This topic is locked from further discussion.
I think you are a fool if you choose to not wear a seatbelt.
It shouldn't be a law though, why make a criminal out of someone who isn't?
[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]I drive which i tend to take turns fast. IF i don't wear seatbelt i can slide too much
br0kenrabbit
That's....about as dumb as not wearing a seatbelt. If you fish-tail you may not regain control in time to prevent an accident.
And that also means you're probably speeding, which is dumb in and of itself.
Not if you're a driving enthusiast and know what you're doing. We have way too many speed limits. There should be a speed limit for each lane. 45 for the right, 60 for the left.
Putting the strap behind the back is cool and you don't look look embarrassing, which is why I always do it. Seatbelts were originally for larger individuals to hold them back without accidentally hitting the wheel anyway. Only the bottom part of the seat belt protects you in most cases as that;s what;s causing pressure up to the top part to pull you back. Without it, it is arguably, more effective.So I'm being nice and offering a neighbor a ride about an hour ago since her car is in the shop. We get in, I buckle up, and wait for her to.
She doesn't.
So I tell her, "You'll need to buckle up."
She then goes on a rant about how her uncle was in a car wreck and 'they' said he would have died if he had been wearing his seatbelt, this that and the other thing.
So once she finishes, I'm like "you'll need to buckle up."
So then she huffs and puffs and buckles up, but then takes off the shoulder strap and puts it behind her.
"Properly," I said, at which point I get another long rant about personal freedom and decisions.
I still haven't started the car, so we just sit there in silence for a minute before she finally huffs "fine" and does herself up properly. Then off we go.
Seriously, everyone I know who doesn't wear seatbelts has the same story about an uncle or a cousin (never someone I have met) who 'they' said would have died had they been wearing a seatbelt. It's old, tired and stupid.
Most of the road fatalities I read about usually mentions "seatbelts were not in use". Is it so damn hard to understand basic laws of physics?
Seriously.
br0kenrabbit
Don't know about that thread but they locked my water thread and immigration thread. I thought we were allowed to do that in off-topic.why did the mods close that gay thread. It was so freaking funny.
MakeMeaSammitch
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]Don't know about that thread but they locked my water thread and immigration thread. I thought we were allowed to do that in off-topic.why did the mods close that gay thread. It was so freaking funny.
DiceofSpades
Yeah why did they close that? This is off-topic you can do that.
Don't know about that thread but they locked my water thread and immigration thread. I thought we were allowed to do that in off-topic.[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
why did the mods close that gay thread. It was so freaking funny.
GOGOGOGURT
Yeah why did they close that? This is off-topic you can do that.
I go back and I see Politic threads all over, not sure why Immigration is not allowed.Putting the strap behind the back is cool and you don't look look embarrassing, which is why I always do it. Seatbelts were originally for larger individuals to hold them back without accidentally hitting the wheel anyway. Only the bottom part of the seat belt protects you in most cases as that;s what;s causing pressure up to the top part to pull you back. Without it, it is arguably, more effective.DiceofSpades
The whole reason they added the shoulder harness in the first place was because lap-only belts were breaking peoples lower spine.
I can't believe how many people fail to even wear a seatbelt, I bet there are people in this world that even if the cure for cancer was found wouldn't take it because of some forsaken reason. Seatbelts save lives, please wear them, or don't and let natural selection do its thing.
[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]You'd have a point if it weren't for the fact that other drivers would be at risk too if you fly out your windshield onto traffic.k2theswissRoads should be privatized so that the owners of the roads can determine these kinds of rules for themselves. lol yay lets be like Texas by spend tax money to build a road then let company make money on it. makes sense. anyways no. 1. The roads are already built 2. Privatizing roads would relieve government of the responsibility of maintaining them, which would reduce government spending.
[QUOTE="k2theswiss"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] Roads should be privatized so that the owners of the roads can determine these kinds of rules for themselves.Laihendilol yay lets be like Texas by spend tax money to build a road then let company make money on it. makes sense. anyways no. 1. The roads are already built 2. Privatizing roads would relieve government of the responsibility of maintaining them, which would reduce government spending.
Plus the private sector does most everything 10x better than the government.
Diceofspades, make a thread about statistics. Teach usdave123321Which might be locked on site. Still trying to figure out how the immigration thread was disruptive posting.
[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="k2theswiss"] lol yay lets be like Texas by spend tax money to build a road then let company make money on it. makes sense. anyways no. k2theswiss1. The roads are already built 2. Privatizing roads would relieve government of the responsibility of maintaining them, which would reduce government spending. so we get take stop at every red light and pay a $dollar?tollbooth, and yeah.
They suck btw and bring traffic to a crawl.
Personally, as an advocate of driving too fast all the time. I oppose that.
Putting the strap behind the back is cool and you don't look look embarrassing, which is why I always do it. Seatbelts were originally for larger individuals to hold them back without accidentally hitting the wheel anyway. Only the bottom part of the seat belt protects you in most cases as that;s what;s causing pressure up to the top part to pull you back. Without it, it is arguably, more effective.DiceofSpades
You are a fucking moron
They should be worn whenever you're in the car. You're more likely to end up dead on the day you don't wear one.
