russians say asteroid may hit earth

  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for reveiwer
reveiwer

650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 reveiwer
Member since 2008 • 650 Posts

http://www.thestar.com/news/sciencetech/article/744268--giant-asteroid-to-pass-earth-at-close-range

If the asteroid does come to hit earth then the governement better do something or bad stuff will happen

Avatar image for Maqda7
Maqda7

3299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 Maqda7
Member since 2008 • 3299 Posts
The chances of it hitting are very slim, I'd much rather they spend all the money that would be spent on something more productive, like stem cell research.
Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

http://www.thestar.com/news/sciencetech/article/744268--giant-asteroid-to-pass-earth-at-close-range

If the asteroid does come to hit earth then the governement better do something or bad stuff will happen

reveiwer
The government will protect the government, and elite families.. before it'll give any major concern to the general population.. if something like this were to occur.
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

You do realise that there is litterally nothing we can do right now about a Comet or asteroid? We can fire a few nukes but that's it. We just have to hope it doesn't hit (obviously).


I think some people have seen one too many Hollywood movies (cough cough Armageddon).

Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.

Pirate700
how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.
Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

2029? Are you kidding me? A little early for this thread.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.

EMOEVOLUTION

how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.

Keep thinking that.

Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]

If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.

Pirate700

how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.

Keep thinking that.

IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.

The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.

Pirate700

Or they'd send up Bruce Willis to drill a hole in it and plant some explosives so that it'd blow into two pieces each of which would miss the Earth...

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]

If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.

Pirate700

how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.

Keep thinking that.

Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.MushroomWig

Keep thinking that.

Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?

A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :|

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.EMOEVOLUTION

Keep thinking that.

IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.

Not to mention that this would be a horrible thing. Rather than one big asteroid, we have thousands or millions of smaller asteroids in addition to the big asteroid raining down on us.

No, we don't have the technological means to blow up an asteroid and even if we did that would cause more destruction than leaving it whole.

Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.

Pirate700

Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?

A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :|

Let me know when we can obliterate objects bigger than mountains.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.

Pirate700

Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?

A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :|

It's not a piece of rock. It's an asteroid coming at tremendous speeds; it cannot be destroyed by any technological means we have. It's impossible; our best efforts could only cause an asteroid to break up into multiple pieces.

Avatar image for rrclarkcdr
rrclarkcdr

766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 rrclarkcdr
Member since 2006 • 766 Posts

If there was even a slight chance of it hitting, it would be blown up first.

Pirate700

Blowing up the asteroid would be counter-productive as it would only be blown into little pieces which would still hit and thus destroy the earth. It would be more logical to divert the asteroid with an explosion.

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts

I've been hearing about this asteroid for years and years. If it's going to hit, we'll do something. In truth, there are so many other dangers out there in space beyond just asteroids that could wipe us all out. Just be happy that this asteroid was actually seen.

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.

Pirate700

Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?

A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :|

I ment in terms of preparation, you seem to think mankind is advanced enough to take care of a comet when we can't even handle damage caused by a hurricane.
Avatar image for Goods_Merchant
Goods_Merchant

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 Goods_Merchant
Member since 2009 • 953 Posts

The movie Armageddon, anyone:question:

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Lol, my statement on how people have watched too many movies seems to be correct. The government can't even manage a hurricane, you seriously think they could ever stop a comet?EMOEVOLUTION

A piece of rock is a lot different than a force of nature. You can't destroy weather. :|

Let me know when we can obliterate objects bigger than mountains.

B....but the nuclear weapons solve every problem!


Obvious sarcasm. :P

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

The movie Armageddon, anyone:question:

Goods_Merchant

Yes, we all know how scientifically accurate that movie was.

Avatar image for cyberdarkkid
cyberdarkkid

16777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#22 cyberdarkkid
Member since 2007 • 16777 Posts
The possibilities could be higher but maybe they don't want people to panic. As for getting rid of it, It's sad that people were more worried about inventing weapons of mass destruction to use against each other instead of something that could protect us from outside threads such as asteroids. Might as well use all those nukes against it, if the asteroid is broken into much smaller pieces they can dissolve in the atmosphere a lot easier.
Avatar image for rrclarkcdr
rrclarkcdr

766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 rrclarkcdr
Member since 2006 • 766 Posts

btw why is everyone so worried? It isn't going to hit Earth until 2036 by then we will have already been dead for 24 years. :P

Avatar image for Emraldo
Emraldo

1959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Emraldo
Member since 2004 • 1959 Posts

btw why is everyone so worried? It isn't going to hit Earth until 2036 by then we will have already been dead for 24 years. :P

rrclarkcdr



Win.

