Senate Hearing on Marijuana Legalization

  • 139 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

I hate potheads they have the memory of an alzheimer's patient and the attention span of a tree frog. Majuana is a mind altering substance and should be kept illegal.  

jdc6305

lol k

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

So much ignorance and stupidity in this thread... I don't know what's worse.. The guys who can shut up about their pot.. or the ones who can't get over people who smoke weed.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#53 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts
Legalized it, man.
Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

Legalized it, man. Master_Live

This too.. There's really hardly and reason not to at this point.. Even if you don't smoke or consume it.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

I'm more concerned about other things right now, to be honest.

Syria, NSA surveillance, the inability of the Obama administration to bring the people who were behind the Benghazi attack to justice. Lots of shit going on in this government right now.

airshocker

 

 

NSA and Marijuana>>Syria and Benghazi.



and ffs people are still going on about Benghazi?




Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

Two things need to be done with pot:

1. Make it legal for medicinal use.

2. Reclassify it so it isn't consider a Schedule I drug (seriously, even if you think it's bad, it isn't THAT bad). This way, people won't be arrested and incarcerated for years and years just because they had a gram too much of grass.

Beyond those two things, I don't give a shit.

Avatar image for Jagged3dge
Jagged3dge

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Jagged3dge
Member since 2008 • 3895 Posts

it's just a Senate hearing, not a floor vote on anything, these go nowhere, they're only stages for political theater and self indulgencelamprey263

Thing is this is the closest congress has gotten to the issue in about 40 years.

So yeah kind of a big deal.

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#58 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts
Hope they reject it, more pressing matters atm.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

Hope they reject it, more pressing matters atm.lightleggy

 

Like what?

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#60 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

[QUOTE="lightleggy"]Hope they reject it, more pressing matters atm.Jebus213

 

Like what?

Not pleasing stoners.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"]Hope they reject it, more pressing matters atm.lightleggy

 

Like what?

Not pleasing stoners.

 

Not a valid argument. 

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="Jebus213"]

 

Like what?

Jebus213

Not pleasing stoners.

 

Not a valid argument. 

Yep.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

I'm actually very happy about this. We can stop overflooding our prisons with people who shouldn't be criminals.

Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts
But if they do that, there would be nobody left to vote for Ron Paul.....
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

But if they do that, there would be nobody left to vote for Ron Paul.....Toxic-Seahorse
Don't worry bro, there's always going to be racists and the delusional

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

Great more stoners running around...just what we need. :roll: UnbiasedPoster

 

Just chill out.

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

[QUOTE="UnbiasedPoster"]Great more stoners running around...just what we need. :roll: GOGOGOGURT

 

Just chill out.

I'd rather have stoners running around than people that think like the person you quoted lol.
Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#68 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="Jebus213"]

 

Like what?

Jebus213

Not pleasing stoners.

 

Not a valid argument. 

Valid as **** because stoners are annoying. They can get whatever amount of weed they want with no issues now, why even bother change that? I'm sorry I don't want to have a bunch of obnoxious dbags running around the streets while high, we already got plenty of them.

mM0MF

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#69 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

I'm actually very happy about this. We can stop overflooding our prisons with people who shouldn't be criminals.

GOGOGOGURT
And start overflooding our streets with more annoying tools.
Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] Not pleasing stoners.lightleggy

 

Not a valid argument. 

Valid as **** because stoners are annoying. They can get whatever amount of weed they want with no issues now, why even bother change that? I'm sorry I don't want to have a bunch of obnoxious dbags running around the streets while high, we already got plenty of them.

mM0MF

You sound worse than the people you are describing lol.
Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

I'm actually very happy about this. We can stop overflooding our prisons with people who shouldn't be criminals.

lightleggy

And start overflooding our streets with more annoying tools.

Take a nap. Don't project your low intelligence on others.

Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts
[QUOTE="lightleggy"]

[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

 

Not a valid argument. 

The_Lipscomb

Valid as **** because stoners are annoying. They can get whatever amount of weed they want with no issues now, why even bother change that? I'm sorry I don't want to have a bunch of obnoxious dbags running around the streets while high, we already got plenty of them.

mM0MF

You sound worse than the people you are describing lol.

