Senate Confirms New Lesbian Federal Judge

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Whether or not what you're saying is true (it's not) how is any of this a bad thing?

ghoklebutter

Nothing wrong a "what do I get out of it" mentality. Humans are hard-wired that way. I take issue with people who try to pretend otherwise (ghokebutler).

I hope this is easier for you to read:

"A judge's sexual orientation has nothing to do with his/her competence, so Idon't care about it."

Great. If it's all the same to you then let's pick the straight judge.

It's religious discrimination to allow gay marriage.moneymatterz

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

Oops. It looks like I didn't make myself clear, so I'll repeat myself: "A judge's sexual orientation has nothing to do with his/her competence, so I don't care about it."

See, I even underlined it and made it bold! Would you like me to make it red as well? Or perhaps would a color less harsh on the eyes be better? 

In any case, I hope you pay attention to what I have to say. 

 moneymatterz

Perhaps math/science escapes you, but there is a such thing as holding variables constant to isolate the effect of, in this case, a single characteristic (sexuality)

P1. A judge's sexual orientation has nothing to do with his/her competence.

P2. In regards to choosing a judge, I only care about the judges' competence.

P3. Both judges are equally competent.

C. I have no preference towards either judge.

Maybe you fail to understand what I said because I didn't make that bolded sentence pink. Sorry about that. I'll do that next time you intentionally ignore what I say.

[QUOTE="meatgrinderz"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

That's why I said in my scenario that they are equally qualified. Perhaps math/science escapes you, but there is a such thing as holding variables constant to isolate the effect of, in this case, a single characteristic (sexuality).

 

moneymatterz

Because gay people happen to be the most vitriolic vocal agenda-pushing minority out there. It's religious discrimination to allow gay marriage. It discriminates because marriage is a religious ceremony.

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

Nothing wrong a "what do I get out of it" mentality. Humans are hard-wired that way. I take issue with people who try to pretend otherwise (ghokebutler).

moneymatterz

I hope this is easier for you to read:

"A judge's sexual orientation has nothing to do with his/her competence, so Idon't care about it."

Great. If it's all the same to you then let's pick the straight judge.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]It's religious discrimination to allow gay marriage.MrPraline

well at least we can still have draw muhammad day, right moneymatterz? Cus those guys ain't [s]white[/s] *freedom loving americans* 

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

I hope this is easier for you to read:

"A judge's sexual orientation has nothing to do with his/her competence, so Idon't care about it."

MrPraline

Great. If it's all the same to you then let's pick the straight judge.

[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="moneymatterz"]It's religious discrimination to allow gay marriage.-Sun_Tzu-

well at least we can still have draw muhammad day, right moneymatterz? Cus those guys ain't [s]white[/s] *freedom loving americans* 

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

Nothing wrong a "what do I get out of it" mentality. Humans are hard-wired that way. I take issue with people who try to pretend otherwise (ghokebutler).

moneymatterz

I hope this is easier for you to read:

"A judge's sexual orientation has nothing to do with his/her competence, so Idon't care about it."

Great. If it's all the same to you then let's pick the straight judge.

[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

Great. If it's all the same to you then let's pick the straight judge.

ghoklebutter

[QUOTE="Rich3232"]op is a mean name. moneymatterz

Which one?

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="MrPraline"] No, it isn't. That's like saying it's religious discrimination to take the Lord's name in vain. Are you proposing we bring back blasphemy laws too? That's very libertarian of you.MrPraline

well at least we can still have draw muhammad day, right moneymatterz? Cus those guys ain't [s]white[/s] *freedom loving americans* 

[spoiler]

[/spoiler]

-Sun_Tzu-

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]MrPraline

Because gay people happen to be the most vitriolic vocal agenda-pushing minority out there.moneymatterz

No, they don't.

It's religious discrimination to allow gay marriage.

No, it isn't.

It discriminates because marriage is a religious ceremony.

No, it isn't.

The Gay agenda infiltrates again, and now we have people supporting forcing it on others! Yay!

The Gay agenda infiltrates again, and now we have people supporting forcing it on others! Yay!

Eddie-Murphy48

The Gay agenda infiltrates again, and now we have people supporting forcing it on others! Yay!

Eddie-Murphy48

The Gay agenda infiltrates again, and now we have people supporting forcing it on others! Yay!

Eddie-Murphy48

Gamespot should rename itself to Gay News Network. So many gay threads.

[QUOTE="Eddie-Murphy48"]

The Gay agenda infiltrates again, and now we have people supporting forcing it on others! Yay!

moneymatterz

Gamespot should rename itself to Gay News Network. So many gay threads.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Murphy48"]

The Gay agenda infiltrates again, and now we have people supporting forcing it on others! Yay!

Rich3232

Gamespot should rename itself to Gay News Network. So many gay threads.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Murphy48"]

The Gay agenda infiltrates again, and now we have people supporting forcing it on others! Yay!

Rich3232

Gamespot should rename itself to Gay News Network. So many gay threads.

I know, right? That's why I plan on making tons of gay threads about the most insignificant news stories.....just so I can help push the agenda and keep the issue in the spotlight.

[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

Gamespot should rename itself to Gay News Network. So many gay threads.

moneymatterz

I know, right? That's why I plan on making tons of gay threads about the most insignificant news stories.....just so I can help push the agenda and keep the issue in the spotlight.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Rich3232"] Yea, it's not like gay rights are a major social issue or anything. Rich3232

I know, right? That's why I plan on making tons of gay threads about the most insignificant news stories.....just so I can help push the agenda and keep the issue in the spotlight.

They had their chance when "Civil Unions" were proposed. Same rights as marriage...just calling it something else. They nearly rioted in the streets.

[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

 

I know, right? That's why I plan on making tons of gay threads about the most insignificant news stories.....just so I can help push the agenda and keep the issue in the spotlight.

moneymatterz

They had their chance when "Civil Unions" were proposed. Same rights as marriage...just calling it something else. They nearly rioted in the streets.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Rich3232"] Yea, it's not like gay rights are a major social issue or anything. Rich3232

I know, right? That's why I plan on making tons of gay threads about the most insignificant news stories.....just so I can help push the agenda and keep the issue in the spotlight.

There are some rights they can;t get just because of the fact they are the same se so they will never gain EQuAL rights. I mean what rights do they not have left  that could possibly be given to them that some places already grant already?

I mean you can only do so much benefits and rights to people that are the same sex if the rights specifically effect two different sexes.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Rich3232"] Or better yet, cut the nonsense and just give equal rights to gays, but I suppose that's asking for too much from the Republicans. Rich3232

They had their chance when "Civil Unions" were proposed. Same rights as marriage...just calling it something else. They nearly rioted in the streets.

Then why make any distinction between white/black/latin people?Just call everyone humans.

Separate but equal or Religious Discrimination......i'll go ahead and side with religious ppl, k?

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Rich3232"] Or better yet, cut the nonsense and just give equal rights to gays, but I suppose that's asking for too much from the Republicans. Rich3232

They had their chance when "Civil Unions" were proposed. Same rights as marriage...just calling it something else. They nearly rioted in the streets.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Rich3232"] Or better yet, cut the nonsense and just give equal rights to gays, but I suppose that's asking for too much from the Republicans. Rich3232

They had their chance when "Civil Unions" were proposed. Same rights as marriage...just calling it something else. They nearly rioted in the streets.

Separate but equal? Straight people can be unionized to.

ITT: Why social conservatism needs to die.DroidPhysX

NY already has marriage equality. 

ITT: Why social conservatism needs to die.DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

i only believe in traditional  biblical marriage.

that's why i have 8 wives 3 of which i inherited from dead brothers.

Riverwolf007

Can I buy one of your daughters?

I have some really fat cattle we can trade.

it would be a sin to marry outside the family.

When you say "new lesbian federal judge,"  do you mean a judge who is newly lesbian, or a new judge who is also a lesbian?

Next thing you know we're gonna have a pedophile judge

WHERE WILL IT END OT?

OP prefers the company of gentlemenJazz_Fan