http://www.thestar.com/news/sciencetech/article/744268--giant-asteroid-to-pass-earth-at-close-range
If the asteroid does come to hit earth then the governement better do something or bad stuff will happen
This topic is locked from further discussion.
The government will protect the government, and elite families.. before it'll give any major concern to the general population.. if something like this were to occur.http://www.thestar.com/news/sciencetech/article/744268--giant-asteroid-to-pass-earth-at-close-range
If the asteroid does come to hit earth then the governement better do something or bad stuff will happen
reveiwer
You do realise that there is litterally nothing we can do right now about a Comet or asteroid? We can fire a few nukes but that's it. We just have to hope it doesn't hit (obviously).
I think some people have seen one too many Hollywood movies (cough cough Armageddon).
how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.
Pirate700
how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.Keep thinking that. IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]
If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.
Pirate700
The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..
If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.
Pirate700
Or they'd send up Bruce Willis to drill a hole in it and plant some explosives so that it'd blow into two pieces each of which would miss the Earth...
how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.Keep thinking that. Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]
If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that. Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :|[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.MushroomWig
Keep thinking that. IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.EMOEVOLUTION
Not to mention that this would be a horrible thing. Rather than one big asteroid, we have thousands or millions of smaller asteroids in addition to the big asteroid raining down on us.
No, we don't have the technological means to blow up an asteroid and even if we did that would cause more destruction than leaving it whole.
Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :| Let me know when we can obliterate objects bigger than mountains.[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.
Pirate700
Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :|[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.
Pirate700
It's not a piece of rock. It's an asteroid coming at tremendous speeds; it cannot be destroyed by any technological means we have. It's impossible; our best efforts could only cause an asteroid to break up into multiple pieces.
If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.
Pirate700
Blowing up the asteroid would be counter-productive as it would only be blown into little pieces which would still hit and thus destroy the earth. It would be more logical to divert the asteroid with an explosion.
I've been hearing about this asteroid for years and years. If it's going to hit, we'll do something. In truth, there are so many other dangers out there in space beyond just asteroids that could wipe us all out. Just be happy that this asteroid was actually seen.
Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :| I ment in terms of preparation, you seem to think mankind is advanced enough to take care of a comet when we can't even handle damage caused by a hurricane.[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :| Let me know when we can obliterate objects bigger than mountains. B....but the nuclear weapons solve every problem![QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?EMOEVOLUTION
Obvious sarcasm. :P
Yes, we all know how scientifically accurate that movie was.The movie Armageddon, anyone:question:
Goods_Merchant
btw why is everyone so worried? It isn't going to hit Earth until 2036 by then we will have already been dead for 24 years. :P
btw why is everyone so worried? It isn't going to hit Earth until 2036 by then we will have already been dead for 24 years. :P
rrclarkcdr
Keep thinking that. IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.EMOEVOLUTION
The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..
You are aware that humans have managed to land on a comet right? They launch a rocket into space, when the rocket coems close to the asteroid or comet they release a small capsule that f;ies down to the surace of the comet or asteroid. This has been done before. The only difference would be that within the capsule there would most likely be a nuclear warhead or something. It would blow backwards from the way it came tryign not to blow up the actual asteroid because then there would be millions of large pieces raining down on us. Instead they use the blast to change the direction of the comet or asteroid without actually blowing it up but as it is moving so fast and as this would have such a small effect on it they would have to alter it's trajectory very early on. IF we wanted to though we could very likely blow it up.Keep thinking that. IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.EMOEVOLUTION
The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..
Could we use a giant ball of garbage XDIT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.
BumFluff122
The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..
You are aware that humans have managed to land on a comet right? They launch a rocket into space, when the rocket coems close to the asteroid or comet they release a small capsule that f;ies down to the surace of the comet or asteroid. This has been done before. The only difference would be that within the capsule there would most likely be a nuclear warhead or something. It would blow backwards from the way it came tryign not to blow up the actual asteroid because then there would be millions of large pieces raining down on us. Instead they use the blast to change the direction of the comet or asteroid without actually blowing it up but as it is moving so fast and as this would have such a small effect on it they would have to alter it's trajectory very early on. IF we wanted to though we could very likely blow it up. No, humans haven't managed to land on a comet, only a small capsule. Crashing a small capsule onto a comet is a farcry from being able to actually destroy or deflect it enough to pass us by. I think certain people are suffering from "mankind fanboyism", thinking there isn't anything we can't do.No, humans haven't managed to land on a comet, only a small capsule. Crashing a small capsule onto a comet is a farcry from being able to actually destroy or deflect it enough to pass us by. I think certain people are suffering from "mankind fanboyism", thinking there isn't anything we can't do.MushroomWigYour post argues with itself. You said "No we actually haven't landed on a comet, only a small capsule". Human technology HAS landed on a comet as you stated in your post.
IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.
BumFluff122
The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..
You are aware that humans have managed to land on a comet right? They launch a rocket into space, when the rocket coems close to the asteroid or comet they release a small capsule that f;ies down to the surace of the comet or asteroid. This has been done before. The only difference would be that within the capsule there would most likely be a nuclear warhead or something. It would blow backwards from the way it came tryign not to blow up the actual asteroid because then there would be millions of large pieces raining down on us. Instead they use the blast to change the direction of the comet or asteroid without actually blowing it up but as it is moving so fast and as this would have such a small effect on it they would have to alter it's trajectory very early on. IF we wanted to though we could very likely blow it up. The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.Your post argues with itself. You said "No we actually haven't landed on a comet, only a small capsule". Human technology HAS landed on a comet as you stated in your post. No, I said WE haven't landed on a comet.[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] No, humans haven't managed to land on a comet, only a small capsule. Crashing a small capsule onto a comet is a farcry from being able to actually destroy or deflect it enough to pass us by. I think certain people are suffering from "mankind fanboyism", thinking there isn't anything we can't do.BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]You are aware that humans have managed to land on a comet right? They launch a rocket into space, when the rocket coems close to the asteroid or comet they release a small capsule that f;ies down to the surace of the comet or asteroid. This has been done before. The only difference would be that within the capsule there would most likely be a nuclear warhead or something. It would blow backwards from the way it came tryign not to blow up the actual asteroid because then there would be millions of large pieces raining down on us. Instead they use the blast to change the direction of the comet or asteroid without actually blowing it up but as it is moving so fast and as this would have such a small effect on it they would have to alter it's trajectory very early on. IF we wanted to though we could very likely blow it up. The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong. You guys are wasting your time. We have 20 years to make a judgement call. Arguing what humans can or can't do by then is purely speculative.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.
The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..
EMOEVOLUTION
The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.EMOEVOLUTIONDid you read my entire post? In it I stated the reasoning behind why they say such things. It isn;t a problem if destroyign the asteroid as it exists. It's a problem with all the pieces that break off that is the reason why scientists aren't considering it as a course of action. We can drop all the nuclear warheads we want on a comet or asteroid, as we do have the technology, however the aftereffects of blowing up an asteroid or comet is that all the pieces that made up that asteroid or comet would rain down on Earth. It would probably be even more devastatign and would merely compound our problem.
[QUOTE="Dante2710"]
Y2K, 2012, Swine flu, Bird flu, and now asteriods hitting the Earth. I have come to the conclusion that people love living in paranoia. Maybe the media is to blame.
tsduv21
The end of times is upon us.:|
Sweet, lets organize a huge orgy. If we are going to die, might as well do it big.Did you read my entire post? In it I stated the reasoning behind why they say such things. It isn;t a problem if destroyign the asteroid as it exists. It's a problem with all the pieces that break off that is the reason why scientists aren't considering it as a course of action. We can drop all the nuclear warheads we want on a comet or asteroid, as we do have the technology, however the aftereffects of blowing up an asteroid or comet is that all the pieces that made up that asteroid or comet would rain down on Earth. It would probably be even more devastatign and would merely compound our problem. All right then. Anyways.. the most effective way to deal with a large asteroid is to attach some form of propulsion to it so it changes it's course.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Your post argues with itself. You said "No we actually haven't landed on a comet, only a small capsule". Human technology HAS landed on a comet as you stated in your post. No, I said WE haven't landed on a comet.He was arguing against me. In it I stated that humans have landed on a comet, which we have. By this I meant human technology has landed on a comet. I thought people would understand what was meant....[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] No, humans haven't managed to land on a comet, only a small capsule. Crashing a small capsule onto a comet is a farcry from being able to actually destroy or deflect it enough to pass us by. I think certain people are suffering from "mankind fanboyism", thinking there isn't anything we can't do.MushroomWig
No, I said WE haven't landed on a comet.He was arguing against me. In it I stated that humans have landed on a comet, which we have. By this I meant human technology has landed on a comet. I thought people would understand what was meant.... You could of explained it a bit better, it's a big difference between us landing on a comet and just sending cheap technology there.[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Your post argues with itself. You said "No we actually haven't landed on a comet, only a small capsule". Human technology HAS landed on a comet as you stated in your post.
BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Did you read my entire post? In it I stated the reasoning behind why they say such things. It isn;t a problem if destroyign the asteroid as it exists. It's a problem with all the pieces that break off that is the reason why scientists aren't considering it as a course of action. We can drop all the nuclear warheads we want on a comet or asteroid, as we do have the technology, however the aftereffects of blowing up an asteroid or comet is that all the pieces that made up that asteroid or comet would rain down on Earth. It would probably be even more devastatign and would merely compound our problem. All right then. Anyways.. the most effective way to deal with a large asteroid is to attach some form of propulsion to it so it changes it's course.You'd need an awfull powerful propulsion system to alter it's course. Even a nuclear strike on the asteroid, with todays bombs which are about 300 (or 3000 can't remember) times or so more powerful that the bombs used in WWII, wouldn't be able to change it's course as much as we'd like. There is a technology, or at least a potential technology, that would be able to alter it's course in significant amounts if we don't catch it in time however fuel is very hard to come by. An anti-matter engine/bomb is thought to be the most powerful potential type of engine or bomb in the universe that is known to man. Those are still a long way off from being made though as we don't even know how to hold the fuel inside the gas chamber yet and the amount of antimatter that humans have seen in their entire existence amounts to far less than even a milligram.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.EMOEVOLUTION
I don't think the technology was cheap. Far from it actually. The only other natural thing other than Earth human have landed on is the moon and the last time that happened was in the 1940's I believe.You could of explained it a bit better, it's a big difference between us landing on a comet and just sending cheap technology there.
MushroomWig
All right then. Anyways.. the most effective way to deal with a large asteroid is to attach some form of propulsion to it so it changes it's course.You'd need an awfull powerful propulsion system to alter it's course. Even a nuclear strike on the asteroid, with todays bombs which are about 300 (or 3000 can't remember) times or so more powerful that the bombs used in WWII, wouldn't be able to change it's course as much as we'd like. There is a technology, or at least a potential technology, that would be able to alter it's course in significant amounts if we don't catch it in time however fuel is very hard to come by. An anti-matter engine/bomb is thought to be the most powerful potential type of engine or bomb in the universe that is known to man. Those are still a long way off from being made though as we don't even know how to hold the fuel inside the gas chamber yet and the amount of antimatter that humans have seen in their entire existence amounts to far less than even a milligram. It wouldn't be as bad as it seems.. it really depends how soon you can get the propulsion system on the asteroid.. the farther away it is.. moving it a matter of inches would make a huge difference.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Did you read my entire post? In it I stated the reasoning behind why they say such things. It isn;t a problem if destroyign the asteroid as it exists. It's a problem with all the pieces that break off that is the reason why scientists aren't considering it as a course of action. We can drop all the nuclear warheads we want on a comet or asteroid, as we do have the technology, however the aftereffects of blowing up an asteroid or comet is that all the pieces that made up that asteroid or comet would rain down on Earth. It would probably be even more devastatign and would merely compound our problem.
BumFluff122
Yea there is. A slight push while early on can move the asteroid or comet of course just a little. That little movement of course could eventually become the difference between hitting earth or passing by.You do realise that there is litterally nothing we can do right now about a Comet or asteroid? We can fire a few nukes but that's it. We just have to hope it doesn't hit (obviously).
I think some people have seen one too many Hollywood movies (cough cough Armageddon).MushroomWig
I don't think the technology was cheap. Far from it actually. The only other natural thing other than Earth human have landed on is the moon and the last time that happened was in the 1940's I believe. The 1940s? Was that a joke?[QUOTE="MushroomWig"]
You could of explained it a bit better, it's a big difference between us landing on a comet and just sending cheap technology there.
BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]You'd need an awfull powerful propulsion system to alter it's course. Even a nuclear strike on the asteroid, with todays bombs which are about 300 (or 3000 can't remember) times or so more powerful that the bombs used in WWII, wouldn't be able to change it's course as much as we'd like. There is a technology, or at least a potential technology, that would be able to alter it's course in significant amounts if we don't catch it in time however fuel is very hard to come by. An anti-matter engine/bomb is thought to be the most powerful potential type of engine or bomb in the universe that is known to man. Those are still a long way off from being made though as we don't even know how to hold the fuel inside the gas chamber yet and the amount of antimatter that humans have seen in their entire existence amounts to far less than even a milligram. It wouldn't be as bad as it seems.. it really depends how soon you can get the propulsion system on the asteroid.. the farther away it is.. moving it a matter of inches would make a huge difference.I can't recall where I read this, it was in one of those science magazines, but as of right now we don't have the technology to move it even a couple inches. Sure we could blow it up, as I stated, but that would only cause more problems. We'd need to get to it long before we would probably know it's even hurtling towards us. At this point anyways. I'm sure that will change in the years to come.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] All right then. Anyways.. the most effective way to deal with a large asteroid is to attach some form of propulsion to it so it changes it's course.EMOEVOLUTION
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment