Seems that Donald Trump is something of a birther

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#51 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="chrisrooR"]And why would that matter? Honestly, why would you have a problem with having someone who wasn't born in the United States running your country if he does a good job as a leader? I don't understand the whole "if he's not American then he shouldn't be president" thing. Is there some actual political reason, or is it just a custom?chrisrooR

It's a requirement for president. And it matters because they don't want foreign nationals with other interests involved in the highest office. Nothing wrong with that rule.....but by now the birthers need to give it up. Time to move on to other issues.....

Not trying to start an argument, I'm just curious :P If a person is living in the United States for a prolonged period of time, and has become an American citizen, would that individual be able to hold any political office?

Edit: Assuming the person was born outside of the United States.

Yes

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="chrisrooR"]And why would that matter? Honestly, why would you have a problem with having someone who wasn't born in the United States running your country if he does a good job as a leader? I don't understand the whole "if he's not American then he shouldn't be president" thing. Is there some actual political reason, or is it just a custom?chrisrooR

It's a requirement for president. And it matters because they don't want foreign nationals with other interests involved in the highest office. Nothing wrong with that rule.....but by now the birthers need to give it up. Time to move on to other issues.....

Not trying to start an argument, I'm just curious :P If a person is living in the United States for a prolonged period of time, and has become an American citizen, would that individual be able to hold any political office?

Edit: Assuming the person was born outside of the United States.

Sure. Arnold was governor of California after all. But they can't be president. On the other hand....I can't be king of England either...so it balances out.:P
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] It's a requirement for president. And it matters because they don't want foreign nationals with other interests involved in the highest office. Nothing wrong with that rule.....but by now the birthers need to give it up. Time to move on to other issues.....BuryMe

Not trying to start an argument, I'm just curious :P If a person is living in the United States for a prolonged period of time, and has become an American citizen, would that individual be able to hold any political office?

Edit: Assuming the person was born outside of the United States.

Yes

So why is that any different for presidential status?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts
[QUOTE="BuryMe"]

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"] Not trying to start an argument, I'm just curious :P If a person is living in the United States for a prolonged period of time, and has become an American citizen, would that individual be able to hold any political office?

Edit: Assuming the person was born outside of the United States.

chrisrooR

Yes

So why is that any different for presidential status?

Because it's the law.:|
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

I'm loving the prospective Republican presidential candidates. Palin, Bachmann, Gingrich and now Trump.

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#56 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] It's a requirement for president. And it matters because they don't want foreign nationals with other interests involved in the highest office. Nothing wrong with that rule.....but by now the birthers need to give it up. Time to move on to other issues.....LJS9502_basic

Not trying to start an argument, I'm just curious :P If a person is living in the United States for a prolonged period of time, and has become an American citizen, would that individual be able to hold any political office?

Edit: Assuming the person was born outside of the United States.

Sure. Arnold was governor of California after all. But they can't be president. On the other hand....I can't be king of England either...so it balances out.:P

You can still rise to head of government (i.e., prime minister,) and he holds more power at this point.

Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="BuryMe"]Yes

LJS9502_basic

So why is that any different for presidential status?

Because it's the law.:|

But why is it the law? Is it establish on customary grounds? Sorry if I was unclear, I'm trying to get at the root of the law, where it stems from. To me, I would think that if someone is a citizen (born in the country or out of it) and proves him/herself to be a person who loves the country they're living in, why would their birthplace matter.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="chrisrooR"] So why is that any different for presidential status?chrisrooR

Because it's the law.:|

But why is it the law? Is it establish on customary grounds? Sorry if I was unclear, I'm trying to get at the root of the law, where it stems from. To me, I would think that if someone is a citizen (born in the country or out of it) and proves him/herself to be a person who loves the country they're living in, why would their birthplace matter.

Allegiance to only the US...not a home country.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

But why is it the law? Is it establish on customary grounds? Sorry if I was unclear, I'm trying to get at the root of the law, where it stems from. To me, I would think that if someone is a citizen (born in the country or out of it) and proves him/herself to be a person who loves the country they're living in, why would their birthplace matter.

chrisrooR

It would make sense cosndierng the time it was made. They were probably worried about the English attempting to regain control of the states. If the requirement is that only a native born citizen can be president, then it significantly diminishes chances of that.

Nowadays, with the accessibility of travel, global communications, and how the world has "shrunk", i really dont think it matters.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"]

But why is it the law? Is it establish on customary grounds? Sorry if I was unclear, I'm trying to get at the root of the law, where it stems from. To me, I would think that if someone is a citizen (born in the country or out of it) and proves him/herself to be a person who loves the country they're living in, why would their birthplace matter.

XaosII

It would make sense cosndierng the time it was made. They were probably worried about the English attempting to regain control of the states. If the requirement is that only a native born citizen can be president, then it significantly diminishes chances of that.

Nowadays, with the accessibility of travel, global communications, and how the world has "shrunk", i really dont think it matters.

No it still matters.....
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
[QUOTE="chrisrooR"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Because it's the law.:|LJS9502_basic

But why is it the law? Is it establish on customary grounds? Sorry if I was unclear, I'm trying to get at the root of the law, where it stems from. To me, I would think that if someone is a citizen (born in the country or out of it) and proves him/herself to be a person who loves the country they're living in, why would their birthplace matter.

Allegiance to only the US...not a home country.

So a person born outside of the country, and who has lived abroad for the first couple years of his/her life is assumed to have less allegiance than a person born inside of the United States? Either way, no memories are made for the first year of development, so how would a child raised in the United states be any different than a child who was born AND raised in the United States (aside from birthplace)? And I have met people who are born inside of a country, and have less allegiance to it relative to others who have migrated from countries with hostile environments.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

No it still matters.....LJS9502_basic

No it doesn't.

The capacity to be a leader has no bearing on birthright.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No it still matters.....XaosII

No it doesn't.

The capacity to be a leader has no bearing on birthright.

It's not about the capacity for being a leader and more about the capacity to want what's best for the US...and not have interests in other countries.:|
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No it still matters.....LJS9502_basic

No it doesn't.

The capacity to be a leader has no bearing on birthright.

It's not about the capacity for being a leader and more about the capacity to want what's best for the US...and not have interests in other countries.:|

What of people born in the U.S. who have interests in other countries? You're assuming that these people don't exist. What of Italian-American children who were born in the United States, but still hold interest in Italy?
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No it still matters.....LJS9502_basic

No it doesn't.

The capacity to be a leader has no bearing on birthright.

It's not about the capacity for being a leader and more about the capacity to want what's best for the US...and not have interests in other countries.:|

What is the connection to birthright? You can be born here and have the best interest of another country. You can be born elsewhere and have the best interest of the US.

There is absolutely no causation between brithright and allegiance.

Avatar image for With-Hatred
With-Hatred

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 With-Hatred
Member since 2009 • 926 Posts

Y'know, this whole birther movement could be shattered in a heartbeat if someone would just go on primetime television with the guys birth certificate.

KH-mixerX

http://nation.foxnews.com/media/2009/07/22/cnn-holds-copy-obama-birth-certificate

Somebody already did, on fox news of all stations.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="XaosII"]

No it doesn't.

The capacity to be a leader has no bearing on birthright.

chrisrooR

It's not about the capacity for being a leader and more about the capacity to want what's best for the US...and not have interests in other countries.:|

What of people born in the U.S. who have interests in other countries? You're assuming that these people don't exist. What of Italian-American children who were born in the United States, but still hold interest in Italy?

What? They may be somewhat interested in their ethnicity but they have no ties to Italy. Anyway, it's the law. There are three requirements....that is one of them. And it makes sense. It's the highest job in the country and it should belong to an American...

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="XaosII"]

No it doesn't.

The capacity to be a leader has no bearing on birthright.

XaosII

It's not about the capacity for being a leader and more about the capacity to want what's best for the US...and not have interests in other countries.:|

What is the connection to birthright? You can be born here and have the best interest of another country. You can be born elsewhere and have the best interest of the US.

There is absolutely no causation between brithright and allegiance.

Really? Because most people would not want to deal harshly if needed with their own country. It's a conflict of interest. Best to avoid that anyway. Were I to head up Canada....I'd not want to do anything that might hurt the US even if necessary.
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#69 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] It's not about the capacity for being a leader and more about the capacity to want what's best for the US...and not have interests in other countries.:|LJS9502_basic

What of people born in the U.S. who have interests in other countries? You're assuming that these people don't exist. What of Italian-American children who were born in the United States, but still hold interest in Italy?

What? They may be somewhat interested in their ethnicity but they have no ties to Italy. Anyway, it's the law. There are three requirements....that is one of them. And it makes sense.It's the highest job in the country and it should belong to an American...

Perhaps their parents are Italian and have instilled a large amount of Italian value on the children. Simply saying that "they have no ties to Italy" isn't satisfactory, because it's quite possible that they do.


And we aren't talking about an American, we're talking about someone born outside of the United States. A person can still become an American Citizen if they live there long enough, so why should they be unable to be president if they prove themselves capable?

Why does this make sense, and why should birthright prevent a perfectly good leader from holding presedential office?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"] What of people born in the U.S. who have interests in other countries? You're assuming that these people don't exist. What of Italian-American children who were born in the United States, but still hold interest in Italy?chrisrooR

What? They may be somewhat interested in their ethnicity but they have no ties to Italy. Anyway, it's the law. There are three requirements....that is one of them. And it makes sense.It's the highest job in the country and it should belong to an American...

Perhaps their parents are Italian and have instilled a large amount of Italian value on the children. Simply saying that "they have no ties to Italy" isn't satisfactory, because it's quite possible that they do.


And we aren't talking about an American, we're talking about someone born outside of the United States. A person can still become an American Citizen if they live there long enough, so why should they be unable to be president if they prove themselves capable?

Why does this make sense, and why should birthright prevent a perfectly good leader from holding presedential office?

Begin Italian...perhaps. But being from Italy...no. Two different things. No they don't have ties...they don't live there and I'm assuming like most US citizens they haven't even visited. Most US citizens actually do not have passports. You can't become president if you are not born American because it's the law. Period. Most jobs DO have requirements. If you don't meet them...you don't get the job. It really is that simple.

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

Really? Because most people would not want to deal harshly if needed with their own country. It's a conflict of interest. Best to avoid that anyway. Were I to head up Canada....I'd not want to do anything that might hurt the US even if necessary. LJS9502_basic

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything though. There have been several detaind US born Al Qaeda agents. They can run for presidency.

On the other hand, i moved to the US when i was less than 2 years old. I've never visited my country of birth. I've never even left the U.S. on vacation or visits. Im 25 years old now, with 10 more years to go for presidency eligibility.

But i cant run because of the native born requirement. How am i not "American" enough to run? How could my interests be more aligned with my country of birth than someone who barely meets elgibility (i.e. living for 21 years elsewhere then 14 years in the US)?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Really? Because most people would not want to deal harshly if needed with their own country. It's a conflict of interest. Best to avoid that anyway. Were I to head up Canada....I'd not want to do anything that might hurt the US even if necessary. XaosII

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything though. There have been several detaind US born Al Qaeda agents. They can run for presidency.

On the other hand, i moved to the US when i was less than 2 years old. I've never visited my country of birth. I've never even left the U.S. on vacation or visits. Im 25 years old now, with 10 more years to go for presidency eligibility.

But i cant run because of the native born requirement. How am i not "American" enough to run? How could my interests be more aligned with my country of birth than someone who barely meets elgibility (i.e. living for 21 years elsewhere then 14 years in the US)?

No party will back someone that has been detained for being an Al Qaeda agent....so I doubt they'd get any support to run. It's not simply being born a citizen gets you in the running....it's not that simplistic.
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Really? Because most people would not want to deal harshly if needed with their own country. It's a conflict of interest. Best to avoid that anyway. Were I to head up Canada....I'd not want to do anything that might hurt the US even if necessary. LJS9502_basic

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything though. There have been several detaind US born Al Qaeda agents. They can run for presidency.

On the other hand, i moved to the US when i was less than 2 years old. I've never visited my country of birth. I've never even left the U.S. on vacation or visits. Im 25 years old now, with 10 more years to go for presidency eligibility.

But i cant run because of the native born requirement. How am i not "American" enough to run? How could my interests be more aligned with my country of birth than someone who barely meets elgibility (i.e. living for 21 years elsewhere then 14 years in the US)?

No party will back someone that has been detained for being an Al Qaeda agent....so I doubt they'd get any support to run. It's not simply being born a citizen gets you in the running....it's not that simplistic.

Whether or not they would get support at running for president is irrelevant. What matters it that the agent, simply because he/she was born inside of the United States, has more of a chance at becoming president than a person who spends his/her first couple years of life abroad, migrates to the states, studies law, and proves him/herself to be a credible leader.

That doesn't make sense to me.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="XaosII"]

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything though. There have been several detaind US born Al Qaeda agents. They can run for presidency.

On the other hand, i moved to the US when i was less than 2 years old. I've never visited my country of birth. I've never even left the U.S. on vacation or visits. Im 25 years old now, with 10 more years to go for presidency eligibility.

But i cant run because of the native born requirement. How am i not "American" enough to run? How could my interests be more aligned with my country of birth than someone who barely meets elgibility (i.e. living for 21 years elsewhere then 14 years in the US)?

chrisrooR

No party will back someone that has been detained for being an Al Qaeda agent....so I doubt they'd get any support to run. It's not simply being born a citizen gets you in the running....it's not that simplistic.

Whether or not they would get support at running for president is irrelevant. What matters it that the agent, simply because he/she was born inside of the United States, has more of a chance at becoming president than a person who spends his/her first couple years of life abroad, migrates to the states, studies law, and proves him/herself to be a credible leader.

That doesn't make sense to me.

The first requirement for president....which mainly disqualifies people...is present at birth. Adding extraneous information about citizens is pointless. Very few are president...so the fact that they were US born is basically worthless considering the choices they made. They will not be president. So? Because not all naturalized citizens are perfect has no bearing on the job requirements of which a foreign born national does not fulfill.
Avatar image for Dalo12345
Dalo12345

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Dalo12345
Member since 2007 • 800 Posts

Hopefully with all these garbage neocon candidates Ron Paul will have a slightly better shot.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23353 Posts

Hopefully with all these garbage neocon candidates Ron Paul will have a slightly better shot.

Dalo12345
Ron Paul doesn't have a legitimate shot anyway. His views are just as extreme as many of the Tea Party candidates..
Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#77 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

Y'know, this whole birther movement could be shattered in a heartbeat if someone would just go on primetime television with the guys birth certificate.

With-Hatred

http://nation.foxnews.com/media/2009/07/22/cnn-holds-copy-obama-birth-certificate

Somebody already did, on fox news of all stations.

Wow. Why are we still having discussions about these people then? Can't we just sweep them under the rug and pretend they don't exist?

Avatar image for With-Hatred
With-Hatred

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 With-Hatred
Member since 2009 • 926 Posts

[QUOTE="With-Hatred"]

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

Y'know, this whole birther movement could be shattered in a heartbeat if someone would just go on primetime television with the guys birth certificate.

KH-mixerX

http://nation.foxnews.com/media/2009/07/22/cnn-holds-copy-obama-birth-certificate

Somebody already did, on fox news of all stations.

.

Wow. Why are we still having discussions about these people then? Can't we just sweep them under the rug and pretend they don't exist?

They're a pretty big number, over half of republican primary voters and like a quarter of the country

Avatar image for zeldaluff
zeldaluff

3387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 zeldaluff
Member since 2008 • 3387 Posts

No you have to either be born IN the United States, or on a US military base. That's it. McCain was born on a military base.BMD004

What if you're born on a plane, How does that work? Are you the citizen of the country you departed from/arrived in/were born above?

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#80 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

[QUOTE="With-Hatred"]

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

Y'know, this whole birther movement could be shattered in a heartbeat if someone would just go on primetime television with the guys birth certificate.

http://nation.foxnews.com/media/2009/07/22/cnn-holds-copy-obama-birth-certificate

Somebody already did, on fox news of all stations.

Wow. Why are we still having discussions about these people then? Can't we just sweep them under the rug and pretend they don't exist?

Yet Trump was on Fox News just the other day asking why he hasn't released his birth certificate...
Avatar image for With-Hatred
With-Hatred

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 With-Hatred
Member since 2009 • 926 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

[QUOTE="With-Hatred"]

http://nation.foxnews.com/media/2009/07/22/cnn-holds-copy-obama-birth-certificate

Somebody already did, on fox news of all stations.

Ninja-Hippo

Wow. Why are we still having discussions about these people then? Can't we just sweep them under the rug and pretend they don't exist?

Yet Trump was on Fox News just the other day asking why he hasn't released his birth certificate...

Just like evolution deniers; mounds and mounds of evidence but it's never enough, no matter how redic their complaints are.