Senate Republicans Vote to Privatize/End Medicare

  • 136 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#51 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
[quote="Former Vice President Dick Cheney"] "I worship the ground that Paul Ryan walks on. I think he's an enormously talented individual and he's trying to do the right thing. And [he] deserves all the support we can provide him."

Link I'm not sure if this particular endorsement is particularly helpful for the Congressman.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

Take away medicare = make seniors very angry.

They are going against the people who vote for them.

Wasdie
Wasdie is that you? Or did someone take over your computer/account while you weren't looking?
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
The OT GOP hasn't come in to defend this yet?X360PS3AMD05
I'm not going to defend something I dont believe in. They're wrong about this, and I have no problem saying so.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]The OT GOP hasn't come in to defend this yet?sonicare
I'm not going to defend something I dont believe in. They're wrong about this, and I have no problem saying so.

You're Republican? Always thought you would be an independent - moderate.
Avatar image for slipknot0129
slipknot0129

5832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 slipknot0129
Member since 2008 • 5832 Posts

Is this good or bad if it passes?

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

I love how only the Republican budgets got any votes while Obama's budget didn't receive one-single vote.:lol:

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]The OT GOP hasn't come in to defend this yet?DroidPhysX
I'm not going to defend something I dont believe in. They're wrong about this, and I have no problem saying so.

You're Republican? Always thought you would be an independent - moderate.

Well, I am a registered republican. But I tend to be much more moderate than the average one. I'm somewhat fiscally conservative, but I tend to be fairly liberal socially.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#58 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[quote="The Hill"] The Senate on Wednesday resoundingly rejected a budget sponsored by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) that calls for significant cuts to future Medicare benefits. Five Republican senators voted against the ambitious budget plan, which suffered only four Republican defections when the House passed it earlier this year. Ryan's budget fell by a vote of 40 to 57 after every Democrat lined up against it except for Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) who did not vote. Republican leaders voted for the Ryan plan but did not pressure colleagues to do the same, recognizing that it had no chance of passing and would likely become a political liability on the 2012 campaign trail. nocoolnamejim
Link My thoughts: This is one to save and look back upon. The 2010 election was about a lot of things, but one of them was that Republicans cast themselves as the DEFENDERS of Medicare. (Anyone remember those Tea Party protests with the signs "Keep your government hands off my Medicare?") Basically, Republicans claimed that it was Democrats who wanted to end Medicare. Well, now you have Republicans, on the record, of having voted overwhelmingly in both the House AND the Senate to essentially end Medicare, even though they knew that it had no chance of passing and even though yesterday's special election in NY-26 was a Republican stronghold that they'd held for 30 years until the Democrat running made the election all about Medicare. I predict that Republicans in both houses of Congress are going to regret these votes more and more over the next few months. Worth noting the next time you see an advertisement this election that it is the Democrats who want to end Medicare is that EVERY Democrat voted in support of Medicare. Worth also noting that this plan that Republicans voted overwhelmingly in support of DOES NOT REDUCE THE DEFICIT. It basically is a bunch of big tax cuts for millionaires paid for by deep cuts in Medicare.

Though to be fair, didn't the Democrats cut Medicare in order to help fund "obamacare"? And as I see it privitizing Medicare is not the same as ending it, but it isn't really a feasible idea either. But both parties have been all too willing to use scare tactics about Medicare (and to complain when the other parties uses scare tactics).

Maybe what America needs is a third party. Perhaps we need Donald Trump to run as the Whig Party candidate.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#59 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]This is actually the first time I can remember where a party actually frightened me.. I am no fearmonger that said it was doom when Bush was elected.. But what the Republican party is doing as of late seriously scares the hell out of me.. The Republicans have screwed themselves, the Democrats don't need to be the better party they just need to be the lesser of two evils.. I honestly hope things change with the Republican party.. It has radicalized.. Bluedog democrats and liberal republicans are disappearing.. And all we have now are these crazy people who have a Ayn Rand novel in one hand and a American flag waving in the other screaming at the top of their lungs.. The fact of the matter is this.. The Democrats in the past years have actually compromised to get things to pass.. The Republicans haven't 99% of the time, they seriously need a immense loss to have a reality check.. Or we are going to see the current trend, where it seems to win popularity in candidency is to be as crazy as possible in the Republican party (example: Trump).GreySeal9

I pretty much had the same thing happen to me when Paul Ryan's plan emerged and got endorsed by Republicans. Up until that point, I had pretty much felt like I disagreed with the Republican Party, but it was just ideological differences between us. Then they basically came out and said "**** old people, tax breaks for the rich hella yea". At that point I really, really tried to keep up that belief I had held, but I just couldn't do it; there is no way I could justify a position like that as just an ideological difference. To run the risk of invoking a sense of objective morality, Ryan's plan is just evil, plain and simple. It's a caricature of Republican policy that would be funny if it weren't for the fact that it's what Republicans actually support.

I don't know if I'd go as far as to use the word evil, but the plan is pretty damn morally bankrupt.

"Morally bankrupt" sounds pretty darn close to "evil". :P

Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#60 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
That's just sad, a lot of people I know need Medicare.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][quote="The Hill"] The Senate on Wednesday resoundingly rejected a budget sponsored by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) that calls for significant cuts to future Medicare benefits. Five Republican senators voted against the ambitious budget plan, which suffered only four Republican defections when the House passed it earlier this year. Ryan's budget fell by a vote of 40 to 57 after every Democrat lined up against it except for Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) who did not vote. Republican leaders voted for the Ryan plan but did not pressure colleagues to do the same, recognizing that it had no chance of passing and would likely become a political liability on the 2012 campaign trail. whipassmt

Link My thoughts: This is one to save and look back upon. The 2010 election was about a lot of things, but one of them was that Republicans cast themselves as the DEFENDERS of Medicare. (Anyone remember those Tea Party protests with the signs "Keep your government hands off my Medicare?") Basically, Republicans claimed that it was Democrats who wanted to end Medicare. Well, now you have Republicans, on the record, of having voted overwhelmingly in both the House AND the Senate to essentially end Medicare, even though they knew that it had no chance of passing and even though yesterday's special election in NY-26 was a Republican stronghold that they'd held for 30 years until the Democrat running made the election all about Medicare. I predict that Republicans in both houses of Congress are going to regret these votes more and more over the next few months. Worth noting the next time you see an advertisement this election that it is the Democrats who want to end Medicare is that EVERY Democrat voted in support of Medicare. Worth also noting that this plan that Republicans voted overwhelmingly in support of DOES NOT REDUCE THE DEFICIT. It basically is a bunch of big tax cuts for millionaires paid for by deep cuts in Medicare.

Though to be fair, didn't the Democrats cut Medicare in order to help fund "obamacare"? And as I see it privitizing Medicare is not the same as ending it, but it isn't really a feasible idea either. But both parties have been all too willing to use scare tactics about Medicare (and to complain when the other parties uses scare tactics).

Maybe what America needs is a third party. Perhaps we need Donald Trump to run as the Whig Party candidate.

Medicare is a single-payer health insurance program. That's the medicare that we all know and love. If the Paul Ryan budget were to become law, this single-payer program will be replaced with an insufficient voucher-program that (barely) will help seniors pay for private insurance. They are two vastly different programs that operate completely differently under the same name. And what the democrats did with medicare was get rid of the icredibly inefficient subsidies for the Medicare advantage program, shrunk the donut hole and made Medicare solvent for 10 more years than it would be if the health care law wasn't passed. What the two parties have done and want to do with medicare is incomparable.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#62 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

well at least we got this Ryan budget junk overwith. Now the next big thing is the so called "Biden Budget". Biden's not the one coming up with the budget though. It is being negotiated between a group of senators and overseen by President Biden.

My guess is that budget will also have it's fair share of problems and upset people.

Since it seems like neither the Obama or the Ryan Budget are likely to pass, maybe we should just go back to the Bush Budget.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

well at least we got this Ryan budget junk overwith. Now the next big thing is the so called "Biden Budget". Biden's not the one coming up with the budget though. It is being negotiated between a group of senators and overseen by President Biden.

My guess is that budget will also have it's fair share of problems and upset people.

Since it seems like neither the Obama or the Ryan Budget are likely to pass, maybe we should just go back to the Bush Budget.

whipassmt
Biden is not coming up with the budge?. Hm, if we used that line of reasoning maybe we should call Obamacare, Senatecare since the US Senate made it up not Obama.
Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#64 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

Republicans in Congress =/= Republicans as a whole

I'll just leave this right here.;)

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#65 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

well at least we got this Ryan budget junk overwith. Now the next big thing is the so called "Biden Budget". Biden's not the one coming up with the budget though. It is being negotiated between a group of senators and overseen by President Biden.

My guess is that budget will also have it's fair share of problems and upset people.

Since it seems like neither the Obama or the Ryan Budget are likely to pass, maybe we should just go back to the Bush Budget.

DroidPhysX

Biden is not coming up with the budge?. Hm, if we used that line of reasoning maybe we should call Obamacare, Senatecare since the US Senate made it up not Obama.

I could be wrong, but I though a group of Senators were working on it and President Biden was presiding over the discussions.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#66 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
Can you imagine what America would be like if the Republican party ever actually got what they wanted? Where rape victims would be forced to have their babies by law and the elderly would be left to die rather than have the government pay to take care of them. Sad.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

Republicans in Congress =/= Republicans as a whole

I'll just leave this right here.;)

KH-mixerX
The Republicans as a whole should really stop voting for the Republicans in Congress, then.
Avatar image for CycleOfViolence
CycleOfViolence

2813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 CycleOfViolence
Member since 2011 • 2813 Posts

Can you imagine what America would be like if the Republican party ever actually got what they wanted? Where rape victims would be forced to have their babies by law and the elderly would be left to die rather than have the government pay to take care of them. Sad. Ninja-Hippo

This could get interesting. I won't deny the first portion since the Republican Party is widely Pro-Life, although I'm not sure how divided they are in terms of the rape/incest issue.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#69 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Can you imagine what America would be like if the Republican party ever actually got what they wanted? Where rape victims would be forced to have their babies by law and the elderly would be left to die rather than have the government pay to take care of them. Sad. CycleOfViolence

This could get interesting. I won't deny the first portion since the Republican Party is widely Pro-Life, although I'm not sure how divided they are in terms of the rape/incest issue.

I don't want to tar everyone with the same brush; i have many conservative views myself, but i'm mostly referring to the ridiculous bills and proposals that have come out of the Republican party over the last couple of years which include the re-defining of rape and efforts to cut even the most basic public services out of some misguided sense that everyone should look after themselves regardless of their circumstances.

The party currently masquerading as the Republican party is a far cry from what many consider the real GOP; it's been hijacked by evangelicals and extreme right-wingers.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23343 Posts

Boehner is now in full defense mode claiming that only Democrats have voted to cut Medicare.

I wonder how many people are going to fall for this line over the next year and a half.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#71 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Boehner is now in full defense mode claiming that only Democrats have voted to cut Medicare.

I wonder how many people are going to fall for this line over the next year and a half.

mattbbpl

I have to give them credit for one thing: it takes chutzpah to vote for something and then immediately thereafter publicly say that the other guys voted for it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#72 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]

Boehner is now in full defense mode claiming that only Democrats have voted to cut Medicare.

I wonder how many people are going to fall for this line over the next year and a half.

I have to give them credit for one thing: it takes chutzpah to vote for something and then immediately thereafter publicly say that the other guys voted for it.

Or you could be like John Kerry, "I voted for it before I voted against it!"
Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]

Boehner is now in full defense mode claiming that only Democrats have voted to cut Medicare.

I wonder how many people are going to fall for this line over the next year and a half.

GabuEx

I have to give them credit for one thing: it takes chutzpah to vote for something and then immediately thereafter publicly say that the other guys voted for it.

I feel like the republican party is a combination of pathetic and dangerous nowadays.

Who would support a party that does things like this?

Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#74 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

Republicans in Congress =/= Republicans as a whole

I'll just leave this right here.;)

Theokhoth

The Republicans as a whole should really stop voting for the Republicans in Congress, then.

It doesn't matter who they vote in. Pleasing the left has become a particularly fickle chore these days.

Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts
I kinda feel bad for the conservatives of OT. Liberals should give them a break. The GOP is making them look and feel bad enough.We are just kicking them while they are down now :P
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#76 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

Republicans in Congress =/= Republicans as a whole

I'll just leave this right here.;)

Theokhoth

The Republicans as a whole should really stop voting for the Republicans in Congress, then.

But then who would they vote for, certainly not the Democrats who tax good ol'Larry who can barely afford to keep his pick up truck running and then use the money to fund Planned Parenthood so Cecile Richards can get herself a new Mercedes.

Maybe they could vote in a third party guy, like they did with Joe Lieberman (most of the Republicans voted for him in 06, but then again so did many democrats. And now poor Schlesinger got his campaign site taken over by the Japanese).

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#77 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

Republicans in Congress =/= Republicans as a whole

I'll just leave this right here.;)

KH-mixerX

The Republicans as a whole should really stop voting for the Republicans in Congress, then.

It doesn't matter who they vote in. Pleasing the left has become a particularly fickle chore these days.

Indeed. "Then there is no pleasing you Mr. Powers".

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#78 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="CycleOfViolence"]

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Can you imagine what America would be like if the Republican party ever actually got what they wanted? Where rape victims would be forced to have their babies by law and the elderly would be left to die rather than have the government pay to take care of them. Sad. Ninja-Hippo

This could get interesting. I won't deny the first portion since the Republican Party is widely Pro-Life, although I'm not sure how divided they are in terms of the rape/incest issue.

I don't want to tar everyone with the same brush; i have many conservative views myself, but i'm mostly referring to the ridiculous bills and proposals that have come out of the Republican party over the last couple of years which include the re-defining of rape and efforts to cut even the most basic public services out of some misguided sense that everyone should look after themselves regardless of their circumstances.

The party currently masquerading as the Republican party is a far cry from what many consider the real GOP; it's been hijacked by evangelicals and extreme right-wingers.

re-define rape? I think you are missing the point that that would have only be as it pertains to Medicaid funded abortions. Also it didn't so much "redefine" as it "clarified" that rape in that sense would not include statutory rape.

Avatar image for Sandvichman
Sandvichman

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Sandvichman
Member since 2010 • 4006 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

Republicans in Congress =/= Republicans as a whole

I'll just leave this right here.;)

whipassmt

The Republicans as a whole should really stop voting for the Republicans in Congress, then.

But then who would they vote for, certainly not the Democrats who tax good ol'Larry who can barely afford to keep his pick up truck running and then use the money to fund Planned Parenthood so Cecile Richards can get herself a new Mercedes.

Maybe they could vote in a third party guy, like they did with Joe Lieberman (most of the Republicans voted for him in 06, but then again so did many democrats. And now poor Schlesinger got his campaign site taken over by the Japanese).

Your right poor larry should just vote so that corporation ceo number 5 can get 5 new cars and a private jet. While suzie couldnt afford cancer treatment. Woohoo!
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#80 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] The Republicans as a whole should really stop voting for the Republicans in Congress, then.Sandvichman

But then who would they vote for, certainly not the Democrats who tax good ol'Larry who can barely afford to keep his pick up truck running and then use the money to fund Planned Parenthood so Cecile Richards can get herself a new Mercedes.

Maybe they could vote in a third party guy, like they did with Joe Lieberman (most of the Republicans voted for him in 06, but then again so did many democrats. And now poor Schlesinger got his campaign site taken over by the Japanese).

Your right poor larry should just vote so that corporation ceo number 5 can get 5 new cars and a private jet. While suzie couldnt afford cancer treatment. Woohoo!

Cancer treatment. Planned Parenthood doesn't do that. Maybe we could take some of that $363 million we give to them and instead give it to hospitals and groups that do do cancer treatments.

Avatar image for Lotus-Edge
Lotus-Edge

50513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Lotus-Edge
Member since 2008 • 50513 Posts
Never did like the Reps. They always seemed dodgy.
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
they are trying to stop theft ? how dare they ?
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

they are trying to stop theft ? how dare they ? dkdk999

I'm sorry, what theft are we talking about?

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"]they are trying to stop theft ? how dare they ? worlock77

I'm sorry, what theft are we talking about?

well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#85 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"]they are trying to stop theft ? how dare they ? dkdk999

I'm sorry, what theft are we talking about?

well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft.

Nah, it's called tax. Been happening for a while now.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23343 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"]they are trying to stop theft ? how dare they ? dkdk999

I'm sorry, what theft are we talking about?

well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft.

:lol:

Taxation is theft now? For the love of... Even if you're an extreme far right conservative, that view doesn't make sense.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

I'm sorry, what theft are we talking about?

mattbbpl

well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft.

:lol:

Taxation is theft now? For the love of... Even if you're an extreme far right conservative, that view doesn't make sense.

Not only that, this theft has been around for_100 years

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"]they are trying to stop theft ? how dare they ? dkdk999

I'm sorry, what theft are we talking about?

well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft.

Nope. Taxation without representation is. You have representation.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

I'm sorry, what theft are we talking about?

mattbbpl

well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft.

:lol:

Taxation is theft now? For the love of... Even if you're an extreme far right conservative, that view doesn't make sense.

You've never heard someone put forward the argument that taxation is theft? Thats a fairly popular position by libertarians. taxation is when government takes money witch is your property. If the government can take your money justly then it's not your money it's the governments money in witch case we are slaves to the state. I know this is a pretty radical position and your a little shocked by it. But can you kind of understand that position ?
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

I'm sorry, what theft are we talking about?

worlock77

well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft.

Nope. Taxation without representation is. You have representation.

Can you explain further ? Are you saying my neighbors and so on represent what I want to have happen ?
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"] well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft. dkdk999

:lol:

Taxation is theft now? For the love of... Even if you're an extreme far right conservative, that view doesn't make sense.

You've never heard someone put forward the argument that taxation is theft? Thats a fairly popular position by libertarians. taxation is when government takes money witch is your property. If the government can take your money justly then it's not your money it's the governments money in witch case we are slaves to the state. I know this is a pretty radical position and your a little shocked by it. But can you kind of understand that position ?

Do the words "Sixteenth Amendment" mean anything?
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"] well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft. dkdk999

Nope. Taxation without representation is. You have representation.

Can you explain further ? Are you saying my neighbors and so on represent what I want to have happen ?

Do I really need to explain this to you? Seriously? This is something you should have learned in elementary school.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23343 Posts
[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"]

well when the government takes money by force I would consider it theft. dkdk999

:lol:

Taxation is theft now? For the love of... Even if you're an extreme far right conservative, that view doesn't make sense.

You've never heard someone put forward the argument that taxation is theft? Thats a fairly popular position by libertarians. taxation is when government takes money witch is your property. If the government can take your money justly then it's not your money it's the governments money in witch case we are slaves to the state. I know this is a pretty radical position and your a little shocked by it. But can you kind of understand that position ?

Whenever someone advocates the presence of government in any form (whether it be public service, public investment, military presence, or even nothing but representation), then positing the viewpoint that taxation is theft is contradictory since all of those things cost money.
Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][quote="The Hill"] The Senate on Wednesday resoundingly rejected a budget sponsored by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) that calls for significant cuts to future Medicare benefits. Five Republican senators voted against the ambitious budget plan, which suffered only four Republican defections when the House passed it earlier this year. Ryan's budget fell by a vote of 40 to 57 after every Democrat lined up against it except for Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) who did not vote. Republican leaders voted for the Ryan plan but did not pressure colleagues to do the same, recognizing that it had no chance of passing and would likely become a political liability on the 2012 campaign trail. whipassmt

Link My thoughts: This is one to save and look back upon. The 2010 election was about a lot of things, but one of them was that Republicans cast themselves as the DEFENDERS of Medicare. (Anyone remember those Tea Party protests with the signs "Keep your government hands off my Medicare?") Basically, Republicans claimed that it was Democrats who wanted to end Medicare. Well, now you have Republicans, on the record, of having voted overwhelmingly in both the House AND the Senate to essentially end Medicare, even though they knew that it had no chance of passing and even though yesterday's special election in NY-26 was a Republican stronghold that they'd held for 30 years until the Democrat running made the election all about Medicare. I predict that Republicans in both houses of Congress are going to regret these votes more and more over the next few months. Worth noting the next time you see an advertisement this election that it is the Democrats who want to end Medicare is that EVERY Democrat voted in support of Medicare. Worth also noting that this plan that Republicans voted overwhelmingly in support of DOES NOT REDUCE THE DEFICIT. It basically is a bunch of big tax cuts for millionaires paid for by deep cuts in Medicare.

Though to be fair, didn't the Democrats cut Medicare in order to help fund "obamacare"? And as I see it privitizing Medicare is not the same as ending it, but it isn't really a feasible idea either. But both parties have been all too willing to use scare tactics about Medicare (and to complain when the other parties uses scare tactics).

Maybe what America needs is a third party. Perhaps we need Donald Trump to run as the Whig Party candidate.

We do need a third major political party called The People's Party of America that will get rid of all these *** clowns, mostly republicans, in Washington and greatly reform the ethics and decision making of today's politicians. Under the current party system, making any type of progress is pretty much impossible and it makes me quite depressed about this "great" government the US has. As a matter of fact, we need as many major political parties that can be made. The current political spectrum is being far too polarized by the current system.
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"]

:lol:

Taxation is theft now? For the love of... Even if you're an extreme far right conservative, that view doesn't make sense.

DroidPhysX

You've never heard someone put forward the argument that taxation is theft? Thats a fairly popular position by libertarians. taxation is when government takes money witch is your property. If the government can take your money justly then it's not your money it's the governments money in witch case we are slaves to the state. I know this is a pretty radical position and your a little shocked by it. But can you kind of understand that position ?

Do the words "Sixteenth Amendment" mean anything?

Sorry I guess maybe I should have put forward this position a little lighter. I don't think the government is a just institution at all. I don't care if it's "legal" or not if that makes sense. I have property. (I own myself, I own this computer etc.) And I'm saying "the law" is complete nonsense. If someone makes a law that says all people with blonde should be imprisoned would that make it alright?

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#96 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][quote="The Hill"] The Senate on Wednesday resoundingly rejected a budget sponsored by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) that calls for significant cuts to future Medicare benefits. Five Republican senators voted against the ambitious budget plan, which suffered only four Republican defections when the House passed it earlier this year. Ryan's budget fell by a vote of 40 to 57 after every Democrat lined up against it except for Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) who did not vote. Republican leaders voted for the Ryan plan but did not pressure colleagues to do the same, recognizing that it had no chance of passing and would likely become a political liability on the 2012 campaign trail. -RocBoys9489-

Link My thoughts: This is one to save and look back upon. The 2010 election was about a lot of things, but one of them was that Republicans cast themselves as the DEFENDERS of Medicare. (Anyone remember those Tea Party protests with the signs "Keep your government hands off my Medicare?") Basically, Republicans claimed that it was Democrats who wanted to end Medicare. Well, now you have Republicans, on the record, of having voted overwhelmingly in both the House AND the Senate to essentially end Medicare, even though they knew that it had no chance of passing and even though yesterday's special election in NY-26 was a Republican stronghold that they'd held for 30 years until the Democrat running made the election all about Medicare. I predict that Republicans in both houses of Congress are going to regret these votes more and more over the next few months. Worth noting the next time you see an advertisement this election that it is the Democrats who want to end Medicare is that EVERY Democrat voted in support of Medicare. Worth also noting that this plan that Republicans voted overwhelmingly in support of DOES NOT REDUCE THE DEFICIT. It basically is a bunch of big tax cuts for millionaires paid for by deep cuts in Medicare.

Though to be fair, didn't the Democrats cut Medicare in order to help fund "obamacare"? And as I see it privitizing Medicare is not the same as ending it, but it isn't really a feasible idea either. But both parties have been all too willing to use scare tactics about Medicare (and to complain when the other parties uses scare tactics).

Maybe what America needs is a third party. Perhaps we need Donald Trump to run as the Whig Party candidate.

We do need a third major political party called The People's Party of America that will get rid of all these *** clowns, mostly republicans, in Washington and greatly reform the ethics and decision making of today's politicians. Under the current party system, making any type of progress is pretty much impossible and it makes me quite depressed about this "great" government the US has. As a matter of fact, we need as many major political parties that can be made. The current political spectrum is being far too polarized by the current system.

We need to bring back the Federalists and the Whigs. And Donald Trump should lead the Whigs.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="dkdk999"] You've never heard someone put forward the argument that taxation is theft? Thats a fairly popular position by libertarians. taxation is when government takes money witch is your property. If the government can take your money justly then it's not your money it's the governments money in witch case we are slaves to the state. I know this is a pretty radical position and your a little shocked by it. But can you kind of understand that position ?dkdk999

Do the words "Sixteenth Amendment" mean anything?

Sorry I guess maybe I should have put forward this position a little lighter. I don't think the government is a just institution at all. I don't care if it's "legal" or not if that makes sense. I have property. (I own myself, I own this computer etc.) And I'm saying "the law" is complete nonsense. If someone makes a law that says all people with blonde should be imprisoned would that make it alright?

So you advocate anarchy?

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"]

:lol:

Taxation is theft now? For the love of... Even if you're an extreme far right conservative, that view doesn't make sense.

mattbbpl

You've never heard someone put forward the argument that taxation is theft? Thats a fairly popular position by libertarians. taxation is when government takes money witch is your property. If the government can take your money justly then it's not your money it's the governments money in witch case we are slaves to the state. I know this is a pretty radical position and your a little shocked by it. But can you kind of understand that position ?

Whenever someone advocates the presence of government in any form (whether it be public service, public investment, military presence, or even nothing but representation), then positing the viewpoint that taxation is theft is contradictory since all of those things cost money.

I don't advocate any of those things.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#99 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Do the words "Sixteenth Amendment" mean anything?worlock77

Sorry I guess maybe I should have put forward this position a little lighter. I don't think the government is a just institution at all. I don't care if it's "legal" or not if that makes sense. I have property. (I own myself, I own this computer etc.) And I'm saying "the law" is complete nonsense. If someone makes a law that says all people with blonde should be imprisoned would that make it alright?

So you advocate anarchy?

He advocates legal restraint. That the government should only make just laws. "Unjust laws do not bind in conscience".

Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="dkdk999"] You've never heard someone put forward the argument that taxation is theft? Thats a fairly popular position by libertarians. taxation is when government takes money witch is your property. If the government can take your money justly then it's not your money it's the governments money in witch case we are slaves to the state. I know this is a pretty radical position and your a little shocked by it. But can you kind of understand that position ?dkdk999

Do the words "Sixteenth Amendment" mean anything?

Sorry I guess maybe I should have put forward this position a little lighter. I don't think the government is a just institution at all. I don't care if it's "legal" or not if that makes sense. I have property. (I own myself, I own this computer etc.) And I'm saying "the law" is complete nonsense. If someone makes a law that says all people with blonde should be imprisoned would that make it alright?

Luckily for the US, we have one of the best judicial systems on the planet and actually have common sense in making laws... (See the UAE for bad judicial system)