Also, if it's going to hit us, it's going to hit us. We cannot possibly destory thousands of tons of rock flying around the solar system at thousands of kilometers an hour.

But hey, maybe by 2036 we'll have some sweet asteroid-destroying lasers. Pew pew.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.EMOEVOLUTION

Keep thinking that.

IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.

The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..

You are aware that humans have managed to land on a comet right? They launch a rocket into space, when the rocket coems close to the asteroid or comet they release a small capsule that f;ies down to the surace of the comet or asteroid. This has been done before. The only difference would be that within the capsule there would most likely be a nuclear warhead or something. It would blow backwards from the way it came tryign not to blow up the actual asteroid because then there would be millions of large pieces raining down on us. Instead they use the blast to change the direction of the comet or asteroid without actually blowing it up but as it is moving so fast and as this would have such a small effect on it they would have to alter it's trajectory very early on. IF we wanted to though we could very likely blow it up.

Avatar image for deimos113
deimos113

516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 deimos113
Member since 2007 • 516 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] how? Right now the technology to blow up an asteroid does not exist.EMOEVOLUTION

Keep thinking that.

IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.

The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..

Could we use a giant ball of garbage XD
Avatar image for kweeni
kweeni

11413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#27 kweeni
Member since 2007 • 11413 Posts
well shoot some vodka then
Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.

BumFluff122

IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.

The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..

You are aware that humans have managed to land on a comet right? They launch a rocket into space, when the rocket coems close to the asteroid or comet they release a small capsule that f;ies down to the surace of the comet or asteroid. This has been done before. The only difference would be that within the capsule there would most likely be a nuclear warhead or something. It would blow backwards from the way it came tryign not to blow up the actual asteroid because then there would be millions of large pieces raining down on us. Instead they use the blast to change the direction of the comet or asteroid without actually blowing it up but as it is moving so fast and as this would have such a small effect on it they would have to alter it's trajectory very early on. IF we wanted to though we could very likely blow it up.

No, humans haven't managed to land on a comet, only a small capsule. Crashing a small capsule onto a comet is a farcry from being able to actually destroy or deflect it enough to pass us by. I think certain people are suffering from "mankind fanboyism", thinking there isn't anything we can't do.
Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
If a large rock the size of a huge mountain hurling towards us from outer space will hit us then it will hit us, even if we launch every nuke on Earth at it.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

No, humans haven't managed to land on a comet, only a small capsule. Crashing a small capsule onto a comet is a farcry from being able to actually destroy or deflect it enough to pass us by. I think certain people are suffering from "mankind fanboyism", thinking there isn't anything we can't do.MushroomWig
Your post argues with itself. You said "No we actually haven't landed on a comet, only a small capsule". Human technology HAS landed on a comet as you stated in your post.

Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Keep thinking that.

BumFluff122

IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.

The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..

You are aware that humans have managed to land on a comet right? They launch a rocket into space, when the rocket coems close to the asteroid or comet they release a small capsule that f;ies down to the surace of the comet or asteroid. This has been done before. The only difference would be that within the capsule there would most likely be a nuclear warhead or something. It would blow backwards from the way it came tryign not to blow up the actual asteroid because then there would be millions of large pieces raining down on us. Instead they use the blast to change the direction of the comet or asteroid without actually blowing it up but as it is moving so fast and as this would have such a small effect on it they would have to alter it's trajectory very early on. IF we wanted to though we could very likely blow it up.

The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.
Avatar image for tsduv21
tsduv21

2942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#32 tsduv21
Member since 2007 • 2942 Posts

[QUOTE="Goods_Merchant"]

The movie Armageddon, anyone:question:

MushroomWig

Yes, we all know how scientifically accurate that movie was.

Just like Volcano or whatever it was. :P
Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#33 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts

Y2K, 2012, Swine flu, Bird flu, and now asteriods hitting the Earth. I have come to the conclusion that people love living in paranoia. Maybe the media is to blame.

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] No, humans haven't managed to land on a comet, only a small capsule. Crashing a small capsule onto a comet is a farcry from being able to actually destroy or deflect it enough to pass us by. I think certain people are suffering from "mankind fanboyism", thinking there isn't anything we can't do.BumFluff122

Your post argues with itself. You said "No we actually haven't landed on a comet, only a small capsule". Human technology HAS landed on a comet as you stated in your post.

No, I said WE haven't landed on a comet.
Avatar image for tsduv21
tsduv21

2942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#35 tsduv21
Member since 2007 • 2942 Posts

Y2K, 2012, Swine flu, Bird flu, and now asteriods hitting the Earth. I have come to the conclusion that people love living in paranoia. Maybe the media is to blame.

Dante2710

The end of times is upon us.:|

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] IT doesn't.. do you know how fast asteroids are traveling through space? And if the asteroid is large enough.. there is nothing on earth that would break it to pieces.

The most logical solution is to attempt to change it's path..

EMOEVOLUTION

You are aware that humans have managed to land on a comet right? They launch a rocket into space, when the rocket coems close to the asteroid or comet they release a small capsule that f;ies down to the surace of the comet or asteroid. This has been done before. The only difference would be that within the capsule there would most likely be a nuclear warhead or something. It would blow backwards from the way it came tryign not to blow up the actual asteroid because then there would be millions of large pieces raining down on us. Instead they use the blast to change the direction of the comet or asteroid without actually blowing it up but as it is moving so fast and as this would have such a small effect on it they would have to alter it's trajectory very early on. IF we wanted to though we could very likely blow it up.

The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.

You guys are wasting your time. We have 20 years to make a judgement call. Arguing what humans can or can't do by then is purely speculative.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.EMOEVOLUTION
Did you read my entire post? In it I stated the reasoning behind why they say such things. It isn;t a problem if destroyign the asteroid as it exists. It's a problem with all the pieces that break off that is the reason why scientists aren't considering it as a course of action. We can drop all the nuclear warheads we want on a comet or asteroid, as we do have the technology, however the aftereffects of blowing up an asteroid or comet is that all the pieces that made up that asteroid or comet would rain down on Earth. It would probably be even more devastatign and would merely compound our problem.

Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#38 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]

Y2K, 2012, Swine flu, Bird flu, and now asteriods hitting the Earth. I have come to the conclusion that people love living in paranoia. Maybe the media is to blame.

tsduv21

The end of times is upon us.:|

Sweet, lets organize a huge orgy. If we are going to die, might as well do it big.
Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.BumFluff122

Did you read my entire post? In it I stated the reasoning behind why they say such things. It isn;t a problem if destroyign the asteroid as it exists. It's a problem with all the pieces that break off that is the reason why scientists aren't considering it as a course of action. We can drop all the nuclear warheads we want on a comet or asteroid, as we do have the technology, however the aftereffects of blowing up an asteroid or comet is that all the pieces that made up that asteroid or comet would rain down on Earth. It would probably be even more devastatign and would merely compound our problem.

All right then. Anyways.. the most effective way to deal with a large asteroid is to attach some form of propulsion to it so it changes it's course.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] No, humans haven't managed to land on a comet, only a small capsule. Crashing a small capsule onto a comet is a farcry from being able to actually destroy or deflect it enough to pass us by. I think certain people are suffering from "mankind fanboyism", thinking there isn't anything we can't do.MushroomWig

Your post argues with itself. You said "No we actually haven't landed on a comet, only a small capsule". Human technology HAS landed on a comet as you stated in your post.

No, I said WE haven't landed on a comet.

He was arguing against me. In it I stated that humans have landed on a comet, which we have. By this I meant human technology has landed on a comet. I thought people would understand what was meant....

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Your post argues with itself. You said "No we actually haven't landed on a comet, only a small capsule". Human technology HAS landed on a comet as you stated in your post.

BumFluff122

No, I said WE haven't landed on a comet.

He was arguing against me. In it I stated that humans have landed on a comet, which we have. By this I meant human technology has landed on a comet. I thought people would understand what was meant....

You could of explained it a bit better, it's a big difference between us landing on a comet and just sending cheap technology there.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] The technology does not exist to effectively obliterate an asteroid to the point where it would have no impact on the surface of the earth. There are asteroids 900 KM in diameter. That's bigger than a mountain. A relatively small asteroid we could blow up.. The scientists themselves even say it's not possible right now with current technology. So, I don't see why you'd go out of your way to say they're wrong.EMOEVOLUTION

Did you read my entire post? In it I stated the reasoning behind why they say such things. It isn;t a problem if destroyign the asteroid as it exists. It's a problem with all the pieces that break off that is the reason why scientists aren't considering it as a course of action. We can drop all the nuclear warheads we want on a comet or asteroid, as we do have the technology, however the aftereffects of blowing up an asteroid or comet is that all the pieces that made up that asteroid or comet would rain down on Earth. It would probably be even more devastatign and would merely compound our problem.

All right then. Anyways.. the most effective way to deal with a large asteroid is to attach some form of propulsion to it so it changes it's course.

You'd need an awfull powerful propulsion system to alter it's course. Even a nuclear strike on the asteroid, with todays bombs which are about 300 (or 3000 can't remember) times or so more powerful that the bombs used in WWII, wouldn't be able to change it's course as much as we'd like. There is a technology, or at least a potential technology, that would be able to alter it's course in significant amounts if we don't catch it in time however fuel is very hard to come by. An anti-matter engine/bomb is thought to be the most powerful potential type of engine or bomb in the universe that is known to man. Those are still a long way off from being made though as we don't even know how to hold the fuel inside the gas chamber yet and the amount of antimatter that humans have seen in their entire existence amounts to far less than even a milligram.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

You could of explained it a bit better, it's a big difference between us landing on a comet and just sending cheap technology there.

MushroomWig

I don't think the technology was cheap. Far from it actually. The only other natural thing other than Earth human have landed on is the moon and the last time that happened was in the 1940's I believe.

Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Did you read my entire post? In it I stated the reasoning behind why they say such things. It isn;t a problem if destroyign the asteroid as it exists. It's a problem with all the pieces that break off that is the reason why scientists aren't considering it as a course of action. We can drop all the nuclear warheads we want on a comet or asteroid, as we do have the technology, however the aftereffects of blowing up an asteroid or comet is that all the pieces that made up that asteroid or comet would rain down on Earth. It would probably be even more devastatign and would merely compound our problem.

BumFluff122

All right then. Anyways.. the most effective way to deal with a large asteroid is to attach some form of propulsion to it so it changes it's course.

You'd need an awfull powerful propulsion system to alter it's course. Even a nuclear strike on the asteroid, with todays bombs which are about 300 (or 3000 can't remember) times or so more powerful that the bombs used in WWII, wouldn't be able to change it's course as much as we'd like. There is a technology, or at least a potential technology, that would be able to alter it's course in significant amounts if we don't catch it in time however fuel is very hard to come by. An anti-matter engine/bomb is thought to be the most powerful potential type of engine or bomb in the universe that is known to man. Those are still a long way off from being made though as we don't even know how to hold the fuel inside the gas chamber yet and the amount of antimatter that humans have seen in their entire existence amounts to far less than even a milligram.

It wouldn't be as bad as it seems.. it really depends how soon you can get the propulsion system on the asteroid.. the farther away it is.. moving it a matter of inches would make a huge difference.
Avatar image for SpartanNapoleon
SpartanNapoleon

214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 SpartanNapoleon
Member since 2009 • 214 Posts

You do realise that there is litterally nothing we can do right now about a Comet or asteroid? We can fire a few nukes but that's it. We just have to hope it doesn't hit (obviously).


I think some people have seen one too many Hollywood movies (cough cough Armageddon).

MushroomWig

Yea there is. A slight push while early on can move the asteroid or comet of course just a little. That little movement of course could eventually become the difference between hitting earth or passing by.

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"]

You could of explained it a bit better, it's a big difference between us landing on a comet and just sending cheap technology there.

BumFluff122

I don't think the technology was cheap. Far from it actually. The only other natural thing other than Earth human have landed on is the moon and the last time that happened was in the 1940's I believe.

The 1940s? Was that a joke?
Avatar image for Tjeremiah1988
Tjeremiah1988

16665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Tjeremiah1988
Member since 2003 • 16665 Posts
Oh noez, we are all gointa diez.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"] All right then. Anyways.. the most effective way to deal with a large asteroid is to attach some form of propulsion to it so it changes it's course.EMOEVOLUTION

You'd need an awfull powerful propulsion system to alter it's course. Even a nuclear strike on the asteroid, with todays bombs which are about 300 (or 3000 can't remember) times or so more powerful that the bombs used in WWII, wouldn't be able to change it's course as much as we'd like. There is a technology, or at least a potential technology, that would be able to alter it's course in significant amounts if we don't catch it in time however fuel is very hard to come by. An anti-matter engine/bomb is thought to be the most powerful potential type of engine or bomb in the universe that is known to man. Those are still a long way off from being made though as we don't even know how to hold the fuel inside the gas chamber yet and the amount of antimatter that humans have seen in their entire existence amounts to far less than even a milligram.

It wouldn't be as bad as it seems.. it really depends how soon you can get the propulsion system on the asteroid.. the farther away it is.. moving it a matter of inches would make a huge difference.

I can't recall where I read this, it was in one of those science magazines, but as of right now we don't have the technology to move it even a couple inches. Sure we could blow it up, as I stated, but that would only cause more problems. We'd need to get to it long before we would probably know it's even hurtling towards us. At this point anyways. I'm sure that will change in the years to come.