Seriously..is this "thing" worth 140 MILLION $?!!!

I think i found Waldo in there...

But seriously, Asthetics is a philosoph that is questioned by everyone...

makaveli2344

yes indeed....BUT as i said in a show called 20/20 they did an experiment and all the "art experts" failed at their so called aesthetics.... they were left speechless...this is not aesthetic...but wanting to be a socialy elite person..its group think and just plain human stupidity

Apparently it is for someone with a lot of money. Im not saying its ugly or anything, im just saying I have taken more "artful" craps.plague32390

Chainsaw art, the newest thing! Kill a man, stick a chainsaw in the wound, and wallah!

TheZ3nMan

its voila, not, wallah. good idea though, there are some people that i would like turned into masterpieces....

Look at the picture, people. When I look at it I see not, beauty nor shame, I see contrast, light and dark, good and bad, people finding what they really want on life. People, we must see past the colours and what right in todays world, but look into our past. Why are we here? why can we see these colours?should we see there colours? That is why the painting is good. (sorry, I'm super bored)kurtoronie

heh...one of the experts said the same thing before getting owned :P

It looks like a dirty rug that someone drizzled mustard over. Definately not worth 140 mil,art at least has to be pleasant to look at...

Artists these days...:roll:

Is that the guy that gets drunk and throws paint on a floor covered by canvas then cuts a piece out he likes and sells it for loads of money?SouL-Tak3R

no..but very good guess :P this is jackson pollack the painting is no 5 1948

Ha, I wouldn't even hang it on my wall, let alone pay a single dollar for it.Cesar_Barba

Its.........a masterpiece :cry:

people here are missing the point.

you all say you COULD do this, but the simple fact of the matter is: you didn't.

THAT is why this sold for so much.

Many people do not understand Jackson Pollock.

He is amazing.

people here are missing the point.

you all say you COULD do this, but the simple fact of the matter is: you didn't.

THAT is why this sold for so much.

Komodog

sry while i was painting REAL art while this guy poured paint accidently and sadly but true some rich folks wanted to be differrent and they bought it

I agree its severly over priced, but you have to remember, art isnt all about the asthetics at times, more the meaning behind the visual.booshdy

well some artists really have meaning behind their paintings but this..pollack could say anything and the sheep would agree...he could say its about god or even its a dog eating food...

Paintings do not have to be photo realistic, that's why paintings like these succeed.hittin

i agree..like picasso ..van gogh and others..but they rought a NEW STYLE and something new to art world a new way of painting in a differrent way..this is just paint poured on canvas