[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"]Putting the strap behind the back is cool and you don't look look embarrassing, which is why I always do it. Seatbelts were originally for larger individuals to hold them back without accidentally hitting the wheel anyway. Only the bottom part of the seat belt protects you in most cases as that;s what;s causing pressure up to the top part to pull you back. Without it, it is arguably, more effective.konvikt_17
You are a **** moron
No I am not. There have been more injuries in the upper areas of the boy due to the strap than with those who put it behind their backs. Unless you have adjustable seatbelts, which a lot of cars don't, and for your iformation with a lot of those people, they have no choice but to have the top part of the seat belt go across their neck which is dangerous.[QUOTE="konvikt_17"][QUOTE="DiceofSpades"]Putting the strap behind the back is cool and you don't look look embarrassing, which is why I always do it. Seatbelts were originally for larger individuals to hold them back without accidentally hitting the wheel anyway. Only the bottom part of the seat belt protects you in most cases as that;s what;s causing pressure up to the top part to pull you back. Without it, it is arguably, more effective.DiceofSpades
You are afucking moron
No I am not. There have been more injuries in the upper areas of the boy due to the strap than with those who put it behind their backs. Unless you have adjustable seatbelts, which a lot of cars don't, and for your iformation with a lot of those people, they have no choice but to have the top part of the seat belt go across their neck which is dangerous.and just imagine how much worse the injury could have been if the upper strap wasnt there.
sure it may cause injuries but not major ones. id rather have some minor burns/scrapes around my chest and neck area from the seatbelt then to have a fucked up back for the rest of my life.
No I am not. There have been more injuries in the upper areas of the boy due to the strap than with those who put it behind their backs. Unless you have adjustable seatbelts, which a lot of cars don't, and for your iformation with a lot of those people, they have no choice but to have the top part of the seat belt go across their neck which is dangerous.[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
You are **** moron
konvikt_17
and just imagine how much worse the injury could have been if the upper strap wasnt there.
sure it may cause injuries but not major ones. id rather have some minor burns/scrapes around my chest and neck area from the seatbelt then to have a **** up back for the rest of my life.
[QUOTE="konvikt_17"][QUOTE="DiceofSpades"] No I am not. There have been more injuries in the upper areas of the boy due to the strap than with those who put it behind their backs. Unless you have adjustable seatbelts, which a lot of cars don't, and for your iformation with a lot of those people, they have no choice but to have the top part of the seat belt go across their neck which is dangerous.DiceofSpades
and just imagine how much worse the injury could have been if the upper strap wasnt there.
sure it may cause injuries but not major ones. id rather have some minor burns/scrapes around my chest and neck area from the seatbelt then to have a **** up back for the rest of my life.
And how many Decapitations have happened in a car accident where the person had used the upper belt?
Decapitation is better than a potentially heal-able damaged back?[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
and just imagine how much worse the injury could have been if the upper strap wasnt there.
sure it may cause injuries but not major ones. id rather have some minor burns/scrapes around my chest and neck area from the seatbelt then to have a **** up back for the rest of my life.
konvikt_17
And how many Decapitations have happened in a car accident where the person had used the upper belt?
More than serious injuries for having a belt behind your back?[QUOTE="konvikt_17"][QUOTE="DiceofSpades"] Decapitation is better than a potentially heal-able damaged back?DiceofSpades
And how many Decapitations have happened in a car accident where the person had used the upper belt?
More than serious injuries for having a belt behind your back?in other words, you're a fucking moron like previously stated.
More than serious injuries for having a belt behind your back?[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
And how many Decapitations have happened in a car accident where the person had used the upper belt?
konvikt_17
in other words, you're a **** moron like previously stated.
[QUOTE="konvikt_17"][QUOTE="DiceofSpades"] More than serious injuries for having a belt behind your back?DiceofSpades
in other words, you're a **** moron like previously stated.
I call em as i see em.
if there are more decapitations from people using the upper belt than from people not using he uper belt, then how about you post some links as proof.
until then, your just talking out your ass.
i like that "or serious neck/head injuries" that you decided to add to try and cover your bases.
I am a moron because there are more decapitations or serious neck/head injuries compared to SERIOUS injuries from having a belt behinf their back? And if calling names is all you do no wonder we are getting nowhere. Did I insult you?[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
in other words, you're a **** moron like previously stated.
konvikt_17
I call em as i see em.
if there are more decapitations from people using the upper belt than from people not using he uper belt, then how about you post some links as proof.
until then, your just talking out your ass.
i like that "or serious neck/head injuries" that you decided to add to try and cover your bases.
[QUOTE="konvikt_17"][QUOTE="DiceofSpades"] I am a moron because there are more decapitations or serious neck/head injuries compared to SERIOUS injuries from having a belt behinf their back? And if calling names is all you do no wonder we are getting nowhere. Did I insult you?DiceofSpades
I call em as i see em.
if there are more decapitations from people using the upper belt than from people not using he uper belt, then how about you post some links as proof.
until then, your just talking out your ass.
i like that "or serious neck/head injuries" that you decided to add to try and cover your bases.
