double standard in the world, because when the US does something it is fine, but when Russia does the same thing it is evil. Russia really doesn't take Chavez too seriously, but hey why not, given that the US is on the door step, Russia just wants to equalize.

Russia is not the super power they used to be, what they're doing now is just unecessary. They should just shut up and step in line just like all the other easter European nations.

You couldn't be more wrong, Russia wields a global influence, though not militarily, but economically. Comparing Russia to the rest of eastern European countries, is like comparing Canada to Mexico. Russia is immensely powerful, and it is the only country who can stand up to the US, and of which the US is afraid of. Like it or not it is true. The only reason the is no war with Iran right now is because Russia is backing Iran.

Russia isn't powerful. Their economy and infrastructure is weak and their military is outdated. And just look at their population, 140 million. Are you kidding me? The EU alone is enough to deter Russia. The only reason they're taken seriously is because they've got nukes, but we all know that bargainingwith nukes is the same as political and international suicide.

Look, the only thing stopping Russia from taking over the entire Europe is NATO. Russia has the man power, it has the tech. Russia has very good allies, such as Syria, Iran, India,, well basically all of middle east would support Russia, except for Pakistan. How is 140 million a small population? Germany didn't have this much, and they waged a global war. Russia would cut all communications in Europe first, the eliminate power plants with missile or air strikes, and then let loose the bombers. No nukes necessary. Russia still has all the intel on western Europe, and all the invasion plant left over from the USSR. Germany knows it, France knows it, The UK knows it, but is too proud to admit it. If it wansn't for the US all of europe would be speaking Russian right now. Also lets not forget that Russian GDP is higher then that of Canada

Russia has conscripts. When they get called for training, 60% show up. Their reserve forces use weaponry from the 1950 and 60s. Their active army gets to play with some neat toys on occasion, but they have to sell plane rides to tourists to pay for gas. The majority of their new tanks had to have their barrels retrofitted to fire old WWII shells because its the only thing they had in surplus.

Allies? I dont think many people want Russia to be the big boy on the block, even compared to the US. Most people still remember what the Soviet Union was like, and how horrible it was. Syria and Iran? I think Israel can handle them all by themselves. India? Not with the deals they have with the West.

They do have a large army, but its just...old and spent. Like George Foreman or Muhamad Ali. if Russia wants to be a big player in the 21st century, it will not be done by flexing muscles. They gotta be smart. Not to sound cliche, but its almost like Russia is living in the past.

And sorry, but a larger GDP than Canada? With no insult to my northern brethren, is that supposed to be funny?

Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#184 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] Im pretty sure it does:|Vilot_Hero
It means the military accomplished their agenda.;)

Yet the war was labeled as a defeat for America?

Not true....that's too simplistic of an answer dude.

I think thats pretty concrete. Tell me where it was labeled as a victory for America?

It wasnt a loss, our military was still in tact and we accomplished our goals, it was a political defeat, which is far from a military defeat. We have never been militarily defeated.
Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#185 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]@lsh......Why cant you accept that the USA lost the Vietnam War? Alot of people say It was a defeat for the States. Are you catching my drift?The_Ish

I think you need to make your own arguments, and actually read what I posted. :|

Or you can just accept that the States lost:| The USA may of won several of the battles, but they still failed their objective. Which would cause a defeat. Alright?

lol, no. You obviously just skimmed my points, and you were hoping to ride on Jointed's work to look like you knew something after you bailed the thread. If you want to make a meaningful argument, respond to the points I made earlier. Otherwise, good game.

What are you arguing about? Vietnam was widely regarded as a failure, even by most Americans. There is no reason to have to defend what we did, because much of our fears were justified.
Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]*sigh*Can you just accept that the States lost the Vietnam War? No one wants this to continue for 500 days.Vilot_Hero

No, because it isn't true, and I won't just so you don't have to admit you were wrong.

Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.

I guess the US also lost the War of 1812 because they failed to acheive Canada... :|
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
I think thats pretty concrete. Tell me where it was labeled as a victory for America?Vilot_Hero
As I've stated twice now the military did not fail. Thus, it's incorrect to call it a defeat.:|
Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.The_Ish

Fallacious logic. That doesn't make it true.

Especially when your claim just now is baseless.

America invaded Vietnam. America stomps battles here and there. America pulls out. Defeat.

I think this is pretty simple to understand.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]*sigh*Can you just accept that the States lost the Vietnam War? No one wants this to continue for 500 days.MattUD1

No, because it isn't true, and I won't just so you don't have to admit you were wrong.

Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.

I guess the US also lost the War of 1812 because they failed to acheive Canada... :|

Yes, It was a huge defeat for the Americans.
Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] I think thats pretty concrete. Tell me where it was labeled as a victory for America?LJS9502_basic
As I've stated twice now the military did not fail. Thus, it's incorrect to call it a defeat.:|

But they still failed an objective right? All I'm saying is that America did not completely win, which would mean they were defeated(Lost the war).
Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#191 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.Vilot_Hero

Fallacious logic. That doesn't make it true.

Especially when your claim just now is baseless.

America invaded Vietnam. America stomps battles here and there. America pulls out. Defeat.

I think this is pretty simple to understand.

Here and there? we killed them militarily, although we took alot of casualties comparatively it is minuscule,

North Vietnam

Total dead: ~1,177,446
Total wounded: ~604,000+

US

Total dead 58,149

2000 missing and wounded.

Avatar image for hongkingkong
hongkingkong

9368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#192 hongkingkong
Member since 2006 • 9368 Posts

I wish we could just nuke them, then what would he say!

CWEBB04z

er touche?

Nuclear holocaust isn't a good ides ;)

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#193 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

What are you arguing about? Vietnam was widely regarded as a failure, even by most Americans. There is no reason to have to defend what we did, because much of our fears were justified.helium_flash

He keeps arguing that the US lost to the Vietcong. That we somehow "lost" the Vietnam war. We didn't. Many Americans back then were against the war because they thought it was unjustified, not because we were losing.

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
[QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]*sigh*Can you just accept that the States lost the Vietnam War? No one wants this to continue for 500 days.Vilot_Hero

No, because it isn't true, and I won't just so you don't have to admit you were wrong.

Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.

I guess the US also lost the War of 1812 because they failed to acheive Canada... :|

Yes, It was a huge defeat for the Americans.

Which is funny because historians call it a tie... because both sides failed to acheive their goals... :|
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#195 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

America invaded Vietnam. America stomps battles here and there. America pulls out. Defeat.

I think this is pretty simple to understand.

Vilot_Hero

Once again, you show your ignorance on the matter.

A ceasefire treay was made. Everyone agreed to pull their troops back. If America lost, then so did Vietnam. Does that make sense to you? Because by your own logic, thats the outcome.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

[QUOTE="helium_flash"]What are you arguing about? Vietnam was widely regarded as a failure, even by most Americans. There is no reason to have to defend what we did, because much of our fears were justified.The_Ish

He keeps arguing that the US lost to the Vietcong. That we somehow "lost" the Vietnam war. We didn't. Many Americans back then were against the war because they thought it was unjustified, not because we were losing.

Because America did lose the war:|
Avatar image for xXBuffJeffXx
xXBuffJeffXx

5913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 xXBuffJeffXx
Member since 2006 • 5913 Posts

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] Im pretty sure it does:|UrbanSpartan125
It means the military accomplished their agenda.;)

Yet the war was labeled as a defeat for America?

Not true....that's too simplistic of an answer dude.

I think thats pretty concrete. Tell me where it was labeled as a victory for America?

It wasnt a loss, our military was still in tact and we accomplished our goals, it was a political defeat, which is far from a military defeat. We have never been militarily defeated.

You realize that you can't divorce the two in counter-insurgency warfare, right? Our tactics during the Vietnam War were counterproductive and inherently flawed. Your assertion that we accomplished our goals is so wrong, so baseless, so ignorant that I really don't know what to say. We used body counts as a baseline assessment for progress in the country. In counter-insurgency warfare body count is all but irrelevant. The people are the center of gravity. The people either sustain the insurgency or exterminate it. Counter-insurgent operations need multiple dimensions. If you perceive it as a conventional war and perceive things in terms of statistics-this many dead, this many weapons, this many friendly casualties, you are going to lose, and we did.

Avatar image for hokies1313
hokies1313

13919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#198 hokies1313
Member since 2005 • 13919 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] I think thats pretty concrete. Tell me where it was labeled as a victory for America?Vilot_Hero
As I've stated twice now the military did not fail. Thus, it's incorrect to call it a defeat.:|

But they still failed an objective right? All I'm saying is that America did not completely win, which would mean they were defeated(Lost the war).

They did not accomplish ALL of their objectives, they did complish a good many of them, INCLUDING, making North Vietnam stop the war. Hence the Cease-Fire and peace talks that the US withdrew after.

South Vietnam lost the war, not the US.

Avatar image for TheWalrusBeast
TheWalrusBeast

1820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#199 TheWalrusBeast
Member since 2005 • 1820 Posts
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.UrbanSpartan125

Fallacious logic. That doesn't make it true.

Especially when your claim just now is baseless.

America invaded Vietnam. America stomps battles here and there. America pulls out. Defeat.

I think this is pretty simple to understand.

Here and there? we killed them militarily, although we took alot of casualties comparatively it is minuscule,

North Vietnam

Total dead: ~1,177,446
Total wounded: ~604,000+

US

Total dead 58,149

2000 missing and wounded.

Well I guess Germany won world war 2 since they killed more troops than they lost...

The US was defeated in Vietnam, its objective was to keep South Vietnam from turning Communist and what happened? North Vietnam took over the turned the place communist. You don't have to lose your whole military to be a defeat, if you don't achieve your objective, it's a defeat. By saying America was not defeated in Vietnam is the same as saying the Soviets were not defated in Afghanistan.

Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts

Cmon dude. I bet most people would agree that the States failed their objective and was considered a failure/defeat.

I guess the US also lost the War of 1812 because they failed to acheive Canada... :|

Yes, It was a huge defeat for the Americans.

Which is funny because historians call it a tie... because both sides failed to acheive their goals... :|

Canada was just simply defending their territory from those "invaders". America thought they were all high and mighty, but they ended up running for the hills, back to America.