To be fair, he has a point, but he's going about it the wrong way. I understand there are a ton of responsible pot smokers, probably way more than there are irresponsible douche bags using it, but increasing the availability of it will increase both parties by a large amount. That's obviously not a good reason to not legalize it, but still something to think about.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="lightleggy"]

Valid as **** because stoners are annoying. They can get whatever amount of weed they want with no issues now, why even bother change that? I'm sorry I don't want to have a bunch of obnoxious dbags running around the streets while high, we already got plenty of them.

mM0MF

Toxic-Seahorse

You sound worse than the people you are describing lol.

To be fair, he has a point, but he's going about it the wrong way. I understand there are a ton of responsible pot smokers, probably way more than there are irresponsible douche bags using it, but increasing the availability of it will increase both parties by a large amount. That's obviously not a good reason to not legalize it, but still something to think about.

 

he has a point?

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="lightleggy"]

Valid as **** because stoners are annoying. They can get whatever amount of weed they want with no issues now, why even bother change that? I'm sorry I don't want to have a bunch of obnoxious dbags running around the streets while high, we already got plenty of them.

mM0MF

Toxic-Seahorse

You sound worse than the people you are describing lol.

To be fair, he has a point, but he's going about it the wrong way. I understand there are a ton of responsible pot smokers, probably way more than there are irresponsible douche bags using it, but increasing the availability of it will increase both parties by a large amount. That's obviously not a good reason to not legalize it, but still something to think about.

At least you're presenting it in a reasonable and calm manner. The other dude was acting like the people he was describing lol.

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#75 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts
[QUOTE="lightleggy"]

[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

 

Not a valid argument. 

The_Lipscomb

Valid as **** because stoners are annoying. They can get whatever amount of weed they want with no issues now, why even bother change that? I'm sorry I don't want to have a bunch of obnoxious dbags running around the streets while high, we already got plenty of them.

mM0MF

You sound worse than the people you are describing lol.

Don't you have to be losing job opportunities or ambition?
Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#76 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

[QUOTE="Toxic-Seahorse"][QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"] You sound worse than the people you are describing lol.The_Lipscomb

To be fair, he has a point, but he's going about it the wrong way. I understand there are a ton of responsible pot smokers, probably way more than there are irresponsible douche bags using it, but increasing the availability of it will increase both parties by a large amount. That's obviously not a good reason to not legalize it, but still something to think about.

At least you're presenting it in a reasonable and calm manner. The other dude was acting like the people he was describing lol.

I'm obviously just looking for triggers. Took you sweet time to realize about that. However I'm still against legalization, like I said they can still get whatever amount of weed they want to with no problems, legalizing would just increase the amount of irresponsible smokers out there.
Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="lightleggy"] To be fair, he has a point, but he's going about it the wrong way. I understand there are a ton of responsible pot smokers, probably way more than there are irresponsible douche bags using it, but increasing the availability of it will increase both parties by a large amount. That's obviously not a good reason to not legalize it, but still something to think about.lightleggy
At least you're presenting it in a reasonable and calm manner. The other dude was acting like the people he was describing lol.

I'm obviously just looking for triggers. Took you sweet time to realize about that. However I'm still against legalization, like I said they can still get whatever amount of weed they want to with no problems, legalizing would just increase the amount of irresponsible smokers out there.

Go to bed.
Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="lightleggy"]

Valid as **** because stoners are annoying. They can get whatever amount of weed they want with no issues now, why even bother change that? I'm sorry I don't want to have a bunch of obnoxious dbags running around the streets while high, we already got plenty of them.

mM0MF

lightleggy
You sound worse than the people you are describing lol.

Don't you have to be losing job opportunities or ambition?

That's up to the individual isn't it.
Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#79 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts
[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"] At least you're presenting it in a reasonable and calm manner. The other dude was acting like the people he was describing lol.The_Lipscomb
I'm obviously just looking for triggers. Took you sweet time to realize about that. However I'm still against legalization, like I said they can still get whatever amount of weed they want to with no problems, legalizing would just increase the amount of irresponsible smokers out there.

Go to bed.

I'm sorry I'm not a stoner so I don't go to bed all day long.
Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts

[QUOTE="Toxic-Seahorse"][QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"] You sound worse than the people you are describing lol.The_Lipscomb

To be fair, he has a point, but he's going about it the wrong way. I understand there are a ton of responsible pot smokers, probably way more than there are irresponsible douche bags using it, but increasing the availability of it will increase both parties by a large amount. That's obviously not a good reason to not legalize it, but still something to think about.

At least you're presenting it in a reasonable and calm manner. The other dude was acting like the people he was describing lol.

Yeah, that's why I said he was going about it the wrong way. lol.
Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts
[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="lightleggy"] I'm obviously just looking for triggers. Took you sweet time to realize about that. However I'm still against legalization, like I said they can still get whatever amount of weed they want to with no problems, legalizing would just increase the amount of irresponsible smokers out there.

Go to bed.

I'm sorry I'm not a stoner so I don't go to bed all day long.

That doesn't work.
Avatar image for superfluidity
superfluidity

2163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 superfluidity
Member since 2010 • 2163 Posts

A friend of mine here in CA has a medical marijuana license. He's uses a vaporizer on an hourly basis, every single day, often while driving. He's never been in an accident as far as I know.

I don't advocate using weed that often or anything, but once someone becomes accustomed to it, it has no significant impact on one's driving ability. A total novice would probably be another story.

Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts

A friend of mine here in CA has a medical marijuana license. He's uses a vaporizer on an hourly basis, every single day, often while driving. He's never been in an accident as far as I know.

I don't advocate using weed that often or anything, but once someone becomes accustomed to it, it has no significant impact on one's driving ability. A total novice would probably be another story.

superfluidity
It doesn't matter if it has different effects on different people, it would need to be treated like it would have the worst possible effect. There would be no way to regulate it differently from person to person.
Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts
[QUOTE="superfluidity"]

A friend of mine here in CA has a medical marijuana license. He's uses a vaporizer on an hourly basis, every single day, often while driving. He's never been in an accident as far as I know.

I don't advocate using weed that often or anything, but once someone becomes accustomed to it, it has no significant impact on one's driving ability. A total novice would probably be another story.

Toxic-Seahorse
It doesn't matter if it has different effects on different people, it would need to be treated like it would have the worst possible effect. There would be no way to regulate it differently from person to person.

Like with any drug.
Avatar image for Amvis
Amvis

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#85 Amvis
Member since 2007 • 510 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="lightleggy"] I'm obviously just looking for triggers. Took you sweet time to realize about that. However I'm still against legalization, like I said they can still get whatever amount of weed they want to with no problems, legalizing would just increase the amount of irresponsible smokers out there.lightleggy
Go to bed.

I'm sorry I'm not a stoner so I don't go to bed all day long.

You obviously never smoked pot before. You don't sleep all day long. Hardly. If you smoke late at night, then yeah you will fall asleep eventually. But you stay up for a good hour or two after smoking. If you are eating those special brownies, then you may take a nap during the day (since the brownie will likely last you most if not all the day), but throughout the rest you tend to function pretty normally unless you are trying to operate machinary. For me, I tended to laugh quite a bit, think really deep thoughts (or so they seemed deep), and my perception of time was warped beyond comprehension. None of those traits qualify as a douche-bag. In fact, I was generally more polite to everyone. And considering I worked my ass off for four years of college, and I splurged a bit on pot towards the end of it after working on a long undergrad thesis, I would say it was well deserved. But by all means, continue to pigeonhole people. It will just make you look foolish.

Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

My only concern with pot legalization is how we can institute a system to tell how high a person is if they get pulled over and also how do we determine what level of weed intoxication we draw the line at in terms of driving. THAT I see as being a major hurdle, especially with the way weed stays in your system for a while.

Besides that though, I am absolutely for this and expect legalization to happen in the near future which should be fun! ;)

Avatar image for dagreenfish
dagreenfish

1818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 dagreenfish
Member since 2010 • 1818 Posts

I hate potheads they have the memory of an alzheimer's patient and the attention span of a tree frog. Majuana is a mind altering substance and should be kept illegal.  

jdc6305

I totally agree. I totally agree.Wait... what? Ah, man, I totally agree. Who are you? Yeah, I totally agree, man.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

smoking it around children

Pirate700
If second hand smoke existed as a term describing the use of marijuana, this would be an issue. It'd be great even if it just gets nationally decriminalized.
Avatar image for Jagged3dge
Jagged3dge

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Jagged3dge
Member since 2008 • 3895 Posts

legalizing would just increase the amount of irresponsible smokers out there.lightleggy

Why do people keep believing this despite studies showing quite the opposite

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] legalizing would just increase the amount of irresponsible smokers out there.Jagged3dge

Why do people keep believing this despite studies showing quite the opposite

Ignorance.
Avatar image for Capitan_Kid
Capitan_Kid

6700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Capitan_Kid
Member since 2009 • 6700 Posts
Great more stoners running around...just what we need. :roll: UnbiasedPoster
Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

[QUOTE="UnbiasedPoster"]Great more stoners running around...just what we need. :roll: Capitan_Kid

The ignorance continues.

Avatar image for konvikt_17
konvikt_17

22378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 konvikt_17
Member since 2008 • 22378 Posts

i would say im surprised to see the same argument come up a second time in this thread, but it is lightleggy.

no surprises there.

and capitan is just capitan. out for justice!

Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts
[QUOTE="UnbiasedPoster"]Great more stoners running around...just what we need. :roll: Capitan_Kid

Most people that want to be stoners are already stoners, the only difference is that now they won't have to run around like criminals and hiding in weird places.
Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts

My only concern with pot legalization is how we can institute a system to tell how high a person is if they get pulled over and also how do we determine what level of weed intoxication we draw the line at in terms of driving. THAT I see as being a major hurdle, especially with the way weed stays in your system for a while.

Besides that though, I am absolutely for this and expect legalization to happen in the near future which should be fun! ;)

LostProphetFLCL
This is a major problem, driving under the influence of any drug should be illegal, but how to determine it might be an issue.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

Valid as **** because stoners are annoying. They can get whatever amount of weed they want with no issues now, why even bother change that? I'm sorry I don't want to have a bunch of obnoxious dbags running around the streets while high, we already got plenty of them.

mM0MF

lightleggy



whine so hard

truly pathetic

Avatar image for Capitan_Kid
Capitan_Kid

6700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Capitan_Kid
Member since 2009 • 6700 Posts

i would say im surprised to see the same argument come up a second time in this thread, but it is lightleggy.

no surprises there.

and capitan is just capitan. out for justice!

konvikt_17
JUSTICE!!!!
Avatar image for konvikt_17
konvikt_17

22378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 konvikt_17
Member since 2008 • 22378 Posts

[QUOTE="konvikt_17"]

i would say im surprised to see the same argument come up a second time in this thread, but it is lightleggy.

no surprises there.

and capitan is just capitan. out for justice!

Capitan_Kid

JUSTICE!!!!

how would you feel, if pot was legalized?

honest question

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts
[QUOTE="Capitan_Kid"][QUOTE="UnbiasedPoster"]Great more stoners running around...just what we need. :roll: chaplainDMK

Most people that want to be stoners are already stoners, the only difference is that now they won't have to run around like criminals and hiding in weird places.

lol yep
Avatar image for Ne-Plus-Ultra
Ne-Plus-Ultra

281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Ne-Plus-Ultra
Member since 2012 • 281 Posts

[QUOTE="superfluidity"]

A friend of mine here in CA has a medical marijuana license. He's uses a vaporizer on an hourly basis, every single day, often while driving. He's never been in an accident as far as I know.

I don't advocate using weed that often or anything, but once someone becomes accustomed to it, it has no significant impact on one's driving ability. A total novice would probably be another story.

Toxic-Seahorse

It doesn't matter if it has different effects on different people, it would need to be treated like it would have the worst possible effect. There would be no way to regulate it differently from person to person.

There actually is a way. Somewhere around ten years ago I hurt my back, the Doctors put me on Oxycontin, after taking it for a while I was up to 360 mg. a day, at the same time I had an opportunity to drive big rigs cross country, when I told my Doctor, he said it was no problem, gave me some tests to check my vision, balance, and cognitive skills then gave me a note that allows me to drive legally while taking Oxycontin.

I can tell everyone from experience that Oxycontin is way way way more debilitating then marijuana. I do agree though that people shouldn't be freely able to drive on it, because the effects can vary greatly between new users, casual users, and daily users. But ultimately some people need it for medical reasons and will need to drive on it, so it should be handled on a case by case basis just like every other medication is today.