Haha, ive got nothing to prove.
you're the one that said not wearing the upper belt is better. i merely called you a moron for saying that.
you however seem to think there have several decapitations due to people using the upper belt, to which i asked for proof to your statement.
proof is on you, not me. dumbass.
I thought the majority of cars on the road were older?You folks know that seat belts are adjustible right? You don't have to wear it across your neck lol.Just move it down to suit your height.
Yusuke420
Do you have links showing what you are claiming?[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
I call em as i see em.
if there are more decapitations from people using the upper belt than from people not using he uper belt, then how about you post some links as proof.
until then, your just talking out your ass.
i like that "or serious neck/head injuries" that you decided to add to try and cover your bases.
konvikt_17
Haha, ive got nothing to prove.
you're the one that said not wearing the upper belt is better. i merely called you a moron for saying that.
you however seem to think there have several decapitations due to people using the upper belt, to which i asked for proof to your statement.
proof is on you, not me. dumbass.
[QUOTE="konvikt_17"][QUOTE="DiceofSpades"] Do you have links showing what you are claiming?DiceofSpades
Haha, ive got nothing to prove.
you're the one that said not wearing the upper belt is better. i merely called you a moron for saying that.
you however seem to think there have several decapitations due to people using the upper belt, to which i asked for proof to your statement.
proof is on you, not me. dumbass.
well that answers my questions.
you're just talking out your ass.
carry on then.
That's not what I asked, I asked do you have something to show I am wrong when I do post links?[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
Haha, ive got nothing to prove.
you're the one that said not wearing the upper belt is better. i merely called you a moron for saying that.
you however seem to think there have several decapitations due to people using the upper belt, to which i asked for proof to your statement.
proof is on you, not me. dumbass.
konvikt_17
well that answers my questions.
you're just talking out your ass.
carry on then.
Putting the strap behind the back is cool and you don't look look embarrassing, which is why I always do it. Seatbelts were originally for larger individuals to hold them back without accidentally hitting the wheel anyway. Only the bottom part of the seat belt protects you in most cases as that;s what;s causing pressure up to the top part to pull you back. Without it, it is arguably, more effective.DiceofSpades
You are showing how ill informed you are about seatbelts and how they work. For at least 20 years, seatbelts have had to be of the single buckle type where you only have to use one buckle. Part of it is attached to the floorpan of the vehicle and the other is attaced in two places, one to the floorpan near the seat and the center post and the other which has a sprague clutch type gear in side is bolted to the door jamb (or b pillar). When you pull the chest strap across your chest, the protection offered from the pendulum swings forward in a crash, it engages said gear and keeps the belt from playing out, thus keeping you from hitting the dash, steering wheel or windshield. If you are putting it behind your back, you might look cool, but you increase the likelyhood of major injuries for not wearing it properly.
As far as decapitations, yeah, they happen, but it is due to the lap belt becoming the guillotine and not the shoulder belt. It happens when people who think they are cool, layimg the seat way back, gets in a wreck and end up sliding under the lap belt and under that dash. The cops in the city I live have told me of many stories of people loosing their heads due to that very reason. And yes, a 6'7" person can fit under the dash of a car, even the size of a Sentra. It isn't pretty.
Believe what you want, but you are way off base with your assumptions. Oh, I used to be an auto mechanic and have replace a few seat belts over the years. If you have a wreck and your car is repairable, your seat belts need replacing, period.
i'm the same way; if you want a ride in my car you will wear a seatbelt and will so properly or i'm not gonig anywhere.
so we get take stop at every red light and pay a $dollar?tollbooth, and yeah.[QUOTE="k2theswiss"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] 1. The roads are already built 2. Privatizing roads would relieve government of the responsibility of maintaining them, which would reduce government spending.MakeMeaSammitch
They suck btw and bring traffic to a crawl.
Personally, as an advocate of driving too fast all the time. I oppose that.
There is an unlimited variety of potential payment plans for private roads. For example there could be cameras set up on exits/entrances that record license plate numbers and then a bill could be sent to the car owner. The "toll booth" argument against private roads is ridiculous.I was in a car that flipped. All the snow that hit my face I'm certain I would have been ejected from the car if I didn't have my seatbelt on.
My dad almost died in a head on collision a few years ago with a semi, the police told him if he was wearing a seatbelt he would have surely died. Luckily he flew out the side window into a ditch and survived, which wouldn't have been possible if he was wearing a seatbelt as they hold you into your seat.
Keep in mind, seatbelts dont always save your life, there are situations where they can and will kill you. I believe in liberty, so I don't think the government should be allowed to tell you that you have to buckle up, that should be your choice. But to answer the question, no I don't always use a seatbelt. If I'm in the drivers seat I will 99% of the time, if I'm in the passengers I sometimes forget or just don't bother because it's more comfortable.
Always. If my passengers are hesitant to put their seatbelts on, I'll tell em flatout without BS to put their seatbelts on or the car's not moving. They usually comply after hearing the tone of my voice and me staring at them.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment