Sequels better than original.

  • 55 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nintendo_fan675
nintendo_fan675

14578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 nintendo_fan675
Member since 2007 • 14578 Posts
Spiderman-2 > Spider-man 1 in my opinion
Avatar image for krazykillaz
krazykillaz

21141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 krazykillaz
Member since 2002 • 21141 Posts

[QUOTE="krazykillaz"]T2. EDIT: Spiderman 2 as well.Food_Nipple

Terminator 2, yes. Spiderman 2, hell no

You must be high. Spiderman 2 was amazing.
Avatar image for chucholucho
chucholucho

664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 chucholucho
Member since 2005 • 664 Posts
TMNT2 > TMNT
Avatar image for hittin
hittin

26966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#54 hittin
Member since 2005 • 26966 Posts
Spiderman 2 > Spiderman 1.
Avatar image for mayormoose
mayormoose

836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#55 mayormoose
Member since 2007 • 836 Posts

From my past experiences with films that have sequels the sequel is most of the time worse than the first one. Examples.

LOTR

Jurassic park

Harry Potter ....lol

Saw

X men

Matrix

edd678

Never heard of LOTR and never seen saw but you are dead wrong on every other. the sequals to X-Men, Matrix, Jurassic Park, and HP, were significantly better than their predicesors.